Building a Stronger OPERS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Act 120 of 2010 A Look at PSERS Retirement Benefit Changes Presentation at: PASBO Annual Conference March 16, 2011.
Advertisements

Ohio University January 27,  OPERS has a long history of proactively addressing issues as early as possible (examples include the Choices Health.
1 New Hampshire Retirement System Presentation to NHSAA September 25, 2008.
McGraw-Hill /Irwin© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS Chapter 17.
York University Pension Fund Leona Fields Manager, Pension Fund Annual Pension Meeting April 2010.
© 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 18 Employee Benefit Plans.
Florida Government Finance Officers Association Webinar GASB’s New Pension Standards December 18, 2014.
Public Employee Pension Plans Steven Kreisberg Steven Kreisberg Collective Bargaining Director Collective Bargaining DirectorAFSCME 1.
McGraw-Hill /Irwin© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS Chapter 17.
Copyright © 2012 GRS – All rights reserved. TMRS Rate Stabilization Part of the Toolkit October 8, 2012 Mark Randall.
Illinois SURS Member Guide –Contributions (page 2) –Disability Benefits (pages 7-9) –Disability Retirement Allowance (page 10) –Retirement Benefits (pages.
TACOMA EMPLOYES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Orientation Outline ISources of Retirement Income IIHow the Plan Is Funded and Managed IIIService Retirement Benefits.
1 City of Fresno’s Deferred Retirement Option Program “DROP” Police Department Retirement Planning Seminar 2008.
Rhode Island Federation of Teachers and Health Professionals 356 Smith Street, Providence, RI Phone: Fax: www.rifthp.org.
The Illinois Pension Problem What is Wrong with Illinois Pensions?
OPEN – C&HR – 1 June 13-14, 2013 OPEN – C&HR – 1 June 13-14, 2013 Board of Curators Compensation and Human Resources Committee June 13-14, 2013.
TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2008 Presented by J. Christian Conradi and Mark Randall on October 22, 2008.
Virginia Government Finance Officers’ Association 2011 Spring Conference Virginia Retirement System Update for Local Government June 10, 2011 Barry C.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 Introduction to the Actuarial Valuation: Funding and Assumptions January 12, 2006 P.
Vancouver Webcast Financial and Operational Review Accountable To You 4th Annual General Meeting October 15, 2005.
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits Chapter 15 Robinson, Munter and Grant.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning Unit #6.
PENSION REFORM: LACERS TIER II P RESENTATION TO L ABOR O RGANIZATIONS Office of the City Administrative Officer City of Los Angeles September 6, 2012.
Arizona State Retirement System Presentation to the Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona January 7, 2011.
Collin County Retirement Plan Briefing September 7, 2010.
Presented by: G.S. Curran & Co. GASB 68 FOR COST SHARING EMPLOYERS OF THE ASSESSORS’ RETIREMENT FUND.
Actuarial Assumptions and Methods: What is Reasonable?
