What is it? Why do we need it? When do we use it?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Learning Cycle (Kolb) RCGP Learning Unit Bath.
Advertisements

EVALUATOR TIPS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT WRITING The following slides were excerpted from an evaluator training session presented as part of the June 2011.
Standards Definition of standards Types of standards Purposes of standards Characteristics of standards How to write a standard Alexandria University Faculty.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Irish Universities Quality Board Internal Quality Assurance at Universities: The Irish perspective Dr Padraig Walsh Chief Executive Irish Universities.
The quality assurance system in Sweden Håkan Hult Linköping University Gdansk March 13, 2009.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
OHT 4.1 Galin, SQA from theory to implementation © Pearson Education Limited 2004 Software Quality assurance (SQA) SWE 333 Dr Khalid Alnafjan
Comparative Evaluation of the Impact of e- participation in Local Climate Change Policy Programs The Effectiveness of E-Participation.
REVIEW AND QUALITY CONTROL
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY
Presenter-Dr. L.Karthiyayini Moderator- Dr. Abhishek Raut
Applying the Principles of Prior Learning Assessment Debra A. Dagavarian Diane Holtzman Dennis Fotia.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Vaal University of Technology (formerly Vaal Triangle Technikon ) Ms A.J. GOZO Senior Director: Library and Information Services.
Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.
University of Warsaw The Office for Quality of Education 11th of December th of December 2008.
Paper Presented at the Standing Conference for African National and University Libraries in East, Central and Southern Africa (SCANUL – ECS), 1st and 2nd.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND THE QUALITY SPIRAL. ETQAs + SAQA SAQA NQF.
“Strategies for Effective Clinical Teaching and Evaluation” Assessment & Evaluation – (Part 2) Patricia A. Mahoney, MSN, RN, CNE This presentation is a.
Evaluation and Assessment What are they? Why do we need them? When do we use them?
The Future of Public Sector Quality Management with CAF The CAF External Feedback Procedure 2010.
 the purposes of quality assurance and accreditation  different types of quality assurance and accreditation (including rankings)
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment 1.2 Discuss approaches to auditing the capabilities and capacity of an college in or der to evaluate its readiness.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
1 Internal Audit. 2 Definition Is an independent activity established by management to examine and evaluate the organization’s risk management processes.
Looking at our School—LAOS School Development Planning Initiative.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
AN INTRODUCTION TO PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR UNDERGRADUATES.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
Novi Sad, 4-5 June 2004 Terminology and Actions in Quality Assurance Towards More Coherent Approaches Laura Grunberg UNESCO-CEPES ( (Novi.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Material produced under Phare 2006 financial support Phare TVET RO 2006/ Project financed under Phare EUROPEAN UNION MERI/ NCDTVET-PIU.
University of Warsaw. The quality of education assurance and enhancement system at the University of Warsaw.
National Lutheran School Accreditation encourages, assists, and recognizes schools that provide quality Christian education and engage in continuous improvement.
Agenda  Purpose  Processes  Deliverables  Executing Activities 4.3.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Some business of External QA: Transparency (reports), measuring impacts, follow up implementation, expected benefits, strategies for the future Josep Grifoll.
Simulation Interaction Models: A Movement in Formative Assessment MYTHS & MOVEMENTS: REIMAGINING HIGHER EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Regional Conference on Assessment:
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
8th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOPS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN AFRICA MULTIDIMENSIONS OF INNOVATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN AFRICA:
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
M-LANG project  Ref. n NO01-KA Interactive Exchange Workshop on how to use response systems and ICT tools for creating interactive learning.
Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat
Assessment in Language Teaching: part 1 Lecture # 23
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Bishkek, March 10th, 2017 Ole Espen Rakkestad, NOKUT
Preparation for SER on Mechanical Engineering Study
UNIT 6 EXTENSION PROGRAM PLANNING
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Guidelines for Self-Assessment at Program Level
Supervision and creating culture of reflective practice
Assessment Jargon The who, what, where, why, when, and how of writing end-of-the-year reports Sarah Todd Director of Institutional Research and Assessment.
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
HERE Seminar Lviv, Ukraine October, 2016
Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies
An ideal assessment programme
QPO Facilitated Faculty Led Institutional Review
The Learning Cycle (Kolb)
Session 6 2:30pm-4:00pm Site Visitor Training Facilitators:
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Quality Matters Overview
Presentation transcript:

What is it? Why do we need it? When do we use it? Evaluation What is it? Why do we need it? When do we use it?

