Domestic Travel Data AITC 2017 Conference Green Bay, WI

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Minneapolis – St. Paul Visitor Count and Profile
Advertisements

Scottish National Golf Tourism Monitor. © Sports Marketing Surveys Ltd 2 »The programme agreed with VisitScotland & the Partner Agencies for the Scottish.
What We Know of the Youth Market
Travel Research Collecting Information on Tourist Wants and Needs.
 The travel and tourism industry is the world’s largest and most diverse industry.  Many nations rely on this dynamic industry as a primary source for.
Copyright © Chmura Economics & Analytics Profile of Visitors to Tompkins County May 4, 2010.
Steamboat Springs Economic Summit 2010 The Changing Tourism Environment RRC Associates, an STR Company May 20, 2010.
Metro Region Visitor Profile Kevin Hanstad August 25, 2010.
PROJECTED RIDERSHIP OF THE HOUSATONIC RAILROAD STUDY Presented by Julie Pokela, Ph.D. August, 2010.
The Meaning of Marketing in Travel and Tourism
1 Fredericksburg/Gillespie County VISITOR TRACKING STUDY FINAL REPORT March, 2013.
2005 HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ON DOMESTIC VISITORS (HSDV)
Travel and Tourism In Maine The 2003 Visitor Study Maine Lakes and Mountains Prepared for the: Maine Office of Tourism June 2004.
HEADLINES FROM THE GREATER MANCHESTER LEISURE VISITOR SURVEY 2014.
The Tourism Industry. Terms Traveller-Anyone on a trip Traveller-Anyone on a trip anywhere, whatever the length or purpose Visitor- someone engaged in.
JerryHenry & A S S O C I A T E S FY 2005 Lake of the Ozarks Convention & Visitors Bureau Conversion Study Performance Analysis & Profile Prepared by Jerry.
MINNEAPOLIS – ST. PAUL VISITOR COUNTS AND PROFILE Kevin Hanstad September 14, 2015.
2011 Minneapolis – St. Paul Visitor Count and Profile Kevin Hanstad November 2, 2012.
Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment Martin Hall, Director, GGKM Medway’s Green Grid Forum February 2 nd 2011.
The Profile of First-time & Repeat Trips to Maine Maine Overnight Visitor Studies - Special Analytics Prepared for the: Maine Office of Tourism November.
Travel and Tourism in Maine The 2003 Visitor Study Southern Maine Coast Prepared for the: Maine Office of Tourism June 2004.
Photo Trip 1. Where are you going? Look in the “City Tourism Site” and identify what where you will go and what you will do. 1.What do you have to pay.
Chapter 1. Hospitality  Meeting the needs of guests with kindness and goodwill.
TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Social Sector Statistics Department Tourism Statistics Group
Travel and Tourism in Maine The 2003 Visitor Study Downeast & Acadia Prepared for the: Maine Office of Tourism June 2004.
Travel and Tourism in Maine 2000 Visitor Study Prepared for the: Maine Office of Tourism July 18, 2001 Top-Line Results.
Six Bells Event Jane and Neil WERU. Valleys Regional Park Six Bells One Day Event in June Six Bells Event - background The Survey – practical details.
Travel and Tourism in Maine The 2003 Visitor Study Kennebec & Moose River Valleys Prepared by the: Maine Office of Tourism June 2004.
Travel and Tourism in Maine The 2003 Visitor Study The Maine Highlands Prepared for the: Maine Office of Tourism June 2004.
Copyright ©2013 The Nielsen Company. Confidential and proprietary. Questions about the Capsicum market in Australia 6 Australian Capsicum Report Year To.
Arts & Culture Campaign % of travelers have seen or heard a Tampa Bay Arts & Culture Advertisement Tampa Bay’s Arts & Culture Campaign marketing.
Copyright ©2013 The Nielsen Company. Confidential and proprietary. Questions about the Cucumber market in Australia 6 Australian Cucumber Report Year To.
‘A Day In The Life Of Urban Canadians’. Objectives Provide insight into a typical day in the life of urban Canadians. Identify the opportunities to target.
3.01 Discuss the economic impact of tourism.
Parves Khan Andrew Gostelow 7 October 2009 Tourist Information provision A national economic impact review Tourism Management Institute National Conference.
Grey County Visitor Survey 2009
Great Britain Tourism Survey May 2016.
Great Britain Tourism Survey May 2016 Provisional results.
Yakama Nation Housing Authority
Great Britain Tourism Survey April 2017.
Great Britain Tourism Survey May 2017.
Great Britain Tourism Survey September 2015.
ASSESSMENT OF DESTINATION’S TOURISM OFFERING IN THE OFF-SEASON
2014 Marketing & Media Effectiveness Study
Ontario Cycling Tourism Statistics 2015
Householder Age and HH Composition Education and Occupation
Ontario Cultural Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Cycling Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Hunting Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Sport Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Indigenous Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Beach Tourism Statistics 2015
Marketing Track: Visitor Profile Research Cheryl Schutz, DK Shifflet
Younger Authentic Experiencers
The Economic Impact of Tourism in Kansas City
Ontario Theme Park Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Casino Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Fishing Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Skiing Tourism Statistics 2015
Innovation and the online payment realm A market study
Ontario Golf Tourism Statistics 2015
Great Britain Tourism Survey December 2016.
Tourism’s Impacts on MA
THE state of the American traveler:
Internationally Comparable Website Surveys
Ontario Trail Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Snowmobiling Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Boating Tourism Statistics 2015
Tourism Statistics Section, Trade and Services Statistics Division
MSP Regional Travel Behavior Inventory Program
Presentation transcript:

