Overview of Polarimetry

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
Advertisements

Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
1 Electron Beam Polarimetry for EIC/eRHIC W. Lorenzon (Michigan) Introduction Polarimetry at HERA Lessons learned from HERA Polarimetry at EIC.
Solenoid effects and compensation B. Dalena, D. Swoboda, R. Tomás.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Beam Energy Measurement: SLC-style Energy Spectrometer Stan Hertzbach University of Massachusetts LCWS 2000, Fermilab.
Stanford – Mar , 2005 LCWS-2005 Norbert Meyners Upstream Polarimetry with 4-Magnet Chicane 1 Introduction & Overview O Compton polarimetry basics.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
IPBI 6 April 05Ken Moffeit Polarimetry Design Updates - Dispersion in upstream chicane - 20mrad extraction line 0.75 mrad beam stay clear location of Synchrotron.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
Machine-Detector Interface MDI Panel Report MDI Panel is one of several World-Wide Study (WWS) panels (R&D, Detector costing, MDI, 2 IRs) Interim panel.
20 March 2005Ken Moffeit LCWS1 Highlights from the MDI workshop Spin Rotation System for 2 IR’s Downstream polarimetry Ken Moffeit.
1 27 Sep 05 Discussion of anti-DID ( “DIDNT” ? ) A.Seryi September 27, 2005.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
SLC  Testbed Proposal Jeff Gronberg  working group SC Linear Collider Retreat June 26 – 29, 2002.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.
CLIC main detector solenoid and anti-solenoid impact B. Dalena, A. Bartalesi, R. Appleby, H. Gerwig, D. Swoboda, M. Modena, D. Schulte, R. Tomás.
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, % e+ Poalarization 1 Physics with an initial positron polarisation of ≈30% Sabine Riemann (DESY)
ILC BCD Crossing Angle Issues G. A. Blair Royal Holloway Univ. London ECFA ILC Workshop, Vienna 14 th November 2005 Introduction BCD Crossing Angle Rankings.
A study of systematic uncertainties of Compton e-detector at JLab, Hall C and its cross calibration against Moller polarimeter APS April Meeting 2014 Amrendra.
COMPTON POLARIMETRY Collected data Cavity power Status on counting methods Systematic errors and hardware issues.
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
1 The Longitudinal Polarimeter at HERA Electron Polarization at HERA Laser System & Calorimeter Statistical and Systematic Precision Laser Cavity Project.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Oct. 6, Summary of the Polarisation Session J. Clarke, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. Riemann 10 November 2006, ECFA Workshop, Valencia.
Global Design Effort ILC Crab Cavity Overview and requirements Andrei Seryi SLAC on behalf of ILC Beam Delivery and Crab-Cavity design teams Joint BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH.
Philip Burrows Snowmass 2005: SiD Concept Plenary, 15/8/05 SiD and MDI issues Philip Burrows Queen Mary, University of London Thanks to: Toshiaki Tauchi,
EIC Compton detector update October 24 th 2014 Alexandre Camsonne.
Polarimetry Report Sabine Riemann on behalf of the DESY/HUB group January 24, 2008 EUROTeV Annual Meeting, Frascati.
Fast or slow positron spin flipping Sabine Riemann (DESY) November 17, 2008 ILC08, University of Illinois - Chicago.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
Inputs from GG6 to decisions 2,7,8,15,21,27,34 V.Telnov Aug.24, 2005, Snowmass.
BDS Lattice Design : EDR plans GWP03 Meeting 04/12/2007.
Ken Moffeit SLAC LCWA09 1 Polarization Considerations for CLIC Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October.
IWLC10, 18 th -22 nd October10, CERN/CICG 1 Global Design Effort Updates to ILC RDR Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin & James Jones ASTeC, STFC.
LCWS Paris – April 19-23, 2004 Polarimeter Issues K. Peter Schüler Polarimeter Issues 1 Polarimeter Studies for TESLA O General Considerations O.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
Full-Acceptance & 2 nd Detector Region Designs V.S. Morozov on behalf of the JLEIC detector study group JLEIC Collaboration Meeting, JLab March 29-31,
The design of the 2mrad extraction line Rob Appleby Daresbury Laboratory On behalf of the SLAC-BNL-UK-France task force ILC European Regional Meeting and.
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
BDIR/MDI Summary ECFA Final Plenary
A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,
The Interaction Region
BDIR/MDI Summary ECFA Final Plenary
Explore the new QCD frontier: strong color fields in nuclei
Analysis of 14/20 mrad Extraction Line Energy Chicane
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Other beam-induced background at the IP
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
CLIC Undulator Option for Polarised Positrons
ILC BDS Emittance Diagnostics: Design and Requirements
At a Future Linear Collider
The 2mrad horizontal crossing angle IR layout for the ILC
Compensation of Detector Solenoid with Large Crossing Angle
Tony Hill Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
ILC Baseline Design: Physics with Polarized Positrons
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Polarimetry Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Polarimetry at CLIC

