CoSMIR Performance during OLYMPEX

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluating Calibration of MODIS Thermal Emissive Bands Using Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer Measurements Yonghong Li a, Aisheng Wu a, Xiaoxiong.
Advertisements

Managing Data from Avian Radar Systems Edwin Herricks, PhD Siddhartha Majumdar.
1 Analysis of Airborne Microwave Polarimetric Radiometer Measurements in the Presence of Dynamic Platform Attitude Errors Jean Yves Kabore Central Florida.
Scanner Characteristics
Sea water dielectric constant, temperature and remote sensing of Sea Surface Salinity E. P. Dinnat 1,2, D. M. Le Vine 1, J. Boutin 3, X. Yin 3, 1 Cryospheric.
Technical improvements and possibilities to observe solar oscillations with the small Metsähovi radiotelescope Juha Kallunki Metsähovi.
Remote Sensing of Mesoscale Vortices in Hurricane Eyewalls Presented by: Chris Castellano Brian Cerruti Stephen Garbarino.
This poster concerns the on-orbit validation of the antenna beam pointing and corresponding instantaneous field of view (IFOV) earth location for the CONAE.
Use of TRMM for Analysis of Extreme Precipitation Events Largest Land Daily Rainfall (mm/day)
Hurricane Imaging Radiometer (HIRAD) Daniel J. Cecil (PI), Carl Benson (LSE) NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Sayak K. Biswas Universities Space Research.
Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite Project LCROSS Site Selection Workshop Oct , 2006 NASA/ARC, Mountain View, California LCROSS Orbital.
1 Pre-decisional / For Planning Purposes Only7/5/2010.
MICROWAVE TEMPERATURE PROFILER (mTP)
Initial Results on the Cross- Calibration of QuikSCAT and Oceansat-2 Scatterometers David G. Long Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Brigham.
EECS 823 MACHARIA.  Four-frequency, linearly-polarized, passive microwave radiometric system which measures atmospheric, ocean and terrain microwave.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R Goddard Lidar Observatory for Winds (GLOW) Wind Profiling from the Howard University Beltsville Research.
Namaste Project 3.4 GHz Interference Study Preliminary document - Work in Progress updated The intent of this study is to collect data which may.
Different Coverage Patterns for a Single Satellite and Constellation of Satellites in Real Time with the STK Pedro A. Capó-Lugo Graduate Student Dr. Peter.
Yimin Ji - Page 1 October 5, 2010 Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Precipitation Processing System (PPS) Yimin Ji NASA/GSFC,
An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen.
Z. P. Szewczyk GIST 25, Oct Recent Field Campaigns with CERES Instruments Z. Peter Szewczyk Kory J. Priestley Lou Smith Remote Sensing of Clouds.
7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 AMIRAS campaign Fernando Martin-Porqueras.
CERES on Terra & Aqua validation and participation in SCALES Z. Peter Szewczyk G. Louis Smith The GIST 19, RAL 08/27-29, 2003.
EMIRAD Data coSMOS2 campaign. coSMOS2 campaign objectives Validation of SMOS SM L2 prototype processor Assimilation of root zone moisture Investigation.
Improved Geo-location Accuracy For POES Imagery 11 December 2002 NOAA/NESDIS Office of Satellite Operations Office of Systems Development Peter Phillips.
Status of calibration and data evaluation of AMSR on board ADEOS-II Keiji Imaoka a, Yasuhiro Fujimoto a, Misako Kachi.
An Intercalibrated Microwave Radiance Product for Use in Rainfall Estimation Level 1C Christian Kummerow, Wes Berg, G. Elsaesser Dept. of Atmospheric Science.
Aquarius Algorithm Workshop Santa Rosa, CA 9 March 2010 College of Engineering Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic & Space Sciences Chris Ruf University.
Frank J. LaFontaine 1, Robbie E. Hood 2, Courtney D. Radley 3, Daniel J. Cecil 4, and Gerald Heymsfield 5 1 Raytheon Information Solutions, Huntsville,
First Tropical Cyclone Overflights by the Hurricane Imaging Radiometer (HIRAD) Chris Ruf 1, Sayak Biswas 2, Mark James 3, Linwood Jones 2, Tim Miller 3.
Design Features of a Boresighted GPM Core Radiometer Christopher S. Ruf Dept. of Atmospheric, Oceanic & Space Sciences University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,
Comparison of OMI NO 2 with Ground-based Direct Sun Measurements at NASA GSFC and JPL Table Mountain during Summer 2007 George H. Mount & Elena Spinei.
CCAR / University of Colorado 1 Airborne GPS Bistatic Radar in CLPX Dallas Masters University of Colorado, Boulder Valery Zavorotny NOAA ETL Stephen Katzberg.
Mapping Greenland Using NASA’s Full- Waveform, Medium/High-Altitude, LVIS Lidar System: Potential 2009 Coverage and Expected Performance Michelle Hofton.
Orbital Analysis for Inter-Calibration Dave Mac Donnell Brooke Anderson Bruce Wielicki Don Garber NASA Langley Research Center Solar Workshop January 30,
Aquarius Level 0-to-1A Processing Rule #1: save everything from the Level 0 data. Rule #2: never forget Rule #1! The objective is to ensure that the Level.
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya CORRECTION OF SPATIAL ERRORS IN SMOS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IMAGES L. Wu, I. Corbella, F. Torres, N. Duffo, M. Martín-Neira.
Rev 131 Enceladus’ Plume Solar Occultation LW Esposito and UVIS Team 14 June 2010.
GPM Inter-Calibration Update Rachael Kroodsma UMD ESSIC / NASA GSFC Kroodsma GSICS meeting 2015/01/131.
Karen Kosiba, Josh Wurman, Stacy Brodzik, Andrew Frambach
Current Status and Lessons from TRMM/GPM XCAL Calibration Activities
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
RENISH THOMAS (GPM) Global-Precipitation- Mapper
Precipitation Classification and Analysis from AMSU
Lunar observation data set preparation
Two-Dimensional Kinematics
Module 5. Functions and protocols of surveillance systems Topic 5. 4
GPM Microwave Radiometer Vicarious Cold Calibration
# A51I-3155 Sensitivity of Forward Radiative Transfer Model on Spectroscopic Assumptions and Input Geophysical Parameters at 23.8 GHz and 183 GHz Channels.
Huailin Chen, Bruce Gentry, Tulu Bacha, Belay Demoz, Demetrius Venable
VIRTIS Operations at Lutetia
Calibration Activities of GCOM-W/AMSR2
Using SCIAMACHY to calibrate GEO imagers
AIRS (Atmospheric Infrared Sounder) Instrument Characteristics
Requirements for microwave inter-calibration
Methodology for 3D Wind Retrieval from HIWRAP Conical Scan Data:
Data Preparation for ASTER
An Update on the Activities of the Precipitation Measurement Missions (i.e. TRMM/GPM) XCAL Team PMM XCAL Team Wesley Berg, Rachael Kroodsma, Faisal Alquaeid,
Frank Wentz and Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems, Santa Rosa CA, USA
Coexistence Issues for Passive Earth Sensing from GHz: Update
NOAA GSICS Processing and Research Center
S-NPP Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Lunar Calibration using GSICS Implementation of the ROLO model (GIRO) for Reflective Solar Bands.
Lunar Observation Data for GIRO Landsat–8 Operational Land Imager
Validation of airborne 1
Calibration and Validation of Microwave Humidity Sounder onboard FY-3D Satellite Yang Guo, Songyan Gu NSMC/CMA Mar
Chapter 2 – Mapping Our World
Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Satellite
MODIS Airborne Simulator (MAS),
Remote sensing in meteorology
Presentation transcript:

CoSMIR Performance during OLYMPEX Rachael Kroodsma rachael.a.kroodsma@nasa.gov UMD ESSIC / NASA GSFC OLYMPEX Workshop - Seattle, WA March 21-23, 2017 Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop

Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop Outline Brief CoSMIR description Instrument characteristics Improvements since IPHEX Performance during OLYMPEX Data outages Issues encountered Data Analysis Geolocation Comparisons with GMI Data Description Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop

Instrument Characteristics Conical and cross-track scanning total power radiometer Off-nadir angle 49.2° Similar channels as GMI (high frequency) Frequency (GHz) 50.3 52.8 89.0 165.5 183.31±1 183.31±3 183.31±7 Polarization H V/H Sensitivity (K) 0.42 0.40/0.30 0.80/0.45 0.53 0.43 0.41 Scan Geometry Conical scan Footprint 1.3x1.9 km* Azimuth -60° to 60° (51 samples) 3 seconds to complete scan Cross track scan Footprint 0.8x0.8 km at nadir* Elevation -49.2° to 49.2° (51 samples) 2 seconds to complete scan *DC-8 cruising altitude of 11.8 km Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop

Scanning Geometry Two conical and two cross-track scans are alternately performed every cycle with hot and cold target looks after each scan. Cold Cold Scan Direction Cold Cold Conical 2 Hot Crosstrack 1 Hot Conical 1 Hot Hot Crosstrack 2 Scan Direction Flight Direction CoSMIR scan pattern for one complete cycle where the azimuth rotates once and the elevation twice. Corresponding 89V counts shown for a flight. CoSMIR ground track for one cycle. Aircraft ground speed 200 m/s and altitude 11.8 km. Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop

