Study of T0 Extraction in the Online Tracking Algorithm

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Prospects for X(3872) Detection at Panda Jens Sören Lange, Martin Galuska, Thomas Geßler, Wolfgang Kühn, Stephanie Künze, Yutie Liang, David Münchow, Björn.
News on PXD Readout Issues Sören Lange, Universität Gießen, Belle II DAQ/TRG, KEK, 七夕, 平成 21.
Track Trigger Designs for Phase II Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen, S.X. Wu, (Boston.
Computing EVO meeting, January 15 th 2013 Status of the Tracking Code Gianluigi Boca, Pavia University.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
Emulsion scanning: present status and plans for the coming run Giovanni De Lellis.
L3 Muon Trigger at D0 Status Report Thomas Hebbeker for Martin Wegner, RWTH Aachen, April 2002 The D0 muon system Functionality of the L3 muon trigger.
Some mediation on fast track reconstruction of BESIII Wang Dayong Mar 10,2004.
The High-Level Trigger of the ALICE Experiment Heinz Tilsner Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik Universität Heidelberg International Europhysics Conference.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
Simulation and Analysis of VTX03 and Upgrades to LASS Ryan Page.
Normal text - click to edit HLT tracking in TPC Off-line week Gaute Øvrebekk.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
1 QuickSim - brief introduction - Akiya Miyamoto KEK 22 June 2005 GLD meeting See also.
Fast Tracking of Strip and MAPS Detectors Joachim Gläß Computer Engineering, University of Mannheim Target application is trigger  1. do it fast  2.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Identifier Introduction Calibration with cosmic rays Performance in Au+Au collisions Summary Hiroki Sato, Kyoto University.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
Global Tracking for CBM Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Ivan Kisel 1 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory.
C. Milsténe1 Muon Purity and Detection Efficiency Variation With Depth in an SiD Type Detector C. Milstene- Fermilab SiD Workshop- SLAC- October-2006 In.
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
XLV INTERNATIONAL WINTER MEETING ON NUCLEAR PHYSICS Tiago Pérez II Physikalisches Institut For the PANDA collaboration FPGA Compute node for the PANDA.
FIRST RESULTS OF THE SILICON STRIP DETECTOR at STAR Jörg Reinnarth, Jonathan Bouchet, Lilian Martin, Jerome Baudot and the SSD teams in Nantes and Strasbourg.
Preliminary results on DT T0s in beam collisions J. Santaolalla, J. Alcaraz (+ help/suggestions from C. Battilana, C. Fouz)
Current Status of MDC Track Reconstruction MdcPatRec Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
1 MDC Track Finding at BESIII Zang Shilei BES Annual Meeting (Jun 1, 2005) ______________________________________ -Outline- 
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
Preliminary Design of Trigger System for BES III Zhen’an LIU Inst of High Energy Physics,Beijing Oct
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Outline Description of the experimental setup Aim of this work TDC spectra analysis Tracking method steps Autocalibration Single tube resolution Summary.
Tracking software of the BESIII drift chamber Linghui WU For the BESIII MDC software group.
FPGA Helix Tracking Algorithm for PANDA Yutie Liang, Martin Galuska, Thomas Geßler, Wolfgang Kühn, Jens Sören Lange, David Münchow, Björn Spruck, Milan.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
Pattern recognition with the triplet method Fabrizio Cei INFN & University of Pisa MEG Meeting, Hakata October /10/20131 Fabrizio Cei.
FPGA Helix Tracking Algorithm for PANDA Yutie Liang, Martin Galuska, Thomas Geßler, Jifeng Hu, Wolfgang Kühn, Jens Sören Lange, David Münchow, Björn Spruck,
FPGA Helix Tracking Algorithm with STT Yutie Liang, Martin Galuska, Thomas Geßler, Wolfgang Kühn, Jens Sören Lange, David Münchow, Milan Wagner II. Physikalisches.
GSI, December 7 th, 2009 Status of the Pattern Recognition with the STT system alone. Gianluigi Boca 1.
FPGA Helix Tracking Algorithm -- VHDL implementation Yutie Liang, Martin Galuska, Thomas Geßler, Wolfgang Kühn, Jens Sören Lange, David Münchow, Björn.
Off-Detector Processing for Phase II Track Trigger Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen,
M.C. Studies of CDC Axial/Stereo Layer Configuration David Lawrence, JLab Sept. 19, /19/08 1 CDC Tracking MC Studies -- D. Lawrence, JLab.
Torino, June 15 th, 2009 Status of the Pattern Recognition with the Hough transform and the STT system alone. Gianluigi Boca 1.
FPGA Helix Tracking Algorithm with STT
April12 DST calibration status
PFA Study with Jupiter Contents : 1. Introduction 2. GLD-PFA
Modeling event building architecture for the triggerless data acquisition system for PANDA experiment at the HESR facility at FAIR/GSI Krzysztof Korcyl.
Status of the Pattern Recognition with
STT Detector risk’s assessment
M. Tiemens The hardware implementation of the cluster finding algorithm and the Burst Building Network.
M. Kuhn, P. Hopchev, M. Ferro-Luzzi
First results from prototype measurements
STT pattern recognition improvements since last December meeting and
Progress on the online tracking algorithm
Hit Triplet Finding in the PANDA-STT
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
the Pattern Recognition Workshop
Status of the Offline Pattern Recognition Code GSI, December 10th 2012
Update on the FPGA Online Tracking Algorithm
Track Finding.
eXtremely Fast Tracker; An Overview
Vertex and Kinematic fitting with Pandaroot
Tracking Pattern Recognition
DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data
Status of the Offline Pattern Recognition Code Goa, March 12th 2013
The LHC collider in Geneva
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Alignment of the PHENIX Silicon Vertex Tracker (VTX) in 2014
road – Hough transform- c2
Hough 工作进展.
Sheraton Waikiki Hotel
Presentation transcript:

Study of T0 Extraction in the Online Tracking Algorithm Yutie Liang, Martin Galuska, Thomas Geßler, Wolfgang Kühn, Jens Sören Lange, David Münchow, Björn Spruck, Milan Wagner II. Physikalisches Institut, JUSTUS-LIEBIG-UNIVERSITÄT GIESSEN Mar. 16. 2015

Outline 1. Introduction 2. T0 extraction from tracking Performance study with C++ 4. Summary and outlook

Straw Tube Tracker (STT) 4636 Straw tubes 23-27 planar layers 15-19 axial layers (green) in beam direction 4 stereo double-layers for 3D reconstruction, with ±2.89 skew angle (blue/red) From STT : Wire position + drift time

Tracking Algorithm -- Road Finding Layer_ID Hit Tube_ID Hit: Seg_ID (3 bits) + LayerID (4 bits) + Tube_ID (6 bits) + Arrival time 1: Start from inner layer 2: Attach neighbour hit to tracklet layer by layer Boundary between two segments. Number of neighbor: 4 in axial layer; 6 in stereo layer

Tracking Algorithm -- helix parameters calculation Known : xi , yi , di Question: To determine a circle, x2 + y2 + ax + by + c = 0 Method: Minimize the equation E2 = ∑(xi2 + yi2 + a xi+ b yi + c)2 (1/di)2 x y xc, yc, R Sx = ∑xi … Sxx = ∑xixi … Sxxx = ∑xixixi … 1) Circle para. 2) Track quality.

Event Structure -- pile-up 20 MHz 2000 ns revolution time 200 ns gap TMean between 2 events: 50 ns Drift time: ~200 ns Event pile-up Wrong T0  Wrong drift circle  bad track quality

Previous Tracking Strategy with experimental data Hits are sorted according to their arrival time. In case of T0 provided: T0 as a start point  hits in 220 ns window  run tracking algorithm  assign track to right event In case of T0 not provided: Do a time-consuming T0 scan

A better Method to Extract T0 T0 shift = Ʃdi /N / const (N: number of hits di: signed distance of circle to track) T0 shifted by: -50 ns: -20 ns: 10 ns: 20 ns: Extracted T0: -47.0±4.0 ns -19.8±2.1 ns 9.4±2.5 ns 19.0±2.3 ns

New Tracking Strategy in case of unknown T0 1) Start from 0 2) hits in 220 ns window 3) run tracking algorithm 4) extract T0 of next event 5) go back to 2) Two time-based simulations: 1 GeV single muon DPM

#1 T0 = 128.1 ns #1 T0 = 147.4 ns #1 T0 = 167.0 ns #1 T0 = 139.2 ns #0 T0 = 97.0 ns #1 T0 = 117.1 ns 8.4 35.9 114.1 128.2 139.0 148.3 T0 (ns) : MC Input Iter_2 8.3 0.0 34.6 112.4 128.0 116.0 138.4 139.2 147.4 8.5 #1 T0 = 138.4 ns #0 T0 = 67.8 ns #1 T0 = 116.6 ns #1 T0 = 128.0 ns #1 T0 = 147.4 ns #1 T0 = 158.1 ns 8.4 35.9 114.1 128.2 139.0 148.3 T0 (ns) : MC Input Iter_2 8.3 0.0 34.6 112.4 128.0 116.0 138.4 8.5 #1 T0 = 128.0 ns #1 T0 = 137.2 ns #1 T0 = 146.1 ns #1 T0 = 127.2 ns #0 T0 = 65.7 ns #1 T0 = 116.0 ns 8.4 35.9 114.1 128.2 139.0 148.3 T0 (ns) : MC Input Iter_2 8.3 0.0 34.6 112.4 128.0 116.0 8.5 #0 T0 = 9.7 ns #2 T0 = 35.9 ns #1 T0 = 112.4 ns 8.4 35.9 114.1 128.2 139.0 148.3 T0 (ns) : MC Input Iter_2 8.3 0.0 34.6 112.4 8.5 #0 T0 = 8.5 ns #2 T0 = 34.6 ns #1 T0 = 36.3 ns 8.4 35.9 114.1 128.2 139.0 148.3 T0 (ns) : MC Input Iter_2 8.3 0.0 34.6 8.5 #0 T0 = 8.3 ns #2 T0 = 31.7 ns #1 T0 = 28.0 ns 8.4 35.9 114.1 128.2 139.0 148.3 T0 (ns) : MC Input Iter_2 8.3 0.0

