Physics with the HFT prototype?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intermediate Silicon Tracker For STAR HFT Upgrade Yaping Wang 1, 3, Gerrit J. van Nieuwenhuizen 2, Zhenyu Ye 1, 3 for the STAR Collaboration 1 University.
Advertisements

High Level Trigger (HLT) for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
HFT Technical Overview September 26, HFT 2013 TPC FGT 2011 STAR Detectors Fast and Full azimuthal particle identification EMC+EEMC+FMS (-1 ≤ 
Explore QCD Emerging Property
STAR Heavy Flavor Tracker
STAR Heavy Flavor Tracker
Terzo Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE - LNF, Andrea Dainese 1 Preparation for ITS alignment A. Dainese (INFN – LNL) for the ITS alignment group.
HFT PXL Mechanical WBS 1.2 March 2010 Howard Wieman LBNL 1.
The Heavy Flavor Tracker (HFT) The Silicon Vertex Upgrade of RHIC Spiros Margetis Kent State University, USA Excited QCD 2010, Slovakia.
Heavy Flavor Physics in HIC with STAR Heavy Flavor Tracker Yifei Zhang (for the STAR HFT Group) Hirschegg 2010, Austria Outline:  Physics motivation 
H eavy F lavor T racker : a silicon inner tracking upgrade for STAR Jonathan Bouchet (Kent State University) for the STAR collaboration Poster 907, April.
1 Jim Thomas – The Berkeley Lab Three Abstracts for QM 2011 Instrumentation Session The Heavy Flavor Tracker (HFT) The Muon Telescope Detector (MTD) A.
Topological D-meson Reconstruction with STAR Using the Silicon Vertex Tracker (SVT) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University SVT review, BNL, July 7 th /8.
STAR J/  Simulations for RUN III Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Analysis Meeting at BNL October 23, 2002.
SSD Operations Manual March 2014 SSD: 4 th layer of vertex detector Heavy Flavor Tracker Silicon Strip Detector – Operations Manual PXL Inserted from this.
JT 1 Pointing with the IST Detectors at the vertex in p-p and Au-Au Collisions Jim Thomas Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory July 12 th, 2007.
Jim Thomas - LBL 1 HFT Performance & Simulation Studies Experience Gained by Simulating One Track at a Time Jim Thomas Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
HFT geometry in Run-13 Spiros Margetis Review goals The possible configuration(s) Beyond engineering Realistic goals; physics and not What is this geometry.
Performance requirements High-Level Key Performance Parameters (KPP) The high-level KPPs cannot be directly measured without beam. The capability to achieve.
Simulation issue Y. Akiba. Main goals stated in LOI Measurement of charm and beauty using DCA in barrel –c  e + X –D  K , K , etc –b  e + X –B 
9/26/11HFT soft meeting, BNL1 Chain analysis fz file MuDst.root minimc.root geant.root event.root McEvent.root StMiniMcMaker StAssociationMaker : STAR.
HFT + TOF: Heavy Flavor Physics Yifei Zhang University of Science & Technology of China Lawrence Berkeley National Lab TOF Workshop, Hangzhou, April,
Spiros Margetis (Kent State Univ.) for the STAR Collaboration STAR Heavy Flavor Tracker Bari, Italy 2014.
Nu Xu1/16STAR Collaboration Meeting, Nov. 12 – 17, 2010, BNL, USA STAR Experiment at RHIC: - Physics Programs - Management Issues Nu Xu.
STAR Physics Program with the TOF Nu Xu for the STAR Collaboration Nuclear Science Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
1 Jim Thomas - LBL HFT Issues that may Bear on the Fate of the SSD & SVT presented by Jim Thomas 07/07/2006.
Open charm hadron production via hadronic decays at STAR
Y.Fisyak, BNL - STAR Upgrade workshop, 12/2/ Integrated Tracker – STAR tracking framework of the future update on  status and  perspective IT(TF)
A Silicon vertex tracker prototype for CBM Material for the FP6 Design application.
L. Greiner 1IPHC meeting – May 7, 2012 STAR HFT Plans for the next year A short report on HFT/PXL plans for post May 2012 TPC – Time Projection Chamber.
HFT-prototype BUR considerations for Run-13 The main goal of the HFT engineering run will be system verification and correction; this includes the study.
STAR Electro-magnetic Physics Status and Future Aspect Guoji Lin (Yale) For STAR Collaboration RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting, BNL, June 5-9.
HFT-prototype BUR considerations (Quantitative) What physics is possible in Run-13 assuming some (prototype) sectors are there? Relates to how long would.
Year -2 topics simulations needs for these Barbara Jacak March 2, 2001.
FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
2007 Run Update for STAR Jeff Landgraf For the STAR collaboration.
10/25/11update BFC with pixl patch1 Update on the simulation with pixl patches BFC chain was working with TPC+full PiXL but crashes when I used patches.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
Non-photonic electron production in p+p collisions at √s=200 GeV Xiaozhi Bai for the STAR collaboration Central China Normal University University of Illinois.
STAR J/  Trigger in dA Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Trigger Workshop at BNL October 21, 2002.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
1 Guannan Xie Nuclear Modification Factor of D 0 Mesons in Au+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Science.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
1 Geometrical efficiencies of a patch Pixel detector via GEANT J. Joseph, S. Margetis and J. Vanfossen Original note based on a MathCAD simulation by H.Wieman.
Status of the STAR tracking upgrade Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL, February 24, 2005.
ITTF “Re-View” Session, August 11, 2003 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez ITTF Evaluation for Spectra.
Observation of antimatter hypernuclei at RHIC Jinhui Chen Kent State University for the STAR Collaboration 10 th International Conference on Hypernuclear.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
Construction of RHIC-STAR TOF and high rating MRPC Wang Yi Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University Beijing,100084, China.
Pile-up vertex finding in heavy ion collisions
Technical Specifications
Software Overview S. Margetis Kent State University HFT CD0 Review.
The Heavy Flavor Tracker (HFT)
Jonathan Bouchet, For the STAR collaboration
STAR High Level Tracking Trigger Upgrade and Physics Opportunities
The Heavy Flavor Tracker (HFT)
ALICE upgrade plans Paolo Giubellino LHCC Upgrades
Pixel-strip-EMC tracker and DC option
The LHC collider in Geneva
PheniX, STAr AND AN EIC E.C. Aschenauer
PIXEL patch efficiency
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Hit and Tracking Data set used: From loose to tight cuts Pythia p+p
Presentation transcript:

