Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Soybean Plant Population. How Low Can We Go?. Introduction  Recent research indicates we may be planting higher populations then necessary Improved varieties.
Advertisements

Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
Introduction Cotton producers throughout Tennessee must battle glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds. The most problematic of these is Palmer amaranth, also.
Evaluation of Various Insecticide Regimes in Sweetpotato Production for Sugarcane Beetle Control in the Mid-South Larry Adams 1, Randall Luttrell 1 and.
Chad Lee © 2006 University of Kentucky 1 Wheat: Weeds & Insects Presentation by: Chad Lee, Grain Crops Extension Specialist University of Kentucky.
Soybean aphid efficacy program update 2011 ICM Conference, Ames Iowa Update on the soybean aphid efficacy program Erin Hodgson and Greg VanNostrand Department.
2011 Product Evaluation and Varietal Differences for Reniform Nematode Suppression in Mississippi Delta Sweetpotato Production Larry Adams and Randy Luttrell.
Wheat losses attributed to PM can reach 40% by affecting grain fill, root growth, and reducing test weights 1,2,3. At expected yield losses greater than.
Oklahoma State University Sorghum Headworm Sequential Sampling System Tom A. Royer Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology.
Oklahoma State University Greenbug Expert System and “Glance ‘N Go” Sampling for Cereal Aphids: Results of Field Testing Tom A. Royer Department of Entomology.
How Prices and Costs Affect IPM Paul D. Mitchell and Eileen Cullen Assistant Professors Ag and Applied Econ Entomology University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Influence of Planting Date, Harvest Date, Soil Type, Irrigation and Nematicides on Pest Numbers, Yield and Quality of Sweetpotatoes in the Mississippi.
Soybean Aphids in Iowa – Past and Present Marlin E. Rice Extension Entomologist Iowa State University.
Spacing between plants Tillers plant DAP Standard error Tillers plant DAP Standard error Tillers plant DAP Standard error Tillers plant.
Unit 12: Soybean Insects. Carefully monitor both damaging and beneficial insects through scouting Have knowledge of economic thresholds for insect damage.
WP2. Adaptability and Productivity Field Trials Results from the fourth growing period and comparison of the results recorded from the years 2003, 2004.
Peanut Tolerance to KIH-485 in Georgia E. P. Prostko and T.L Grey Department of Crop & Soil Sciences The University of Georgia APRES-2008.
Use of By-Plot CV’s for Refining Mid-Season Fertilizer N Rates Daryl Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Field evaluation of endophytes for management of Witches’ broom on cacao Rachel Melnick Anissa poleatewich Department of Plant pathology Penn State university.
Texas High Plains Canola Dr. Sangu Angadi, NMSU-Clovis Dr. Calvin Trostle, AgriLife-Lubbock SA, , CT, ,
UW MADISON AGRONOMY Impact of Cultural Practices on Soybean Aphid Incidence, Soybean Yield, and Virus Incidence John Gaska, Dr. Craig Grau, Nancy Kurtzweil,
Integrated Pest Management. Learning Objectives 1.Define IPM (Integrated or Insect Pest Management). 2.Describe why IPM is important. 3.Describe what.
Insecticide Trials Insecticide residues are of major concern in the tobacco industry. Some tobacco companies has stipulated in their contract that specific.
IPM Management Strategies for Field Corn Joyce Meader Cooperative Extension System University of Connecticut.
Insecticide Application Method and Chemistry Evaluation for Sweetpotato Production in the Mississippi Delta Larry C. Adams and Randall G. Luttrell USDA-ARS,
AGRONOMY IN SPATE IRRIGATION 5.1. AGRONOMY IN SPATE IRRIGATION Spate irrigation supports low value agriculture: Uncertainties in timing, number and sizes.
Insecticidal Control of Aphids, Impact on Lady Beetles and Yield Response Brant Baugh 1 and David Kerns 2 1 Texas AgriLife Extension Service, Lubbock Co.,
Herbicide Trials 2002 Only one herbicide trail was conducted. Conditions were dry with heavy weed pressure which can be seen by the dramatic effect of.
Almost Everything You Want to Know About Stink Bugs and What You Better Know about Roundup Ready Cotton Certified Crop Advisor Training January 22, 2002.
Effects of Postemergence Herbicides on Centipedegrass Seed Production J. A. Ferrell, T. R. Murphy, W. K. Vencill University of Georgia.
15 July 2009 INFLUENCE OF PHC SEED AND FOLIAR TREATMENTS ON IRISH POTATO GROWTH AND YIELD Summary of Rhizoctonia Data, Holland Ag Services, Washington.
Open Discussion “Stink Bug Movement, Sampling, Damage and Controls – What We Have Learned in Recent Years” 2006 GA PAC/ACAA Annual Meeting Dothan, Al February.
Dick Auld Calvin Trostle Plant & Soil Sciences Extension Agronomist
LATE SEASON N APPLICATIONS FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED WHEAT PROTEIN ENHANCEMENT. S.E. Petrie*, Oregon State Univ, B.D. Brown, Univ. of Idaho. Introduction.
Tolerance Of Staked Tomatoes Grown On Plastic Mulch To SANDEA (HALOSULFURON) Hudgins, J. E. 1, A. S. Culpepper 2, L. M. May 1,and D. E. Mcgriff 1 1 decatur.
Comparison Of cucumber plots from transplanting to harvest Location: Shaki Farm– Achituv Company: Hydrological Israel Date: 23/5/2013 May 2013 Hydrological.
Development of an Action Threshold for Spodoptera exigua in Tomatoes James E. Taylor and David G. Riley. University of Georgia, Department of Entomology,
©2005 copyright, FMC Corporation. FMC confidential. Carbine TM 50WG (flonicamid) 2006 Field Efficacy Results Craig Heim Henry R. Mitchell Yemel Ortega.
Cotton and Palmer Amaranth (AMAPA) Response to Milo-Pro Applied at-Plant and POST Lynn M. Sosnoskie and A. Stanley Culpepper UGA, Tifton, GA Jared Whitaker.
Best Management Practices by Barney Bernstein and Dr. Ron Heiniger - NCSU Smithfield recommended hybrids based on Mid-Atlantic OVT data Smithfield.
The effect of low levels of CIPC on Seed Potato Performance John Walsh Associate Principal Scientist, Potato Storage McCain Foods Limited.
Kelley Tilmon OSU Field Crop Entomologist OARDC, 120 Thorne Hall, Wooster Photo By: R. Venette.
New Peanut Cultivar Response to Paraquat Applications
Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting
Environmental Variables and Observed Field Differences in Aphid Population Change Across Geographic Locations John Gordy, Michael Brewer Texas A&M University.
Scott D. Stewart (project leader)
Tobacco Insect Management 2016 Update
SCA Sampling Protocol Results: 2016
Influences of Planting Population on Sugarcane Aphid (Melanaphis sacchari) in Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) Brittany Lipsey Mississippi State University.
Whitney D. Crow, Angus Catchot, Jeff Gore,
Leads: David Kerns and Gus Lorenz
Effects of foliar fungicide application on the growing corn plant
Tracking sugarcane aphid infestations using myFields.info in 2016
Models for estimate yield losses due to wheat rusts and powdery mildew By Dr.Gamalat Abd-Elazize& Dr. Mohamed Abdelkader Wheat Diseases Research Department.
Grain Sorghum/Sugarcane Aphid Insecticide Seed Treatment Test
Question 6: Sorghum IPM System for SCA Management
Jeff Gore Mississippi State University Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid
1Dept. of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, AL
Fig 1: Nitrogen fertilizer application at V7.
Research & Development and Product Development Update
Update on PLH Resistant Alfalfa
A number of hemipteran pests have the ability to directly
Pepper Response to Sandea
Lodging immediately after July 4, 2007 storm.
Kristopher Giles Oklahoma State University Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid
Cultivar-dependent facilitation of other aphids by M. sacchari
Ryan Gilreath Louisiana State University Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid
Pest Monitoring and Scouting in grapes
PRAB Dry Bean Research Priorities Meeting 2.19
PEANUT RESPONSE TO MULTIPLE SIMULATED OFF-TARGET
Presentation transcript:

Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting Impact of insecticide seed treatments, tolerant sorghum varieties, and planting date on population growth of sugarcane aphid and sorghum yield in the Texas Panhandle Ada Szczepaniec Texas A&M AgriLife Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting Dallas, TX, January 3 – 4, 2017

Introduction SCA in High Plains: timing of colonization, effectiveness of thresholds established in the South The goal of this research was to establish how planting date, insecticide seed treatments, and sorghum varieties affected colonization and population growth of sugarcane aphid (SCA) and sorghum yield.

Materials & Methods Replicated plots (8 rows by 50’) in Bushland, TX– each treatment was replicated four times for early and common planted sorghum Plots were scouted for aphids twice each week; once aphids colonized sorghum their density per leaf was established Insecticide (Sivanto® at 4 oz/A) was applied once densities reached the 50-125 aphids per leaf threshold Sorghum were harvested from a portion of each plot to estimate yield

SCA Densities in Early Planted Sorghum (Treated) 50-125 SCA/leaf

SCA Densities in Sorghum (Treated) Tolerant variety with insecticide seed treatment had the fewest SCA. Effective suppression was achieved when insecticide applied at 50-125 SCA/leaf.

No significant differences in yield between varieties regardless of seed treatment in early-planted sorghum

In absence of foliar insecticide treatments tolerant variety yielded better than susceptible

Tolerant variety had higher yield than susceptible var.

*

Key Learnings Planting date affects SCA densities post-insecticide treatments, yield Seed treatments had an impact on SCA and on yield when sorghum planted at common planting date Tolerant variety had significant effect on SCA densities and yield Using threshold of 50-125 SCA/leaf allowed for successful suppression of aphids

Next Steps Repeat experiments in 2017 Expand number of tolerant variants Evaluate economic threshold of SCA (post-bloom sorghum)