Time-based simulation with DPM events

8.4 35.9 114.1 128.2 139.0 148.3 T0 (ns) : MC Input Iter_2 0.0 37.2 114.5 140.9 116.6 9.0 9.4 38.2 #1 T0 = 116.8 ns #1 T0 = 116.6 ns #1 T0 = 119.0 ns #1 T0 = 140.9 ns 8.4 35.9 114.1 128.2 139.0 148.3 T0 (ns) : MC Input Iter_2 0.0 37.2 115.3 9.0 9.4 38.2 114.5 140.9 141.1 150.9 8.4 35.9 114.1 128.2 139.0 148.3 T0 (ns) : MC Input Iter_2 9.0 0.0 37.2 114.5 9.4 38.2 #0 T0 = 38.2 ns #1 T0 = 114.5 ns #1 T0 = 115.3 ns #1 T0 = 128.0 ns 8.4 35.9 114.1 128.2 139.0 148.3 T0 (ns) : MC Input Iter_2 9.0 0.0 37.2 9.4 #0 T0 = 37.2 ns #1 T0 = 9.4 ns #1 T0 = 98.3 ns 8.4 35.9 114.1 128.2 139.0 148.3 T0 (ns) : MC Input Iter_2 9.0 0.0 #0 T0 = 9.0 ns #1 T0 = 35.7 ns #1 T0 = 95.3 ns 12

The Missing Event at Event-based simulation Tracks in this event are not well reconstructed. In this case, it is hard to extract a T0. 13

New Tracking Strategy with experimental data Hits are sorted according to their arrival time. In case of T0 provided: T0 as a start point  hits in 220 ns window  run tracking algorithm  assign track to right event In case of T0 not provided: Dynamic T0 extraction (fast)

Summary and Outlook Extract T0 using the distance of drift circles to track. Simultaneous tracking and Dynamic T0 extraction: fast Secondary vertex does not work yet.

Thank you

Performance at FPGA For one event with 100 hits (6 tracks): 7 μs Hit reading Road finder Pt extraction Pz extraction (100 cc) (50 cc X 6) (120 cc X 2 X 6) (60 cc X 2 X 6)

Tracking at FPGA -- at low event rate Data flow: Hit information at PC  FPGA, extract helix para.  PC PC is used to draw hits and helix in the plot. The helix parameters come from FPGA.

Tracking at FPGA -- 20 MHz Data flow: Hit information at PC  FPGA, extract helix para.  PC PC is used to draw hits and helix in the plot. The helix parameters come from FPGA.

C++ VHDL Pt 1st iteration √ Pt 2nd iteration χ2 calculation Pz 1st iteration Pz 2nd iteration σ_pt : ~ 3.2% σ_pz : ~ 4.2% 7 μs/event (6 tracks) , 140 FPGA @ 20MHz

The Compute Node (CN)

Hardware Description Language VHDL, Verilog, SystemC VHDL: Very-high-speed integrated circuits Hardware Description Language. It’s a dataflow language, unlike procedural computing languages such as C++ which runs sequentially, one instruction at a time. Signal A3_B1 …; Signal A4_B2 …; A3 <= A3_B1; B1 <= A3_B1; A4 <= A4_B2; B2 <= A4_B2; A1 A A3 B1 B B3 A2 A4 B2 B4

Setup and Test PC as data source and receiver. Ethernet. Optical link (UDP by Grzegorz Korcyl ) (not integrated yet) Ethernet via Optical Link FPGA FIFO Tracking algorithm FIFO

Assign a track to the correct event T0 information: current event(Red) or other events(Green) Black dashed line: track by MC truth Red line: recon. track Blue: recon. using outer layers drift circles belong to current event (Red) or other events (Green) Event #2 Event #2

Performance study – single track y(cm) 0.2GeV y(cm) 0.5GeV x(cm) x(cm) 1GeV 2GeV y(cm) y(cm) x(cm) x(cm)

Pz reconstruction Pt = 0.5 GeV/c Pz(input) 0.25 GeV/c : 3.7 %

Beam test data Event #2 Red Solid circle : drift circle Blue dashed line : track from 1st iteration Red dashed line : track from 2nd iteration

A better Method to Extract T0