Brainstorming on photon-photon scattering experiment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gamma-Ray Spectra _ + The photomultiplier records the (UV) light emitted during electronic recombination in the scintillator. Therefore, the spectrum collected.
Advertisements

Adnan Doyuran a, Joel England a, Chan Joshi b, Pietro Musumeci a, James Rosenzweig a, Sergei Tochitsky b, Gil Travish a, Oliver Williams a a UCLA/Particle.
2. The Particle-like Properties Of Electromagnetic Radiation
05/03/2004 Measurement of Bunch Length Using Spectral Analysis of Incoherent Fluctuations Vadim Sajaev Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
Larmor Formula: radiation from non-relativistic particles
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
Particle Interactions
LESSON 4 METO 621. The extinction law Consider a small element of an absorbing medium, ds, within the total medium s.
March 2, 2011 Fill in derivation from last lecture Polarization of Thomson Scattering No class Friday, March 11.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Gamma Beam Systems a simple introduction. Purpose of the machine Deliver a high performance photon beam: Variable energy Highly polarized High intensity.
Outline 1.ERL facility for gamma-ray production [A. Valloni] 2.ERL facility - Tracking Simulations [D. Pellegrini] 3.SC magnet quench tests [V. Chetvertkova]
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
EuroNNAc Workshop, CERN, May 2011 External Injection at INFN-LNF ( integrating RF photo-injectors with LWFA ) Luca Serafini - INFN/Milano High Brightness.
NEEP 541 Radiation Interactions Fall 2003 Jake Blanchard.
March 2011Particle and Nuclear Physics,1 Experimental tools accelerators particle interactions with matter detectors.
Physics 452 Quantum mechanics II Winter 2011 Karine Chesnel.
Young/Freeman University Physics 11e. Ch 38 Photons, Electrons, and Atoms © 2005 Pearson Education.
Compton Collision Scheme of E-Gammas Proposal for ELI-NP Luca Serafini – INFN Milan ELI-NP: third Pillar of Extreme Light Infrastructure (large European.
Compton/Linac based Polarized Positrons Source V. Yakimenko BNL IWLC2010, Geneva, October 18-22, 2010.
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #10 Monday, Feb. 17, 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Photoelectric Effect Compton Effect Pair production/Pair annihilation Monday,
Optimization of Compact X-ray Free-electron Lasers Sven Reiche May 27 th 2011.
X-RAY LIGHT SOURCE BY INVERSE COMPTON SCATTERING OF CSR FLS Mar. 6 Miho Shimada High Energy Research Accelerator Organization, KEK.
Compact X-ray & Emittance Measurement by Laser Compton Scattering Zhi Zhao Jan. 31, 2014.
The Next Generation Light Source Test Facility at Daresbury Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop, Daresbury,
Assessment of Physics, Applications and Construction Issues for the Proposed Magurele Short-Pulse Facility Silviu Olariu National Institute of Physics.
ELI-NP meeting, Magurele, Aug. 18th 2011 INFN Proposal for ELI-NP Compton Gamma-ray Source Luca Serafini – INFN Spokeperson for ELI-NP Motivations for.
Abstract: We present on overview of the STAR project (Southern european Thomson source for Applied Research), in progress at the Univ. of Calabria (Italy)
SL_THOMSON C. Vaccarezza on behalf of the SL_Thomson team.
Advanced Compton Sources (for Nuclear Photonics) Luca Serafini – INFN/Milan Physics and Technology of Compton/Thomson X/  rays Sources - weak Compton.
Lecture 5. Particle Properties of Waves (cont’d)
Production of coherent X-rays with a free electron laser based on optical wiggler A.Bacci, M.Ferrario*, C. Maroli, V.Petrillo, L.Serafini Università e.
IPAC12, New Orleans (USA), May 25th 2012 Marrying Lasers and Particle Beams Luca Serafini – INFN Milan Common Aspects of Laser and Particle Beams: Brilliance,
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
SPARCLAB: PW-class Ti:Sa laser+SPARC
Emittance measurements for LI2FE electron beams
I. Chaikovska and F. Zomer (LAL, Orsay, France)
Luca Serafini – INFN-Milan and University of Milan
In collaboration with Winthrop Brown, T.Y. Fan, Franz Kaertner,
A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,
Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo
Origin of Quantum Theory
OTR based measurements for ELI-NP Gamma Beam Source
Other beam-induced background at the IP
Luca Serafini – INFN-Milan and University of Milan
IRIDE: The Photon Machine
17/10/2016 Reserch Activity Report 6D Phase Space Electron Beam Analysis And Optimization For Rf Linac Based Inverse Compton Scattering Radiation Sources.
Low energy g - g Collider for QED measurements
Conveners: L.Serafini,F. Villa
General Physics (PHY 2140) Lecture 28 Modern Physics Quantum Physics
Scattering of light Physics /15/2018 Lecture XI.
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
F. Villa Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - LNF On behalf of Sparc_lab
Compton effect and ThomX What possible future?
Using a Bessel Light Beam as an Ultra-short Period Helical Undulator
Beam beam simulations with disruption (work in progress...)
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Val Kostroun and Bruce Dunham
SASE FEL PULSE DURATION ANALYSIS FROM SPECTRAL CORRELATION FUNCTION
Serge Kalmykov, UNL (WG 6, Tuesday, 10/26/2017) vg +15 fs
Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update.
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
Thermal Emittance Measurement at PITZ
Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Zhirong Huang
DANE Compton ring for ultra high flux photons in the 100 KeV-10 MeV energy range D. Alesini (LNF, INFN Frascati)
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
USPAS Course on 4th Generation Light Sources II
Presentation transcript:

