Matthew Norton – Business Manager - Planning Policy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Site Allocations & Policies Development Plan Document Brett Culpin Peter Beever Planning Policy.
Advertisements

PLANNING THE FUTURE OF SEVENOAKS DISTRICT Alan Dyer Planning Policy Manager Sevenoaks District Council Presentation to Sevenoaks Society 7 October 2009.
Laura Wood Team Leader –Strategic Planning 16 th February 2015 Little Gaddesden Parish Council Meeting.
Copyright 2009 Northumberland County Council Northumberland Local Plan Core Strategy Update Riding Mill Parish Council 28 April.
Rushcliffe Borough Council
Strategic Sites Development Plan Document – Consultation Bernadette McGuigan and Duncan Morrison Wealden District Council Local Development Framework.
Issues and Options Consultation September Plans A Neighbourhood Plan Our vision and local planning policies Housing, Business and Employment, Tourism,
Understanding ‘objectively assessed needs’ Nicky Linihan Director – NJL-Solutions.
Leicestershire and Rutland Association of Local Councils and the Campaign to Protect Rural England Supporting Communities in Planning: Planning Workshop.
Planning and Localism – How it can work for you John King Friends of the Peak District
Trevor Warrick Spatial Policy and Implementation Manager
Settlement Boundaries Where do they come from? What do they do? What is the future?
Core Strategy for Central Lincolnshire The Growth Agenda Comment from Cllr Marianne Overton; Some people blame the press for the negative public view of.
Aberdeenshire Local Development Plan 2016 Identification of issues.
Core Strategy – Radstock Action Group 14 January 09 Bath & North East Somerset’s Core Strategy David Trigwell Divisional Director Planning & Transport.
Salford Draft Core Strategy Graham Gentry Head of Spatial Planning.
Langdon Parish Council Site Allocation Consultation Two sites at East Langdon One site at Green Lane, Martin Mill.
GAPTC Training Event - 30 th June 2011 Theme: Shaping what our communities will look like in the future Philippa Lowe, Head of Development Services and.
Forest of Dean Core Strategy The root of the Local Development Framework 1.
Deciding the priorities Evidence from the templates and from Parish Plans will form part of the evidence for the Core Strategy, but a range of other sources.
The Local Development Framework and other Planning matters Presentation to the Bradford Property Forum 19 June 2007.
Strategic Local Plan (SLP) 18 October The process to date Strategic Local Plan (SLP) – overarching policies, principles and spatial vision. Level.
Bath and North East Somerset – The place to live, work and visit CORE STRATEGY & PLACEMAKING PLAN.
Planning for the future of our district Core strategy options Presentation to C4B Associates February 2010.
Neighbourhood Planning. Frequently Asked Questions What is Neighbourhood Planning? What can a Neighbourhood Plan do – and what can it not do? What are.
Planning Policy Briefing Community Plan Local Plan Part 1 South East Plan Local Plan Part 2 Local Plan 2006 Village Design Statement Neighbourhood Plan.
Salford Core Strategy Strategic Planning and Housing Scrutiny Sub-Group 12 November 2008.
National Planning Policy Framework Based on Consultation ended 17 th October Issues affecting Local Councils.
Central Lancashire Preferred Core Strategy Your local councils working together to plan for a better future for everyone.
Shenstone Neighbourhood Plan Working Groups launch event 18 th June 2013.
Welcome and Introduction to GNTP Forum Councillor Jane Urquhart Portfolio Holder for Transport and Area Working Nottingham City Council.
Regional planning I local plan I design & regeneration I transport planning I research & information Southend-on-Sea Core Strategy Development Plan Document.
Salford Core Strategy Eccles Political Executive Briefing 14 November 2008.
Know your Community Rights Localism 6 months on Neighbourhood Planning Collecting the Evidence Alyson Linnegar 16 November 2012.
Little Chalfont Community Association Little Chalfont Parish Council 0.
Item 6: Progress report - Greater Nottingham Aligned Core Strategies - Strategic Regeneration Framework.
Herefordshire Local Plan Members’ Seminar 9 October 2015.
Why do we need more housing? The East Midlands Regional Plan is still in force, which requires 510 houses to be built per annum between 2006 and 2026 Although.
Local Development Framework Update Presentation by Claire May Principal Planning Officer.
Affordable Housing Martin Aust Pathfinder Development Consultants
‘People, Homes and Jobs’ Local Plan Consultation 2015 PPCLG 27 January 2016.
Local Plan Options Parish Coffee Time Friday 31 July 2015.
Neighbourhood Planning training for Parish Councils in Harborough District Session A: Setting a Vision.
Greater Nottingham Aligned Core Strategies Option for Consultation (15 th February until 12 th April 2010) Karen Shaw Nottingham City Council.
Item 3 South East Plan and recent policy statements…
19th November 2015 Wealden Local Plan – Issues, Options and Recommendations East Hoathly with Halland Parish Council.
Site Specific Proposals Local Development Document Background Papers Presented by Julia Baish 9 November 2011.
David Way, Senior Planning Officer, Wiltshire Council.
Housing and Planning in London under the Conservative Government: Spatial impacts, social polarization and sustainable development Duncan Bowie Housing.
Planning Overview, Newbury Gary Lugg Head of Planning and Countryside.
PLAN REVIEW PREFERRED APPROACH – STRATEGY Parish Council Briefing Sessions 5 th September 2016 Matthew Norton – Business Manager - Planning Policy Matthew.
Planning Explained Module 4 – Engaging with Neighbourhood Planning.
Trevor Warrick Spatial Policy and Implementation Manager
All information provided by Stoke dAbernon and District Residents' Association (the Association) and its Officers and.
AGENDA The current focus on housing Do we need older people’s housing? The role of planning? National Level Local Level Opportunities to influence Planning.
Southborough Hub - Update Southborough Town Council 31 March 2016
A Commercial Planner’s View…
Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan
THE EFFECT OF PPS3 ON LOCAL AUTHORITY PLANNERS
MMETAG Conference - Marston Vale 2050
Draft Babergh Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan
Neighbourhood Planning
Regional Spatial and Economic Strategy – Issues Paper
Planning for New Housing in Dacorum
MMETAG Conference - Marston Vale 2050
Neighbourhood Planning Workshop
Ashtead Neighbourhood Forum 2nd June
Stroud District Local Plan Briefing on Stroud District Local Plan (- Conrad Moore, Planning Strategy Team) January 2016.
PUBLIC CONSULTATION WORKSHOP BBB VILLAGE HALL 10 NOVEMBER 2014
Agenda – What we will be covering today
Presentation transcript:

PLAN REVIEW PREFERRED APPROACH – STRATEGY Parish Council Briefing Sessions 5th September 2016 Matthew Norton – Business Manager - Planning Policy Matthew Tubb – Planner - Policy Debbie Dickinson – Planner - Policy

Agenda Introduction Current Situation Plan Review so far Preferred Approach Preferred Approach - Strategy Question and Answer session

Current Situation Planning Policy in Newark & Sherwood National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) Newark & Sherwood Local Development Framework (LDF or Local Plan) Core Strategy Allocations & Development Management Document Supplementary Planning Documents

Current Situation

Plan Review So Far Issues Paper consultation from the 5th October to the 16th November 2015 Call for sites Production of Evidence Base Reviews underway Parish Council workshop 4th May 2016

Plan Review So Far The Issues Paper looked at: Amending the Spatial Strategy (i.e. the amount and location of new development) Lower Housing and Employment Targets But a sensible approach to review of allocated sites and consideration of new sites New detailed housing policies (including for Gypsies and Travellers)

Plan Review So Far The result of the consultations – some headlines: Concern from the Development Industry that our proposed figure of 454 dpa is not high enough General support for employment land figures A wide variety of views regarding development in rural areas

Plan Review So Far Call for sites Around 60 sites submitted to us 24 sites are new sites (not previously identified) 13 sites in the Nottingham-Derby Green Belt 34 in and around main towns and villages We are now carrying out assessments of these sites

Plan Review So Far Updating the Evidence Base Work underway on the major evidence base elements, including Infrastructure and retail. Problems getting consultants interested in doing the work have led to some delays

Preferred Approach Due to time constraints we have decided to split consultation on the Preferred Approach to the Plan Review into three documents: Preferred Approach – Strategy currently out to consultation until the 23rd September Preferred Approach – Settlements & Sites consultation on this and Preferred Approach – Town Centre & Retail to begin at the end of the month.

