Identifying & addressing its challenges and its role in Re-accreditation process Understanding the philosophy of continuous improvement review (CIR)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
Advertisements

PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII WEST OAHU REAFFIRMATION OF WASC ACCREDITATION The journey here and the path ahead April 17, 2015 Teri Cannon, Higher Education Consultant.
WAGGGS Policy & Guidelines: Adult Training, Learning and Development
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Quality Assurance Programme Higher Education Commission, Islamabad (Prof. Dr. Riaz Hussain Qureshi)
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
Presentation to the Board December 17,  Spring 2011 – Economically Disadvantaged subgroup – Reading  Warning List – Begin to Develop Plan  Spring.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
CEEMAN AccreditationCape Town, CEEMAN Accreditation IQA Dr.Virginijus Kundrotas.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Pharmacy School Self Study Prof. Abdalla Elkhawad UMST.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
STRATEGIC PLAN DEVELOPING ACTION PLANS April
ACCREDITATION STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 2012.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE MEETING PRESENTATION ON THE APP AND BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR THE YEAR 2016/ th APRIL 2016.
Introduction to IQAC Khawza I Ahmed, Director IQAC.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Administrative Unit Review
The Role of Students in Program and Course Evaluation
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Standard I Systematic Planning.
Project Management (x470)
Lia Lowrie, MD Professor of Pediatrics
Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management M Adil A Kazi Dr. Kumail Rizvi Associate Professor M Adil A Kazi Asstt. Professor.
ITS Strategic Planning Guidelines
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
4.4 Procurement by grant beneficiaries
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
Curriculum and Accreditation
Faculty Performance Reviews at MSU
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Assessment Committee Meeting Continuous Program Improvement
My Performance Journey
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Sam Houston State University
NWCCU update February 13, 2018.
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
My Performance Journey
Understanding and Preparing for Accreditation
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Are we ready to move to the Creation Phase?
AQIP Accreditation Systems Appraisal 2010
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College
Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST)
Sam Houston State University
Strategic Enhancement
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Fort Valley State University
Module 3 Part 2 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Planning and Execution Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Quality.
The Program Evaluation Committee and the Annual Program Evaluation
Session 6 2:30pm-4:00pm Site Visitor Training Facilitators:
Consultants: Dr. Kamran Ali Chatha Dr. Hamid Hassan
Developing and Evaluating Processes and Practices
2010 NEASC Self-Study and Evaluation Visit
CJA/475 FORECASTING AND STRATEGIC PLANNING The Latest Version // uopcourse.com
CJA/475 CJA/ 475 cja/475 cja/ 475 FORECASTING AND STRATEGIC PLANNING The Latest Version // uopstudy.com
Presentation transcript:

Identifying & addressing its challenges and its role in Re-accreditation process Understanding the philosophy of continuous improvement review (CIR) M Adil A Kazi

Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management NO Yes 1- Formal Application 2- Pre-Eligibility Mentorship 3- Eligibility Screening 4- Pre-Review Mentorship 5-Self Assessment Process 6-Peer Review Process 7-Accreditation Decision 8-Continuous Review (Re-accreditation/ Revisit NBEAC RE-ACCREDITATION FRAMEWORK NBEAC Accreditation 8-Stages Process Formal Application Pre Eligibility Mentorship Eligibility Screening Pre Review Mentorship Self-Assessment Process Peer Review Process Accreditation Decision Continuous Review (Reaccreditation / Accreditation)

Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management NO Yes 1- Formal Application 2- Pre-Eligibility Mentorship 3- Eligibility Screening 4- Pre-Review Mentorship 5-Self Assessment Process 6-Peer Review Process 7-Accreditation Decision 8-Continuous Review (Re-accreditation/ Revisit NBEAC RE-ACCREDITATION PROCESS NBEAC Accreditation 8-Stages Process Formal Application Pre Eligibility Mentorship Eligibility Screening Pre Review Mentorship Self-Assessment Process Peer Review Process Accreditation Decision Continuous Review (Reaccreditation / Accreditation) The NBEAC accreditation process enters into “Re-accreditation/ Revisit process cycle” as continuous function after completion of the PRT visit or accreditation award. This embeds a dynamic function of continuous review process configuring Quality Enhancement regime to improve standards before the re-accreditation visit.

Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management NO Yes 1- Formal Application 2- Pre-Eligibility Mentorship 3- Eligibility Screening 4- Pre-Review Mentorship 5-Self Assessment Process 6-Peer Review Process 7-Accreditation Decision 8-Continuous Review (Re-accreditation/ Revisit NBEAC RE-ACCREDITATION PROCESS Post-Accreditation – Continuous Improvement Review The School of Business after having acquired Accreditation from 3-5 years or otherwise communicated by NBEAC through official “Accreditation Decision/ Awarding Notification” The notification carries: Accreditation Award Committee Decision PRT report with Recommendations & Suggestions Annex-I Eligibility policy and timeline for re-acrrediation Annex-II NBEAC Publicity Policy Annex-III

Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management NO Yes 1- Formal Application 2- Pre-Eligibility Mentorship 3- Eligibility Screening 4- Pre-Review Mentorship 5-Self Assessment Process 6-Peer Review Process 7-Accreditation Decision 8-Continuous Review (Re-accreditation/ Revisit NBEAC RE-ACCREDITATION PROCESS Post-Accreditation – Continuous Improvement Review RECOMMENDED COURSE OF ACTION: Engage internal stakeholders (Faculty & Management) and share high-level concerns

Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management NO Yes 1- Formal Application 2- Pre-Eligibility Mentorship 3- Eligibility Screening 4- Pre-Review Mentorship 5-Self Assessment Process 6-Peer Review Process 7-Accreditation Decision 8-Continuous Review (Re-accreditation/ Revisit NBEAC RE-ACCREDITATION PROCESS Post-Accreditation – Continuous Improvement Review RECOMMENDED COURSE OF ACTION: Engage internal stakeholders (Faculty & Management) and share high-level concerns Constitution and formal establishment of permanent “Accreditation Management Committee”, at School of Business / Management Sciences: Head AMC Experienced Faculty Members Cluster Heads Coopted Members Junior Faculty QEC Dy Manager Secretary

Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management NO Yes 1- Formal Application 2- Pre-Eligibility Mentorship 3- Eligibility Screening 4- Pre-Review Mentorship 5-Self Assessment Process 6-Peer Review Process 7-Accreditation Decision 8-Continuous Review (Re-accreditation/ Revisit NBEAC RE-ACCREDITATION PROCESS Post-Accreditation – Continuous Improvement Review RECOMMENDED COURSE OF ACTION: Engage internal stakeholders (Faculty & Management) and share high-level concerns Accreditation Management Committee (AMC) Formally discuss and minute decisions

Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management NO Yes 1- Formal Application 2- Pre-Eligibility Mentorship 3- Eligibility Screening 4- Pre-Review Mentorship 5-Self Assessment Process 6-Peer Review Process 7-Accreditation Decision 8-Continuous Review (Re-accreditation/ Revisit NBEAC RE-ACCREDITATION PROCESS Post-Accreditation – Continuous Improvement Review RECOMMENDED COURSE OF ACTION: Engage internal stakeholders (Faculty & Management) and share high-level concerns Accreditation Management Committee (AMC) Formally discuss and minute decisions Assign PRT report to AMC for addressing recommendations and suggestions etc.

Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management NO Yes 1- Formal Application 2- Pre-Eligibility Mentorship 3- Eligibility Screening 4- Pre-Review Mentorship 5-Self Assessment Process 6-Peer Review Process 7-Accreditation Decision 8-Continuous Review (Re-accreditation/ Revisit NBEAC RE-ACCREDITATION PROCESS Post-Accreditation – Continuous Improvement Review RECOMMENDED COURSE OF ACTION: Engage internal stakeholders (Faculty & Management) and share high-level concerns Accreditation Management Committee (AMC) Formally discuss and minute decisions Assign PRT report to AMC for addressing recommendations and suggestions etc. Develop “Action Plan” using timeline and deliverables using prescribed Proforma

Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management NO Yes 1- Formal Application 2- Pre-Eligibility Mentorship 3- Eligibility Screening 4- Pre-Review Mentorship 5-Self Assessment Process 6-Peer Review Process 7-Accreditation Decision 8-Continuous Review (Re-accreditation/ Revisit NBEAC RE-ACCREDITATION PROCESS Post-Accreditation – Continuous Improvement Review RECOMMENDED COURSE OF ACTION: Engage internal stakeholders (Faculty & Management) and share high-level concerns Accreditation Management Committee (AMC) Formally discuss and minute decisions Assign PRT report to AMC for addressing recommendations and suggestions etc. Develop “Action Plan” using timeline and deliverables using prescribed Proforma Execute, monitor & control through AMC

Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management NO Yes 1- Formal Application 2- Pre-Eligibility Mentorship 3- Eligibility Screening 4- Pre-Review Mentorship 5-Self Assessment Process 6-Peer Review Process 7-Accreditation Decision 8-Continuous Review (Re-accreditation/ Revisit NBEAC RE-ACCREDITATION PROCESS Post-Accreditation – Continuous Improvement Review RECOMMENDED COURSE OF ACTION: Engage internal stakeholders (Faculty & Management) and share high-level concerns Accreditation Management Committee (AMC) Formally discuss and minute decisions Assign PRT report to AMC for addressing recommendations and suggestions etc. Develop “Action Plan” using timeline and deliverables using prescribed Proforma Execute, monitor & control through AMC Prepare and submit Bi-annual update report of School of Business

Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management NO Yes 1- Formal Application 2- Pre-Eligibility Mentorship 3- Eligibility Screening 4- Pre-Review Mentorship 5-Self Assessment Process 6-Peer Review Process 7-Accreditation Decision 8-Continuous Review (Re-accreditation/ Revisit NBEAC RE-ACCREDITATION PROCESS Post-Accreditation – Continuous Improvement Review RECOMMENDED COURSE OF ACTION: Engage internal stakeholders (Faculty & Management) and share high-level concerns Accreditation Management Committee (AMC) Formally discuss and minute decisions Assign PRT report to AMC for addressing recommendations and suggestions etc. Develop “Action Plan” using timeline and deliverables using prescribed Proforma Execute, monitor & control through AMC Prepare and submit Bi-annual update report of School of Business Pursue & Track “Action Plan”, timelines Vs Deliverables and submit progress report to Rector/Dean/ HoD.

Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management NO Yes 1- Formal Application 2- Pre-Eligibility Mentorship 3- Eligibility Screening 4- Pre-Review Mentorship 5-Self Assessment Process 6-Peer Review Process 7-Accreditation Decision 8-Continuous Review (Re-accreditation/ Revisit NBEAC RE-ACCREDITATION PROCESS Post-Accreditation – Continuous Improvement Review RECOMMENDED COURSE OF ACTION: Engage internal stakeholders (Faculty & Management) and share high-level concerns Accreditation Management Committee (AMC) Formally discuss and minute decisions Assign PRT report to AMC for addressing recommendations and suggestions etc. Develop “Action Plan” using timeline and deliverables using prescribed Proforma Execute, monitor & control through AMC Prepare and submit Bi-annual update report of School of Business Pursue & Track “Action Plan”, timelines Vs Deliverables and submit progress report to Rector/Dean/ HoD Make input for Strategic Plan and align academic, financial and administrative operations with strategic vision/ mission, objectives, values and goals/outcomes of programmes.

Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management NO Yes 1- Formal Application 2- Pre-Eligibility Mentorship 3- Eligibility Screening 4- Pre-Review Mentorship 5-Self Assessment Process 6-Peer Review Process 7-Accreditation Decision 8-Continuous Review (Re-accreditation/ Revisit NBEAC RE-ACCREDITATION PROCESS Post-Accreditation – Continuous Improvement Review RECOMMENDED COURSE OF ACTION: Engage internal stakeholders (Faculty & Management) and share high-level concerns Accreditation Management Committee (AMC) Formally discuss and minute decisions Assign PRT report to AMC for addressing recommendations and suggestions etc. Develop “Action Plan” using timeline and deliverables using prescribed Proforma Execute, monitor & control through AMC Prepare and submit Bi-annual update report of School of Business Pursue & Track “Action Plan”, timelines Vs Deliverables and submit progress report to Rector/Dean/ HoD Make input for Strategic Plan and align academic, financial and administrative operations with strategic vision/ mission, objectives, values and goals/outcomes of programmes. This embeds a dynamic function of continuous review process configuring Quality Enhancement regime to improve standards before the re-accreditation visit.

Stakeholder Engagement is Ongoing Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management Stakeholder Engagement is Ongoing STAKEHOLDERS MANAGEMENT Continuous improvement is Ongoing Constitution and formal establishment of permanent “Accreditation Management Committee”, at School of Business / Management Sciences is a promising strategy to deploy quality function in the institution- (for stakeholder engagement and continues involvement)

Introduction to Accreditation life cycle & stakeholders management NO Yes 1- Formal Application 2- Pre-Eligibility Mentorship 3- Eligibility Screening 4- Pre-Review Mentorship 5-Self Assessment Process 6-Peer Review Process 7-Accreditation Decision 8-Continuous Review (Re-accreditation/ Revisit NBEAC RE-ACCREDITATION PROCESS Post-Accreditation – Continuous Improvement Review RE-ACCREDITATION : A process to assess the accomplishments of institution as per PRT report provided at the time of accreditation IMPROVEMENT & CHANGES sine last PRT visit The school initiates Re-accreditation process by applying for relevant programmes Submit current SAR along with CIR (6 months before expiry of Accreditation period) CIR is an abridged document of AMC proceeding along accreditation period containing: Improvements as per previous PRT report Overall Improvements/ Changes on school’s initiatives (Strategic and/or Operational Plan) The Re-accreditation visit & decision may be communicated as per prevalent policy