Roles and Perspectives in Science Collaboration – the view of the high-tech industry Dr. Peter Kurz Agilent Technologies International Sàrl Morges 25 April.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collaborative Intellectual Property
Advertisements

Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 2015 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
Creation of IP Culture in Universities & Advantages of Universities having an IP Culture Dr Duncan Matthews Queen Mary University of London.
Foundation* Grants and IP Terms Sally O’Neil, Manager, Industrial Contracts Office SMART meeting April 5, 2011.
IP Management at Massey 1.national collaborative infrastructure.
February 25, 2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 2 OF AAPLS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Material Transfer and Confidentiality Agreements.
WIPO Conference on Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology Collaboration, Geneva, Switzerland, April 2005 Structuring Science &
Technology Transfer Commercial Opportunities in Research J. Heidjer Staecker Partner.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. (ISURF) and the Office of Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (OIPTT) Kenneth Kirkland, Executive.
8 December Institutional Structures and Arrangements at Public Sector Laboratories Lyndal Thorburn Advance Consulting & Evaluation Pty Ltd OECD Workshop.
Best Practices: “IPR in Successful University-Industry Collaborations” Disputes relating to University Inventions Tal Band, Adv. Senior Partner S. Horowitz.
Wyoming Research Products Center Intellectual Property and Licensing Services Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 12, 2008 Davona K. Douglass, Acting.
The use of patents by a university spin-off. Sub-module BThe use of patents by a university spin-off 2/21 Structure of the case study University technology.
University Startup Best Practices Presentation for Technology Transfer Tactics April 15 th, 2009.
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON NEGOTIATING TECHNOLOGY LICENSING AGREEMENTS organized by The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in cooperation with.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
6 November 2002 Areas of Potential Disputes: the Venture Capital Perspective Francesco De Rubertis, PhD General Partner, Index Ventures WIPO Conference.
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
PROMOTING TECHNOLOGY TO INDUSTRY Technology transfer objectives: enhance commercial value of invention promote technology to partner / investor identify.
“Today, the Department of Veterans Affairs takes credit for the work our researchers did in the past and will do in the future.” Anthony J. Principi Secretary.
10/19/2011F. B. Bramwell1.  Thanks to conversations with: ◦ HU Office of General Counsel  John Gloster  Dan McCabe ◦ University of Kentucky Intellectual.
1 Knowledge | Innovation | Technology Overview of Risk Management in University Technology Transfer David N. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for.
Josiah Hernandez UPR Policy on IP. Whose Property is it? Under UPR’s policy (Cert. 132, ) the University owns IP that is generated through research.
Inventing the Future – The Role of Patents and Utility Models in Leveraging Technical Innovation in the Market Place Ron Marchant CB FRSA Implementation.
IP Institutional Policy “Ten Questions Method” Santiago, October 21 – 24, 2013.
Elements of a Workable Intellectual Property Policy OPIC IP Roundtable Noel Courage Bereskin & Parr November 21, 2007.
1 WIPO – Geneva – April 2005 European Commission – Research DG D. Dambois European Patent Attorney IPR disputes in international.
The basic Legal Aspects of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) by Alexander Lykourezos Lykourezos Law Offices 1 st ARAB-GREEK ECONOMIC FORUM Athens, September.
Intellectual Property Dr Laura Rush Business Development Manager Research Enterprise Services copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
Ignite Technology Transfer NUI Galway Technology Transfer Office Seamus Coyne, Ph.D Neil Ferguson, Ph.D Commercialisation Executives Technology Transfer.
Developing a National IP Action Plan for building the capacity of Entrepreneurs and SMEs to make effective use of the IP system 14 th March 2008 Ulaanbaatar.
The structure of an IP Institutional Policy “Ten Questions Method” Sofia, Bulgaria November 25 and 26, 2015.
Moscow, Russia, 10 September 2012 HSE Intellectual Property Policy Aliya Ermakova, Head of IP Department, Innovation and Enterprise Office, HSE
Wyoming Research Products Center Technology Transfer and Licensing Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 20, 2013 Phillip Wulf, Intellectual Property.
Realize. A better world through research November 10, 2015 Flash of Genius The First steps after an Invention Divyesh Patel.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Industry’s Perspective on Industry-University Intellectual Property External Research Directors Network Industrial Research Institute, Inc. April 17, 2001.
Top 10 Legal Minefields A University Perspective October 8, 2009 Catherine Shea Associate University Counsel University of Colorado.
© 2004 The IPR-Helpdesk is a project of the European Commission DG Enterprise, co-financed within the fifth framework programme of the European Community.
HOW DO PATENTING AND LICENSING AFFECT RESEARCH? JOAN S. LEONARD VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE The National Academies.
Intellectual Property as Integral Part of S&T Strategy Dr. Nadya Reingand Patent Hatchery LLC Washington DC, USA © Nadya Reingand.
Arbitration and Mediation Cases and Dispute Resolution Clauses in the context of R&D World Intellectual Property Organization WIPO Arbitration and Mediation.
University of Iowa Research Foundation We help you identify, protect and commercialize your discoveries. We can help you start a company. We will help.
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
What the America Invents Act (AIA) Means for Scientists’ Tech Transfer Activities.
Shared Intellectual Property CHALLENGES OF ACADEMIA COLLABORATING WITH INDUSTRY Per Mercke and Sara Ljung.
Technology Transfer Office
Impact of EU structural funds in research and innovation: the experience of the Lithuanian 'Valleys’ April, 2016.
Cleantech to Market Technology Transfer at Berkeley Lab
Alain GALLOCHAT, French Research Ministry
Protecting and exploiting research results at Newcastle University Geraint Lewis – Business Development Manager, Research and Enterprise Services
Novosibirsk State University
Gilbert Nicolaon Kiev June 10, 2008
National Contact Points (NCP) Training
IP Protection under the WTO
Partnering with Business and Industry
Industry Funded Research - Process for Contracts
Legal Framework for the Commercialization of University Inventions
University of Iowa Research Foundation
Giampiero De Luca Serono International S.A. April 25, 2005
TURKPATENT and Its Role in IP Commercialization
Causes of disputes Dispute Resolution in International Science and Technology Collaboration - WIPO Ian Harvey Chairman, Intellectual Property Institute.
Patenting from the perspective of a university in a developed country
CHAPTER 10 THE CORPORATE FINANCIAL STRUCTURE
Presentation transcript:

