NE Rural Ordinance Survey Results

What is appropriate setback for residential developments on Scenic Roadway Corridors? 100 feet, 75 feet,50 feet, Other

Do you believe that the proposed protection of existing topography language is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Policy? Do you recommend any additional changes?

Topography Language Sample Comments Preserve the hills Language is too restrictive

5 foot shoulder for cyclists on the rural street cross-section standards (consistent with FDOT minimum standard for bike lane.) Would you support this recommendation?

Street Standards 5 foot Shoulders Language Sample Comments Encourage safe cycling Would like to make sure taxes don’t go up to pay for it Promotes the rural environment to stay rural Let County build them

Do you want to include Rural Building Character for residential development? Do you want to list examples of rural consistent design elements?

Do you agree with the proposed 4 feet height in front setback for fences and walls?

Rural Building Character Language Sample Comments Agree with rural character, but disagree with specific guidelines Appropriate for 3+ homes No on residential, Yes on business Not important

Do you want to limit material type used on fences and walls? Sample Comments No Chain-link No Solid Walls No limit on material No Barbwire

Do you agree with the intent to include dark sky lighting standards?

Do you agree with the intent to include dark sky lighting standards? Sample Comments Sky at nigh most beautiful part of living in NE Pasco If all residential why is it needed? Minimum light pollution Full cut off lighting