Value-added education and substance use

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

An Introduction to Multicultural Education
What is the purpose of bilingual education ?
Factors That Influence How We Teach
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
How do processes within school affect educational attainment?
School Innovation in Science Formerly Science in Schools An overview of the SIS Model & supporting research Russell Tytler Faculty of Education, Deakin.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
9/12/2015 Kevin G. Tucker/University of Belize1 Meaningful Social Studies.
Townhill Primary School
A big picture for Outstanding Citizenship. Three key questions 3 How well are we achieving our aims? 1 What are we trying to achieve? 2 How do we organise.
School Influence on Sports. School Influences in PE We are all affected by our experiences of PE in school, and also the importance given to PE and sport.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
School ethos: A relevant concept for school-based health promotion research? Sherri Bisset *PhD (Cand) Public Health, Université de Montréal.
Click to add presenter’s name Click to add date Click to add venue Click to add presenter’s job title.
Professional Development for High-Poverty Schools Joseph F. Johnson, Jr., Ph.D. MSP Conference January 10, 2007 Phoenix, AZ.
EDU 402 SYLLABUS DESIGN.
Parents Information Evening Northern Ireland Curriculum.
SENJIT Code of Practice update and SEND Support Plans.
An Introduction to Multicultural Education
The role of teacher in implementing inclusive education and the initial and continuing teacher education for supporting it. Pirjo Koivula Counselor of.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Progress Monitoring National Center on Response to Intervention.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
Redefining Leadership for Inclusive Instructional Leadership: The Role of Higher Education Brian A McNulty Ph. D.
“Can’t Anybody Teach These Children?” The Case for Culturally Relevant Pedagogy Gloria Ladson-Billings University of Wisconsin-Madison.
© Crown copyright 2007 Study Plus training. © Crown copyright 2007 Aims of Study plus To accelerate the progress of pupils who are not on track to attain.
CHAPTER 7 DELIVERY OF YOUR COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAM
Methods and approaches of collecting education data
Professional Certification January 25, 2007

ANA Definition of Nursing
Standards-Based Assessment Linking up with Authentic Assessment
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
…..BECOMING AN INTERNATIONAL BACCALAUREATE SCHOOL
STEM education Science, Technologies, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) and STEM education have become the focus of considerable political, industry and.
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Impact of ATTENDING Incoming Freshmen Academy on Student Achievement
Week 12: Observation and Assessment
CENTER FOR COORDINATION OF RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITIES  (IFCU) Continuing of Education for Disadvantaged Adolescents in.
TYPES AND AIMS OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
New SEN Code of Practice
Theory of Change template
Teaching and Educational Psychology
How do processes within school affect educational attainment?
Motivation and Engagement in Learning
Lecture 4: Approaches to Health Promotion (A) Dr J. Sitali
NJCU College of Education
Health and Wellbeing.
Not Managers co-ordinators Not Subject Leadership.
VISIBLE LEARNING John Hattie.
PARENT INFORMATION SESSION
How do processes within school affect educational attainment?
Data on Child and Family Outcomes: Tools for Improving State Systems
W. Onyango-Ouma, PhD Senior Research Fellow
Statewide InD Coordinators/ December 2017
Progression and the Primary Framework
Planning October 2011.
How do processes within school affect educational attainment?
Healthy Relationships Plus Program Information
Young Lives, University of Oxford
The Organization of American Schools
Teacher Education for an Expert Profession: Current Issues
How do processes within school affect educational attainment?
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Healthy Relationship Plus Program Fourth R Parent Information
Quality Early Childhood Care and Development:
Chapter 7 The Organization of American Schools
A Socio-Cultural Approach to Curriculum Theory: Basil Bernstein
Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession EHHS Conceptual Framework
Presentation transcript:

Value-added education and substance use Wolf Markham Paul Aveyard Sherri Bisset

Talk outline Outline of the theory Application of the theory

Basis of theory The application of Nussbaum’s Aristotelian interpretation of good human functioning which includes a focus of fundamental human needs and essential human capacities Bernstein’s influential theory of cultural transmission

Bernstein's theory of cultural transmission Instructional order Regulatory order

Instructional order Focuses on ability of pupils to contribute to future production through work Aims are to relay knowledge and skills and influence pupils’ orientations to meaning

Regulatory order Focuses on the conduct, character and manner of pupils Aims to relay values and thus facilitate the attachment of pupils’ to the school and the internalisation of the values and beliefs of the school

What influences pupils’ response to the two orders Socio-cultural origins of the pupil Pupils’ friendship groups Pupils expectations including expected future occupation Pupils’ hopes and interests Pupils’ view of the purpose of the school School culture Schools’ values Schools’ hope and expectations

Classification and framing Classification refers to boundaries Framing refers to communication

Strongly classified and framed school Strong boundaries within school and between the school and the outside world High degree of specialism of teachers and subjects Celebrated hierarchies within pupil population based on e.g. age, academic attainment and sporting prowess Little pupil input into running of school

Pedagogy Teachers are viewed as the primary source of knowledge The pedagogic practice focuses on the learner The overriding concern of schooling is the instructional order and the main focus of the regulatory order is to facilitate the learner

Weakly classified and weakly framed school School has strong links with the communities it serves and with outside agencies Pupils involved in school-level decision making Integrated curriculum

Pedagogy Pupils are viewed as sources of knowledge Pupils encouraged to think that there are different ways of knowing Greater input into the selection pacing and sequencing of classroom activities

Two studies provide the data TTM-based smoking prevention/ cessation trial (1997-1999) 8352 adolescents in 52 schools aged 13-14 at baseline (Year 9) 89.1% followed up one year later 84.6% followed up two years later 3 computerised interventions in Year 9 Cross-sectional study- West Midlands Young People’s Lifestyle Survey (YPLS) 1995/6 25,781 pupils in 166 secondary schools Years 7 (11-12), 9 (13-14), and 11 (15-16)

Measuring school culture? Predicting the 5 A-Cs rate Predicting the truancy rate Gender, deprivation (Townsend, FSM, housing tenure), ethnicity

Base model + observed achievement scores 0.96 (0.91-1.02)d   OR (95%CI) OR (95%CI 2, df, p Base modelb Achievement terms 5A-C Truancy Base model + observed achievement scores 0.96 (0.91-1.02)d 0.97 (0.89-1.06)e 2.4, 2, 0.30 Base model + observed achievement scores + pupil-level risk factorsc 1.01 (0.95-1.07)d 1.01 (0.92-1.10)e 0.2, 2, 0.91 Value-added (support and control) terms High Low Base model + school culture 0.80 (0.70-0.91) 1.16 (1.07-1.27) 11.6, 1, <0.001 Base model + school culture + pupil-level risk factorsc 0.83 (0.73-0.95) 1.13 (1.04-1.24) 7.9, 1, 0.005

Does school culture influence pupils’ smoking?

Replication of the value-added terms in the trial data OR (95% confidence interval) for a 1SD increase in value-added score 0.85 (0.73 to 0.99) at one year follow up 0.80 (0.71 to 0.91) at two year follow up These effects lead to 27% fewer smokers in high value-added vs. low value-added at 2 years

Value-added effect smaller in those already smoking? Very little evidence of this At one year, OR for value added term for baseline regular smokers=0.85 and 0.85 for baseline never smokers At two years, OR for value added term for baseline regular smokers=0.87 and 0.79 for baseline never smokers