Student’s Perception Toward Teacher- Self- and Peer Evaluation in English Oral Class Presenter : Hsiao-Wei Cheng Adviser: Dr. Pi-Ying Teresa Hsu May 25th, 2009 1

Contents I. II. III. Ⅳ. Introduction Research questions Literature review III. Methodology Ⅳ. 2

students’perceptions Introduction The purpose of my study students’perceptions Teacher evaluation Self evaluation Peer evaluation e-Portfolio 3

Introduction Evaluation can be used to “provide constructive criticism and suggestions to improve weak areas and amplify strengths.” (Boyd, 1989) 4

Research questions 1. How do the high/low achiever students respond to self evaluation in this process? There is no significant difference between high and low achiever students’ responses in self evaluation. H 5

Research questions 2. How do the high/low achiever students respond to peer evaluation in this process? There is no significant difference between high and low achiever students’ responses in peer evaluation. H 6

Research questions 3. How do the high/low achiever students respond to teacher evaluation in this process? There is no significant difference between high and low achiever students’ responses in teacher evaluation. H 7

Research questions 4. What are the high/low achiever students’ responses to the use of e-Portfolio assessment? There is no significant difference between high and low achiever students’ responses in e-Portfolio. H 8

Research questions 5. Which is the most useful (self, peer and teacher) evaluation for high/low achiever students? 9

Literature Review Teacher evaluation Self evaluation Peer evaluation 1 Teacher evaluation 2 Self evaluation 3 Peer evaluation 4 e-Portfolio assessment 10

Literature Review Teacher evaluation Teacher evaluations were more complete and accurate than student self-evaluations. (Olina and Sullivan, 2002) 11

Literature Review Self evaluation Researchers have suggested that self-evaluation has the potential to improve student performance. (Davies, 2002; Fallows & Chandramohan, 2001). 12

Literature Review Peer evaluation Peer-assessment can play a useful role in writing classes. She mentioned the peer-raters produced fewer bias than the self and teacher raters. (Matsuno, 2009) 13

Literature Review Portfolio sharing as experienced through paired peer interviews and exceeded the original goals. (Anna M, 2005) 14

Methodology Research Design Methodology Instrumentation Procedure 15

English major students in oral class Methodology participants English major students in oral class in Chaoyang University of Technology 16

Methodology high achievers low achievers 17

Methodology Instrument evaluation form Training 18

Methodology T test Participants e-Portfolio Questionnaire Procedure English speech 1 English speech 2 English speech 3 English speech 4 English speech 5 English speech 6 e-Portfolio T test Questionnaire 19

Methodology teacher’s comments peers’ comments e-Portfolio self reflection 20

Methodology self reflection before during after 21

Methodology Questionnaire Self Peer evaluation Teacher evaluation e-Portfolio 22

Methodology My topic Taiwanese Students' Perceptions on Peer Review Activity Questionnaire design Rather information from students’ reflection. Related questionnaire design (Chen, 1998; Heng 1998) Reliability Validity Learner attitude (0.81) Perceived effect (0.85) Review ability (0.78) Group participation (0.77) Usefulness of peer evaluation (0.69) Learner motivation (0.65) Timing 10 months Participant 60 participants (College students) 23

Methodology Topic A Study on Implementing Writing Portfolio in EFL Classroom in Senior High Questionnaire design Designed by researcher and discussed with the researcher’s supervisor Reliability Validity Did not mention Timing 6 months Participant 43 participants (senior high 1st ) 24

Methodology Topic Attitudes and Responses to Portfolio Assessment and Writing Autonomy of Senior High EFL Students Questionnaire design Designed by researcher Reliability Validity Did not mention Timing 5 months Participant 33 participants (12thgrade student) 25

Designed by researcher (5 Liker scales) Methodology My topic Student’s perception toward teacher- self- and peer evaluation in English class. Questionnaire design Designed by researcher (5 Liker scales) Reliability SPSS Validity 3 experienced EFL professors to confirm the validity of the questionnaire. Participant (pilot) 30 students Revise (formal) ? T test 26

Thank You! 27