Brainstorming on photon-photon scattering experiment Scaling Laws for Photon Fluxes, Bandwidths, Luminosity, etc, and a look at the interaction point (e-g with primary and secondary electron beams) Can we get up to L= 1027 cm-2sec-1 ?? Nev = 1 mbarn*1027 = 1 ev/hour L. Serafini - INFN-Milan First we produce Gamma photons (0.5-1.5 MeV) with 2 Compton Sources (similar to ELI-NP), then we collide the 2 counter-prop. gamma photon beams, focused to mm spot size

Small Compton Recoil in quasi-Thomson back-scattering = electron relativistic factor = angle of observation (q = 0 -> photon scattered on electron beam propagation axis) = laser frequency ng = frequency of the scatterd (X,g) photon a0 = dimensionless amplitude of the vector potential for the laser e.m. field , a0=eE0/(wLmc)

Relative deviation of Comtpon vs. Thomson frequency/wavelength (optical incident photons) x=0.01 ELI Thomson (elastic) neglig. recoil Classical Synchr. Rad. Intermediate zone Quantum Effects Dominant

All quantities below are per shot (i.e. nRF=1 fRF=1) g (MeV) ELI-NP-like machine U= 1 Joule st = 1.5 psec Q=480 pC (3.109 e-) hn = 1.2 eV hn=2.4 eV hn=1.2 eV total # gamma photons over solid angle per shot All quantities below are per shot (i.e. nRF=1 fRF=1) sx (mm)

Total Scattered Photons UL = Laser pulse energy Q = electron bunch charge fRF = RF rep rate nRF = #bunches per RF pulse f = collision angle (<<1) f = 0 for head-on collision st = laser pulse length hn = laser photon energy [eV] sx = electron bunch spot size at collision point N.B. all quantities are intended as rms, all distributions are assumed as gaussians in (phase) space and time

Angle-frequency correlation Collecting the radiation over the whole solid angle, the spectrum is white. n q CAIN results Dn Dn The more energetic photons are emitted on or close to the axis Dn By selecting the photons on axis with a system of collimators one can reduce the bandwidth. White spectrum

RMS bandwidth, due to collection angle, laser phase space distribution and electron beam phase space distribution electron beam laser

Energy-angular Spectral distribution

Luminosity in collision Cost (Meuro): 2 x ( laser 5 + linac 15) = 40

Envelopes of the laser beam (dotted line), first electron beam (for Compton back-scattering, dashed) deflected after collision with laser to clear the second electron beam (solid line). laser envelope envelope of first electron beam deflected x [mm] Laser intensity distribution and first electron bunch at Compton back-scattering Collision point collision point second electron beam envelope to collision incoming gamma photon beam envelope z [mm]

