Figure Legend: statistical inference

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From: What limits performance in the amblyopic visual system: Seeing signals in noise with an amblyopic brain Journal of Vision. 2008;8(4):1. doi: /8.4.1.
Advertisements

From: Early interference of context congruence on object processing in rapid visual categorization of natural scenes Journal of Vision. 2008;8(13):11.
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(9):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: System gamma as a function of image- and monitor-dynamic range
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Holistic integration of gaze cues in visual face and body perception: Evidence from the composite design Journal of Vision. 2017;17(1):24. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2003;3(5):3. doi: /3.5.3 Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(6):2. doi: /9.6.2 Figure Legend:
From: Asymmetric interference between the perception of shape and the perception of surface properties Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):13. doi: /
From: Salience of unique hues and implications for color theory
From: Visual illusions based on single-field contrast asynchronies
From: Responses of the human visual cortex and LGN to achromatic and chromatic temporal modulations: An fMRI study Journal of Vision. 2010;10(13):13. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(13):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):3. doi: /4.9.3 Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Bayesian inference for psychometric functions
From: What are the units of storage in visual working memory?
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci ;43(9): Figure Legend:
From: Subjectively homogeneous noise over written text as a tool to investigate the perceptual mechanisms involved in reading Journal of Vision. 2013;13(11):14.
From: Event-related potentials reveal an early advantage for luminance contours in the processing of objects Journal of Vision. 2011;11(7):1. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(2):4. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Mice: Comparison with Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy and Fluorescein Angiography Trans. Vis. Sci.
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(16):13. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Visual speed sensitivity in the drum corps color guard
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The color lexicon of the Somali language
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(3):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Color constancy and hue scaling
Figure Legend: From: Color constancy and hue scaling
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Surface color perception and equivalent illumination models
From: What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene?
Figure Legend: From: A short-term memory of multi-stable perception
From: Maximum likelihood difference scales represent perceptual magnitudes and predict appearance matches Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):1. doi: /
From: Perception of light source distance from shading patterns
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(6):4. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(6):14. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Cross-modal attention influences auditory contrast sensitivity: Decreasing visual load improves auditory thresholds for amplitude- and frequency-modulated.
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(12):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(1):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Latitude and longitude vertical disparities
From: Linear–nonlinear models of the red–green chromatic pathway
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(1):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion Journal of Vision.
From: Rapid visual categorization of natural scene contexts with equalized amplitude spectrum and increasing phase noise Journal of Vision. 2009;9(1):2.
From: Variability of eye movements when viewing dynamic natural scenes
From: Attentional selection of relative SF mediates global versus local processing: Evidence from EEG Journal of Vision. 2011;11(7):11. doi: /
From: What's color got to do with it
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(10):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):1. doi: /4.9.1.
From: Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility
From: What predicts the strength of simultaneous color contrast?
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
Figure Legend: From: Measuring visual clutter
From: Four types of ensemble coding in data visualizations
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(3):28. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The fine structure of multifocal ERG topographies
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):15. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(5):2. doi: /6.5.2 Figure Legend:
From: Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(9):20. doi: / Figure Legend:
Presentation transcript:

Figure Legend: statistical inference Journal of Vision. 2008;8(3):24. doi:10.1167/8.3.24 Figure Legend: The p-values comparing d′ measurements from 24 subjects between two conditions. Each bimodal condition was compared to all related trimodal conditions using a paired two-tailed t-test ( df = 23). Significant results ( p < 0.05, Bonferroni corrected) are shown as red squares for positive t-statistics, and blue squares for negative t-statistics. Each panel examines the change in d′ in each of two modalities as a result of introduction of a third modality. Each row corresponds to the one of the two modalities, and each column corresponds to the number of pulses in the third modality. Each figure title displays the visual (V), auditory (A), and tactile (T), stimulation parameters for the bimodal condition (baseline comparison). For example, in panel g, there is not a significant change in the subjects' d′ for either visual or auditory responses when adding a single tap, as shown by the gray scale boxes for both the auditory and the visual percepts in the column T = 1. In contrast, both auditory and visual d′ significantly change when two taps are added. Date of download: 11/12/2017 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2017. All rights reserved.