TOPS TSA MD 1100.43-4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Management
Advertisements

1 The Revised PEP Process Presented by… Rick Losemann Director, Employee Relations Division Office of Personnel Services and Benefits.
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
HOUSTON EMPLOYEE ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW (HEAR) INTERIM APPLICATION ORIENTATION FOR TRAINERS & HEAR ADMINISTRATORS For more information, visit
Performance Management Review FAQs
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Introduction Performance Appraisal Application (PAA) Demonstration Training Introduction Fall 2014.
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of The Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management Human Resources Center The Department of Labor’s Performance.
Performance Appraisal System Update
The New Uniform Appraisal Rating Periods Union Brown Bag Lunch Series: Wednesday, October 2, 2002 Noon, Lecture Room D.
Contractor Management and ISO 14001:2004
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Performance Management: A System for Success UCLA Library.
Performance & Development Plan Rhea Seeber-Reynolds Human Resource Manager & Stefani Coverson Human Resource Manager.
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
Annual Review Process Georgi Lowe UWSA Office of Human Resources & Workforce Diversity.
EPMS OVERVIEW – Prepare Planning Stages – Provide Ongoing Communication – Performing Evaluation Stage – Address substandard performance. – Use EAP appropriately.
Appraisal Process & Paperwork Update Workshop Jackie Skeel 13 March 2014.
USC Health and Safety Supervisor Training November 24 th and 25 th, 2011 Health & Safety Refresher PART 3.
SUPERVISING STUDENT EMPLOYEES Rob Drybread – University of Colorado, Boulder
1 Writing Effective Critical Elements Using the SMART or MARST Formats.
Association for the Improvement of Minorities-IRS Career Assistance Mentoring Program – CAMP 2011 C.A.M.P. ORIENTATION March 25, 2011.
CONDUCT AND PERFORMANCE ISSUES James Reno LER Specialist.
Performance Management  Performance Management Cycle  Organizational Success  Shared Responsibilities  Setting Goals and Expectations.
Supporting Services Mentoring Program. Mentoring Program Definition The Mentoring Program of MCPS provides mentors to both new employees and existing.
Successfully Conducting Employee Performance Appraisals Wendy L. McCoy Director HR & Benefits Florida Conference of The United Methodist Church.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
Appraisal Process & Paperwork Update Changes to A4C Terms & Conditions Nationally agreed Agenda for Change terms and conditions (annex W) were.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
SAN FRANCISCO’S FAMILY AND CHILDREN’S SERVICES BUILDING A COMPETENCY BASED ORGANIZATION.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
Organizational Behavior (MGT-502) Lecture-43. Summary of Lecture-42.
Introduction to SEPAP: An Explanation of the Program  Importance of employee participation in the appraisal process  Learn the three phases of SEPAP.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
DoD Lead Agent: Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center.
Roll-out of the NORTHRAIL PMS
Performance Management
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Session objectives After completing this session you will:
Performance Management
System Office Performance Management
TOPS TRAINING.
TOPS TSA HANDBOOK MD
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
NHN member organizations
Five-Level Performance Management System
T.O.P.S
You Need to Know About the English Learner Advisory Committee
Monitoring Performance
“Leadership Workshop Series” PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL April 20, Sep-18.
Performance Management System
Supporting Services Mentoring Program
Performance Review for County Educators
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
NG Technician Performance Management
NG Technician Performance Management
Performance Management Workshop
Performance Review for County Educators
Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees
The Individual Development Plan (IDP)
Human Resources Office, Naples
Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees
PEP Webinar for Employees Review Cycle
Dean of Engagement Evaluation
Performance based planning and programming
Presentation transcript:

TOPS TSA MD 1100.43-4

4. Definitions: NOTE: Article 1 of the CBA establishes the performance management process that provides employees with the opportunities for feedback to keep them advised of performance expectations, their current performance, and when necessary, assistance in improving that performance.

5. RESPONSIBILITES D. Rating Officials are responsible for: (1) Scheduling and conducting performance planning meetings, progress reviews, and end-of-year reviews for their employees; (3) Conducting informal discussions (observing, coaching, and provide feedback) with employees; (4) Documenting and rating employees’ performance; (5) Maintaining performance documents in accordance with this directive; (6) Providing regular updates to reviewing officials on workforce performance; (7) Addressing performance deficiencies with employees as soon they become evident; (9) Complying with Article 1 of the CBA

E. Employees are responsible for: (1) Attending the meeting with their Rating Official to discuss the contents of their performance agreement; (2) Performing their work assignments according to the established performance agreement, expectations, procedures, and supervisory instructions; (3) Promptly notifying the Rating Officials about factors that interfere with the ability to perform duties at the level of performance required by their performance elements; (4) Attending progress reviews and end-of-year reviews with their Rating Official; (5) Signing their performance plans; (6) Voluntarily, and at the employees discretion, completing a narrative self-assessment of their performance for consideration in their end-of-year; (7) Attending informal discussions initiated by the supervisor, Rating Official or employees to discuss their performance; and (8) Complying with the TOPS performance requirements of the CBA.

6. POLICY: TOPS is intended to promote a culture of high performance and accountability and to ensure each employee knows what is required to successfully accomplish his or her work in order to help TSA accomplish its mission position appointment. A. An employee shall receive a rating of record based on a four-tiered rating system. B. Individual performance goals shall align with organizational goals and performance standards shall be specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound (SMART). C. Generally, an employee must be on a performance plan for a minimum of 90 days in order to receive a rating of record. D. The performance appraisal period begins in October 1 or the employee’s current permanent date, whichever is later, and ends on September 30, or until the employee has been on the performance plan for at least 90 days, whichever is later.