Pavement Design Al-Balqa’ Applied University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Material Strength Local subgrade settlement failure (from NHI Highway Materials Engineering course)
Advertisements

LOW VOLUME ROAD DESIGN EMPIRICAL APPROACH.
Deterioration of Concrete Roads
Dr. Wa'el M. Albawwab ECGD4228 Transportation Engineering II Summer 2008 Sat. 15:30-18:30 PM K115.
Pavement Structure and Base
Pavement Design Session Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Recalibration of the Asphalt Layer Coefficient Dr. David H. Timm, P.E. Mrs. Kendra Peters-Davis.
Engr. Ejaz Ahmad Khan Deputy Director Pakhtunkhwa Highways Authority
Material Properties.
Pavement Design CE 453 Lecture 28.
Project Title: Chemical Stabilization of Clay Design Department Presenter: Stephan Cheong Date: February 5,2015.
Unified Soil Classification System Training
Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitation Pavement Structures By Matt Mason.
Know the factors considered in the AASHTO design method
Pavement Design.
Transportation Engineering II
Pavement Design CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Introduction to Soil Mechanics
Presentation about Reinforced concrete
SESSION 3 Subgrade This module presents the concepts and methods of characterizing the subgrade for the purpose of concrete pavement design. It also highlights.
Pavement Design CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Subgrade Characterization For Concrete Pavement Design
Lec 28, Ch.20, pp : Flexible pavement design, ESAL (Objectives)
Flexible Pavement Thickness Design / AASHTO Method
Road Construction Method
Pavement Base & Subbase CEE 320 Steve Muench 8/13/ The subbase course is between the base course and the subgrade. It functions primarily as structural.
6. Soil Classification (Das, chapter 5) Sections: All except 5.1.
Dr. Wa'el M. Albawwab ECGD4228 Transportation Engineering II Summer 2008 Sat. 15:30-18:30 PM K004.
Soil Classification Systems
AAPA 2011 Pre-CAPSA’11 Study Tour - Topic Brief Introduction of Australian Pavement Design.
SESSION 6 Thickness Design
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (CBR) METHOD
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-II
PAVEMENT TYPE SELECTION Hesham Mahgoub, PhD, PE. South Dakota State University South Dakota Department of Transportation, Office of Road Design.
Soil Classification Prof. Basuony El-Garhy
Construction Inspection for FO Activities - Soils and Earthwork
Chapter 5. Classification of Soil. 5.1 Textural Classification texture of soil : surface appearance ※ In most cases, natural soils are mixtures of particles.
Easy Pavement Thickness Design Using
California Bearing Ratio
General Road Construction Information
An –Najah National University
Chapter 9. Highway Design for Rideability
CE 3500 Transportation Engineering Introduction to Pavement Materials
Transportation Engineering-II
Structural Design of Highway
Lesson 2: Soils and Aggregates
Chapter(16) AASHTO flexible pavement design method
Structural Design of Highway
7. CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS
Structural Design of Highway
AASHTO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-II
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (CBR) METHOD
Spread Footing Design for Columns
Pavement Design  A pavement consists of a number of layers of different materials 4 Pavement Design Methods –AASHTO Method –The Asphalt Institute Method.
PAVEMENTS CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Transportation Engineering
SUBGRADE HOW TO DEAL WITH SOFT SPOTS
Calculating Dimensions for a Typical Pavement Section using 1993 AASHTO Flexible Pavement Design Guide.
Flexible Pavement Design (JKR Method)
Flexible pavement design
Find: the soil classification
Lecturer: Dr. Frederick Owusu-Nimo
Structural Design of Highway
Find: the soil classification
Soil Classification Dr. Attaullah Shah.
Spread Footing Design for Columns
Pavement materials: Soil
Transportation Engineering II
Spread Footing Design for Columns
Presentation transcript:

Pavement Design Al-Balqa’ Applied University Faculty of Engineering Technology Department of Civil Engineering M. Kharabsheh Fall 2013-2014 8/2/2018 CEE 320 Steve Muench

Empirical 1993 AASHTO Flexible Equation 1993 AASHTO Rigid Equation

Terms – Flexible The ZR and So variables account for reliability W18 (loading) Predicted number of 80 kN (18,000 lb.) ESALs over the pavement’s life. SN (structural number) Abstract number expressing structural strength SN = a1D1 + a2D2m2 + a3D3m3 + … ΔPSI (change in present serviceability index) Change in serviceability index over the useful pavement life Typically from 1.5 to 3.0 MR (subgrade resilient modulus) (Measure Soil Stiffness) Typically from 3,000 to 30,000 psi (10,000 psi is good)

Recommended Values of ZR and So Functional Classification Recommended Level of Reliability Urban Rural Interstate and Other Freeways 85 – 99.9 80 – 99.9 Principal Arterials 80 – 99 75 – 95 Collectors 80 – 95 Local 50 – 80 Typical values of So used are 0.40 to 0.50 for flexible pavements and 0.35 to 0.40 for rigid pavements.

Resilient Modulus MR Typical values for fine-grained soils are 2,000 to 10,000 psi. Typical values for course-grained soils are 10,000 to 20,000 psi. If resilient modulus results are not available, then use the following correlations: For fine-grained soils with a soaked CBR between 5 and 10 , use the following equation to correlate CBR to resilient modulus (MR): Design MR (psi) = 1,500 x CBR For non fine-grained soils with a soaked CBR greater than 10, use the following equation: MR = 3,000 x CBR 0.65

Terms – Rigid D (slab depth) S’c (PCC modulus of rupture) A measure of PCC flexural strength Usually between 600 and 850 psi Cd (drainage coefficient) Relative loss of strength due to drainage characteristics and the total time it is exposed to near-saturated conditions Usually taken as 1.0

Drainage Coefficient Quality of Drainage Water Removal Within Excellent 2 hours Good 1 day Fair 1 week Poor 1 month Very Poor no drainage

Terms – Rigid J (load transfer coefficient) Ec (PCC elastic modulus) Accounts for load transfer efficiency Lower J-factors = better load transfer Between 3.8 (undoweled JPCP) and 2.3 (CRCP with tied shoulders) Ec (PCC elastic modulus) 4,000,000 psi is a good estimate k (modulus of subgrade reaction) Estimates the support of the PCC slab by the underlying layers Usually between 50 and 1000 psi/inch

Mean Effective k-value (psi/inch) Typical Range – 50 to 500 Typical Value for Pavement Design 200 – 250 If the subgrade resilient modulus is known or obtained from the CBR, then use the following equation: k-value = MR / 19.4

Reliability Reliability = P [Y > X] Probability Stress/Strength X = Probability distribution of stress (e.g., from loading, environment, etc.) Y = Probability distribution of strength (variations in construction, material, etc.) Probability Stress/Strength

Typical PSI vs. Time p0 Serviceability (PSI) p0 - pt pt Time

Subgrade California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Measures shearing resistance Characterized by strength and/or stiffness California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Measures shearing resistance Units: percent Typical values: 0 to 20 Resilient Modulus (MR) Measures stress-strain relationship Units: psi or MPa Typical values: 3,000 to 40,000 psi

Subgrade Some Typical Values MR Classification CBR MR (psi) Typical Description Good ≥ 10 20,000 Gravels, crushed stone and sandy soils. GW, GP, GM, SW, SP, SM soils are often in this category. Fair 5 – 9 10,000 Clayey gravel and clayey sand, fine silt soils.  GM, GC, SM, SC soils are often in this category. Poor 3 – 5 5,000 Fine silty sands, clays, silts, organic soils.  CL, CH, ML, MH, CM, OL, OH soils are often in this category.

Flexible Pavement Design for Highways (Nomograph to Solve for SN)