Introduction to Accelerator Beam Diagnostics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FAIR accelerator R&D Oliver Kester GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung Darmstadt and IAP Goethe-Universität Frankfurt.
Advertisements

Lyon 2005 DIPAC Lyon th DIPAC Lyon June 2005Ulrich Raich CERN AB/BDI Instrumentation in small, low energy machines Ulrich Raich CERN AB-BDI.
R Scrivens, CERN, ABI Workshop, 12/2008 The Feschenko Bunch Shape Monitor User experience at CERN Developed by INR, Troitsk. High resolution bunch shape.
Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
Ulrich RaichLinac-4 instrumentation day May 2007 Longitudinal Bunch Shape Monitor U. Raich.
TUPD02 BEAM DIAGNOSTICS FOR THE ESS BLM BPM Trans Profile Bunch Shape BCM Preliminary System Count A. Jansson, L. Tchelidze, ESS AB, Lund, Sweden Hybrid.
 An h=4 (30 MHz) RF system will be used for electron operation. For protons, this would correspond to h=56, and the 1 kV maximum gap voltage would only.
CCC Meeting Cryogenic Current Comparator in the FAIR Project Overview of FAIR / current status Beam diagnostics work package Tasks and installation locations.
AS Diagnostic Collaboration Mark Boland
Eric Prebys USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014.
June 14th 2005 Accelerator Division Overview of ALBA D. Einfeld Vacuum Workshop Barcelona, 12 th -13 th September 2005 General 10 th September 2005.
P. Spiller, SIS18upgrade, Peter Spiller GSI, Darmstadt Kick off Meeting - EU Construction DIRAC Phase SIS18 upgrade.
Research in Particle Beam Physics and Accelerator Technology of the Collaboration IKP Forschungszentrum Jülich & JINR A.N. Parfenov for the Collaboration.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
Mathilde FAVIER Fellow in BE/BI/QP Mathilde FAVIER BE/BI-QPSCHOTTKY STATUS - BI DAY - December 6th
Peter Spiller, DIRAC Kick-off meeting Peter Spiller Design Study Group DIRAC kick-off meeting SIS100.
FFAG-Workshop Dec Kumatori Japan Diagnostics for FFAG- accelerator Takahisa ITAHASHI Department of Physics, Osaka Univ. Toyonaka, Osaka, ,Japan.
Cavities Auto Recovery with Beam RF&Linac Section - ALBA Accelerators Division Francis Perez Angela Salom.
EBIS ARR Jim Alessi May 4- 7, 2010 Technical Overview.
Jørgen S. Nielsen Institute for Storage Ring Facilities (ISA) Aarhus University Denmark 1 ESLS-RF 14 (29-30/9 2010), ASTRID and ASTRID2 new LLRF.
February 2010 ALBA Synchrotron Light Source Francis Perez.
State Scientific Center of Russian Federation Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics ( ITEP )
October, 2009 Internal Review Beam Instrumentation David Gassner.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities Peter Forck, JUAS.
K.Hanke / TDR Meeting / 13 June 2006 Linac 4 Diagnostics L4: K. Hanke, M.Pasini (requirements, specifications, integration) AB/BI: U.Raich et al. (technical.
1 NICA Project Report of The Group I S.L.Bogomolov, A.V.Butenko, A.V.Efremov, E.D.Donets, I.N.Meshkov, V.A.Mikhailov, A.O.Sidorin, A.V.Smirnov, Round Table.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Progress of Bunched Beam Electron Cooling Demo L.J.Mao (IMP), H.Zhang (Jlab) On behalf of colleagues from Jlab, BINP and IMP.
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
ApEx needs for CeC PoP Experiment December 11, 2015.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
Beam Instrumentation of CEPC Yue Junhui (岳军会) for the BI Group Accelerator Center, IHEP HF2014.
L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities Peter Forck, JUAS.
ESS Front End diagnostic
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Beam Diagnostics for the FAIR Proton LINAC RFQ Workshop at GSI
Interpretation of beam signals for high intensities
Precision Tests of Fundamental Interactions with Ion Trap Experiments
 Spontaneous radiation and permanent activation is produced.
NICA injection complex status
Alexander Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source Oak Ridge, USA
Experience with beam instrumentation at Linac4
Instrumentation for Accelerators Technologies for the HL-LHC
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
A. Martynov on behalf of accelerator division.
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group
Beam based measurements
BE-BI Software for LINAC4
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
P. Forck, P. Kowina, M. Schwickert, R. Singh
Lebanese Teacher Programme 18/04/2017
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
WP11: electron and proton beam testing
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW. Operators training.
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
Electron Source Configuration
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Beam Current Monitoring with ICT and BPM Electronics
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
LCLS Injector/Diagnostics David H. Dowell, SLAC April 24, 2002
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Pulsed electron beam cooling experiments: data & preliminary results
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Accelerator Beam Diagnostics Dr. Peter Forck Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschnung (GSI) & University Frankfurt, Germany