Domestic Travel Data AITC 2017 Conference Green Bay, WI September 12, 2017 Presented by Rick Cain

Methodology In 2017, we have added an activity of Visited Indian American Community. This is similar activity currently captured in the International Study. With this addition, we will be able to profile visitors to Indian American Community in total, by state, and depending on sample size by city. Each quarter, a random, projectable sample of adult members (18 years of age and over) of a major U.S. consumer panel is invited to participate in the Travel USA® survey: Selected to be representative of the U.S. adult population For the 2016 travel year, this yielded : 308,946 trips for analysis nationally: 216,738 overnight trips 92,208 day trips

Methodology – (Cont’d) Travel USA provides the following each year: Number of visitors (person trips) for day and overnight trips Source of business Demographics Month started trip Size and composition of travel party Main purpose of trip Length of trip Transportation used Accommodations used Trip planning and booking Social media usage on the trip Activities on trip Cities visited – almost 300

Methodology – (Cont’d) Expenditures Transportation to destination Transportation at destination Lodging Food and beverage Retail purchases Recreation/sightseeing/entertainment Satisfaction with trip on 7 dimensions Past visitation with destination

Methodology – (Cont’d) For day travelers, the data collected includes:   Number of visitors (person trips) Main purpose of trip Activities participated in Source of business Month of trip Size of travel party Total spending on the trip Social media usage on the trip Demographics

Methodology To provide the information you will likely receive, the rest of this presentation will examine the profile of those visiting national/state parks. The International Study has found a high correlation of respondents who visit national/state parks to those who visiting Indian American Communities. We will hone in the states of Arizona, Oklahoma, and Montana.

2016 Main Purpose of Trip - Arizona 7

2016 Main Purpose of Trip - Oklahoma 8

2016 Main Purpose of Trip - Montana 9

Length of Trip Planning in 2016 - Arizona 10

Length of Trip Planning in 2016 - Oklahoma 11

Length of Trip Planning in 2016 - Montana 12

Sources to Plan in 2016 - Arizona 13

Sources to Plan in 2016 - Oklahoma 14

Sources to Plan in 2016 - Montana 15

Size of Travel Party - Arizona Total = 3.5 Total = 3.0 16

Size of Travel Party - Oklahoma Total = 3.4 Total = 3.0 17

Size of Travel Party - Montana Total = 3.6 Total = 3.1 18

Number of Nights Spent in Arizona– Park Visitors vs. Total Visitors Average Park = 6.8 nights Total = 4.5 nights 19

Number of Nights Spent in Oklahoma – Park Visitors vs. Total Visitors Average Park = 7.5 nights Total = 3.9 nights 20

Number of Nights Spent in Montana – Park Visitors vs. Total Visitors Average Park = 9.5 nights Total = 5.8 nights 21

Top 5 Vacation Activities in 2016 Other than Visiting National/State Parks - Arizona 22

Top 5 Vacation Activities in 2016 Other than Visiting National/State Parks - Oklahoma 23

Top 5 Vacation Activities in 2016 Other than Visiting National/State Parks - Montana 24

Social Media Usage in 2016 - Arizona 25

Social Media Usage in 2016 - Oklahoma 26

Social Media Usage in 2016 - Montana 27

Expenditure Ratio – Parks to Total by State * Excludes transportation to destination 28

Observations Travelers in the target states who visit National/State Parks are more likely to: Have touring or outdoors as their main purpose of the trip Are more deliberate in their trip planning Advice from friends and destination web sites are primary trip planning sources Have a bigger travel party size Spend more nights on their trip Spend more money on their trip