15TH WORKSHOP ON MHD STABILITY CONTROL

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
November 3-5, 2003Feedback Workshop, Austin NORMAL MODE APPROACH TO MODELING OF FEEDBACK STABILIZATION OF THE RESISTIVE WALL MODE By M.S. Chu(GA), M.S.
Advertisements

DPP 2006 Reduction of Particle and Heat Transport in HSX with Quasisymmetry J.M. Canik, D.T.Anderson, F.S.B. Anderson, K.M. Likin, J.N. Talmadge, K. Zhai.
Physics of fusion power
Results from Visible Light Imaging of Alfvén Fluctuations in the H-1NF Heliac J. Read, J. Howard, B. Blackwell, David Oliver, & David Pretty Acknowledgements:
HEAT TRANSPORT andCONFINEMENTin EXTRAP T2R L. Frassinetti, P.R. Brunsell, M. Cecconello, S. Menmuir and J.R. Drake.
MCZ Equilibrium and Stability of High-  Plasmas in Wendelstein 7-AS M.C. Zarnstorff 1, A. Weller 2, J. Geiger 2, E. Fredrickson 1, S. Hudson.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10 : Running a discharge / diagnostics.
Physics of Fusion power Lecture 7: Stellarator / Tokamak.
49th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2007, Orlando, Florida Ion Temperature Measurements and Impurity Radiation in.
托卡马克的平衡计算 李国强 四室学术报告. Introduction Decompose the physics problem by the orders (time order and space order) Traditional decomposition of plasma.
N=4,m=0 n=4,m=1 n=8,m=0 The HSX Experimental Program Program F. Simon B. Anderson, D.T. Anderson, A.R. Briesemeister, C. Clark, K.M.Likin, J. Lore, H.
Profile Measurement of HSX Plasma Using Thomson Scattering K. Zhai, F.S.B. Anderson, J. Canik, K. Likin, K. J. Willis, D.T. Anderson, HSX Plasma Laboratory,
Excitation of ion temperature gradient and trapped electron modes in HL-2A tokamak The 3 th Annual Workshop on Fusion Simulation and Theory, Hefei, March.
Plasma Dynamics Lab HIBP E ~ 0 V/m in Locked Discharges Average potential ~ 580 V  ~ V less than in standard rotating plasmas Drop in potential.
The toroidal current is consistent with numerical estimates of bootstrap current The measured magnetic diagnostic signals match predictions of V3FIT Comparisons.
12/03/2013, Praga 1 Plasma MHD Activity Observations via Magnetics Diagnostics: Magnetic island Analysis Magnetic island Analysis Frederik Ostyn (UGent)
QSH/SHAx states: towards the determination of an helical equilibrium L. Marrelli acknowledging fruitful discussions with S.Cappello, T.Bolzonella, D.Bonfiglio,
1 Confinement Studies on TJ-II Stellarator with OH Induced Current F. Castejón, D. López-Bruna, T. Estrada, J. Romero and E. Ascasíbar Laboratorio Nacional.
DIFFER is part ofand Modelling of ECCD applied for NTM stabilization E. Westerhof FOM Institute DIFFER Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research.
Work with TSC Yong Guo. Introduction Non-inductive current for NSTX TSC model for EAST Simulation for EAST experiment Voltage second consumption for different.
FEC 2006 Reduction of Neoclassical Transport and Observation of a Fast Electron Driven Instability with Quasisymmetry in HSX J.M. Canik 1, D.L. Brower.
1 Stability Studies Plans (FY11) E. Fredrickson, For the NCSX Team NCSX Research Forum Dec. 7, 2006 NCSX.
Cheng Zhang, Deng Zhou, Sizheng Zhu, J. E. Menard* Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, P.O. Box 1126, Hefei , P. R. China *
MCZ Active MHD Control Needs in Helical Configurations M.C. Zarnstorff 1 Presented by E. Fredrickson 1 With thanks to A. Weller 2, J. Geiger 2,
47th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 24-28, 2005, Denver, Colorado ECE spectrum of HSX plasma at 0.5 T K.M.Likin, H.J.Lu, D.T.Anderson,
52 nd APS-DPP Annual Meeting, November, 8-12, 2010, Chicago, IL Plasma Pressure / BJ Contours Poloidal dimension Radial dimension Toroidal Angle (rad)
52nd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2010, Chicago, Illinois Non-symmetric components were intentionally added to the.
1) For equivalent ECRH power, off-axis heating results in lower stored energy and lower core temperature 2) Plasma flow is significantly reduced with off-axis.
51 st APS-DPP Annual Meeting, 2-6 November 2009, Atlanta GA Time BθBθ Φ≈ 1/6 FP Φ≈1/2 FP J Pfirsh-Schlüter Poloidal Index BθBθ.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2010, Salt Lake City, Utah 5-pin Langmuir probe configured to measure the Reynolds.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2011, Salt Lake City, Utah When the total flow will move approximately along the.