Preferred Approach – Strategy Includes: Spatial Strategy including Housing and Employment targets Housing Policy including affordable housing and gypsy and traveller housing requirements Minor Changes to Spatial and Core Policies

Preferred Approach – Strategy Spatial Strategy Housing Target Options – PA for 454 dwelling per annum Employment Target Options – PA 83.06 Ha Inclusion of Thoresby Colliery as a Strategic Site Consequential changes to distribution of growth

Preferred Approach – Strategy Thoresby Colliery Proposed Mixed Use development of Housing, Employment and Leisure uses Will require a change of the balance of development in the District Would require re-designation of Edwinstowe as a Service Centre Would require infrastructure improvements to support the development

Preferred Approach – Strategy Housing Targets – the difference Settlement Core Strategy Requirement (2006- 2026) Plan Review Preferred Approach Requirement (2013 – 2033) Core Strategy Residual Requirement (as at 1 April 2009) Plan Review Residual Requirement (as at April 2016) Newark Urban Area 9913 5284 7760 2324 Service Centres 2832 2642 1864 959 Ollerton & Boughton 1133 793 513 206 Rainworth 425 264 421 77 Southwell 294 151 Clipstone 850 660 636 -21 Edwinstowe n/a 545 Principal Villages 1416 881 990 420 Bilsthorpe 354 232 121 Blidworth 176 300 138 Collingham 142 117 124 283 Farnsfield 211 109 -4 Lowdham 71 9 65 3 Sutton on Trent 44 46 37

Preferred Approach – Strategy New Housing Targets – Residual Requirements Settlement Plan Review Residual Requirement (as at April 2016) Allowance for existing allocations still to gain planning permission Approximate Residual Dwelling Numbers to be found Newark Urban Area 2324 5971 -3647 Service Centres 959 960 -1 Ollerton & Boughton 206 370 -164 Rainworth 77 190 -113 Southwell 151 230 -79 Clipstone -21 120 -99 Edwinstowe 545 50 495 Principal Villages 420 412 8 Bilsthorpe 121 75 46 Blidworth 138 155 -17 Collingham 124 140 -16 Farnsfield -4 Lowdham 3 5 -2 Sutton on Trent 37

Preferred Approach – Strategy Spatial Policy 3 Rural Areas Three Options – Named Villages in the Hierarchy, retain current approach or amend SP3. Preferred Approach – Amend SP3 Change the locational and need criteria to facilitate residential development

Preferred Approach – Strategy Location – new development should be within the main built-up areas of villages which have sustainable access to Newark Urban Area, Service Centres or Principal Villages and have a range of local services themselves which address day to day needs. Local services include but are not limited to Post Office/shops, schools, public houses and village halls; Need –New housing where it helps to support community facilities and local services and reflects local need in terms of both tenure and house types; Within the main built up area of settlements which do not meet the locational criterion of this policy but are well related to villages that do, consideration will be given to the infilling of small gaps with 1 or 2 dwellings so long as this does not result in the joining of outlying areas into the main built up areas of the village in question or the coalesence with another village. Such development will need to comply with the scale, need, impact and character criteria of this policy.

Preferred Approach - Strategy Spatial Policy 4 – Green Belt Amendments to clarify: No new Green Belt Review Which policies apply to which villages excluded from the Green Belt No limited infilling in other locations in the Green Belt

Preferred Approach – Strategy Affordable Housing Changes in Government policy mean that we will not be able to ask for 30% Social Rented and Intermediate housing (e.g. Shared Ownership, Discounted Market for sale) Affordable Housing Nor ask for Affordable Housing on small sites below 11 dwellings. 20% of new homes must be ‘Starter Homes’ which are homes that have a one-off 20% discount on market value.

Preferred Approach – Strategy PA – Affordable Housing Policy Area   Overall % Starter Homes % Other Tenure Types Area 1 – Sherwood & Mansfield Fringe 30% 20% 6% Affordable Rent 4% Intermediate Area 2 – Central Newark & Sherwood 40% 12 % Affordable Rent 8% Intermediate Area 3 – Newark and South District

Preferred Approach – Strategy

Preferred Approach – Strategy Gypsy & Traveller Housing Targets New government guidance has resulted in a change to the way that Gypsy & Travellers who no longer travel are counted, resulting in lower pitch targets: Time Period Pitch requirement Method of delivery 2013-2018 14 pitches Planning permission granted for 4 permanent pitches. Allocations, permanent planning permissions or availability of lawful pitches for a minimum of 10 pitches by 2018 2018-2023 15 pitches Allocations or availability of lawful pitches to provide a minimum of 15 pitches by 2023 2023-2028 11 pitches Provision of sites, in and around settlements central to delivering the Spatial Strategy.

Preferred Approach – Strategy Amendments are proposed to many of the other Spatial and Core Policies other than the ones mentioned above. Core Policies relating to Town Centre and Retail issues and the Area Policies will be tackled in later consultations

Preferred Approach - Strategy Questions & Answers