Gregory M. Curran, FCA, MAAA, ASA, EA Consulting Actuary G. S. Curran & Company, Ltd N. Glenstone Place Baton Rouge, Louisiana (225)
1 EMS/Fire Department Consolidation Treatment of Pension and Service Under the Police/Fire, CSRS, and 401(a) Plans.
Retiree Health Negotiations May 13, OVERVIEW Background On Retiree Medical Benefit Retiree Health Benefit Negotiations in FY12 and Tentative Agreement.
SHARED RISK PLAN FOR ACADEMIC EMPLOYEES OF UNB (AESRP) Pre-Retirement Seminar UNB Human Resources & Organizational Development.
TRSL UPDATE Louisiana School Board Association 2016 Convention February 15, 2016.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) Presentation to the Joint Board of Supervisors.
January 13, 2015 Town of San Anselmo June 30, 2014 OPEB Valuation Review.
Town of Plymouth, Massachusetts Results of the January 1, 2015 GASB 45 Valuation September 22, 2015 Linda L. Bournival, FSA Consulting Actuary KMS Actuaries,
New Member Mid-CareerNearRetirementAfterRetirement Municipal Pension Plan Operations and Financial Review December 31, 2002.
Pensions GOMB Response to Budgeting For Results Commission Pension Questions.
Actuarial Status Update of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth May 4, 2010 Presented by Doug Anderson, EA, ASA, MAAA Gallagher Benefit.
OPERS Pension Plan Changes and Health Care. Learning Objectives 2 OPERS History and Funding Challenges Pension Changes Health Care Changes Communicating.
Pension Reform Effective Date July 1, 2017.
Yasuko Shirakawa, PHR, SHRM-CP Office of Human Resources
Pension Information Committee Report
TRS Funding and Pension Benefits
CalPERS Background 1,439 School Districts 1 State of California 1,581
League of AZ Cities and Towns PSPRS Pension Task Force August 15, 2014
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits
History July 1, 1968 – Establishment of Trust Territory Social Security Administration July 1, 1974 – Establishment of disability program February 8,
TLFFRA Educational Conference
Financial Statement Analysis K.R. Subramanyam
Yasuko Shirakawa, PHR, SHRM-CP Office of Human Resources
RETIRE Retirement Earnings Training and Information for Retiring Employees
Director, Center for Workers’ Benefits and Capital Strategies, AFT
Building a Stronger OPERS
Pre-Retirement Seminar March 23, 2018
Retirement Plans and Mutual Funds
Other Post Employment Benefits
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
Moving into the Future 60 Years of Retirement Security.
Funding Pension Benefits for Georgia’s Educators
HRM Pension Plan Town Hall Information Sessions
Senate E-12 Finance March 19, 2018
Presented by: Director of Finance, Joseph Lillio February 5, 2019
Actuarial Audit of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth October 21, 2008.
Retirement 101 James Wilbanks, Ph.D. Retirement Administrator
Queen’s University Information Session University Pension Plan (UPP)
Retirement Information
OHIO POLICE AND FIRE HEALTH CARE
Pension Regulations Presented by David Maccoux, CPA, Shareholder
CalPERS Update & Discussion
Presentation transcript:

Building a Stronger OPERS Ohio Municipal League Annual Conference Nov. 1, 2017

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System State of OPERS Funding Update Investment Update Health Care Status Update Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) Why now? Why retirees also? Why COLA? Status Questions Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System State of OPERS – Funding Status Update Funding as of 12/31/2016 $ in B Pension Health Care* AAL $100,166 $18,711 Assets $80,280 $11,922 UAAL $19,886 $6,789 Funded Ratio 80% 64% Amortization/ Solvency 19 years 16 years Health care assets cannot be used for pension funding Ohio Public Employees Retirement System * Roll-forward of 12/31/15 AAL

State of OPERS – Funding Status Update Valuation Year Actuarial Accrued Liabilities (AAL) Valuation Assets Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liabilities (UAAL) Ratio of Assets to AAL Amortization Years Total Defined Benefit Return Unrealized Gain/(Loss) 2016 $ 100,166 $ 80,280 $ 19,886 80% 19 8.31% $ (2,766) 2015* $ 97,177 $ 78,061 $ 19,116 20 0.33% $ (3,501) 2015 $ 91,832 $ 13,771 85% 2014 $ 89,285 $ 74,865 $ 14,420 84% 21 6.96% $ 2,398 OPERS is currently anticipated to fund health care at 0% in 2018 and beyond, so no additional levers would be available to offset any reduction in the assumed rate of return. Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System State of OPERS – Funding Status Update Investment Returns (1972-2016) Negative Return 0.00%-8.00% Return 8.00+% Return Year Return 1973 -18.80% 1978 2.20% 1972 18.00% 1974 -11.90% 1979 2.87% 1975 21.40% 1977 -1.00% 1981 0.71% 1976 20.80% 1994 -0.02% 1987 1.29% 1980 9.73% 2000 -0.71% 1990 6.30% 1982 28.32% 2001 -4.58% 1992 5.66% 1983 9.64% 2002 -10.73% 1996 7.85% 1984 13.07% 2008 -26.92% 2011 0.20% 1985 25.59% 2015 -0.03% 2014 6.70% 1986 15.21%   1988 9.25% 1989 18.38% 1991 15.68% 1993 9.72% 1995 20.47% 1997 13.37% 1998 14.45% 1999 12.10% 2003 25.39% 2004 12.49% 2005 9.03% 2006 14.66% 2007 8.52% 2009 20.06% 2010 13.90% 2012 14.40% 2013 14.00% 2016 8.23% Any year less than 8.0% return is a loss Despite many years of positive returns, a $19 billion unfunded liability still exists OPERS cannot invest our way out of UAAL Market volatility calls for pragmatism in plan design Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System State of OPERS – Investment Update OPERS Investment Performance (Preliminary Returns, net of fees, as of 08/31/2017) Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System State of OPERS – Investment Update OPERS Asset Allocation Today: Since 2007, the asset structure of OPERS Investment Fund has been transformed. The changes were made to reduce the volatility of the Fund’s assets, while continuing to earn high risk-adjusted returns. This was accomplished principally by moving toward a peer group weighting in alternatives asset classes such as real estate and private equity, and moving some funds to multi-asset class strategies such as Risk Parity (which broadly owns the same asset classes found elsewhere in the asset allocation of the Fund but adjusts their portfolio weighting to balance risk). Private Alternatives: include Private Equity and Private Real Estate Public Alternatives: include Commodities, REITs, Risk Parity and Global Tactical Asset Allocation (GTAA) Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System State of OPERS – Investment Update Private Alternatives: include Private Equity and Private Real Estate Public Alternatives: include Commodities, REITs, Risk Parity and Global Tactical Asset Allocation (GTAA) Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System Health Care Update HRA Successes Educational Efforts Open Enrollment Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Cost-of-Living Adjustment State of OPERS – COLA Cost-of-Living Adjustment Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System Challenges – COLA Update Market Volatility Unfunded Liability Changing Demographics Environment - Pension Envy Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Why now?

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System COLA – Why Now Reduce $19 billion unfunded pension liability specific target not set Maintain intergenerational equity Ability to react to market volatility and life expectancy of retirees Continue to provide health care Continue to be proactive No Health Care funding beyond 2017 Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Accumulated Member Contribution Pension Benefit Paid To Date OPERS Retiree Statistics Averages Current Age % of Retirees Years of Service Years in Retirement Monthly Benefit COLA Career Contrib. Rate Accumulated Member Contribution Pension Benefit Paid To Date 90+ 2% 19 29 $1,380 $23 8.0% $28,126 $359,777 80-89 11% 20 $1,735 $33 8.3% $47,279 $359,710 70-79 26% 22 13 $2,153 $48 8.5% $75,168 $303,414 60-69 36% 24 7 $2,676 $66 8.8% $99,758 $251,487 50-59 10% 26 6 $3,195 $83 $109,018 $227,124 Below 50 & Disability 1% $2,318 $59 9.1% $53,340 $177,783 Deceased 14% $1,272 $26 $48,876 $267,718 All 100% 12 $2,260 $53 8.6% $79,337 $278,167 Retirees/beneficiary receiving pension benefit as of 8/31/2017. Deceased = beneficiary receiving benefit. Accumulated member contributions include 4%/1% interest accumulated throughout career and up to retirement. Pension benefits paid to date are nominal dollar amounts. If one considers investment losses the greatest risk to a DB plan, then loss of future contributions is the second biggest risk. The active members’ contributions to UAAL creates a trickledown destabilizing impact on the plan. The bulk of our retiree population has retired in the last 10 years. When we see these heavy waves of young retirees, long term costs of the group must be carefully considered and accounted for. All older retirees have gone through high inflation periods with little or no COLAs at times. Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Why retirees also?

