An improved method for estimating the efficiency of GW detectors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.
Advertisements

A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
A SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM INSPIRALING NEUTRON STARS AND BLACK HOLES Using data taken between July 2009 and October 2010, researchers from the.
Statistic for Combination of Results from Multiple Gravitational-Wave Searches Chris Pankow and Sergey Klimenko GWPAW 2011 Milwaukee, Wisconsin LIGO G v5G v5.
GWDAW /12/16 - G Z1 Report on the First Search for BBH Inspiral Signals on the S2 LIGO Data Eirini Messaritaki University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Virgo Open Data Plans October 27, 2011 Benoit Mours (LAPP-Annecy) On behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
Burst detection efficiency  In order to interpret our observed detection rate (upper limit) we need to know our efficiency for detection by the IFO and.
LIGO-G Z External Triggers Circulation only within LIGO I authorship list Status of the Triggered Burst Search (highlights from LIGO DCC# T Z,
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
Current status of Joint LIGO-TAMA Inspiral Analysis In collaboration with: Patrick Brady, Nobuyuki Kanda, Hideyuki Tagoshi, Daisuke Tatsumi, the LIGO Scientific.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
DelayRatio: A Gravitational Wave Event Physical Likelihood Estimator Based on Detection Delays and SNR Ratios Amber L. Stuver LIGO Livingston ObservatoryCalifornia.
Data Characterization in Gravitational Waves Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Golm, Germany. Talk at University of Texas, Brownsville.
Adapting matched filtering searches for compact binary inspirals in LSC detector data. Chad Hanna – For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
TAMA binary inspiral event search Hideyuki Tagoshi (Osaka Univ., Japan) 3rd TAMA symposium, ICRR, 2/6/2003.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
GRBs & VIRGO C7 run Alessandra Corsi & E. Cuoco, F. Ricci.
A High Frequency Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts In the 1 st Year of LIGO’s 5 th Science Run LIGO consists of 3 laser interferometers at 2 sites:
1 Gravitational Wave Astronomy using 0.1Hz space laser interferometer Takashi Nakamura GWDAW-8 Milwaukee 2003/12/17.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
Veto Selection for Gravitational Wave Event Searches Erik Katsavounidis 1 and Peter Shawhan 2 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139,
Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Searches for Compact Binary Coalescences in LIGO and Virgo data Gabriela González For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration APS.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
LIGO- G D Experimental Upper Limit from LIGO on the Gravitational Waves from GRB Stan Whitcomb For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Informal.
Search for Short-Duration GW Bursts Coincident with S2/S3/S4 Gamma-Ray Bursts S5 GRB-GWB Search: First Results Isabel Leonor (for External Triggers group)
LIGO-G v2 The Search For Continuous Gravitational Waves Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration The.
Searching for Binary Black Holes with Spin Aligned with Orbital Angular Momentum 1 Deborah L. Hamm – Northern Arizona University LIGO SURF 2013 Mentors:
GWDAW10, UTB, Dec , Search for inspiraling neutron star binaries using TAMA300 data Hideyuki Tagoshi on behalf of the TAMA collaboration.
First Year S5 Low Mass Compact Binary Coalescences Drew Keppel 1 representing the LIGO/VIRGO Compact Binary Coalescence Group 1 California Institute of.
LIGO-G All-Sky Burst Search in the First Year of the LSC S5 Run Laura Cadonati, UMass Amherst For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW Meeting,
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
LIGO-G v1 Searching for Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of High Mass Black Hole Binaries 2014 LIGO SURF Summer Seminar August 21 st, 2014.
November, 2009 STAC - Data Analysis Report 1 Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi Università di Urbino and INFN Firenze for the Virgo Collaboration.
Searching the LIGO data for coincidences with Gamma Ray Bursts Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
SEARCH FOR INSPIRALING BINARIES S. V. Dhurandhar IUCAA Pune, India.
24 th Pacific Coast Gravity Meeting, Santa Barbara LIGO DCC Number: G Z 1 Search for gravitational waves from inspiraling high-mass (non-spinning)
LIGO-G Z Results from LIGO Observations Stephen Fairhurst University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
GRB triggered Inspiral Searches in the fifth Science Run of LIGO Alexander Dietz Cardiff University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
Search for gravitational waves from binary inspirals in S3 and S4 LIGO data. Thomas Cokelaer on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data Thomas Cokelaer On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. LIGO-G Z.
Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data Craig Robinson On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. LIGO-G
Thomas Cokelaer for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. APS April Meeting, Jacksonville, FL 16 April 2007, LIGO-G Z Search.
Gravitational wave sources
Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi
SC03 failed results delayed FDS: parameter space searches
A 2 veto for Continuous Wave Searches
S3 Spinning Binary Black Hole Search: Status Report
Searching for gravitational-wave transients with Advanced detectors
S5 First Epoch BNS & BBH Inspiral Update
All-Sky Burst Searches for Gravitational Waves at High Frequencies
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Coherent wide parameter space searches for gravitational waves from neutron stars using LIGO S2 data Xavier Siemens, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Searching for Gravitational-Wave Bursts (GWBs) associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) during the LIGO S5 run Isabel Leonor University of Oregon (for the.
GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves
On Behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and VIRGO
L(h) = || X – A*h ||2 + hT *Ω*h
M.-A. Bizouard, F. Cavalier
Maria Principe University of Sannio, Benevento, Italy
The arrival of Gravitational Waves and the EEE network:
Excess power trigger generator
Towards the first coherent multi-ifo search for NS binaries in LIGO
OK Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University
Searching for GRB-GWB coincidence during LIGO science runs
Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates
A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data
Distributional Tests for Supernova Searches
The Method of Comparing BNS Merger Rate Estimated from Radio Afterglows from Short Gamma Ray Bursts and by Gravitational Waves my new research plan Minori.
Presentation transcript:

An improved method for estimating the efficiency of GW detectors Craig Robinson, Cardiff University Introduction and Motivation Compact binary coalescences are one of the most promising sources of gravitational waves (GWs) for the current generation of detectors such as LIGO and Virgo. There are a number of searches underway for such sources, namely the low mass search (for systems with total mass in the range 2 − 35M⊙); the high mass search (systems in the range 25 − 100M⊙); and an externally triggered search for signals in coincidence with gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). In the absence of a detection of a signal, the goal of these searches is to set an upper limit on the number of CBC events in the universe, or, in the case of the externally triggered search, to place an exclusion region on the location of the source assuming a CBC progenitor. The detection efficiency of CBC signals as a function of distance plays a crucial role in the calculation of the upper limits and exclusion regions. Thus, it is essential to get a good estimate of the efficiency. This is done by injecting fake signals into the data stream, and determining whether this signal would have been found. To get enough statistics to obtain a reliable estimate of this efficiency, we perform tens of thousands of injections, distributed across the parameter space of masses, distances, orientations, and sky locations. This is a time consuming and computationally expensive process, and can be a significant bottleneck in obtaining final search results. The current preferred method for distributing injections is uniformly in the log of the distance. Although such a distribution is useful for diagnosing potential problems in search pipelines, it is less than optimal for obtaining a measure of the efficiency, due to the placement of too many injections nearby, and too few where efficiency falls off quickly. Similarly, distributing injections uniformly in volume results in too many being placed in regions of no detection efficiency. An optimal approach would concentrate injections in the region where detection efficiency is changing quickly, with fewer injections in the region of 100% or 0% efficiency. We propose a method which attempts to place injections in the region where efficiency is changing quickly. It works by estimating the efficiency as a function of distance for a given set of mass parameters and sky location. 1 0.8 0.6 Efficiency 0.4 0.2 100 101 102 103 Effective distance / Mpc Fig. 1: Estimated efficiency for binary neutron star injections for a single detector with the initial LIGO PSD. The threshold SNR is chosen to be 5.5. Distributing the Injections We wish to place the injections such that they will be concentrated in the area where the efficiency is changing quickly. To calculate this, we need to take the derivative of the efficiency with respect to D. This is given by where k’i = dki/dD, which is where λ = σ2i / Deff,i . Using this distribution leaves one free parameter in the hands of the user: the SNR threshold in the individual detectors ρ*. This can be chosen to be the actual threshold used in a search to register a trigger in a detector; or it can be tuned to a more appropriate value if desirable. Estimating the Efficiency We will first consider how to obtain an estimate of the expected efficiency as a function of distance for a signal with parameters (m1 , m2 , ι, θ, φ, ψ). For an injection to be considered found, it must result in a trigger above a given SNR threshold ρ* in at least two interferometers. In the case of a single detector, it is more convenient to work with effective distance , defined as We define the quantity σ2 as the expected squared SNR at an effective distance of 1 Mpc. The expected squared SNR ρ2exp is therefore In the absence of a signal, ρ2 will be chi-squared distributed with 2 degrees of freedom. In the presence of a signal, ρ2 will have a non-central chi-squared distribution with 2 degrees of freedom, and non-centrality parameter ρ2exp. The cumulative form of the non-central chi-squared distribution is given by: where k is the number of degrees of freedom, λ is the non-centrality parameter, and Pχ2(k,x) is the cumulative distribution function of the standard chi-squared distribution with k degrees of freedom. The expected detection efficiency for a single detector as a function of effective distance is: In the multi-detector case, for a given sky location, inclination and polarization, the effective distance in a given detector Deff,i = Deff,i(D), where i is the label for the detector. We will define single-detector terms ki such that Given this, the efficiency for a multi-detector case is Where i and j are indices of the detectors, and N is the total number of detectors. Fig. 2: A set of binary neutron star (BNS) injections with distances chosen based on the expected efficiency to such systems. Calculated for three detectors with the Initial LIGO design noise curve. The threshold SNR ρ* was chosen to be 8. LIGO DCC No. G0901050