Maturity by Type of Interoperability

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright 2004 Northrop Grumman Corporation 0 HIT Summit Leveraging HIT for Public Health Surveillance HIT Summit Leveraging HIT for Public Health Surveillance.
Advertisements

Report from the Networking in Times of Disaster. What is a Disaster? Networks that work in times of disaster should address: Events that affect a network.
Microsofts Disaster Management Efforts UN ESCAP Regional Inter Agency WG on ICT Gísli Ólafsson Disaster Management – Technical Advisor Microsoft Corporation.
THE ROLE OF CSDs DURING ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS OR OPERATIONAL DISRUPTION THE ROLE OF CSDs DURING ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS OR OPERATIONAL DISRUPTION A PRESENTATION.
Hospital Emergency Management
Connecticut Emergency Management and Response
 Define Medical Reserve Corps (MRC)  Name two ways the MRC benefits local communities  Understand the mission of the Utah County Medical Reserve Corps.
Disaster Communications System (DCS) Overview for State and Local Governments National Conference on Emergency Communications (NCEC) Panel 5: State and.
Development Principles PHIN advances the use of standard vocabularies by working with Standards Development Organizations to ensure that public health.
NGAC Interagency Data Sharing and Collaboration Spotlight Session: Best Practices and Lessons Learned Robert F. Austin, PhD, GISP Washington, DC March.
Emergency Management Information System - EMIS
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 FCC-NTIA Joint Advisory Committee on Communications Capabilities of.
BOTSWANA NATIONAL CYBER SECURITY STRATEGY PROJECT
Public Health Data Standards A View from the Front Lines Bethesda, MD March 17, 2004 Presentation to PUBLIC HEALTH DATA STANDARDS CONSORTIUM 2004 ANNUAL.
Ontology Summit 2015 Track C Report-back Summit Synthesis Session 1, 19 Feb 2015.
Responding to the Unexpected Yigal Arens Paul Rosenbloom Information Sciences Institute University of Southern California.
Urban Infrastructure and Its Protection Responding to the Unexpected Interest Group Report Group Members G. Giuliano (USC), Jose Holguin-Veras (CUNY),
This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator.
PHEP Capabilities John Erickson, Special Assistant Washington State Department of Health
NFPA 1600 Disaster/Emergency Management and Business Continuity Programs.
1 Power to the Edge Agility Focus and Convergence Adapting C2 to the 21 st Century presented to the Focus, Agility and Convergence Team Inaugural Meeting.
ESA Harwell Robotics & Autonomy Facility Study Workshop Autonomous Software Verification Presented By: Rick Blake.
Work Zone & Incident Management Strategies Denise Markow, PE, TSMO Administrator Susan Soucie, PE ITS Project Manager ACEC/NHDOT 2016 Technical Exchange.
Center of Excellence PEACE OPERATIONS COMMAND & CONTROL AND COMMAND & CONTROL AND TRANSITION ISSUES Lt Col (R) John Derick Osman Center of Excellence in.
11 S I A M E M B E R C O M P A N I E S Satellite Industry Response to 2005 Hurricanes Satellites = Redundancy, Ubiquity, Interoperability.
SURGE WORKSHOP XV, NOVEMBER 2015 SURGE Deployment Mechanism.
1 The information contained in this presentation is based on proposed and working documents. Health Information Exchange Interoperability Minnesota Department.
Smart City As Unified Multi-tier IoT Solution. Increased Smart City IQ Generation 1: local management systems (e.g. traffic lights synchronization) Generation.
1 Ontology Summit 2011 Track 3 Value Metrics & Value Models Synthesis Rex Brooks Starbourne Communications Todd Schneider Raytheon 31 March 2011.
Community Resilience Jill J Artzberger, MPH 2011 Texas Emergency Management Conference Thursday, April 28, 2011.
EasyWay - conclusion.
Incident Management Information Sharing Capability Maturity Model
Joint CIO Council and HR Deans & Directors Meeting
Fourth Dimension Technologies
Utilizing Your Business Continuity Plan.
Satellites = Redundancy, Ubiquity, Interoperability
Overview of Wireless Networks:
and Security Management: ISO 28000
Technology Implications for Net Centric Operations 2004 Interoperability & Systems Integration Conference Industry Views Dr. Aaron Budgor Vice President.
Microsoft Operations Management Suite Insight and Analytics
Information Technology Sector
Incident Management & Business Continuity
Lamorinda Community Emergency Response Team
Federal Health IT Ontology Project (HITOP) Group
CCNET Managed Services
Review of ONAP Carrier Grade Requirements
Disaster Response – A Collaboration
Instantiation of the Concept in GAMMA Prototypes
Lisa Spanberger, MPH Emergency Manager, St. Luke’s
UCSD’s Responsphere Infrastructure
Scalable and Worldwide Cloud Platform Powers Expansion for White-Label Mobile TV Solution MINI-CASE STUDY “Microsoft Azure played a vital role in the design.
EIS Fast-track Revision Om Trivedi Enterprise Information Systems
Electronic Health Information Systems
مدیریت داده ها و اطلاعات آزمایشگاه پزشکی
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
GameDay Planning.
Health Information Exchange Interoperability
Management in Mass Fatality Incidents
ICAO Air Navigation Bureau
Geospatial and Problem Specific Semantics Danielle Forsyth, CEO and Co-Founder Thetus Corporation 20 June, 2006.
Bringing Large Commercial Airport Capabilities to Your Local Community
Planning for Emergencies Skill Station
19 Continuous Change.
Information Technology Services Strategic Directions
Get Connected Knowledge Forum
Tax Software Development in a Multi-Jurisdictional Environment
Information Technology Services Strategic Directions
Sachiko A. Kuwabara, PhD, MA
eHR Clinical data repository and pharmacovigilance
Presentation transcript:

Maturity by Type of Interoperability Collaborative design; engineered processes Dynamic data models, ontologies; shared standards and vocabularies. (inference engines if robust) Dynamic shared services High (Future) Selected constraints on common model(s ) Shared data model (e.g. HL7 V.3 RIM) + domain - specific standards, cross- ref’d terminologies Specific shared standard(s ) for exchange of data and programs Medium (Near term) Varies by org- anization; with regulation prn Shared message syntax (e.g. HL7 V2.0) Reliable, secure connectivity, transmission Low (Now) Process Semantic Technical Level/Type à Maturity by Type of Interoperability March 1, 2006 Mayo Clinic

Types of Interoperability by Level of Urgency Routine Emergency Disaster Secure, reliable connectivity for trusted end-to-end exchange of data. Redundant infrastructures, backup (incl manual). Ability to access data from other sites. Decentralized (self-healing) infrastructures; “bleeding edge” detection; ability to reroute communications; deploy mobile units; knowledge of manual and automated alternatives. Thorough, natural or logical order of data collection. Semantic transparency to support all functions (clinical, financial, administrative, research) Focus, summarization, most critical information displayed first. Real-time alerts which do not delay or interfere with medical intervention. Access to important information from external sources. Situational awareness; rapid reporting, seamless alerting; coordinated responder communication w automated resource deployment and tracking. Post-event recovery and analysis. Standardized, routine work processes. Keys: ‘Best practice.’ Consistency, efficiency. Flexible, modular tasks combined in response to situation; well-defined roles with clear leadership. Keys: Triage, speed & discipline. Planning for various event types, for multiple scenarios. During incident, ability to improvise: heroism, role flexibility. Immediate post-incident: implement Plan, . Keys: Rapid detection & response; surge capacity; panic management. Teamwork (quality, consistency and efficiency) Command/Control (strong leadership & explicit roles) Before: planning; detect’n During: initiative; rapid response, ‘heroism,’ After: leadership, logistics Technical Semantic Process March 1, 2006 Mayo Clinic