Follow-up on Doppler Design in ax

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1484r1 Submission November 2011 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Discussions on Signaling for UL HE MU PPDU
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
Thoughts on Doppler Design in ax
SIG Fields Design of Long Preamble
1MHz SIG Field Discussions
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
Usage of Doppler Bit in 11ax
NSYM and TPE at RX side for Midamble design
PHY abstraction and performance for outdoor channel models
Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission
Thoughts on Doppler Design in ax
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
NSYM and TPE at RX side for Midamble design – Follow up
NSYM and TPE at RX side for Midamble design
VHTSIG Considerations
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Discussions
Usage of Doppler Bit in 11ax
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
Simulation of Potential PHY Technology
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
Stream Partition Index for MU-MIMO Transmissions
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Thoughts on Doppler Design in ax
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
Simulation of Potential PHY Technology
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
Performance evaluation of Mid-amble
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Preamble Design Harmonization
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Preamble Design Harmonization
320MHz Channelization and Tone Plan
Performance evaluation of Mid-amble
F3-6A, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen
False L-STF Detection Issue
Capability on Doppler Mode
Preamble design and auto-detection for 11bd
Further investigation of Mid-amble performance
20 MHz transmission in NGV
SIG Fields Design of Long Preamble
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
Performance evaluation of Mid-amble
Compressed Midamble in NGV
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
20 MHz transmission in NGV
Evaluation of PAPR in WUR FDMA transmission
Further discussion for 11be preamble
F3-6A, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen
Preamble Autodetection for 11be
Consideration on HARQ feedback
Further investigation on Mid-amble performance
Coordinated Spatial Reuse Performance Analysis
Forward Compatibility for WiFi Preamble Design
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Preamble design and auto-detection for 11bd
Further discussion for 11be preamble
PHY Signaling for Adaptive Repetition of 11p PPDU
Presentation transcript:

Follow-up on Doppler Design in 802.11ax Date: 2017-07-09 Authors: Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Lochan Verma Qualcomm 5775 Morehouse Dr. San Diego, CA, USA lverma@qti.qualcomm.com Bin Tian   btian@qti.qualcomm.com Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al

Introduction Mid-amble Doppler procedure introduced in [1], [2] Do you agree that Doppler procedure in 802.11ax is based on mid- ambles? Y/ N/ A : 14/ 0/ 8. [3] Simulation of various mid-amble update intervals, MCSs, and Doppler was presented in [1] However, [1] stopped short of proposing the mid-amble update interval values for 802.11ax and its respective signaling In this slide-set, we propose two mid-amble update intervals of 10 & 20 from [1] and propose its signaling Two values are selected for simplicity of Doppler procedure, which is optional in 11ax Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al

What is Mid-amble Update Interval ‘Mid-amble update interval’ is the number of data symbols between two mid-ambles A mid-amble has one or many HE-LTF symbols # of HE-LTF symbols is a function of # of space-time streams (Nsts) NOTE: Slide-3/4/5 presented in [1] but included here as a refresher L-STF L-LTF L-SIG RL-SIG HE-SIG-A HE-SIG-B HE-STF HE-LTF1 HE-LTFn … Data Symbol Mid-amble PE Mid-amble Update Interval Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al

Simulation Setup Channel : UMI-NLOS; 5 GHz Ntx = Nrx = 2; NSS = 1; STBC: Off MCSs = 0, 1, 3, 5, 8 GI = 3.2 us Doppler 15 Km/h on all taps 30 Km/h on all taps 60 Km/h on all taps 60 Km/h on 2nd and 3rd tap and all other taps at 3 Km/h Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al

Mid-amble Update Interval (M) Ntx = Nrx = 2; Nss = 1 Mid-amble update interval for 1 to 2 dB performance loss @ 10% PER compared to No Doppler Doppler/MCS BPSK (MCS0) QPSK (MCS1) 16 QAM (MCS3) 64 QAM (MCS5 256 QAM (MCS8) 60 Km/h on 2nd/3rd tap 50 30 15 8 4 60 Km/h on all taps 20 10 5 2 30 Km/h on all taps 60 40 15 Km/h on all taps 120 80 M = 10 enables using higher MCSs w/ low Doppler and Lower MCSs w/ higher Doppler M = 20 reduces mid-amble overhead compared M = 10 while enabling lower to higher MCSs for variety of Doppler M < 10 is noticeable overhead while M > 20 does not offer significant overhead savings Furthermore, these values don’t support wide range of Doppler and MCSs Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al

