Second semester Grading: homework: 60% term report: 40%  

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
APPLIED PHYSICS CODE : 07A1BS05 I B.TECH CSE, IT, ECE & EEE UNIT-3
Advertisements

Electrical and Thermal Conductivity
Jackson Section 7.5 A-C Emily Dvorak – SDSM&T
Lecture #5 OUTLINE Intrinsic Fermi level Determination of E F Degenerately doped semiconductor Carrier properties Carrier drift Read: Sections 2.5, 3.1.
1 Fermi surfaces and Electron dynamics  Band structure calculations give E(k)  E(k) determines the dynamics of the electrons  It is E(k) at the Fermi.
CHAPTER 3 Introduction to the Quantum Theory of Solids
Exam Study Practice Do all the reading assignments. Be able to solve all the homework problems without your notes. Re-do the derivations we did in class.
Semiconductors n D*n If T>0
Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.
1 Applications of statistical physics to selected solid-state physics phenomena for metals “similar” models for thermal and electrical conductivity for.
5. Simplified Transport Equations We want to derive two fundamental transport properties, diffusion and viscosity. Unable to handle the 13-moment system.
AME Int. Heat Trans. D. B. GoSlide 1 Non-Continuum Energy Transfer: Electrons.
Metals: Free Electron Model Physics 355. Free Electron Model Schematic model of metallic crystal, such as Na, Li, K, etc.
Microscopic Ohm’s Law Outline Semiconductor Review Electron Scattering and Effective Mass Microscopic Derivation of Ohm’s Law.
Computational Solid State Physics 計算物性学特論 第9回 9. Transport properties I: Diffusive transport.
Berry Phase Effects on Bloch Electrons in Electromagnetic Fields
1 Lecture IX dr hab. Ewa popko Electron dynamics  Band structure calculations give E(k)  E(k) determines the dynamics of the electrons.
Electrical Conduction in Solids
6. Free Electron Fermi Gas Energy Levels in One Dimension Effect of Temperature on the Fermi-Dirac Distribution Free Electron Gas in Three Dimensions Heat.
Specific Heat of Solids Quantum Size Effect on the Specific Heat Electrical and Thermal Conductivities of Solids Thermoelectricity Classical Size Effect.
UNIT 1 FREE ELECTRON THEORY.
What happens to the current if we: 1. add a magnetic field, 2. have an oscillating E field (e.g. light), 3. have a thermal gradient H.
8. Semiconductor Crystals Band Gap Equations of Motion Intrinsic Carrier Concentration Impurity Conductivity Thermoelectric Effects Semimetals Superlattices.
Lecture 1 - Review Kishore Acharya. 2 Agenda Transport Equation (Conduction through Metal) Material Classification based upon Conductivity Properties.
9. Fermi Surfaces and Metals
Metals I: Free Electron Model
ELECTRON THEORY OF METALS 1.Introduction: The electron theory has been developed in three stages: Stage 1.:- The Classical Free Electron Theory : Drude.
Landau diamagnetism and de Hass van Alphen effect by Enas Hamasha Stastical mechanics ph 761 Dr. Abdulla Obeidat.
Free electron theory of Metals
Chapter 5: Conductors and Dielectrics. Current and Current Density Current is a flux quantity and is defined as: Current density, J, measured in Amps/m.
Lecture 21 Optical properties. Incoming lightReflected light Transmitted light Absorbed light Heat Light impinging onto an object (material) can be absorbed,
Thermal Properties of Materials
Energy Gaps Insulators & Superconductors When does an energy or band gap lead to insulating behavior? Band gap insulators, Peierls’ insulators When does.
Chapter 7 in the textbook Introduction and Survey Current density:
Nanoelectronics Part II Many Electron Phenomena Chapter 10 Nanowires, Ballistic Transport, and Spin Transport
Free Electron Model. So far: –How atoms stick together (bonding) –Arrangement of atoms (crystal lattice) – Reciprocal lattice –Motion of atomic cores.
제 4 장 Metals I: The Free Electron Model Outline 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Conduction electrons 4.3 the free-electron gas 4.4 Electrical conductivity 4.5 Electrical.
Free electron Fermi gas ( Sommerfeld, 1928 ) M.C. Chang Dept of Phys counting of states Fermi energy, Fermi surface thermal property: specific heat transport.
Metallic Solids Metallic bond: The valence electrons are loosely bound. Free valence electrons may be shared by the lattice. The common structures for.
Electrical Engineering Materials
The London-London equation
Conductivity Charge carriers follow a random path unless an external field is applied. Then, they acquire a drift velocity that is dependent upon their.
Qian Niu 牛谦 University of Texas at Austin 北京大学
Band Theory of Electronic Structure in Solids
Do all the reading assignments.
EE 315/ECE 451 Nanoelectronics I
Chapter 41 Atomic Structure
Semiconductor crystals
Phonons II: Thermal properties specific heat of a crystal
Review of Semiconductor Physics
Electrical Properties of Materials
4.6 Anharmonic Effects Any real crystal resists compression to a smaller volume than its equilibrium value more strongly than expansion due to a larger.
Lecture #5 OUTLINE Intrinsic Fermi level Determination of EF
Gauge structure and effective dynamics in semiconductor energy bands
Lecture 2:
Lecture 1: Semiclassical wave-packet dynamics and the Boltzmann equation Dimi Culcer UNSW.
Fermi surfaces and metals
Condensed Matter Physics: review
Anharmonic Effects.
Physics 342 Lecture 28 Band Theory of Electronic Structure in Solids
Free electron Fermi gas (Sommerfeld, 1928)
The Free Electron Fermi Gas
Chapter 41 Atomic Structure
Semiconductor crystals
Quantum Mechanical Considerations
Anharmonic Effects.
PHY 752 Solid State Physics Electron Gas in Magnetic Fields
Plasmons, polarons, polaritons
Plasmons, polarons, polaritons
Presentation transcript:

Second semester Grading: homework: 60% term report: 40%   Part IV: ELECTRON TRANSPORT         Chapter 16: Dynamics of Bloch Electrons         Chapter 17: Transport Phenomena and Fermi Liquid Theory         Chapter 18: Microscopic Theories of Conduction         Chapter 19: Electronics Part V: OPTICAL PROPERTIES         Chapter 20: Phenomenological Theory         Chapter 21: Optical Properties of Semiconductors         Chapter 22: Optical Properties of Insulators         Chapter 23: Optical Properties of Metals and Inelastic Scattering Part VI: MAGNETISM         Chapter 24: Classical Theories of Magnetism and Ordering         Chapter 25: Magnetism of Ions and Electrons         Chapter 26: Quantum Mechanics of Interacting Magnetic Moments         Chapter 27: Superconductivity

Chap 16 Dynamics of Bloch electrons Classical electron dynamics: Drude model Semiclassical electron dynamics Effective mass, Bloch oscillation, Zener tunneling Quantizing semiclassical dynamics Wannier-Stark ladders, de Haas-van Alphen effect M.C. Chang Dept of Phys

Drude theory of electrical transport (1900) Classical theory The source of resistance comes from electron scattering with defects and phonons. If these two types of scatterings are not related, then Current density conductivity resistivity

Determine the scattering time from measured resistivity ρ At room temp the electron density →τ= m/ρne2 = 2.5×10-14 s Fermi velocity of copper mean free path  = vFτ = 40 nm For a very pure Cu crystal at 4K, the resistivity reduces by a factor of 100000, which means  increases by the same amount ( = 0.4 cm). This cannot be explained using the classical theory. K dirty For a crystal without any defect, the only resistance comes from phonon. Therefore, at very low T, the electron mean free path theoretically can be infinite clean Residual resistance

Thermal conduction in metal Both electron and phonon can carry thermal energy In a metal, electrons are dominant heat current density (classical theory) Thermal conductivity Wiedemann-Franz law (1853) Classical: Semi-classical: Only electrons near FS contribute to κ Lorentz number

Lorentz number L=2.45×10-8 watt-ohm/deg2

Semiclassical electron dynamics Consider a wave packet with average location r and wave vector k, then Derivation neglected here Notice that E is the external field, which does not include the lattice field. The effect of lattice is hidden in εn(k)! Range of validity This looks like the usual Lorentz force eq. But It is valid only when Interband transitions can be neglected. (One band approximation) May not be valid in small gap or heavily doped semiconductors, but “never close to being violated in a metal” E and B can be non-uniform in space, but they have to be much smoother than the lattice potential. E and B can be oscillating in time, but with the condition

Effective mass of a Bloch electron The electron near band bottom is like a free electron effective mass matrix (symmetric) For a spherical FS, m*ij=m*δij, only one m* is enough. In general, electron in a flatter band has a larger m* If ε(k) is (e.g. at the top of a valence band) then m*<0

For an ellipsoidal FS, there can be at most three different m. s Eg For an ellipsoidal FS, there can be at most three different m*s Eg. the FS of Si is made of six identical ellipsoidal pockets L T For Si, εg = 1.1 eV, mL = 0.9 m, mT = 0.2 m

k Bloch electron in an uniform electric field ε(k) v(k) Energy dispersion (periodic zone scheme, 1D) ε(k) k v(k) -π/a π/a In a DC electric field, the electrons decelerate and reverse its motion at the BZ boundary. A DC bias produces an AC current ! (called Bloch oscillation)

Why the oscillation is not observed in ordinary crystals? To complete a cycle (a is the lattice constant), eET/ = 2π/a → T=h/eEa For E=104 V/cm, and a=1 A, T=10-10 sec But electron collisions take only about 10-14 sec. ∴ a Bloch electron cannot get to the zone boundary without de-phasing. To observe it, one needs a stronger E field → but only up to about 106 V/cm (for semicond) a larger a → use superlattice (eg. a = 100 A) reduce collision time → use crystals with high quality (Mendez et al, PRL, 1988) Bloch oscillators generate THz microwave: frequency ~ 1012~13, wave length λ ~ 0.01 mm - 0.1mm (Waschke et al, PRL, 1993)

