CLASS KeysSM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Advertisements

Training Overview For separate modules:
Training for Teachers and Specialists
We will lead the nation in improving student achievement. CLASS Keys SM Module 10: Professional Development Plan For Improvement Spring 2010 Teacher and.
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
 Reading School Committee January 23,
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
Welcome to CLASS Keys™ Study Session 2 March 15, 2010 Our session will begin at 4:00 p.m. While you are waiting, please do the following: Configure your.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams, CHRO.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys ™ Module 8: Georgia Teacher Duties and Responsibilities Spring 2010 Teacher and.
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Lincoln School District. Agenda  Overview of packets Observations Other Types of Evidence Mid-Year Conferences Closing and Next Steps.
Welcome to CLASS Keys™ Study Session 1 February 22, 2010 Our session will begin at 4:00 p.m. While you are waiting, please do the following: Configure.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
CLASS Keys Process Studying the Standards Marlo Mong
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 5 Pre-Evaluation Conference Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
The levels of performance considered at the element level are not intended to be used to label teachers as Not Evident, Emerging, Proficient, and Exemplary.
Data Sources Artifacts: Lesson plans and/or curriculum units which evidence planned use of diagnostic tools, pre- assessment activities, activating strategies,
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 9: Annual Evaluation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
Formal Observation Administrator schedules and conducts one Formal Observation (50 Minutes). Administrator uses the Formative Classroom Analysis form to.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 3: Self-Assessment and Reflection Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Introduction to Peer Observations.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part A: Observation Data for the Summative Rating.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Oconee Keys Training September, Oconee Keys is designed to: Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess instructional practices.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.
Educator Plans Overview
Evaluation 4.0 Or at least a 3.75.
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement
CLASS KeysSM Module 10: Professional Development Plan For Improvement
Module 9: Category III: Monitoring Student Progress
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
Human Resources Management: Module 2
Educator Effectiveness Annual Update
Educator Effectiveness Annual Update
CLASS KeysTM Module 3: Self-Assessment and Reflection Spring 2010
Teacher Evaluation Process
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Georgia Department of Education
CLASS KeysTM Module 10: Professional Development Plan For Improvement
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
TDES Think Tank September 25, 2018 Jill Cabe, Director of Performance Management Megan Scully, TDES Coordinator Time: 1 Minute.
Why do we have to change? Every student is taught by an effective teacher and every school is led by an effective principal. Fair and equitable statewide.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
Presentation transcript:

CLASS KeysSM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement

Resources and Materials Teachers will need the following resources and materials for this module: CLASS KeysSM Notebook Handout 2A: Three Phases of the CLASS KeysSM Process Module 2 PowerPoint

Module Objectives Introduces the Pre-Evaluation Phase of the CLASS KeysSM evaluation process. Introduces the Evidence Collection Phase of the CLASS KeysSM evaluation process. Introduces the Annual Evaluation Phase of the CLASS KeysSM evaluation process.

Evidence Collection Phase Three Phases of the CLASS KeysSM Process CLASS KEYSSM Pre-Evaluation Phase 1 Evidence Collection Phase 2 Annual Evaluation 3 Self Assessment /Reflection Professional Growth Plan Pre-Evaluation Conference Informal Observations Formal Observation Other Evidence Collection Element/Strand Evaluation Overall Evaluation GTDR Evaluation FEEDBACK

Self Assessment/Reflection: Teachers self-assess and reflect on their performance of the elements. Professional Growth Plan: Teachers design a PGP to improve their performance on the elements. Pre-Evaluation Conference: Teachers and evaluators meet to review the PGP, set student achievement goals, and clarify expectations of the elements and duties and responsibilities. 1 Pre-Evaluation Phase

Evidence Collection Phase Informal Observations: Evaluators conduct two, 5 to 15-minute, unannounced classroom observations to assess a few elements. Formal Observation: Evaluators conduct a 30 to 50-minute announced classroom observation to assess as many elements as possible. Other Evidence Collection: Evaluators collect evidence from sources such as conferences, meetings, planning and professional learning sessions, examination of student and adult products, etc. 2 Evidence Collection Phase

3 Annual Evaluation Phase Element/Strand Evaluation: Evaluators review the evidence collected and score the teacher’s performance on the rubrics. When the element scores are aggregated, all strands must be scored at least at the EMERGING level. GTDR Evaluation: The reviewed performance on all duties and responsibilities must be satisfactory to receive an overall SATISFACTORY scoring. Overall Evaluation: Both sections, the Strands and GTDR, must receive a SATISFACTORY scoring for a teacher to receive a satisfactory annual evaluation. 3 Annual Evaluation Phase