Demands on Beam Diagnostics Diagnostics is the ’organ of sense’ for the beam. It deals with real beams in real technical installations including all imperfections. Four types of demands leads to different installations: Quick, non-destructive measurements leading to a single number or simple plots. Used as a check for online information. Reliable technologies have to be used. Example: Current measurement by transformers. Instruments for daily check, malfunction diagnosis and wanted parameter variation. Example: Profile measurement, in many cases ‘intercepting’ i.e destructive to the beam Complex instruments for severe malfunctions, accelerator commissioning & development. The instrumentation might be destructive and complex. Example: determination of lattice functions at a synchrotron, e.g. tune Instruments for automatic, active beam control. Example: Closed orbit feedback using position measurement by BPMs. Non-destructive (’non-intercepting’) methods are preferred: The beam is not influenced The instrument is not destroyed.

The Role of Beam Diagnostics The cost of diagnostics is about 3 to 10 % of the total facility cost:  3 % for large accelerators or accelerators with standard technologies  10 % for versatile accelerators or novel accelerators and technologies. Cost Examples: The amount of man-power is about 10 to 20 %: very different physics and technologies are applied technologies have to be up-graded, e.g. data acquisition and analysis accelerator improvement calls for new diagnostic concepts.

Relevant physical Processes for Beam Diagnostics Electro-magnetic influence by moving charges Physics: classical electro-dynamics Technology: voltage & current meas., low & high frequencies Examples: Faraday cups, beam transformers, pick-ups Emission of photon by accelerated charges: (only for high relativistic electrons and p) Physics: classical electro-dynamics; Technology: optical techniques (from visible to x-ray) Example: Synchrotron radiation monitors Interaction of particles with photons Physics: atomic physics optics, lasers; Technology: optical techniques, particle detectors Examples: laser scanners, short bunch length measurement, polarimeters Coulomb interaction of charged particles with matter Physics: atomic & solid state physics; Technology: current meas., optics, particle detectors Examples: scintillators, viewing screens, ionization chambers, residual gas monitors Nuclear- or elementary particle physics interactions Physics: nuclear physics; Technology: particle detectors Examples: beam loss monitors, polarimeters, luminosity monitors And of cause accelerator physics for proper instrumentation layout. Beam diagnostics deals with the full spectrum of physics and technology,  this calls for experts on all these fields and is a challenging task!

Beam Quantities and their Diagnostics I LINAC & transport lines: Single pass ↔ Synchrotron: multi pass Electrons: always relativistic ↔ Protons/Ions: non-relativistic for Ekin < 1 GeV/u Depending on application: Low current ↔ high current Overview of the most commonly used systems: Beam quantity LINAC & transfer line Synchrotron Current I General Special Transformer, dc & ac Faraday Cup Particle Detectors Pick-up Signal (relative) Profile xwidth Screens, SEM-Grids Wire Scanners, OTR Screen MWPC, Fluorescence Light Residual Gas Monitor Wire Scanner, Synchrotron Light Monitor Position xcm Pick-up (BPM) Using position measurement Transverse Emittance εtrans Slit-grid Quadrupole Variation Pepper-Pot Wire Scanner Transverse Schottky

Beam Quantities and their Diagnostics II Beam quantity LINAC & transfer line Synchrotron Bunch Length Δφ General Special Pick-up Secondary electrons Wall Current Monitor Streak Camera Electro-optical laser mod. Momentum p and Momentum Spread Δp/p Pick-ups (Time-of-Flight) Magnetic Spectrometer Pick-up (e.g. tomography) Schottky Noise Spectrum Longitudinal Emittance εlong Buncher variation Pick-up & tomography Tune and Chromaticity Q, ξ --- Exciter + Pick-up Transverse Schottky Spectrum Beam Loss rloss Particle Detectors Polarization P Laser Scattering (Compton scattering) Luminocity L Destructive and non-destructive devices depending on the beam parameter. Different techniques for the same quantity ↔ Same technique for the different quantities.