Quantization of Bloch oscillations: Wannier-stark ladders Bloch band (before quantization) Superlattice potential → (Resonances, not eigenstates) Mendez and Bastard, Phys Today 1993

Zener tunneling x E One band approximation Beyond 1-band approx. 2 One band approximation 1 Beyond 1-band approx. To 0th order Let To simplify, consider only 2 bands, with C1(0)=1, C2(0)=0, then then

is roughly independent of t (compared to the exponential) Assume Extrema of F(t) is at ≡ F(t) Stationary phase approximation: (aka, the method of steepest descent) If f(x) is varying rapidly, then For metal The tunneling is more likely in semiconductors due to larger E ∴ one-band approx. is never close to being violated in metals

Integrand Re phase

Bloch electron in an uniform magnetic field Therefore, 1. Change of k is perpendicular to the B field, k|| does not change and 2. ε(k) is a constant of motion This determines uniquely the electron orbit on the FS For a spherical FS, it just gives the usual cyclotron orbit For a connected FS, there might be open orbits

Cyclotron orbit in real space The above analysis gives us the orbit in k-space. What about the orbit in r-space? r-orbit k-orbit ⊙ r-orbit is rotated by 90 degrees from the k-orbit and scaled by c/eB ≡ λB2 magnetic length λB = 256 A at B = 1 Tesla

De Haas-van Alphen effect (1930) Silver In a high magnetic field, the magnetization of a crystal oscillates as the magnetic field increases Similar oscillations are observed in other physical quantities, such as Resistance in Ga magnetoresistivity (Shubnikov-de Haas effect, 1930) specific heat sound attenuation … etc Basically, they are all due to the quantization of electron energy levels in a magnetic field (Landau levels, 1930)

Quantization of the cyclotron orbits In the discussion earlier, the radius of the cyclotron orbit can be varied continuously, but due to their wave nature, the orbits are in fact quantized. Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule (Onsager, 1952) for a closed cyclotron orbit, Why (q/c)A is momentum of field? See Kittel App. G. Gauge dependence prob? Not worse than the gauge dependence in qV. the r-orbit is quantized in units of flux quantum: hc/e≡Φ0=4.14·10-7 gauss.cm2

Energy of the orbit (for a spherical FS) Since a k-orbit (circling an area S) is closely related to a r-orbit (circling an area A), the orbits in k-space are also quantized B=0 (Onsager, 1952) Energy of the orbit (for a spherical FS) Landau levels Degeneracy of the Landau level (assuming spin degeneracy) B≠0 Notice that the kz direction is not quantized In the presence of B, the Fermi sphere becomes a stack of cylinders.

Note: Fermi energy ~ 1 eV, cyclotron energy ~ 0.1 meV (for B = 1 T) ∴ the number of cylinders usually ~ 10000 need low T and high B to observe the fine structure Radius of cylinders , so they expand as we increase B. The orbits are pushed out of the FS one by one. FS E EF B larger level separation, and larger degeneracy (both B) Successive B’s that produce orbits with the same area: Sn = (n+1/2) 2πe/c B Sn'= (n-1/2) 2πe/c B' (B' > B) equal increment of 1/B reproduces similar orbits

Oscillation of the DOS at the Fermi energy Number of states are proportional to areas of cylinders in energy shell The number of states at EF are highly enhanced when there are extremal orbits on the FS There are extremal orbits at regular interval of 1/B This oscillation in 1/B can be detected in any physical quantity that depends on the DOS Two extremal orbits

Determination of FS In the dHvA experiment of silver, the two different periods of oscillation are due two different extremal orbits Therefore, from the two periods we can determine the ratio between the sizes of the "neck" and the "belly" A111(belly)/A111(neck)=51

Bloch electron in crossed E and B fields (both uniform) w The 2nd term is usually very small compared to ε(k) So the effect is to tilt the band structure slightly (max along w, min ⊥ w), and earlier analysis about the cyclotron orbit still applies (not restricted to closed orbits). Real space orbit Current density If “all” orbits on the FS are closed, then This result is valid for different band structures! ExB drift (independent of the sign of charge)

supplementary Derivation of the semiclassical dynamics (generalized version, only an outline. See Marder Sec. 16.4 for more) 1. Construct a wavepacket from one Bloch band that is localized in both the r and the k spaces. 2. Using the time-dependent variational principle to get the effective Lagrangian Berry connection Wavepacket energy Self-rotating angular momentum

Berry curvature supplementary 3. Using the Leff to get the equations of motion Three basic quantities of a Bloch electron: Bloch energy Berry curvature, (~an effective B field in k-space) Angular momentum (in Rammal-Wilkinson form) Berry curvature Two “kinetic” momenta Chang and Niu, PRB 1996 Sundaram and Niu, PRB 1999