Minds and Bodies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Philosophy Through the Centuries
Advertisements

Week 2, Lecture 3 Dualism: mental events, substance vs. property dualism, four arguments.
Philosophy of Mind Dualism: in addition to the physical/material body, there is an immaterial mind Dualism: in addition to the physical/material body,
Michael Lacewing Is the mind the brain? Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Metaphysics Part II. Thought Experiment: Physical & Mental Properties A1. 2 more objects: quarters, books, grass… A2. 2 more physical descriptors: green,
I move, therefore I am Physical Literacy June 2013 Jens E. Birch Oslo University College
LECTURE 24 THE NATURE OF PERSONS PHYSICALISM AND DUALISM (“WHAT AM I?)
Concept innatism II: the case of substance Michael Lacewing
Chapter 10: What am I?.
Substance dualism: do Descartes’ arguments work? Michael Lacewing
The Mind-Body Relation Dualism: human beings are composed of a material body and an immaterial mind which are distinct from each other (Descartes) Problems:
Section 2.5 The Whole is Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts
The Mind-Body Relation Dualism: human beings are composed of a material body and an immaterial mind which are distinct from each other (Descartes) Problem:
Chapter 2 The Mind-Body Problem
The metaphysics of mind: an overview Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Dualism and the Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
The Mind-Body Debate. Mind-Brain Debate What is the relationship between mind and brain?
Descartes argument for dualism
Philosophy of Mind Week 3: Objections to Dualism Logical Behaviorism
Metaphysics.
Substance dualism and mental causation Michael Lacewing
Finding our way back  The initial result of Descartes’ use of hyperbolic doubt is the recognition that at least one thing cannot be doubted, at least.
Knowledge and Reality Lecture 2: Dualism. Dualism: what is it? Mind and body are different basic substances They have different essences The mind is essentially.
Dualism: epiphenomenalism
Chapter 2 The Mind-Body Problem McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
This week’s aims: To set clear expectations regarding homework, organisation, etc. To re-introduce the debate concerning the mind-body problem To analyse.
Philosophy of Mind The Mind/Body Problem. Overview  The Mind/Body Problem  Some Possible Solutions Dualist Solutions Monist Solutions.
Metaphysics…an Introduction Some Guiding Questions: What is Reality? What is a personal identity? Is there a Supreme Being? What is the meaning of life?
Mind-Body Dualism. The Mind-Body Problem The problem of explaining how a mind is connected to and interacts with a body whose mind it is, or the problem.
Human Nature 2.3 The Mind-Body Problem: How Do Mind and Body Relate?
METAPHYSICS ONTOLOGIES OFTEN CENTER ON MIND-BODY & MAY DEAL IN ISSUES OF COMPLEMENTARITY (APPARENT CONTRADCTORY PROPERTIES: eg WAVE, PARTICLE)
 Doubt- to be uncertain about something, to hesitate to believe  Dualism- the belief that the mind and body are separate (but interact). Mind is a kind.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 12 Minds and bodies #1 (Descartes) By David Kelsey.
Owen Flanagan James B. Duke Professor of Philosophy Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience Co-Director Center for Comparative Philosophy Duke University.
© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing
Descartes Historical Context Epistemology vs. Metaphysics Subjective vs. Objective Arguments - Dreaming - Evil Demon - Cogito - The Wax Substance.
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Descartes’ Interactionist Dualism. Overview Descartes’ general project Descartes’ general project Argument for dualism Argument for dualism Explanation.
Berkeley’s Three Dialogues Is there material substance? Does the belief in material substance lead to skepticism?
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing
Philosophy of Mind: Theories of self / personal identity: REVISION Body & Soul - what makes you you?
Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Lesson 4: Descartes; a dualist view
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 13 Minds and Bodies #2 (Physicalism) By David Kelsey.
Descartes’ divisibility argument
The argument for the existence of bodies (Meditation 6) 1.Nature provided me with a strong propensity to believe there are bodies. 2.The only way I could.
The Mind-Body Problem and the Puzzle of Consciousness Minds and Machines.
The Mind And Body Problem Mr. DeZilva.  Humans are characterised by the body (physical) and the mind (consciousness) These are the fundamental properties.
Criticisms of Dualism. Descartes argument for dualism I can clearly and distinctly conceive of the mind without the body and the body without the mind.
MIND-BODY DUALISM One aspect of Descartes’ Meditations deals with the nature of the world we live in. Philosophical (metaphysical) theories that claim.
Substance and Property Dualism Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity ?v=sT41wRA67PA.
This week’s aims  To test your understanding of substance dualism through an initial assessment task  To explain and analyse the philosophical zombies.
Mind body problem What is the relationship between mental states and the physical world? Zoltán Dienes, Philosophy of Psychology René Descartes ( )
Recap on your whiteboards
Substance and Property Dualism
The Search for Ultimate Reality and the Mind/Body Problem
Descartes’ conceivability argument for substance dualism
The view that mind and body are distinct and separate entities.
What is the relationship between body and soul.
Life After Death: The Soul (Aristotle)
Philosophy 1010 Title: Introduction to Philosophy
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
Get Yourself Thinking…
Think, pair, Share Is this the same person?.
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
Is the concept of substance innate?
The Mind-Body Problem.
Dualism.
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
Presentation transcript:

Minds and Bodies

Two possibilities: Monism: the view that the world consists of one kind of thing Substance Dualism: The view that the world consists of two distinct kinds of things, minds and bodies.

Descartes is a substance dualist Descartes is a substance dualist. He believes that there are minds and bodies are distinct kinds of things. They are characterized by distinct properties The mind is characterized by thought The body is characterized by extension

Alternatives to dualism A materialist holds that everything is physical. What we call “mind” or “thought” is understood in terms of physical processes (probably in the brain) An Idealist holds that the world is mental or mind dependent. Material objects are understood in terms of conscious experience.

Descartes argument for dualism Whatever can be understood as distinct really is distinct We can understand the mind without the body We can understand the body without the mind Therefore there is a real distinction between mind and body.

Is it true that we can understand our minds independently of anything physical? Is it true that whatever we can understand as distinct is really distinct? Lightning is identical to an electrical discharge, but it was a scientific discovery that these “two” things were really one. Could the same be true of mind/body?

Another argument for dualism Physical things are spatially extended (have a certain size, exist in space) Minds have no spatial extension Whatever is identical must have all properties in common. Therefore minds and bodies are distinct things.

The Mind/Body Problem Descartes is an interactionist dualist. He believes that there is causal interaction between minds and bodies. When I move my hand my mind causes my body to move. When I stub my toe, my body causes my mind to experience pain http://prosblogion.ektopos.com/

It’s hard to understand how interaction is possible It seems that when two things causally interact, they must share a common medium, they must be able to “meet up” somehow One billiard ball can cause another to move only because they are both in space and can touch each other The Moon and Earth do not touch, but they share the medium of space. Even “action at a distance” presupposes a common medium