What is evaluation? Evaluation is the process of determining significance or worth, usually by careful appraisal and study. the analysis and comparison of actual progress vs. prior plans, oriented toward improving plans for future implementation. part of a continuing management process consisting of planning, implementation, and evaluation; ideally with each following the other in a continuous cycle until successful completion of the activity. the process of determining the worth or value of something. This involves assigning values to the thing or person being evaluated.

Functions? Answers the question "How well did we do?" "How much did we do?

Types of Evaluation Internal evaluation External evaluation Preliminary evaluation Formative evaluation Summative evaluation

Internal Evaluation Internal evaluation is a process of quality review undertaken within an institution for its own ends (with or without the involvement of external peers). Internal review is something an institution does for its own purposes. From an external agency perspective, internal review is seen as the part of the external process that an institution undertakes in preparation for an external event, such as a peer-review, site visit. In such circumstances, internal review tends to be conflated with self-evaluation.

Internal and Self Evaluation Internal evaluation: Same as self-evaluation, done by a unit as a form of quality management or in preparation for external evaluation. (Campbell & Rozsnyai, 2002) Internal Evaluation/Self-Evaluation: The process of self-evaluation consists of the systematic collection of administrative data, the questioning of students and graduates, and the holding of moderated interviews with lecturers and students, resulting in a self-study report. Self-evaluation is basically a collective institutional reflection and an opportunity for quality enhancement. The resulting report further serves as a provider of information for the review team in charge of the external evaluation. (Vlãsceanu, 2004, p. 38) Campbell, C. & Rozsnyai, C., 2002, Quality Assurance and the Development of Course Programmes. Papers on Higher Education Regional University Network on Governance and Management of Higher Education in South East Europe Bucharest, UNESCO. Vlãsceanu, L., Grünberg, L., and Pârlea, D., 2004, Quality Assurance and Accreditation: A Glossary of Basic Terms and Definitions (Bucharest, UNESCO-CEPES) Papers on Higher Education, ISBN 92-9069-178-6. http://www.cepes.ro/publications/Default.htm

External Evaluation a generic term for most forms of quality review, enquiry or exploration used here as an umbrella term for all forms of quality monitoring, assessment, audit, enhancement legitimation, endorsement or accreditation (Harvey, 2002, p. 1) a process that uses people external to the program or institution to evaluate quality or standards External Evaluation is the process whereby a specialized agency collects data, information, and evidence about an institution, a particular unit of a given institution, or a core activity of an institution, in order to make a statement about its quality.

Process of External Evaluation External evaluation is carried out by a team of external experts, peers, or inspectors, and usually requires three distinct operations: In its basic format: i. analysis of the self-study report; ii. a site visit; iii. the drafting of an evaluation report (Vlãsceanu, 2004, pp. 37–38)

Preliminary Evaluation Occurs early in the process Provides a basis for expectations Based on informal observations and oral questions Looks at skills, attitudes, physical characteristics,etc. These evaluations tend to happen naturally.

Formative Evaluation According to the Thesaurus of ERIC Descriptors, formative evaluation is "evaluation that is used to modify or improve products, programs, or activities, and is based on feedback obtained during their planning and development" (p. 124).

Summative Evaluation According to the Thesaurus of ERIC Descriptors, summative evaluation is "evaluation at the conclusion of an activity or plan to determine its effectiveness" (p. 299).