Bore quench field vs. critical current density

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superconducting Magnet Program S. Gourlay CERN March 11-12, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory IR Quad R&D Program LHC IR Upgrade Stephen A.
Advertisements

Mechanical Analysis of Dipole with Partial Keystone Cable for the SIS300 A finite element analysis has been performed to optimize the stresses in the dipole.
Mechanical Design & Analysis Igor Novitski. Outlines Electromagnetic Forces in the Magnet Goals of Finite Element Analysis Mechanical Concept Description.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQS Progress Report High Field Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration Meeting – CM11 FNAL October 27-28, 2008.
Preliminary Design of Nb 3 Sn Quadrupoles for FCC-hh M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC.
Twin Solenoid Twin Solenoid - conceptual design for FCC-hh detector magnet - Matthias GT Mentink Alexey Dudarev Helder Pais Da Silva Leonardo Erik Gerritse.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
FCC Week 2015Design Options for 16 T LTS Dipoles – G. Sabbi 1 Overview of Magnet Design Options for LTS Dipoles in the 16 T Range GianLuca Sabbi, LBNL.
Magnets for muon collider ring and interaction regions V.V. Kashikhin, FNAL December 03, 2009.
Towards Nb 3 Sn accelerator magnets, challenges & solutions, history & forecast Shlomo Caspi Superconducting Magnet Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Development of the EuCARD Nb 3 Sn Dipole Magnet FRESCA2 P. Ferracin, M. Devaux, M. Durante, P. Fazilleau, P. Fessia, P. Manil, A. Milanese, J. E. Munoz.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Progress and Schedule Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP Collaboration Meeting – CM13 Port Jefferson November 4-6, 2009.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 1 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
Superconducting Magnet Group Superconducting magnet development for ex-situ NMR LDRD 2003 Paolo Ferracin, Scott Bartlett 03/31/2003.
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
Magnet design, final parameters Paolo Ferracin and Attilio Milanese EuCARD ESAC review for the FRESCA2 dipole CERN March, 2012.
LARP Collaboration Meeting, April 26-28, 2006Gian Luca Sabbi HQ Design Study (WBS ) LARP Collaboration Meeting April 26-28, 2006 N. Andreev, E.
New options for the new D1 magnet Qingjin Xu
Dipole design at the 16 T frontier - Magnet R&D for a Future Circular Collider (FCC) at Fermilab Alexander Zlobin Fermilab.
Muon Cooling Channel Superconducting Magnet Systems Muon Collider Task Force Meeting on July 31, 2006 V.S. Kashikhin.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 3 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
Cold test of SIS-300 dipole model Sergey Kozub Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP), Protvino, Moscow region, Russia.
FCC week March 2015 Marriott Georgetown Hotel D2 for FCC P.Fabbricatore INFN Genova D2 for FCC P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon INFN Genova Presented.
S. Lassiter, P. Brindza, M. Fowler, E. Sun - Jefferson Lab G. Markham - NovaTech, B. Wands - Fermi Lab Abstract—Jefferson Laboratory is developing a set.
1 BNL -FNAL - LBNL - SLAC P. Wanderer IR’07 - Frascati 7 November 2007 U.S. LARP Magnet Programme.
DESIGN STUDIES IR Magnet Design P. Wanderer LARP Collaboration Meeting April 27, 2006.
Long Quad (LQ) & High Gradient (HQ) Series Alexander Zlobin bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program DOE LARP review Fermilab, June.
Program overview: motivation, target parameters, timeline A.V. Zlobin 15 T dipole design review 28 April 2016.
IR Magnets for Muon Collider Alexander Zlobin and Vadim Kashikhin Muon Collider Physics Workshop, Fermilab November 12, 2009.
Preliminary analysis of a 16 T sc dipole with cos-theta lay-out INFN team October 2015.
Page 1 TQC Mechanical Model Igor Novitski / Rodger Bossert May 24, 2006 Results of MM#4 and MM#5.
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Mechanical behavior of the EuroCirCol 16 T Block-type dipole magnet during a quench Junjie Zhao, Tiina Salmi, Antti stenvall, Clement Lorin 1.
Massimo Sorbi on behalf of INFN team:
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
WORK IN PROGRESS F C C Main Quadrupoles FCC week 2017
TQS Overview and recent progress
Model magnet test results at FNAL
HQ Mirror Assembly R. Bossert
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
LARP Technology Quadrupole Review
At ICFA Mini-Workshop on High Field Magnets for pp Colliders,
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils (DRAFT)
TQC-01 SG data I. Novitski.
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Plans for the PSI Canted-Dipole Program
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
FCC-hh 16 T, 1.9 K INFN Team October 2015.
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
Block design status EuroCirCol
DESIGN OPTIONS IN THE T RANGE
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
SEMI-ANALYTIC APPROACHES TO MAGNET DESIGN
MKQXF FEA Model Haris Kokkinos
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
MQXF coil cross-section status
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 2 Paolo Ferracin European Organization for Nuclear Research.
PROGRESS TOWARDS AN OPEN MIDPLANE SEPARATION DIPOLE
P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Muon Collider Magnet Technologies/Challenges
Muon Collider SR and IR Magnets
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Q4 development M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet, E. Todesco
J. García, F. Toral (CIEMAT) P. Fessia (CERN)
Review of Quench Limits
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
Presentation transcript:

Bore quench field vs. critical current density Design Studies of 16 T Nb3Sn dipole at Fermilab* V.V. Kashikhin, I. Novitski, A.V. Zlobin, Fermilab, Batavia, IL 60510, USA FCC Week 2017 Berlin, 29 May – 2 June 2017 Introduction Fermilab in collaboration with other members of the US-MDP is developing a 15 T Nb3Sn dipole demonstrator based on a 4-layer graded cos-theta coil with a 60 mm aperture and a ~600 mm diameter cold iron yoke. In parallel, magnet design studies are being conducted to explore the limits of the Nb3Sn accelerator magnet technology while pushing the nominal bore field to 16 T. The first results of these studies, including a possible stress management technique are discussed and compared with the baseline (BL) design parameters. Magnetic Analysis The BL design analysis has shown that achieving higher fields above 15 T is limited by unloading and separation of the inner layer pole turns under the Lorentz forces. The increase the coil preload, however, is not possible as the stress in the coil midplane approaches 180 MPa, which is close to the limit for the brittle Nb3Sn conductor. To overcome these limitations, the following strategy was used: use coil with the floating wedges for the inner coil unload the inner coil by moving turns to the outer coil introduce the azimuthal and radial SM in the outer coil Structural Analysis A structural analysis was performed with ANSYS code to evaluate displacements and stresses in both designs using a special parametric model. The pole turn in the SM design remains in contact with the pole block at the fields up to 16 T whereas in the BL design, the pole turn separates from the pole block at the fields above 15 T and the gap reaches ~20 µm at 16 T. For the outer SM coil, the peak equivalent stress is under 180 MPa at 16 T, located in the mid-plane block of the outer layer. Cross-sections of the baseline (BL) coil design (left) and the stress-management design (SM) (right) Equivalent stresses in the coil (left) and the support structure of the outer layers (right) at 16 T Peak stress (left) and the gap between the inner pole turn and the spacer (right) vs. bore field Bore quench field vs. critical current density Conclusion A stress management technique has been proposed together with the turn re-distribution between the inner and outer coils to increase the level of magnetic field. It was found that the stresses in the inner and outer coils are below 150 MPa and 180 MPa respectively, and that the inner pole turn stays in contact with the pole spacer at up to 16 T bore field. Given the 10% margin at 1.9 K, it can be considered as the nominal operating field for this design. The studies and optimization of this design concept will continue. *Work supported by Fermi Research Alliance, LLC, under contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359 with the U.S. Department of Energy. Presented at IPAC2017, Copenhagen, May 2017.