Mechanical results on the double aperture Version V20ar

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mechanical Analysis of Dipole with Partial Keystone Cable for the SIS300 A finite element analysis has been performed to optimize the stresses in the dipole.
Advertisements

SPL Intercavity support Conceptual design review 04/11/ A. Vande Craen TE/MSC-CMI.
Update on ARIES-CS Coil Structural Analysis X.R. Wang and A.R. Raffray ARIES Meeting PPPL, NJ October 4-5, 2006.
Cable inventory, relative measurements and 1 st mechanical computations STUDY OF THE QUADRUPOLE COLLAR STRUCTURE P. Fessia, F. Regis Magnets, Cryostats.
LARP QXF 150mm Structure Mike Anerella / John Cozzolino / Jesse Schmalzle November 15, nd Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting.
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
2 nd Joint HiLumi LHC – LARP Annual Meeting INFN Frascati – November 14 th to 16 th 2012 Helene Felice Paolo Ferracin LQ Mechanical Behavior Overview and.
2D STRESS ANALYSIS OF THE TS MAGNET PROTOTYPE Stefania Farinon and Pasquale Fabbricatore.
KDEMO Structural Analysis P. Titus June ! KDEMO coil axisymmetric analysis pfcb 21 1, 1.52,0.70,.9,1.3,8,10 !CS1 2, 1.52,2.10,.9,1.3,8,10 !CS2.
SC magnet developments at CEA/Saclay Maria Durante Hélène Felice CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SACM/LEAS.
Redesign of the STOL CH 701 Landing Gear Strut
NED Project P. MANIL – CEA/IRFU/SIS – Short Model Coils meeting #18 – 25/01/2008 – slide 1/18 SHORT MODEL COILS PROGRAM SMC meeting #18 Pierre MANIL CEA/IRFU/SIS.
First approaches J. García, F. Toral, J. Munilla – CIEMAT.
Features: 1. 2D structural analysis (plane stress) 2. Static analysis 3. Quarter symmetric 4. SI units 5. Only the yoke is modeled 6. Material properties.
WP6: HIGH FIELD STUDIES The work package deals with 20 T field accelerator-type configurations and its consequences on mechanics and materials: The purpose.
MQXF support structure An extension of LARP experience Helene Felice MQXF Design Review December 10 th to 12 th, 2014 CERN.
Results of Linear Stress Analyses for Modular Coils and Coil structure For 2T High Beta Currents at 0 Seconds and Initial Coil Shrinkage of in/in.
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Bolt Preload and Shear Load
UCLA - S.Sharafat: ITER TBM Dec. ’04 DCLL ITER-TBM: Design for Accident Relevant Loading Jaafar A. El-Awady, P. Rainsberry, S. Sharafat, and N. Ghoniem,
Hybrid Structure with Cooling John Cozzolino LARP Collaboration Meeting Port Jefferson, NY November 4-6, 2009.
Twin Solenoid Study Infinite and Short Models. Infinitive Twin Solenoid Induction in the Detector area B d = µ 0 (i d -i a ) with radius R d Induction.
Magnet design, final parameters Paolo Ferracin and Attilio Milanese EuCARD ESAC review for the FRESCA2 dipole CERN March, 2012.
ZTF Gasket and window stress under 1 atm pressure Callahan 10/23/2014.
Update on Q4 DSM/IRFU/SACM The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
16 T Dipole Design Options: Input Parameters and Evaluation Criteria F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT-VC, Sept. 4th, 2015.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
Stresses and Deformations in 14 T Nb 3 Sn Solenoid of 0.8 m I.R. and 1.0 m O.R. & Half Length Bob Weggel 10/7/10.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus March F.
Practice Problems for Axisymmetric Planar Elements Jake Blanchard Fall 2007.
DESIGN STUDIES IR Magnet Design P. Wanderer LARP Collaboration Meeting April 27, 2006.
3 rd ESAC Review, 27 th February to 1 st March 2013, CEA Saclay Fresca2 Dipole Structure Assembly J.C Perez on behalf of Fresca2 collaboration team.
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF D2 MECHANICAL STRUCTURE S. Farinon, P. Fabbricatore (INFN-Sezione di Genova) Sept. 17 th 2014.
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Mechanical behavior of the EuroCirCol 16 T Block-type dipole magnet during a quench Junjie Zhao, Tiina Salmi, Antti stenvall, Clement Lorin 1.
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
WORK IN PROGRESS F C C Main Quadrupoles FCC week 2017
TQS Overview and recent progress
HQ02b Preload Increase - Summary
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
Mechanical tolerance analysis for the MQXF prototype structures
16 T Cosq DIPOLE Mechanical Analysis
Segreti, Lorin, Durante 11 July 2017
16 T Nb3Sn block dipole EuroCirCol
Cosq configuration - Mechanics
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils (DRAFT)
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
11 T dipole coil features and dimensions
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Bore quench field vs. critical current density
Date of download: 12/20/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
D2 and Q4 orbit corrector status
Block design status EuroCirCol
16T Cosθ Dipole Configuration
MKQXF FEA Model Haris Kokkinos
Active MEMS for Wireless and Optical Space Communications
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
Thermo-mechanical Analysis
MQXF coil cross-section status
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
Q4 development M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet, E. Todesco
Table 5. Maximum stress, strain and deformation values
Stress distribution around door-opening. Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
HQ test at CERN: strain and stress measurements
Presentation transcript:

Mechanical results on the double aperture Version V20ar Michel Segreti, Clément Lorin, Maria Durante, Hélène Felice 28 March 2017

Mechanical model 80 mm thick shell 800 µm ← 50 µm ↓ Contacts/symmetry: sliding; no friction glued: coils with pole vertically and all coils together ¼ of the structure due to symmetries Version V20ar from Clément LORIN

Coil stress distribution Key Cold – 4.2 K 16.8 T (105% nominal) σX -97 MPa -229 MPa -209 MPa von Mises +91 MPa +216 MPa +207MPa

σx at coils / pole interface σX (Mpa) 16.8 T (105% nominal) 3rd coil Compression at the coils / pole interface at 8 T and 16 T. Low traction in the 3rd coil / pole interface in average at 16.8 T, but in compression in the mid-height of the 3rd coil

Aperture displacement (µm) Aperture displacement in the X direction from the nominal position (+125 mm) at each loading step ( the impact on the optic aspect need to be verified ?) Key A B C A: -111; B: -110; C: -111 Cold – 4.2 K A: -606; B: -603; C: -604 A B C 8 T (50% nominal) A B C A: -579; B: -576; C: -577 16 T (nominal) A B C A: -502; B: -500; C: -501 16.8 T (105% nominal) A B C A: -492; B: -490; C: -491

Synthesis For instance, the aperture displacement is about 100 µm between cool-down and energization at nominal current (16 T)

Stress in the structure Von Mises stress distribution in the structure at each loading step Key 4.2 K +346 MPa +965 MPa 8 T 16 T 16.8 T +821 MPa +959 MPa +987 MPa