Mid-amble Update Interval Indication Currently 1 bit ‘Doppler’ field exists in HE Preamble ‘This’ can indicate presence or absence of mid-ambles E.g., 0 – indicates absence of mid-ambles; 1 – indicates presence of mid-ambles When Doppler is ON, additional 1 bit needed to indicate mid-amble update interval in HE Preamble Propose to limit the Doppler cases to up to 4 space-time streams and borrow 1 bit from “Nsts” or “# of HE-LTF symbols” field in HE Preamble Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al

Mid-amble Update Interval indicated in 1 bit in HE Preamble When Doppler is ON, mid-amble update interval is signaled in 1 bit in HE-SIG-A Bit borrowed from ‘Nsts’ or ‘# of HE-LTF symbols’ depending on PPDU format 2 values (10, 20) can be signaled For non-Doppler cases: ‘Nsts’ & ‘# of HE-LTF symbols’ is 3 bits, [as in D1.3] Mid-amble Update Interval field in HE Preamble Field Bits Description Mid-amble Update Interval 1 0  mid-amble update interval of 10. 1  mid-amble update interval of 20. Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al

Mid-amble Update Interval Signaling in HE-SIG-A of HE SU/HE ER SU PPDU Doppler = 0 in HE SIG-A Doppler = 1 in HE SIG-A Field # of Bits Description Nsts 3 # of space-time streams minus 1 (values 0 – 7) Doppler 1 Set to 0 Others … Field # of Bits Description Nsts 2 # of space-time streams minus 1 (values 0 -- 3) Mid-amble Update Interval 1 0  mid-amble update interval of 10. 1  mid-amble update interval of 20. Doppler Set to 1 Others … HE-SIG-A Fields of HE SU/HE ER SU PPDU Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al

Mid-amble Update Interval Signaling in HE-SIG-A of HE MU PPDU Doppler = 0 in HE SIG-A Doppler = 1 in HE SIG-A Field # of Bits Description # of HE-LTF symbols 2 Indicates number of HE-LTF symbols Mid-amble update interval 1 0  mid-amble update interval of 10. 1  mid-amble update interval of 20. Field # of Bits Description # of HE-LTF symbols 3 Indicates number of HE-LTF symbols HE-SIG-A fields in HE MU PPDU Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al

Mid-amble Frequency Signaling in HE TB PPDU ‘# of HE-LTF Symbols’ field (B23-B25) in Common Info field of the Trigger frame is repurposed when ‘Doppler’ field (B53) in Common Info field of the Trigger frame is 1 ‘Doppler = 0’ in Trigger frame ‘Doppler = 1’ in Trigger frame Field # of Bits # of HE-LTF Symbols 3 Field # of Bits # of HE-LTF Symbols 2 Mid-amble Update Interval 0  mid-amble update interval of 10. 1  mid-amble update interval of 20. # of HE-LTF Symbols field in Trigger frame Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al

Summary We propose mid-amble update interval (M) of 10 and 20 for 802.11ax mid-amble Doppler procedure Two values proposed for simplicity of Doppler design, which is optional in 11ax M=10 enables using higher MCSs at low Doppler and lower MCSs at high Doppler M=20 reduces mid-amble overhead by 50% compared with M=10, while enabling lower to higher MCSs for variety of Doppler M<10 is noticeable overhead & M>20 does not offer significant overhead savings Furthermore, these values don’t support wide range of Doppler and MCSs Mid-amble update interval signaling in HE Preamble is discussed Doppler support is limited to up to 4 space-time streams When Doppler is ON, mid-amble update interval is signaled in 1 bit in HE-SIG-A Bit borrowed from ‘Nsts’ or ‘# of HE-LTF Symbols’ depending on PPDU format Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al

References [1] 11-17-0773-02-00ax-thoughts-on-Doppler-in-802-11ax [2] 11-17-0734-01-00ax-Doppler-Discussions 11-17-0783-02-00ax-tgax-may-2017-meeting-phy-adhoc- agenda Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al

SP #1 Do you support mid-amble update interval of 10 and 20 for mid-amble Doppler procedure in 11ax? Y / N / A Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al

SP #2 Do you support signaling mid-amble update interval in HE-SIG-A of HE PPDUs? HE SU PPDU: Borrow 1 bit from ‘Nsts’ field HE MU PPDU: Borrow 1 bit from ‘# of HE-LTF Symbols’ field HE TRIG PPDU: Borrow 1 bit from ‘# of HE-LTF Symbols’ field in Trigger frame NOTE: For non-Doppler cases: ‘Nsts’ = 3 bits and ‘# of HE-LTF Symbols’ = 3 bits [as in D1.3] Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al

Appendix Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al

Mid-amble Update Interval Overhead Lochan Verma, Qualcomm et. al