Improvements since IPHEX Several modifications were made since the last campaign (IPHEX in 2014) to make CoSMIR more reliable Power system now has a custom board to improve instrument grounding and reduce noise Thermal system now uses chip heaters to better control temperature 166 GHz receiver redesigned with newer technology Mechanical layout redesigned to make it more robust Instrument tested in thermal chamber prior to flight Detected issue with motion control and fixed Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop

CoSMIR Performance During OLYMPEX Overall, CoSMIR operated extremely well for most of the campaign Total data collected: 72 hours, 8 minutes Total data lost: approx. 4 hours Nominal operation: all channels operated for entire flight with CoSMIR in hybrid scan mode Cross-track mode only: first three flights operated only in cross-track until azimuth scan was fixed Hot target power supply: issues with power supply on plane caused computer outages and gain increases Some flights lost 52 and/or 50 GHz channels part way Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop

CoSMIR data collected (UTC) Date (UTC) CoSMIR data collected (UTC) GPM overpass (UTC) CoSMIR performance notes 11/5/2015 20:04-22:38 -- Nominal operation Engineering test flight out of Palmdale, CA 11/12/2015 16:09-22:17 21:16 Cross-track mode only 11/13/2015 13:56-19:29 11/14/2015 17:13-23:17 21:06 11/18/2015 18:29-00:06 11/23/2015 15:57-21:40 11/24/2015 14:40-19:34 18:36 Hot target power supply issue 11/25/2015 17:24-19:15 17:43 Lost 52 GHz channel after 18:20 due to gain increase 12/1/2015 20:59-01:25 Hot target power supply issue Lost 52 GHz channel after 22:43 Lost 50 GHz channel after 00:15 12/3/2015 14:33-16:59 15:22 Hot target power supply issue Lost 52 GHz channel after 16:05 12/4/2015 13:27-17:31 Fixed hot target power supply issue 12/5/2015 14:18-15:38 15:13 Lost 52 GHz channel after 15:08 Lost 50 GHz channel after 15:31 Lost connection with archive computer at 15:38 12/8/2015 14:08-16:33 17:44-19:24 14:11 Lost 52 GHz channel after 14:36. Lost connection with archive computer at 16:33 Rebooted successfully but hot target temperature not recorded for the rest of the flight 12/10/2015 14:58-15:55 16:34-19:18 Lost connection with archive computer at 15:55. Rebooted successfully but hot target temperature not recorded for the rest of the flight 12/12/2015 15:52-21:15 12/13/2015 13:54-18:15 12/18/2015 04:57-07:04 12/19/2015 01:32-03:22 2:54 Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop

Quicklook Plot Example 12/3/2015 Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop

Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop Some Pictures Credit: NASA NASA DC-8 CoSMIR CoSMIR mounted on DC-8 Credit: NASA Onboard operations 12/4/2015 flight paths Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop

Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop Geolocation CoSMIR has an azimuth mounting offset. This offset was estimated and confirmed using Google Earth to plot TBs at coastlines. 11/18 flight 11/25 flight 89H TBs at coastlines look accurate Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop

GPM Overpass: Comparisons with GMI Channel GMI 89.0 V/H 166.0 V/H 183.31±3 V 183.31±7 V CoSMIR 165.5 V/H 183.31±3 H 183.31±7 H EIA (nominal) 52.8 49.2 49.3 Footprint (km) 4.4x7.2 4.1x6.3 3.8x5.8 1.3x1.9 11/25 clear air flight Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop

GPM Overpass: Comparisons with GMI 183.31±3 183.31±7 GMI vs. CoSMIR TBs by channel and date. CoSMIR TBs are averaged over a GMI footprint. Locations of GMI/CoSMIR match-ups Channel 89V 89H 166V 166H 183.31±3 183.31±7 GMI-CoSMIR mean TB (K) 2.2 -0.5 1.9 1.1 3.8 Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop

Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop Data Description olympex_cosmir_YYYYMMDD_conical_v1.hdf5 olympex_cosmir_YYYYMMDD_crosstrack_v1.hdf5 HDF5 files with 3 groups Aircraft: altitude, heading, latitude, longitude, pitch, roll, speed Interpolated to CoSMIR pixels Cosmir: azimuth, elevation, incidence angle, latitude, longitude, TB Time: year, month, day of month, hour, minute, second, millisecond Quicklook plots also available Kroodsma OLYMPEX Workshop