Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of the Minimum Quantity of Lubricant Technique With Auxiliary Cleaning of the Grinding Wheel in Cylindrical Grinding of N2711 Steel J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017;139(12):121018-121018-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037041 Figure Legend: Machining cost breakdown [7]
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of the Minimum Quantity of Lubricant Technique With Auxiliary Cleaning of the Grinding Wheel in Cylindrical Grinding of N2711 Steel J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017;139(12):121018-121018-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037041 Figure Legend: Schematic view of the setup of the grinding operation with details of the auxiliary wheel cleaning system positioning (adapted from Ref. [8])
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of the Minimum Quantity of Lubricant Technique With Auxiliary Cleaning of the Grinding Wheel in Cylindrical Grinding of N2711 Steel J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017;139(12):121018-121018-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037041 Figure Legend: Roughness values versus feed rate under different cooling–lubrication techniques
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of the Minimum Quantity of Lubricant Technique With Auxiliary Cleaning of the Grinding Wheel in Cylindrical Grinding of N2711 Steel J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017;139(12):121018-121018-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037041 Figure Legend: Roundness error values versus feed rate under different cooling–lubrication techniques
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of the Minimum Quantity of Lubricant Technique With Auxiliary Cleaning of the Grinding Wheel in Cylindrical Grinding of N2711 Steel J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017;139(12):121018-121018-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037041 Figure Legend: Diametric wear versus feed rate under different cooling–lubrication techniques
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of the Minimum Quantity of Lubricant Technique With Auxiliary Cleaning of the Grinding Wheel in Cylindrical Grinding of N2711 Steel J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017;139(12):121018-121018-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037041 Figure Legend: G-ratio versus the specific material removal rate (Qw′) per wheel speed (vs)
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of the Minimum Quantity of Lubricant Technique With Auxiliary Cleaning of the Grinding Wheel in Cylindrical Grinding of N2711 Steel J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017;139(12):121018-121018-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037041 Figure Legend: Grinding power values versus feed rate under different cooling–lubrication techniques
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of the Minimum Quantity of Lubricant Technique With Auxiliary Cleaning of the Grinding Wheel in Cylindrical Grinding of N2711 Steel J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017;139(12):121018-121018-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037041 Figure Legend: Microhardness values versus feed rate under different cooling–lubrication techniques
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of the Minimum Quantity of Lubricant Technique With Auxiliary Cleaning of the Grinding Wheel in Cylindrical Grinding of N2711 Steel J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017;139(12):121018-121018-8. doi:10.1115/1.4037041 Figure Legend: Micrograph of the workpieces subsurface after the grinding experiments under different cooling and cutting conditions