Fig. 4. Positive margin rate: RARP vs. RRP. (A) Positive margin rate

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Fig. 4-1, p Fig. 4-2, p. 109 Fig. 4-3, p. 110.

Advertisements

Fig. 11-1, p p. 360 Fig. 11-2, p. 361 Fig. 11-3, p. 361.

Figure 1.1 The observer in the truck sees the ball move in a vertical path when thrown upward. (b) The Earth observer views the path of the ball as a parabola.

Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Oncological and Functional Outcomes Following Fellowship Training. Introduction Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is a technically.

Normal Distribution.

Confidence Intervals for a Population Proportion Excel.

Lecture 4 Confidence Intervals. Lecture Summary Last lecture, we talked about summary statistics and how “good” they were in estimating the parameters.

Postsurgical Risk Factors for Prostate Cancer Mortality Slideset on: Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, et al. Risk of prostate cancer–specific mortality.

Date of download: 6/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Long-term Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids and the Risk.

2015 Comparison.

From: Anesthetic Technique for Radical Prostatectomy Surgery Affects Cancer Recurrence:A Retrospective Analysis Anesthes. 2008;109(2): doi: /ALN.0b013e31817f5b73.

Disfunzione erettile dopo prostatectomia radicale

Cost of New Technologies in Prostate Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy,

Philipp Dahm, Ari D. Silverstein, Alon Z

For the single mean & proportion Confidence Interval vs Hypothesis Testing At the same level in confidence interval and hypothesis testing,

Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)

Oncological outcomes of high risk prostate cancer patients between robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)

Fig. 3. Comparative RFS in response to combination of RFA and TACE vs

New perioperative risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon experience in high volume Canadian.

The Role of Radical Prostatectomy and Radiotherapy in Treatment of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Urol Int 2017;99:

Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)

Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)

CHOICE: Relative risk of death on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis

Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)

Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)

Development and internal-external validation of a multivariable prediction model for pre-operative assessment of positive lymph nodes during robot assisted.

ROBOTIC ASSISSTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY OUR INITIAL EXPERIENCE

European Urology Oncology

Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)

Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)

Volume 73, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)

Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages e39-e40 (March 2013)

MP05-12 CLINICAL AND ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY (RARP) WITH NERVE SPARING FOR HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS Kiyoshi.

Supplemental Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier Curves of overall survival based on clinical stage at presentation and treatment modality Kaplan-Meier analyses depicting.

Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)

Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)

PREMIER: Rate of hypertension at 18 months

An overview to this point

Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)

Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)

Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)

Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)

LESLIE M. RAINWATER, M.D., WILLIAM R. MORGAN, M.D.

Rectal Injury During Radical Prostatectomy: Focus on Robotic Surgery

!'!!. = pt >pt > \ ___,..___,..

Mohammad Hassan Murad, MD, MPH, Anas Shahrour, Nilay D

Andrew H. Stewart, FRCS, Paul S. Eyers, FRCS, Jonothan J

Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (June 2005)

European Urology Oncology

Deep neuromuscular block to optimize surgical space conditions during laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis M.H. Bruintjes, E.V.

Incidence of venous gas embolism during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is lower than that during radical retropubic prostatectomy†

Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Between Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy at 24-month Follow-up in the Swedish LAPPRO Trial Martin Nyberg, Jonas.

Radical Lymph Node Dissection in Primary Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Chen-Sung Lin, MD, PhD, Chih-Tao Cheng, MD, DrPH, Chao-Yu.

bDMARD: biologic DMARD.

High-dose versus low-dose local anaesthetic for transversus abdominis plane block post-Caesarean delivery analgesia: a meta-analysis S.C. Ng, A.S. Habib,

Volume 4, Pages (October 2018)

Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)

European Urology Oncology

D. Fletcher, V. Martinez British Journal of Anaesthesia

Relative Risk of Onset of Cancer from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Meta-Analysis of Statin Trials, According to Year of Onset Risk ratios.

Industrial Robotics.

Physical Function in Patients with Cancer

Increase of physical activity over time associated with lower HF risk

Sublingual oxybutynin reduces postoperative pain related to indwelling bladder catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy† P. Tauzin-Fin, M. Sesay,

Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)

Fig. 1. Classification of the Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox survival estimates for the OS of patients using the pSPC in Cohort_C and in the overall population.

Association between day and time of admission to critical care and acute hospital outcome for unplanned admissions to adult general critical care units:

Kaplan–Meier curves for PFS and OS (for patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy). Kaplan–Meier curves for PFS and OS (for patients treated with.

Fig. 2. Forest plot of the meta-analysis for homocysteine levels

Presentation transcript:

Fig. 4. Positive margin rate: RARP vs. RRP. (A) Positive margin rate Fig. 4. Positive margin rate: RARP vs. RRP. (A) Positive margin rate. RARP, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; RRP, retropubic radical prostatectomy; CI, confidence interval. (B) Positive margin rate of studies assessed as low risk studies. (C) Positive margin rate for pT2 tumors in studies published after 2010. RARP, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; RRP, retropubic radical prostatectomy; CI, confidence interval Fig. 4. Positive margin rate: RARP vs. RRP. (A) Positive margin rate. RARP, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; RRP, retropubic radical prostatectomy; CI, confidence interval. (B) Positive margin rate of studies assessed as low risk studies. (C) Positive margin rate for pT2 tumors in studies published after 2010. RARP, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; RRP, retropubic radical . . . Yonsei Med J. 2016 Sep;57(5):1165-1177. http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.5.1165