Simulation of Turbulence in FTU M. Romanelli, M De Benedetti, A Thyagaraja* *UKAEA, Culham Sciance Centre, UK Associazione.
4. Neoclassical vs Anomalous Transport: Crucial Issue for Quasisymmetric Stellarators Overview of HSX Experimental Program J.N. Talmadge, A. Abdou, A.F.
Presented by Yuji NAKAMURA at US-Japan JIFT Workshop “Theory-Based Modeling and Integrated Simulation of Burning Plasmas” and 21COE Workshop “Plasma Theory”
51st Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 2 - 6, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia ∆I BS = 170 Amps J BS e-root J BS i-root Multiple ambipolar.
Plasma Turbulence in the HSX Stellarator Experiment and Probes C. Lechte, W. Guttenfelder, K. Likin, J.N. Talmadge, D.T. Anderson HSX Plasma Laboratory,
Effects of Symmetry-Breaking on Plasma Formation and Stored Energy in HSX Presented by D.T. Anderson for the HSX Team University of Wisconsin-Madison 2001.
56th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 27 – October 31, 2014, New Orleans, LA Increase ion temperature with neutral beams: Study.
Flows Move Primarily Along the Helical Direction of Symmetry Geometric factors are used to relate the measured velocities to the average flow in the symmetry.
54th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics, October 29 – November 2, 2012, Providence, Rhode Island 3-D Plasma Equilibrium Reconstruction.
Electron Cyclotron Heating in the Helically Symmetric Experiment J.N. Talmadge, K.M. Likin, A. Abdou, A. Almagri, D.T. Anderson, F.S.B. Anderson, J. Canik,
18 th Int’l Stellarator/Heliotron Workshop, 29 Jan. – 3 Feb. 2012, Canberra – Murramarang Reserve, Australia Recent Results and New Directions of the HSX.
Hard X-rays from Superthermal Electrons in the HSX Stellarator Preliminary Examination for Ali E. Abdou Student at the Department of Engineering Physics.
57th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , Savannah, Georgia Equilibrium Reconstruction Theory and Modeling Optimized.
Profiles of density fluctuations in frequency range of (20-110)kHz Core density fluctuations Parallel flow measured by CHERS Core Density Fluctuations.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
54th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 29 – November 2, 2012, Providence, Rhode Island 5-pin Langmuir probe measures floating potential.
48th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 30 – November 3, 2006, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Energetic-Electron-Driven Alfvénic Modes.
U NIVERSITY OF S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY OF C HINA Influence of ion orbit width on threshold of neoclassical tearing modes Huishan Cai 1, Ding Li 2, Jintao.
Reconnection Process in Sawtooth Crash in the Core of Tokamak Plasmas Hyeon K. Park Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Korea National.
Measurements of Reynolds stress flow drive and radial electric fields in the edge of HSX Bob Wilcox HSX Plasma Laboratory University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Neoclassical Currents and Transport Studies in HSX at 1 T
Ringberg Theory Meeting
Neoclassical Predictions of ‘Electron Root’ Plasmas at HSX
J.C. Schmitt, J.N. Talmadge, J. Lore
CREC in the AC operation theory via simulation and experiment
0.5 T and 1.0 T ECH Plasmas in HSX
Reduction of Neoclassical Transport and Observation of a Fast Electron Driven Instability with Quasisymmetry in HSX J.M. Canik1, D.L. Brower2, C. Deng2,
Spontaneous rotation in stellarator and tokamak
Magnetic fluctuation measurements in HSX and its impact on transport
Characteristics of Edge Turbulence in HSX
Overview of Recent Results from HSX
Studies of Bias Induced Plasma Flows in HSX
Application of SIESTA to Island Formation in HSX
First Experiments Testing the Working Hypothesis in HSX:
Targeted Physics Optimization in HSX
Yasuhiro Suzuki for the LHD experiment group
M.Yokoyama (National Institute for Fusion Science)
Stabilization of m/n=1/1 fishbone by ECRH
20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference,
Presentation transcript:

15TH WORKSHOP ON MHD STABILITY CONTROL Measurement, Reconstruction and Modeling of Equilibrium Currents in the HSX Stellarator J.C. Schmitt, J.N.Talmadge, J.Lore 15TH WORKSHOP ON MHD STABILITY CONTROL 15-17 November, 2010 Madison, WI

Toroidal current is predominantly bootstrap-driven Electron Cyclotron Resonance Heating 1st Harmonic Ordinary-mode Perpendicular launch No ohmic drive Toroidal current reverses with B-field direction Bootstrap current induces toroidal current with long decay times: τη||/μ0 ≥ τEXP Net Toroidal Plasma Current Ne = 3 ρECRH = +0.18 (OB) BCCW 50 kW ECH BCW

Equilibrium Currents with Quasi-Helical Symmetry Pfirsch-Schlüter current rotates with the |B| contours. Bootstrap current is in the opposite direction and reduced compared to a tokamak. The evolving current profile is modeled with a diffusion equation using a 3D susceptance matrix. V3FIT calculates the expected signal response for an array of magnetic diagnostics. V3FIT reconstructs the pressure and current profiles based on the magnetic diagnostics signals.

Bootstrap current depends on Er Te Ne JBS e-root Multiple ambipolar solutions JBS i-root Ti Te, Ne from Thomson Scattering. Ti from ChERS. Zeff ≈ 1 from Bremsstrahlung radiation (ChERS optics). PENTA1 calculates the fluxes. Er is determined by ambipolarity. The electron-root reverses the direction of the bootstrap current. 1 D.A. Spong, Phys. Plasmas 12, 056114 (2005).

Toroidal current evolves during shot 50 kW ECH JBS e-root -60 A ∆IBS = 304 Amps JBS i-root -364 A If electron-root dominates: IBS = -60 A If ion-root dominates: IBS = -364 A The measured net current is between the predicted limits of the ion- and e-roots. The extrapolated steady state value is -345 A. τL/R ~ 40ms.

Modeling the Evolution of the Toroidal Current 3D susceptance matrix links toroidal and poloidal currents and magnetic fluxes2 S12 = S21 = 0 for Tokamaks S11 ≈ S12 ≈ S21 for HSX 1-D diffusion equation for rotational transform Boundary conditions Finite current density on axis: iota @ LCFS set by measurement: Any non-inductive source 2 P. I. Strand and W. A. Houlberg, Phys. Plasmas 8, 2782 (2001).

V3FIT3 Calculates the Magnetic Diagnostics Signals Diagnostic set includes two Rogowski coils, two flux loops , 32 dB/dt sensors and the limiter location. VMEC is the equilibrium solver. The plasma pressure, toroidal current profile and net toroidal flux are specified with up to 9 free parameters. For reconstruction, V3FIT adjusts the parameters to minimize the difference between the measured and modeled signals. Thanks to James Hanson and Steve Knowlton for the assistance in using V3FIT 3 Nucl. Fusion 49 (2009) 075031. Φ=1/2 Field Period Φ=0 (symmetry plane)

The Pfirsch-Schlüter current rotates helically Φ≈ 1/6 Field Period Φ≈1/2 Field Period 8 Poloidal Index 16 1 17 32 18 25 26 4 12 Bθ Br Red Contours: JPS OUT OF PLANE Blue Contours: JPS IN TO PLANE The plasma pressure profile is calculated and used in V3FIT to find the magnetic response due to the Pfirsch-Schlüter current. The net toroidal current is set to 0.

A ‘dipole-like’ response is predicted for the case of no net toroidal current Φ≈ 1/6 Field Period Φ≈1/2 Field Period 8 Poloidal Index 16 1 17 32 18 25 26 4 12 Bθ Br The sign of the signals at the two toroidal locations demonstrate a phase shift showing the helical rotation. Br ≈ 1/2 FP Br ≈ 1/6 FP Bθ Bθ Poloidal Index Poloidal Index

Bootstrap Current Contributes Little to Br Early in Shot The toroidal current profile is simulated in time and the diagnostic response is predicted with V3FIT. A small net toroidal current (40 A) contributes to the Bθ component. Br ≈ 1/2 FP Br ≈ 1/6 FP Bθ Bθ P.S. only tsim=8 ms Poloidal Index Poloidal Index

Confirmation of the Helical Rotation of the Pfirsch-Schlüter Current The experimental signals at t=8ms agree well with theory in terms of the sign and phase. Good agreement in magnitude. Reconstruction with V3FIT may resolve the differences. Br ≈ 1/2 FP Br ≈ 1/6 FP Bθ tsim=8 ms Bθ P.S. only P.S. only tsim=8 ms Poloidal Index Poloidal Index

Later in Time, the Largest Signals are from Bootstrap Current Simulated profiles at 25ms and 50ms. Bθ has large unidirectional contribution from <J∙B>. Br is dominated by the m=2 structure of the vacuum vessel. Br Br 25 ms Bθ Bθ 50 ms Poloidal Index Poloidal Index

Measured signals are close to the simulated ones Measurement evolves slightly faster than simulated values. Possible sources of error: Zeff, initial plasma profiles, neoclassical calculation of bootstrap current. The pressure profile and evolved current profile serve as an ‘initial guess’ in the V3FIT reconstruction attempt. Br Br 50 ms 50 ms Bθ Bθ Poloidal Index Poloidal Index

The reconstruction minimizes the mismatch between the measured and modeled signals Pressure profile becomes wider; Current density is shifted radially outward. Posterior sigmas are large: Need to reduce the # of free parameters in the model. Initial guess in blue Reconstruction in red Br Br 50 ms 50 ms Bθ Bθ Poloidal Index Poloidal Index

Toroidal Currents with Quasi-Helical Symmetry The direction of the bootstrap current is reversed and reduced by ~1/3 compared to an equivalent tokamak (same iota, Rmajor, rminor). This results in a reduction in rotational transform. The Pfirsch-Schlüter current rotates with |B| contours and is reduced by ~1/3 compared to a tokamak, demonstrating the lack of toroidal curvature. The evolving current profile is modeled with a diffusion equation using a 3D susceptance matrix. Expected magnetic diagnostic signal are calculated with V3FIT. Continue to improve the V3FIT reconstruction. e.g., Reduce the # of free parameters in the reconstruction to achieve reasonable uncertainties in the profiles.