Physics with polarized beams 'Scope Document no.1' (2003) and 'no.2' (2006): baseline 'full luminosity of 2 x 1034 cm2s-1' 'electron beams with polarisation >80% within whole energy range.' Options: 'e+ polarisation ~50% in whole energy range wo sign. loss of lumi...., Reversal of helicity ... between bunch crossings.' GigaZ: e+ polarisation+frequent flips essential.' s RL e- beam is completely right-handed polarized (P e- = +1) e+ beam is completely left-handed polarized (P e+ = -1)

Physics with polarized beams: motivation and requirements Standard Model only J = 1 is possible. New Physics models: may contribute to J = 1 may allow the production of scalar particles, J = 0 would be allowed Exchange Diagrams Helicity of e- not coupled with helicity of e+ T - and U – channel diagrams The helicity of the incoming beam is directly coupled to the helicity of the final particle and is completely independent of the helicity of the second incoming particle. Single W+ production: the vertex e+W+n depends only on Pe+.

Physics with polarized beams Cross section enhanced or reduced Positron Polarization important Comparison with (Pe- =80%, Pe+ =0) estimated gain factor when (Pe-=80%, Pe+=60%) (Pe-=80%, Pe+ =30%) gain factor 2 gain factor 1.4 gain factor 2 gain factor 1.6

Machine-Detector Interface Issues BDS and Polarimeter Alignment

Impact of Crossing Angle and IR Magnets on Polarimetry Crossing angle + Detector Solenoid has beam axis and solenoid axis misaligned. This causes a vertical deflection of the beam and affects the trajectory of low energy beamsstrahlung pairs. An “Anti-Detector-Integrated Dipole” Anti-DID has been designed to compensate for this. It aligns low energy pairs with the exit beampipe (good for backgrounds) but misaligns the incoming beam and the beam at the IP Angle -102 mrad for SID Vertical trajectory of the beam in SiD with anti-DID and 14 mrad crossing angle. Collider IP is at Z = 0 meters. Trajectory of the beam at the upstream and downstream Compton IP s must be corrected for this vertical angle.

Polarimetry in the BDS of the ILC Beam Delivery System (BDS) as described in the RDR. The upper part shows the region from 2200 m to 1200 m upstream of the e+e- IP, including the polarimeter chicane at 1800 m. The lower part shows the region from 1200 m upstream to 400 m downstream of the IP, including the upstream energy spectrometer at 700 m as well as the extraction line energy spectrometer and polarimeter around 100 m downstream of the IP located at z = 0 m.

Compton differential cross section on Compton edge (b) Compton edge energy dependence on beam energy. (a) Compton differential cross section versus scattered electron energy for same (red curve) and opposite (green curve) helicity configuration of laser photon and beam electron. The beam energy is 250 GeV and the laser photon energy is 2.3 eV.

Schematic of the upstream polarimeter chicane.

Movable mirror and lens focusing the laser onto the electron beam.

Schematic of a single gas tube (left) and the complete hodoscope array covering the tapered exit window (right) as foreseen for the Cherekov detectors of both polarimeters.

“The plan is to separate them but we haven't finished all work on optics yet. Andrei Seryi

Downstream extraction line Polarimeter Goal for Polarimeter Accuracy is <0.25% Optical b functions and vertical momentum dispersion Dy in the 14 mrad extraction line from IP to the dump, shown for the 250 GeV nominal disrupted beam. Ken Moffeit February 1, 2005

Schematic of the ILC extraction line diagnostics for the energy spectrometer and the Compton polarimeter. Ken Moffeit February 1, 2005

Laser Optics Bench 1% measurement every minute 3 bunches per train Continuum Powerlite 8000 YAG Laser 10 Hz 6ns wide 532 nm 600 mJ Need ~100 mJ/2ns at Compton IP 1% measurement every hour 180 bunches per train 1% measurement every day all bunches of train Will investigate availability of a mode-locked laser with ~35 picosec wide pulse width. Recent new product from Quantel Pizzicato B -30 mJ pulse energy at 532 nm (2.33 eV) -20 Hz operation -35 picoseconds Ken Moffeit February 1, 2005

