Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: Schematic diagram of EGT and ECT: (a) EGT and (b) ECT

Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: The schematic diagram for engine bench testing

Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: Performances' parameters of test engine: (a) pressure, (b) PMEP, (c) temperature, (d) wastegate mass flow ratio, (e) exhaust gas energy, and (f) utilization efficiency of exhaust gas energy

Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: The tested performances of motor: (a) power versus motor model, (b) efficiency versus motor model, (c) power versus generator model, and (d) efficiency versus generator model

Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: The calibration of GT-Power steady-state model (full load): (a) torque, (b) brake efficiency, (c) exhaust energy, and (d) turbine power

Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: The simulation result of ECT engine at 5000 r/min, full load: (a) ECT output power, (b) engine power, (c) pressure, (d) engine PMEP, (e) improvement of ECT engine efficiency, and (f) ECT engine brake efficiency

Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: The recovered power from ECT: (a) power, (b) utilization efficiency of exhaust gas energy, (c) PMEP, and (d) brake efficiency

Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: The recovered power of ECT under part load: (a) ECT output power, (b) engine power, (c) pressure, (d) PMEP, (e) improvement of brake efficiency, and (f) engine brake efficiency

Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: The comparison of different turbochargers: (a) torque, (b) brake efficiency, (c) turbine inlet pressure, and (d) PMEP

Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: ECT engine performance at 5000 r/min: (a) ECT power, (b) PMEP, (c) utilization efficiency of exhaust gas energy, and (d) brake efficiency

Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: The distribution of exhaust gas energy at 5000 r/min part load: (a) BMEP = 4.9 bar, (b) BMEP = 10.1 bar, (c) BMEP = 15.9 bar, and (d) BMEP = 16.4 bar

Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: ECT engine performances at low speed: (a) torque, (b) PMEP, (c) pressure, and (d) brake efficiency

Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: ECT engine performances in the whole map: (a) ECT power, (b) the recovery efficiency of ECT, (c) turbine outlet pressure, and (d) turbine outlet temperature

Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: The calibration of GT-Power model (in-cylinder pressure): (a) in-cylinder pressure, 1000 r/min, (b) in-cylinder pressure, 2000 r/min, (c) in-cylinder pressure, 3000 r/min, (d) in-cylinder pressure, 4000 r/min, (e) in-cylinder pressure, 5000 r/min, and (f) In-cylinder pressure, 5200 r/min

Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: The maps of compressor and turbine data: (a) the compressor map and (b) the turbine map

Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of Energy-Saving Potential of Electronically Controlled Turbocharger for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Gas Energy Recovery J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112805-112805-13. doi:10.1115/1.4033535 Figure Legend: The GT-Power model of exhaust gas turbocharged engine