Roles and Perspectives in Science Collaboration – the view of the high-tech industry Dr. Peter Kurz Agilent Technologies International Sàrl Morges 25 April 2005

November 1, 1999 WIPO Conference on Dispute Resolution in International Science and Technology Cooperation Geneva 25 26 April 2005

Semiconductor Products Agilent Revenue – FY04 Test and Measurement $2.9B Semiconductor Products $2.0B Automated Test $0.9B Life Sciences and Chemical Analysis $1.3B Speaker Notes: Total net revenue for fiscal 2004 increased by 19 percent compared with the previous year.   For the full year, orders were up by 15 percent compared with 2003. Agilent Laboratories WIPO Conference on Dispute Resolution in International Science and Technology Cooperation Geneva 25 26 April 2005

Agilent’s university collaborations Basic observations & shifts in direction More basic research and less applied research @ universities, due to internal shifts in Agilent. Sometimes of philanthropic nature (e.g., funding a professorship). Not much contract research (of the type „Run this project for us“), rather funding of research conducted at the university, provided Agilent has an interest in the results. Exception: projects where only the university has expertise Some research funded by EU or local governments Acquisition of university spin-offs or university IP WIPO Conference on Dispute Resolution in International Science and Technology Cooperation Geneva 25 26 April 2005

Agilent’s university collaborations Recent Issues Universitites under too much pressure to commercialize & do not understand a) the investments required for product development, b) the limits of IP protection and c) the basis of profit calculation. E.g., a 20% royalty on a lab-status technology is usually not an option, unless there are special leverages. Examples: Equity investment in spin-off failed because there were only 3 recently filed patent applications and one of the professors held unspecified rights in them Expected royalty rate was so excessive that Agilent decided not to fund a project, but rather hire a scientist from the university. Now, government money could not be assigned WIPO Conference on Dispute Resolution in International Science and Technology Cooperation Geneva 25 26 April 2005

Agilent’s university collaborations Conflicts In our experience, conflicts arise rather during the negotiation of the contract, than during execution. There is one essential bottleneck that has a name: University Legal Departments. (Slow in response, no power to compromise, ...) One particular issue with the revision of § 42 Inventor Code in Germany: the professor is no longer the owner of his/her inventions. => 3 or 4 parties to agree (funding company, university, professor, student if any). Agilent has split up the agreements into 3 for that purpose. WIPO Conference on Dispute Resolution in International Science and Technology Cooperation Geneva 25 26 April 2005

Thank you for your attention ! WIPO Conference on Dispute Resolution in International Science and Technology Cooperation Geneva 25 26 April 2005