Collaborative Decision Making “Formulating CDM Strategies”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OMT RETREAT (WORK PLANNING). The UNDG Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of Common Services were developed in 2000 by an inter-agency.
Advertisements

Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 2 Developing A Collaborative Framework.
FAA / Eurocontrol TFM/CDM Technical Interchange Meeting
01/14/01 S2K+1 Field Training Spring /14/01 FAR 121 Air Safety PAD Operational Responsibility shared by: –P ilots –A TC –D ispatchers Enhancing.
Presented by United Arab Emirates MID ATM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (MAEP) TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.
Traffic Management and FUA integration
Federal Aviation Administration 1 June 2013 Federal Aviation Administration 1 October 2013 WET Update to NBAA and FPAW Federal Aviation Administration.
1 ITRC Mission ITRC is A state-led coalition working together with industry and stakeholders to achieve regulatory acceptance of environmental technologies.
Runway Safety Teams (RSTs) Description and Processes Session 5 Presentation 1.
Date: 18 February 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Collaborative Decision Making at the FAA/ATO A look at how CDM is applied in the U.S.
RST processes Session 6 Presentation 3. A framework for RST processes Establishing an RST Membership Terms of reference Work programme (schedule, agenda,
2014 Work Planning Local Program Leadership Team.
DPW BD&C Employee Performance Evaluation Guideline Discussion
11 Aeronautical Information Exchange Model (AIXM) / Weather Information Exchange Model (WXXM) Conference Addressing the NextGen Challenge Charles A. Leader.
Strategic Planning A Tool for “Charting our Future” Strategic Planning Team May 24-25, 2012.
AST Research and Development Activities COMSTAC Launch Operations and Support Working Group Chuck Larsen October 24, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Enabling Project Communication, Collaboration & Workflow (CCW)
Transportation Planning Process Freight Transportation Planning Workshop July 11, 2001.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 June 2013 Federal Aviation Administration 1 October 2013 WET Update to NBAA and FPAW Federal Aviation Administration.
CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (CDM) Testimony before the National Civil Aviation Review Commission Testimony.
Central Kitsap School District SHARED DECISION MAKING Central Kitsap High School March 2, 2006.
Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO) Col Mark Weadon Air Force Weather Deputy for Federal Programs May 17 th,
Commercial Space Transportation Research and Development Program COMSTAC RLV Working Group Chuck Larsen October 10, 2007 Federal Aviation Administration.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 7 “Formulating CDM Strategies”
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Improving Air Traffic Management Together…
© BLR ® —Business & Legal Resources 1408 Teambuilding for All Employees.
1 CWSU Near-term Improvement Program. 2 Objective Low-cost improvements at CWSUs which will noticeably improve quality of support provided to FAA ARTCCs.
1 Home Care Support Outcome Based Specification Workshop 26 th November 2009.
CDM Training (From August 21 meeting) CDM Training Web Page – Established CDM Training exploder – Established Development of CDM Training POC List –ATCSCC.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
Welcome To University Shared Services
Continuous Improvement Project (A Guideline For Sponsors)
Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
Update from the Faster Payments Task Force
Collaborative Decision Making Module 8 “Collaborative Leadership”
FF-ICE A CONCEPT TO SUPPORT THE ATM SYSTEM OF THE FUTURE
The Role of Air Traffic Control in A CDM ENVIRONMENT
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Presented by United Arab Emirates
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Mini Global Demonstration
Project Management Processes
ARRL Field Organization for Emergency Communications
Collaborative Decision Making “Collaborative Tools and Technology”
Case Study: The Accounting Software Installation Project
IT Governance Planning Overview
Be an Effective Council Member
Understanding what is the Phytosanitary Capacity Evaluation (PCE)
By Jeff Burklo, Director
Global Air Navigation Plan (GANP) Aviation System Block Upgrade (ASBU)
RST processes Session 5 Presentation 2.
Ethics as Culture key elements
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Operating a District or Shared Service Arrangement (SSA) Migrant Parent Advisory Council (PAC) Texas Education Agency Curriculum Division Migrant Education.
Model T(eamwork) in The Aid Office
Project Management Processes
CHINA GO TEAM VISIT 2014 Opening Civil/Military Session
Core Competencies of a World Class Customer Advisory Board
Friends of Aviation Weather CCFP for 2003
Joint Planning and Development Office “Where new ideas are welcome”
Executive Order No. 23 Update Air & Waste Management Association Conference November 16, 2018 Presentation will focus on the latest policy development.
Collaborative Decision Making “Developing A Collaborative Framework”
FGFOA Committees Established and evaluated by the FGFOA Board of Directors to utilize talent and resources of the FGFOA membership.
Ethics as Culture key elements
A Concept for Launch and Reentry Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)
Draft Charter Community of Practice for Direct Access Entities
Presentation transcript:

Collaborative Decision Making “Formulating CDM Strategies” Module 7 “Formulating CDM Strategies”

CDM Structure Air Transport Association (ATA) sponsors and provides Industry input to the FAA CDM Stakeholder Group (CSG) provides leadership and direction for the CDM process CDM is currently hosted by the Air Transport Association (ATA) which acts as an “umbrella” agency to allow for Industry CDM input to the FAA. Participants agree to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including the antitrust laws of the United States. Leadership and direction for the CDM process is provided by the CDM Stakeholders Group (CSG). The participants of the CSG are the Air Transport Association (ATA), National Business Aviation Association (NBAA), Regional Airline Association (RAA), and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The purpose of the CSG is (1) to oversee the general direction and mission of the working sub-groups, (2) to provide the FAA with input on prioritization and tasking for possible technologies, communication tools etc., that will increase the efficiency of the NAS, and (3) to provide industry recommendations to the FAA on overall CDM priorities and activities. Leadership within CDM is shared by the FAA and Industry. The FAA Lead for CDM is appointed by the FAA and the POC for Industry is appointed by ATA Air Traffic Control (ATC) Council with concurrence of the CSG industry members. The FAA and Industry Leads will provide an annual review of activities to the CSG each January. CDM Stakeholder Group (CSG) – Participants: ATA, NBAA, RAA, FAA – Purpose: provide recommendations to the FAA on CDM priorities and activities

FAA Lead and Industry Lead CDM Structure FAA Lead and Industry Lead Provide leadership Provide recommendations Establish and oversee work groups FAA Lead/ Industry Lead – Provide leadership for overall CDM activities and meetings – Provide recommendations on: requirements, design, development and implementation – Establish and oversee work groups as needed

CDM Structure Work Groups/Sub-Teams Directed by FAA and Industry Leads Provide recommendations for technology, communication tools, etc. Work Groups/Sub-Teams – Report to and receive tasking from FAA and Industry Leads – Established to complete specific assigned tasking – Provide recommendations for technology, communication tools, etc. – Participants are determined by FAA and Industry Leads based on tasking objectives – Recommendations are advisory only CDM Sub-teams will be established at the direction of the CSG when it is determined that a certain knowledge base or skill set is required to accomplish further research and/or development of traffic management tools/concepts. Sub-teams receive specific tasking and provide input/recommendations on concept requirements and implementation. Each sub-team will have a charter, typically in the form of a tasking paper, which governs the scope of their activities with established milestones and timelines. Sub-teams will be disbanded at the completion of their tasking or when otherwise determined by the CSG. Flow Evaluation Team (FET) Future Concept Team (FCT) Weather Evaluation Team (WET) Ground Delay Program Enhancement (GDPE) Surface CDM Team (SCT) CDM Training Team (CTT)

CDM Strategy Sessions Allow airlines and ATC the opportunity to exchange dialogue concerning the ATFM challenges faced on both sides. Create energizing opportunities to improve collaboration between the two factions. Energize the debate on how best to improve the performance of the NAS through: Positive ATC & Customer interaction and problem solving Consistent use of best practices Maximizing the use of capabilities that exist in current automation tools Development of new approaches or procedures that can be implemented within a short period of time