Enlarged view (zoomed out over 1 cm in z and +-200 microns in x) to show laser envelope clearance and deflecting dipole poles (0.3 T B field applied). laser envelope x [mm] envelope of first electron beam deflected collision point second electron beam envelope to collision incoming gamma photon beam envelope z [mm]

Energy available W in the center of mass 1 GeV electron against 10 MeV gamma -> W=200 MeV Luminosity in collision hng = gamma photon energy [MeV] ; Te = colliding electron energy [MeV] s0 = electron bunch (and gamma photon beam) spot size at collision point Ne= # electron in bunch ; Ng = # gamma photons in burst fRF = RF rep rate ; nRF = # electron bunches per RF pulse

Inverse Compton (Thomson) Scattering lL energy = Ee= g me q lX Normal Compton Scattering the photon has higher energy than the electron The inverse process has the Thomson cross-section when hx < Ee The scattered photon satisfies the undulator equation with period lL/2 for head-on collisions (1+a02/2+gq) lX = lL 4g2 Therefore, the x-ray energy decreases substantially at an angle 1/g

The electron gamma collider will operate in the weak Compton regime to generate the gamma photons: the gamma photon energy will be approx. given by So the center of mass energy W becomes (for a0=0.15) g

Scattered photons in collision electrons laser Thomson cross-section Scattered flux Luminosity as in HEP collisions Many photons, electrons Focus tightly N.B. there are two collisions: the first is in the Compton Source, between the first electron bunch and the laser pulse (optical photons) to produce the gamma-ray beam (spot size sx). The second collision is between the “focused” gamma ray beam and a second independent electron bunch (spot size s0): luminosity is calculated in this second collision

We have to decide what is the maximum acceptable bandwidth for the gamma photon beam: let’s assume 10%, this defines univocally the maximum collection angle Yopt so the # gamma photons within the requested bandwidth (0.1) is function only of the laser and electron beam characteristics

ELI-NP extended f = 0 , T = 800 MeV Dg/g = 0.001 en = 0.5 mm Dng/ng=0.1 This is the number of gamma photons per shot to be used in the luminosity formula

Therefore the photon beam peak Brilliance (on single shot) becomes We can also derive the emittance of the gamma photon beam: this is a quadratic sum of the electron beam emitt. and rms angle of scattering, i.e. Yopt /g Therefore the photon beam peak Brilliance (on single shot) becomes

Coming back to luminosity: now we collide a fresh 1 GeV electron bunch carrying Qb=320 pC, with Dg/g = 0.001 en = 0.5 mm and sz = 190 mm against the gamma photons per burst What is the minimum spot size s0 ? We have to respect the hour-glass condition for the collision, i.e. therefore because c.v.d…

Concerning the separation of the two counter-propagating electron beams: since the laser-electron collision (Compton Source) to produce the gamma photons occurs 4.7 mm before the final collision point (where laser and electron beam have 5.5 mm spot size), and the gamma photon beam focuses down to the collision point to 0.21 mm spot size, it is enough to deflect the first eletron beam (the one colliding with the laser) by a very small angle = 6*0.21 mm / 4.7 mm = 0.27 mrad. This small deflection angle is enough to clear the two counter-propagating electron beams (note that the gamma photon beams retains almost the same emittance as the electron beam that produces it by Compton back-scattering, with a slight degradation).

Spectral broadening due to ultra-focused beams: Thomson Source classically described as a Laser Syncrotron Light Source X e- X e- focus envelope Scattering angle in Thomson limit (no recoil) is small, i.e. < 1/g

Spectral broadening due to ultra-focused beams: Thomson Source classically described as a Laser Syncrotron Light Source focus X Limit to focusability due to max acceptable bandwidth

Brilliance of X-ray radiation sources Beam param. invariant under linear optics 12.4 1.24 0.124 l (nm) FLAME SASE-FELs will allow an unprecedented upgrade in Source Brilliance SPARX TTF Covering from the VUV to the 1 Å X-ray spectral range: new Research Frontiers Thomson Source @ LNF Compact Thomson Sources extend SR to hard X-ray range allowing Advanced Radiological Imaging inside Hospitals First Collisions and X-ray generation expected by march 2012 FDT-2011, Frascati, Nov. 30th 2011