From: Maximum likelihood difference scales represent perceptual magnitudes and predict appearance matches Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):1. doi:10.1167/17.4.1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(5):2. doi: /6.5.2 Figure Legend:
Advertisements

From: A unified Bayesian observer analysis for set size and cueing effects on perceptual decisions and saccades Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):27. doi: /
From: System gamma as a function of image- and monitor-dynamic range
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(13):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):3. doi: /4.9.3 Figure Legend:
From: Occlusion-related lateral connections stabilize kinetic depth stimuli through perceptual coupling Journal of Vision. 2009;9(10):20. doi: /
From: What are the units of storage in visual working memory?
From: Subjectively homogeneous noise over written text as a tool to investigate the perceptual mechanisms involved in reading Journal of Vision. 2013;13(11):14.
From: ERP P1-N1 changes associated with Vernier perceptual learning and its location specificity and transfer Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):19. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Event-related potentials reveal an early advantage for luminance contours in the processing of objects Journal of Vision. 2011;11(7):1. doi: /
Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(2):4. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Illumination discrimination in real and simulated scenes
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(16):13. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Temporal eye movement strategies during naturalistic viewing
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Illumination assumptions account for individual differences in the perceptual interpretation of a profoundly ambiguous stimulus in the color domain:
Figure Legend: From: Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video
From: Estimating predictive stimulus features from psychophysical data: The decision image technique applied to human faces Journal of Vision. 2010;10(5):22.
From: Hue shifts produced by temporal asymmetries in chromatic signals
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: An escape from crowding
Figure Legend: From: The color lexicon of the Somali language
From: Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Contextual effects on real bicolored glossy surfaces
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(3):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene?
Figure Legend: From: Color constancy and hue scaling
From: Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination
From: Surface color perception and equivalent illumination models
From: What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene?
Figure Legend: From: A short-term memory of multi-stable perception
Figure Legend: statistical inference
From: Perceptual entrainment of individually unambiguous motions
From: Perception of light source distance from shading patterns
Copyright © 2007 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
From: Threshold and Variability Properties of Matrix Frequency-Doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis.
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(12):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2014;14(14):2. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2007;7(11):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(10):5. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The perceptual basis of common photographic practice
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(15):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):1. doi: /4.9.1.
From: Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility
From: What predicts the strength of simultaneous color contrast?
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):13. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
Figure Legend: From: Measuring visual clutter
From: Four types of ensemble coding in data visualizations
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(3):28. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Spatial structure of contextual modulation
Figure Legend: From: The fine structure of multifocal ERG topographies
From: Objects predict fixations better than early saliency
Figure Legend: From: Eidolons: Novel stimuli for vision research
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):15. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(5):2. doi: /6.5.2 Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(3):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Motion-induced blindness and microsaccades: Cause and effect
From: Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry
Figure Legend: From: The color constancy of three-dimensional objects
Presentation transcript:

From: Maximum likelihood difference scales represent perceptual magnitudes and predict appearance matches Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):1. doi:10.1167/17.4.1 Figure Legend: Estimation of scales using MLDS with triads. (A) Hypothetical scale relating perceptual experiences Ψ(xi) to stimulus values xi. For an example stimulus triad (x2, x5, x8), observers are asked to compare which pair is more different, (x2, x5) or (x5, x8). The decision model for this example triad is Δ = [Ψ(x8) − Ψ(x5)] − [Ψ(x5) − Ψ(x2)] or Δ = Ψ(x8) − 2Ψ(x5) + Ψ (x2). (B) The weights for each term in the decision model are the covariates in a design matrix, X, in a binomial GLM. Each row in the design matrix X indicates the elements of a triad in one trial. The shaded rows are two repetitions of the same triad, which is the example triad in panel A. The design matrix contains all triads shown in one experiment. (C) Empirical scale that results from solving the GLM and obtaining the coefficients β. The coefficients correspond to the scale values at different levels of the physical variable. Error bars are estimates for the error associated with each coefficient and were obtained using bootstrap. Date of download: 11/12/2017 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2017. All rights reserved.