CDM Structure CDM Stakeholder Group (CSG) ATA RAA FAA NBAA Plan ATA RAA FAA NBAA Industry Lead FAA Lead The CDM Stakeholders Group Leadership and direction for the CDM process is provided by the CDM Stakeholders Group (CSG). The participants of the CSG are the Air Transport Association (ATA), National Business Aviation Association (NBAA), Regional Airline Association (RAA), and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The purpose of the CSG is (1) to oversee the general direction and mission of the working sub-groups, (2) to provide the FAA with input on prioritization and tasking for possible technologies, communication tools etc., that will increase the efficiency of the NAS, and (3) to provide industry recommendations to the FAA on overall CDM priorities and activities. Leadership within CDM is shared by the FAA and Industry. The FAA Lead for CDM is appointed by the FAA and the POC for Industry is appointed by ATA Air Traffic Control (ATC) Council with concurrence of the CSG industry members. The FAA and Industry Leads will provide an annual review of activities to the CSG each January. CDM Sub-Teams CDM Sub-teams will be established at the direction of the CSG when it is determined that a certain knowledge base or skill set is required to accomplish further research and/or development of traffic management tools/concepts. Sub-teams receive specific tasking and provide input/recommendations on concept requirements and implementation. Each sub-team will have a charter, typically in the form of a tasking paper, which governs the scope of their activities with established milestones and timelines. Sub-teams will be disbanded at the completion of their tasking or when otherwise determined by the CSG. Each month, every existing CDM sub-team is required to submit a monthly update to the CSG. In addition to the CSG Update, CDM sub-teams must develop a timeline associated with each of their respective tasks or projects. These timelines are to be updated after every sub-team meeting and provided as an attachment to the CSG Update. Sub-Teams Sub-Teams Sub-Teams Sub-Teams Sub-Teams

CDM Sub-Teams Weather Evaluation Team (WET) Flow Evaluation Team (FET) Future Concept Team (FCT) Ground Delay Program Surface CDM Team Develop New Planning Concepts Routes TFM Programs Develop Tools Surface Data Future NextGen Concepts Weather Data Sharing Improve Products Future Product Research Improve FSM Unified GDP’s TFM Advisory Program Integration Surface CDM Model Adopt Applicable A-CDM Concepts Give examples of possible work groups depending upon current needs and capabilities.

CDM Feedback Loops Customer Meetings Quality Assurance Telcons Annual Severe Weather Review Operational Customer meetings held bi-annually; Next session September 23-24, 2009 USAir Headquarters, Phoenix, AZ Format; Breakout Sessions, Panel Discussions

CDM MOU (Membership) Benefits A clear step toward greater collaboration and information exchange Access to the CDM “network” of participants (Sub Teams) Access to ATM tools used by Traffic Managers to make real-time traffic management decisions: CDM membership is limited to qualified aviation related entities that meet the data-sharing criteria. All CDM participants are required to sign the most current version of the CDM Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). CDM Members who sign a MOA but fail to exchange meaningful data with the FAA will have their membership revoked. A clear step toward greater collaboration and information exchange Access to the CDM “network” of participants (Sub Teams) Access to ATM tools used by Traffic Managers to make real-time traffic management decisions: Flight Schedule Monitor (FSM) Flight Schedule Analyzer (FSA) Operational Post Evaluation Tools (IRIS) Route Management Tool (RMT and ROG) Common Constraint Situation Display (CCSD) Collaborative Convective Forecast Product (CCFP) Access to the Diversion Recovery Tool Access to the TCA Webpage

CDM Membership Requirements Must sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Must be able to provide flight plan data Must pass a data quality check All flight plan data is unfiltered and available for all to members to see

Collaborative Decision Making cdm.fly.faa.gov