Example: Diagnostics Bench for the Commissioning of an RFQ

Typical Installation of a Diagnostics Device Modern trend: High performance ADC & digital signal processing → action of the beam to the detector → low noise pre-amplifier and first signal shaping accelerator tunnel: → analog treatment, partly combining other parameters → digitalization, data bus systems (GPIB, VME, cPCI...) local electronics room: → visualization and storage on PC → parameter setting of the beam and the instruments control room:

The ordering of the subjects is oriented by the beam quantities: Outline of the Lecture The ordering of the subjects is oriented by the beam quantities: Current measurement: Transformers, cups, particle detectors Profile measurement: Various methods depending on the beam properties Pick-ups for bunched beams: Principle and realization of rf pick-ups, closed orbit and tune measurements Measurement of longitudinal parameters: Beam energy with pick-ups, time structure of bunches for low and high beam energies, longitudinal emittance Beam loss detection: Secondary particle detection for optimization and protection It will be discussed: The action of the beam to the detector, the design of the devices, generated raw data, partly analog electronics, results of the measurements. It will not be discussed: Detailed signal-to-noise calculations, analog electronics, digital electronics, data acquisition and analysis, online and offline software.... General: Standard methods and equipment for stable beams with moderate intensities.

Understanding the signal generation of various device Goal of the Lecture Signal generation Valid interpretation The goal of the lecture should be: Understanding the signal generation of various device Showing examples for real beam behavior Enabling a correct interpretation of various measurements.

Literature on Beam Diagnostics Conferences (with proceedings at www.jacow.org): American: Beam Instrumentation Workshop BIW Europe: Diagnostics and Instrumentation at Part. Acc. Conf. DIPAC now joined as International Beam Instrumentation Conference IBIC Books: V. Smaluk, Particle Beam Diagnostics for Accelerators: Instruments and Methods, VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, Saarbrücken 2009. D. Brandt (Ed.), Beam Diagnostics for Accelerators, Proc. CERN Accelerator School CAS, Dourdan, CERN-2009-005 (2009) see http://cas.web.cern.ch/cas/France-2008/Dourdan-after.html. P. Strehl, Beam Instrumentation and Diagnostics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 2006. H. Koziol, Beam Diagnostic for Accelerators, Proc. CERN Accelerator School CAS, University Jyväskylä, Finland, p. 565 CERN 94-01 (1994), see http://cas.web.cern.ch/cas/CAS. J. Bosser (Ed.), Beam Instrumentation, CERN-PE-ED 001-92, Rev. 1994. P. Forck, JUAS Lecture Notes on Beam Diagnostics, see www-bd.gsi.de/conf/juas/juas.html. 11 11

Appendix: Example of Beam Diagnostics Installations The beam diagnostics installations for two example are presented: Heavy ion LINAC, synchrotron and transport line at GSI Germany Electron LINAC, booster and synchrotron at light source ALBA, Barcelona, Spain 12 12

The German Heavy Ion Accelerator Facility at GSI German national heavy ion accelerator facility in Darmstadt Layout: Acceleration of all ions LINAC: up to 15 MeV/u Synchrotron: up to 2 GeV/u Research area: Nuclear physics Atomic physics Bio physics incl. therapy Material research Extension by international FAIR facility

The German Heavy Ion Accelerator Facility at GSI: Overview SIS FRS ESR Ion Sources: all elements UNILAC UNILAC: all ions p – U : 3 – 12 MeV/u, 50 Hz, max. 5 ms Up to 20 mA current Synchrotron, Bρ=18 Tm Emax p: 4.7 GeV U: 1 GeV/u Achieved e.g.: Ar18+: 1·1011 U28+: 3·1010 U73+: 1·1010 ESR: Storage Ring, Bρ=10 Tm Atomic & Plasma Physics Radiotherapy Nuclear Physics

