A proposal to prevent the routing of “dark” space addresses

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IPv4 Address Transfer proposal APNIC prop-050-v002 Geoff Huston.
Advertisements

Introduction to ARIN and the Internet Registry System.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E APNIC Open Address Policy Meeting Address Policy SIG October 26th, Brisbane.
Running Out of Space: IPv4 Exhaustion Brian Nisbet Network Operations, HEAnet.
1 Change in the Minimum Allocation Criteria Policy Proposal Proposed by Rajesh Chharia, President – ISPAI Presented by Kusumba S Vice President - ISPAI.
Addressing spam and enforcing a Do Not Registry using a Certified Electronic Mail System Information Technology Advisory Group, Inc.
1 prop-018-v001 Protecting historical records in the APNIC Whois Database Project Update DB SIG APNIC18 2 September 2004 Nadi, Fiji Sanjaya, Project Manager,
2009-3: Allocation of IPv4 Blocks to Regional Internet Registries.
Policy Documentation Adam Gosling APNIC 38 Policy SIG Meeting 18 September 2014.
1 The Geography and Governance of Internet Addresses Paul Wilson APNIC.
APNIC Update Paul Wilson 1. APNIC news 2 Resource Certification Digital certificates verifying resource holdings –For security, routing, authorisation.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Presented by Nurani Nimpuno, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
Mirjam Kühne 1 RIPE 33, May 1999 Introduction to the RIPE NCC presented by Mirjam Kühne.
Standardize IP Reassignment Registration Requirements Draft Policy
APNIC Update The state of IP address distribution and IPv6 deployment status Miwa Fujii Senior IPv6 Program Specialist APNIC.
CONFIDENTIAL IPv4 Current Market Conditions and Information Matt Talarico October,
David Wetherall Professor of Computer Science & Engineering Introduction to Computer Networks Hierarchical Routing (§5.2.6)
Prop-080: Removal of IPv4 Prefix Exchange Policy Guangliang Pan Resource Services Manager, APNIC.
Draft Policy Revising Section 4.4 C/I Reserved Pool Size.
Routing integrity in a world of Bandwidth on Demand Dave Wilson DW238-RIPE
and Inter-RIR Transfers And Lengthening the Justification Period to 24 Months Sandra Brown IPv4 Market Group What did the IPv4 Address.
Draft Policy IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement.
1 APNIC Update AP* Retreat Meeting 17 July Status Update Membership –1250 ISPs –6 NIRs (CN, ID, JP, KR, TW, VN) Staff –48 staff –15+ nationalities.
Draft Policy IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement.
Prop-097: Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 allocation mechanisms by the IANA Alejandro Acosta, Nicolas Antoniello, S. Moonesamy, Douglas Onyango,
© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 Proposal for Discrete Networks and National Peering Prop-029-v001 APNIC 20 Hanoi Presented at APNIC.
Tracking Malicious Regions of the IP Address Space Dynamically.
1 Application of the HD ratio to IPv4 [prop-020-v001] Policy SIG 1 Sept 2004 APNIC18, Nadi, Fiji.
IPv4 Address Lifetime SANOG IV Presented by Nurani Nimpuno, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
Draft Policy Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy 1.History including origin & shepherds 2.Summary 3.Status at other RIRs 4.Staff/legal assessment.
Rework of IPv6 Assignment Criteria Draft Policy
A week in the life of (IRT address) Frank Salanitri Project & Systems Services Manager, APNIC.
IPv4 IXP Address Policy APNIC Policy SIG Meeting Taipei, August 2001 Philip Smith.
Prop-073 Automatic allocation/assignment of IPv6 Terry Manderson Andy Linton.
PacINET 2011 The state of IP address distribution and its impact Elly Tawhai Senior Internet Resource Analyst/Liaison Officer, Pacific, APNIC 1.
APNIC Executive Council Report APNIC 29 Meeting Kuala Lumpur 5 March 2010.
1 IANA global IPv6 allocation policy [prop-005-v002] Policy SIG 1 Sept 2004 APNIC18, Nadi, Fiji.
A proposal for changing IPv6 per address fee Izumi Okutani Japan Network Information Center NIR 18, Fiji 31 August – 3 September, 2004.
Draft Policy Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers.
1 Transition to IPv6: Should ISPs consider it now? PITA 11th AGM Meeting 2007 Tahiti, French Polynesia 24 April 2007.
IPv4 Transfer Proposal. What does a transfer proposal do? Transfer Proposal allows APNIC to reflect records of transfers undertaken by APNIC account holders.
Copyright (c) 2002 Japan Network Information Center Proposal for IPv6 Policy for Essential Infrastructure in the AP region Izumi Okutani IP Address Section.
1 APNIC Open Address Policy Meeting Special Interest Group Session March 2nd, Korea, Seoul.
Draft Policy Better IPv6 Allocations for ISPs 1.History including origin & shepherds 2.Summary 3.Status at other RIRs 4.Staff/legal assessment 5.PPML.
8 th Address Policy SIG Report Takashi Arano Yong Wan Ju Kenny Huang Chair/co-Chairs of APNIC Address Policy SIG.
59 Draft Policy Allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 Address Space to Out-of-region Requestors.
APNIC Open Address Policy Meeting
A proposal to deprecate ip6.int reverse DNS service in APNIC
Legacy Resources in the Research & Education Community
This Christmas, you don’t Have to Be Stuck at Home
Lame DNS Server Sweeping
Nurani Nimpuno Registration Services Manager RIPE NCC
Regional Internet Registries
Internet Interconnection
A Coordinated Proposal Regional Internet Registries
Introduction to ARIN and the Internet Registry System
IPv6 Documentation Address Policy
Spam Detection Algorithm Analysis
IP Statistics Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total /24 Equivalents Issued*
APJII POLICY MEETING 2 updates.
Geoff Huston September 2002
Prop-093: Reducing the minimum delegation size for the final /8
Draft Policy Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension
Requiring aggregation for IPv6 subsequent allocations
A week in the life of (IRT address)
A Proposal to Protect Historical Records in APNIC Whois Database
Report for APNIC Member Meeting Friday 3rd September Nadi, Fiji
Randy Bush & Philip Smith
Privacy of Customer Assignment Records
Status Report on Policy Implementation at the APNIC Secretariat
Presentation transcript:

A proposal to prevent the routing of “dark” space addresses Gordon W. Bader APNIC Open Policy Meeting 1 September 2004 – Nadi, Fiji

Introduction Scofflaws are utilizing unallocated IP address space (i.e., “dark” space) for a variety of unsavory activities. Originating & sending of SPAM, Servicing SPAM & hosting websites Technology to date has had little impact as SPAM has increased to consume over 70% of email traffic and is continuing to increase. Internet Community must consider a combination of Business, Technology and Policy responses.

Current Problems APNIC currently contracts out IP space. APNIC rescinds IP space upon nonpayment of fees. APNIC currently has no policy for misuse or misapplication of it’s unallocated IP “dark” space. Routing of “dark” space conveys illegal ownership of the IP address, i.e.,“squatter’s rights”.

Current Problems (continued) Routing tables of legal carriers are being modified/updated to route to “dark” space. Servicing SPAM is being viewed as a “cost of doing business”. Removing routing of “dark” address space can take days and weeks, thus providing an extended “safe haven” to the scofflaws.

Position in other regions Unknown However, SPAM continues to increase.

Proposal Carriers and ISPs who continue to route to & service “dark” address space, will loose their own IP address space if they: Refuse to maintain their routing tables Take too long to maintain their routing tables Continue to route to “dark” space Essentially the “Internet Death Penalty”

Benefits - Disadvantages Reduction in SPAM traffic (bandwidth). Reduction in capital expenditures due to bandwidth growth. Reduction in where SPAMMERS are able to hide. Continuous routing table maintenance. Possible loss of ability to perform business.

Implementation Schedule Prior to implementation this proposal needs to be: Accepted by APNIC community and Accepted by other RIR communities.

Summary If you continue to route “dark” address space you will loose your own IP address space.

Thank you for making it possible for me to present. Questions? Thank you for making it possible for me to present.