Retiree & Member Levers Age & service eligibility increased Age & service calculation modified 5-year FAS CPI-based COLA Actuarial reduction factors Spiking (CBBC) Minimum earnable salary increased Disability program changes Liability cost service purchases Joint retirement/intersystem transfers Survivor benefit eligibility Medicare-Eligible Health Care & HCPP 3.0 Remaining: COLA Non-Medicare Health Care S.B. 343: Age & service retirement eligibility/calculation Final Average Salary (FAS) Cost-of-living adjustment Actuarial reduction factors for early retirement Contribution-based benefit cap (CBBC) Minimum earnable salary Disability program changes Cost of service credit purchases Intersystem transfers Enhanced refund Membership determinations

Impact of Prior Pension Changes

Why COLA?

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System Why COLA? Active member benefits have been addressed to account for increased life expectancy and elimination of subsidization of benefits and for contribution levels Source of pension UAAL remains primarily attributable to retiree population; COLA is the only pension lever Long-term, low inflation predicted to continue; current COLA outpaces inflation No additional levers remain to significantly reduce unfunded liability that do not constitute total benefit redesign Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System Historical Inflation Original COLA significantly lower than inflation = mitigated only 1.5% of 6.0% (1970) COLA predated health care – never intended to offset health care inflation In the last 30 years, COLA has tended to outpace inflation 60% of the time Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System Payments in 2016 OPERS paid $5.3 billion in pension, the COLA accounts for $1.3 billion of that amount OPERS paid $1.2 billion in health care coverage Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

COLAs at Ohio Retirement Systems COLAs at Ohio Retirement Systems All Ohio COLAs are simple, not compounded COLAs at Ohio Retirement Systems Set by Board 0% beginning 7/1/17 Previously 2% with 5-year delay after retirement STRS HPRS Set by Board annually currently 1.25% Capped at 3% Retire after 1/7/13, minimum age 60 Pre-1/7/13, minimum age 53 SERS Board authority to grant COLA based on CPI, capped at 2.5%, beginning 1/1/18 Previously a flat 3%, regardless of CPI changes 3% Currently suspended Resume in 2019 CRS 3% for those with 15 years on 7/1/13; minimum age 55 2013 new hires & lower service members = CPI, capped at 3%; eligible at age 60 3% (pre-1/7/13) % increase in CPI, capped at 3%, starting in 2019 (2/1/13) OPERS OP&F

COLA Status Update

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System COLA - Process Discuss Considerations with Stakeholders Board Discussions Collecting Data Revise Considerations Based on Input/ Feedback Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System COLA Survey Surveys Sent 194,125 Surveys Received 75,796 (37.1%) Survey Comments 29,681 Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

75,796 Surveys Received and Entered Survey Results 75,796 Surveys Received and Entered 73% think it is reasonable to align all COLAs with inflation 58% think OPERS should provide a COLA every year regardless of the System’s financial condition 56% would prefer the shortest 1-year freeze (if a freeze were imposed) 72% would prefer a lower cap over a COLA freeze 46% would prefer a lower cap of 2.5% (if a cap were imposed) *As of Sept. 27, 2017 Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System Feedback Themes Retirees feel COLA exceeding inflation is acceptable and would rather the COLA be compounding Retirees express need for COLA to offset health care expenses WEP/GPO Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System Feedback Themes Many people retired in anticipation of Senate Bill 343 Retirees recognize low inflation times but worry about possible future high inflation Given the choice, the preference for all is no additional change Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System COLA – Next Steps Update Board’s discussions: Options presented to the Board included several parts: Transitioning all COLAs based on CPI subject to a cap COLA freeze 1-5 years Ad hoc increase Transition delay Future funding triggers Changes only on actives Flat dollar amount COLA Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Board Approved CPI COLA (Cap 2.25%) CPI-based COLA capped at 2.25% 85% purchasing power restored 2-year delayed implementation for 2010-2012 retirees First COLA – delay for future retirees to second pension anniversary (24 months after retirement) plus 1-year freeze for those who rush to the door. Triggers – 30 or more years amortization = freeze Upward trigger to 3% subject to inflation/funding/amortization period

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System Questions/Feedback Ohio Public Employees Retirement System