The German Heavy Ion Accelerator Facility at GSI: Overview Synchrotron: Current: 2 DCCT, 1 ACCT, 1 FCT Profile: 1 SEM-Grid, 1 IPM, 1 Screen Position: 16 BPM Tune, mom. spread: 1 Exciter + BPM 1 Schottky Ion Sources: all elements UNILAC SIS UNILAC FRS Transport Lines: Current: 8 FCT 15 Part. Detec. Profile: 10 SEM-Grid 26 MWPC 18 Screens Position: 8 BPM ESR LINAC: Current: 52 transformers, 30 F-Cups Profile: 81 SEM-Grids, 6 BIF Position & phase: 25 BPM Trans. emittance: 9 Slit-Grid, 1 pepper-pot Long. emittance: 3 devices

All ions, high current, 5 ms@50 Hz, 36&108 MHz GSI Heavy Ion LINAC: Current Measurement Faraday Cup: for low current measurement and beam stop, total 30 MEVVA MUCIS PIG RFQ IH1 IH2 Alvarez DTL HLI: (ECR,RFQ,IH) Transfer to Synchrotron 2.2 keV/u β = 0.0022 120 keV/u β = 0.016 11.4 MeV/u β = 0.16 Gas Stripper U4+ U28+ All ions, high current, 5 ms@50 Hz, 36&108 MHz Foil Stripper To SIS ↑ Transformer ACCT: for current measurement and transmission control total 52 device Constructed in the 70th, Upgrade 1999, further upgrades in preparation 1.4 MeV/u ⇔β = 0.054

Dipole, quadrupole, rf cavity Dipole, quadrupole, transfer line GSI Heavy Ion Synchrotron: Overview Dipole, quadrupole, rf cavity acceleration acceleration Important parameters of SIS-18 Important parameters of SIS-18 Circumference 216 m Inj. type Multiturn Energy range 11 MeV → 2 GeV Acc. RF 0.8 → 5 MHz Harmonic 4 (= # bunches) Bunching factor 0.4 → 0.08 Ramp duration 0.06 → 1.5 s Ion range (Z) 1 → 92 (p to U) Circumference 216 m Inj. type Multiturn Energy range 11 MeV → 2 GeV Acc. RF 0.8 → 5 MHz Harmonic 4 (= # bunches) Bunching factor 0.4 → 0.08 Ramp duration 0.06 → 1.5 s Ion range (Z) 1 → 92 (p to U) injec- tion injec- tion extrac- tion extrac- tion Dipole, quadrupole, transfer line

Important parameters of SIS-18 GSI Heavy Ion Synchrotron: Current Measurement acceleration ACCT: injected current 0.01... 1 MHz Important parameters of SIS-18 DCCT: circulating current 0... 10 kHz Circumference 216 m Inj. type Multiturn Energy range 11 MeV → 2 GeV Acc. RF 0.8 → 5 MHz Harmonic 4 (= # bunches) Bunching factor 0.4 → 0.08 Ramp duration 0.06 → 1.5 s Ion range (Z) 1 → 92 (p to U) FCT: bunch structure 0.01... 500 MHz injec- tion Faraday Cup: beam dump extrac- tion

The Spanish Synchrotron Light Facility ALBA 3rd generation Spanish national synchrotron light facility in Barcelona Layout: Beam lines: up to 30 Electron energy: 3 GeV Top-up injection Storage ring length: 268 m Max. beam current: 0.4 A Commissioning in 2011 Talk by Ubaldo Iriso: at DIPAC 2011, adweb.desy.de/mpy/DIPAC2011/html/sessi0n.htm see also www.cells.es/Divisions/Accelerators/RF_Diagnostics/Diagnostics

The Spanish Synchrotron Light Facility ALBA: Overview 3rd generation Spanish national synchrotron light facility in Barcelona Layout: Beam lines: up to 30 Electron energy: 3 GeV Top-up injection Storage ring length: 268 m Max. beam current: 0.4 A Commissioning in 2011 LINAC 100 MeV Booster 100 MeV  3 GeV Storage Ring: 3 GeV From U. Iriso, ALBA

The Spanish Synchrotron Light Facility ALBA: Current Meas. FCT DCCT FCUP AE BCM LTB 1 FCT 1 FCUP 3 BCM BOOSTER 1 DCCT 1 AE BTS 2 FCT SR Beam current: Amount of electrons accelerated, transported and stored Several in transport lines One per ring Abbreviation: FCT: Fast Current Transformer DCCT: dc transformer FCUP: Faraday Cup AE: Annular Electrode BCM: Bunch Charge Monitor Remark: AE: Annular Electrode i.e. circular electrode acting like a high frequency pick-up From U. Iriso, ALBA