Ken Moffeit February 1, 2005

Ken Moffeit February 1, 2005

Beam Energy and Compton Endpoint 45.6 GeV y =32.1 cm 250 GeV y=27.2 cm Vertical offset of the Compton endpoint for a fixed-field chicane with 20mm dispersion at 250 GeV and the last 2 polarimeter "chicane" magnets 50% stronger than the first two. Scaling Multiplier of the last two dipoles to keep the Compton edge at 27.4cm from beamline Ken Moffeit February 1, 2005

Backgrounds due to beam loss Beam conditions for the norminal ILC parameter set show very small beam losses and no significant background is expected in the Compton electron Cherenkov detector cells. Beam loss with worse case having large disruption: Low power option study. Longitudinal density of the primary beam loss for the ILC low beam power parameter option “cs14” at 250 GeV beam energy. The two red lines show loss on the energy and polarimeter chicane collimators. The backgrounds from secondary interactions should be small at the Cherenkov detector compared to the signal even for the Low Power beam parameter running. Ken Moffeit February 1, 2005

Synchrotron Radiation Distribution of x vs y at the Compton detector plane for synchrotron radiation photons generated from the upstream magnets. The sharp cutoff at 14 cm is the shadow from the special collimator located at z = 160 m. There are no synchrotron radiation photons above 14.04 cm. Ken Moffeit February 1, 2005

Systematic Errors Expected Polarimeter Systematic Errors Uncertainty The physics of the Compton scattering process is well understood in QED, with radiative corrections less than 0.1% Detector backgrounds are easy to measure and correct for by using laser off pulses; Polarimetry data can be taken simulatanously with physics data; The Compton scattering rate is high and small statistical errors can be achieved in a short amount of time (sub-1% precision in one minute is feasible); The laser helicity can be selected on a pulse-by-pulse basis; The laser polarization is readily determined with 0.1% accuracy. Expected Polarimeter Systematic Errors Uncertainty dP/P Detector Analyzing Power 0.2% Detector Linearity 0.1% Laser Polarization Electronic Noise and Background Subtraction 0.05% TOTAL 0.25%

The Blondel scheme With 860 fb-1 of luminosity, the error on Pe- ~ 0.1% and the error on Pe+ ~ 0.2%.

CLIC Upstream Polarimeter Requirements: dP/P = 0.25% measurement robust and fast Slide from Peter Schuler’s talk at CLIC08 Workshop

CLIC Polarimeter Orbit angle tolerances at Compton IP and IR due to spin precession considerations Change in spin direction for various bend angles and the projection Of the longitudinal polarization. Electron beam energy is 1.5 TeV. Change in Bend Angle Change in Spin Direction Longitudinal Polarization Projection 100 mrad 340.4 mrad (19.5 degrees) 94.26% 50 mrad 170.2 mrad (9.75 degrees) 98.55% 25 mrad 85.1 mrad (4.87 degrees) 99.64% 13 mrad 45 mrad 99.9% For dP/P = 0.1% implies angle at Compton IP and IR is aligned to better than 13 mrad. Polarimeter needs to be before energy collimator to clean up Compton electrons.

CLIC Upstream Polarimeter Slide from Peter Schuler’s talk at CLIC08 Workshop

CLIC Upstream Polarimeter Slide from Peter Schuler’s talk at CLIC08 Workshop

Conclusions RDR Baseline: 30% polarized positrons Spin rotations systems for both electrons and positrons Does not have positron helicity flip randomly pulse train to pulse train Upstream and downstream polarimeters for both electrons and positrons. Both upstream and downstream polarimeters required. Physics benefit of having both polarimeters justifies $(10 to 15) million cost for either. Positron polarization of 30% improves physics reach (factor 2 in some reactions) Positron helicity flip important for systematic error reduction Z-pole calibration data taking: Important to have precision measurement of polarization ILC luminosity at Z-pole should be ~8*1032cm-2s-1 (40 times LEP & 400 times SLC) Check luminosity weighted polarization measurements from upstream and downstream polarimeters, check SLD measurement and physics-based using Blondel scheme. Calibrate upstream and downstream precision energy measurements against z-mass from LEP Measure ALR 1-day gives error on sin2qW at ~10-4 (with P error of 0.25%) Upstream Polarimeter Decision to have a Dedicated Chicane has been reached by ILC management. Energy collimator and laser wire system will be moved upstream of polarimeter chicane Downstream Polarimeter The extraction line with six magnets improves the acceptance of the Compton scattered electrons. This allows detection over a larger part of the Compton electron energy spectra. The backscattered electrons are further away from the beam pipe by ~10 cm.