Physics with the HFT prototype? Motivation Results of simulation : Acceptance optimization studies Tracking efficiency studies with TPC+PXL Next steps J. Bouchet for the HFT-soft group 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011 Motivation PIXEL detector is the inner sub-system of the HFT tracker in STAR 3 (or 2 or 4) PXL sectors (out of 10) will be installed in STAR next year for Run-13 as an engineering run Question : Which geometry is the most efficient for track pointing and physics measurement ? for low Pt D0, opening angle between daughters is large. For higher Pt D0, the opening angle decreases. Different Pt D0 regimes lead to different configurations of the sectors. cosine(φpion-φkaon) vs. PtD0 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

2 configurations studied =108 =72 =144 =36 =180 =0 =216 =324 =252 =288 Triangle-shape Joined-shape 1 sector covers 36 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011 Simulation Setup Input: Generate 100k D0 with flat Pt in [0,5], ||<3,|Vz|<10 cm Count : NN : # of D0 input N0 : # of D0 after Pt cut for both daughters and|| <1 N1 : # of D0 with above cuts + TPC>10,PXL=2 N2 : # of D0 in triangle configuration N3 : # of D0 in joined configuration Single track efficiency/ghosting Modify the existing geometry file with Removal of SSD and IST Localization of 3 pxl sectors according the patches configuration ~500 central AuAu Hijing events but NO PILEUP Plus minbias AuAu hijing events for creating pile-up 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

Cuts on Daughters: ||<1, TPC>10,PIXL=2, triangle(N2) 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

Cuts on Daughters: ||<1, TPC>10,PIXL=2, triangle(N3) 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

What physics can be achieved ? Can we do anything substantial here ? Any physics with the prototype? Charm cross-section Charm Rcp 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

TPC+PXL Efficiency/ghosting studies BFC chain reconstruction and tracking (Sti) with only pixel prototypes geometry = no material form SSD nor IST. 350 hijing events, no pile up. Vertex cuts : |Vreco -VMC| < 0.01 cm : good reconstruction vertex |Vreco | < 10 cm Tracks cuts : Reco TPC hits >15 |η|<1 The definition is : effSiGoodRc = # of tracks with 2 good pixels hit / # of tracks with 2 MC pixel hits Ghosting = # of tracks with 2 good pixels hits / # of tracks with 2 pixel hits 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011 Efficiency with TPC+PXL prototype Good tracking efficiency (but no pile-up yet) Hijing – NO Pile-up TPC+PXL TPC+SSD+IST+PXL 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011 http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/jetcorr/kapitan/HFT/upgr15_2010/productionQA/thin/CD1/single/ Ghosting with TPC+PXL prototype Low Ghosting Hijing – NO Pile-up TPC+PXL TPC+SSD+IST+PXL 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011 Next steps Include pile-up events : Will increase single track ghosting Study reconstruction of D0 in this environment So far it looks encouraging We have two configurations for x-section and Rcp measurements (if everything else goes well) Please think of what physics YOU would like to do. We will help you run the simulation. 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011 Back-up 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011 SSD+PXL SSD layer Pixel outer layer Pixel inner layer Note : the x-axis scale changes with the layer 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011 PXL only SSD layer Pixel outer layer Pixel inner layer Note : the x-axis scale changes with the layer 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011 comments With SSD : Residuals in r/phi for the outer pixel layer is better than w/o SSD Residuals in r/phi for the inner pixel are slightly better than w/o SSD Residuals in r/phi and Z are asymetric (due to the asymetric resolution of SSD) for both outer and inner layer w/o SSD: Residuals in r/phi and Z are symmetric (due to the same resolution of the pixel) 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

Some precautions to make Optimization wrt TPC sectors : TPC has 12 sectors PIXEL has 10 sectors 2. TPC sectors health during a physics run : we want to avoid to place a PXL sector matching a unhealthy TPC sector 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011

Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011 MRPC ToF barrel 100% ready for run 10 (now!) BBC PMD FPD FMS EMC barrel EMC End Cap DAQ1000 FGT Completed Ongoing MTD R&D HFT TPC FHC HLT 8/2/2018 Star Coll. Meeting, LBNL, Nov. 2011