Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 – Seattle Region 10 – Seattle
Advertisements

What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
TMDLs and the NACD TMDL Task Force TMDLs NACD TMDL Task Force TMDL Draft Policy Trading and TMDLs.
Pollutant Trading Discussion 22 July Why Allow Trading? §To make point sources pay §To lure nonpoint sources into doing pollution control so we.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Components of every Good Watershed Management Plan NDEQ – Planning Unit August 6 th, 2014 NDEQ – Planning Unit gust 6 th 2014.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
9.Monitoring Plan + 10.Implementation Plan + 4. LAs* 5. WLAs* 6. MOS* 7.Seasonal Variation* 8.Reasonable Assurance + TMDL Process 1 Problem Understanding.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Water Policy in the US and the EU K H Reckhow and C Pahl-Wostl Part I: US Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
Water Quality Trading In The Bear River Basin. EPA National Watershed Initiative Bear River Basin WIS WQT Market WQ ModelingOutreach EPA GuidebookFinancial.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Federal Clean Water Act Monitoring and assessments completed statewide Standards not met? Section 303 (d) requires placing the water body on the “Impaired.
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Preparing for Regulatory Change WATER RESOURCES WORKSHOP February 20, 2004 Donald J. Brady, Ph.D.
The ABCs of TMDLs for Stakeholders Bruce Zander, EPA 28 September 2005 Webcast.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
Staci Goodwin Senior TMDL Project Manager Office of Water Quality
Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen Total Mass Daily Load Development for the Atascosa River Jessica L. Watts.
Clifton Bell, P.E., P.G. Chesapeake Bay Modeling Perspectives for the Regulated Community.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
Introduction to Water Quality Trading National Forum On Water Quality Trading July 22-23, 2003 Chicago, Illinois.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
FY 2016 EAP Proposals 1.Groundwater Sampling at Coulee Creek 2.Deep & Coulee Straight to Implementation Project 3.Little Spokane DO/pH TMDL 4.Lake Spokane.
TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed Linda Pardy (858) Jimmy.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
USEPA TARGETED WATERSHEDS GRANT
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
David Stevens, Nancy Mesner, Terry Glover, Arthur Caplan
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Legal Tools for Reducing HABs In Lake Erie
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
Total Maximum Daily Load Program
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Water Quality Credit Trading
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Phosphorus and Suspended Solids TMDL For the Lower Fox River/Green Bay Area of Concern – Putting the Pieces Together Bud Harris, P. Sager, D. Scheberle,
Using GIS to Aid in TMDL Modeling
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Harpeth River Watershed TMDL Development: Making the most of the stakeholder group HARPETH CONSERVANCY 9/19/2018.
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Implementation of Water Quality Standards and the WQ Based Approach
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective Mike Allred, Utah DEQ Lynn Van Every Idaho DEQ 19 July 2007

The TMDL Process TMDL

TMDL Definition jWLA + jLA + {MOS} = TMDL WLA = wasteload allocation (point source loads) LA = load allocation (nonpoint source and background loads) MOS = margin of safety (explicit or implicit) TMDL = total maximum daily load

Dealing with Uncertainty in TMDLs Use margin of safety (explicit or implicit) to address uncertainties. The larger the uncertainty, the larger the margin of safety (MOS). Use phased TMDL* approach * A phased TMDL is designed to achieve applicable water quality standards and is based on the best data and information that is available at the time the TMDL is established, but is subject to change as new data and information is collected. Using the phased TMDL approach triggers the need to include a monitoring plan in the TMDL.

TMDL Review Criteria Is the TMDL approvable? Identification of waterbody/pollutant of concern Applicable water quality standards and numeric targets Technical analysis/supporting documentation Margin of safety & seasonality TMDL/loading capacity Wasteload & load allocations Reasonable assurances nonpoint source controls will be implemented if point source WLAs rely on those controls Public participation Monitoring plan (for phased approach) Implementation plan (not required)

Allocation Options for TMDLs Chap. 7; EPA’s Sediment TMDL Protocol Maximum allowable loads . allocation to source categories, tributaries, channel types, specific parcels, erosion process categories Percentage reduction targets . reduction from estimated baseline load Performance-based actions or practices . for example, allocation of responsibilities of BMPs distributed throughout watershed All allocation methods must demonstrate that water quality standards will be met.

Table 1. Examples of Total Maximum Daily Load allocations for total phosphorus in Bear River basin in Idaho. Current Load Estimate Allocation % Reduction Preston WWTP 1550 kg/yr 50 kg/yr Significant 5-Mile Creek 314 kg/y 152 kg/yr Deep Creek 5090 kg/yr 2145 kg/yr

Why? TMDL Development: An Ongoing Process water quality standards changed environmental conditions changed shifting priorities new water quality problems uncovered previous assumptions changed - - - -

TMDL Implementation TMDLs are not self-implementing Section 303(d) does not create any implementing authorities, TMDLs are implemented only through other programs and statutory mechanisms TMDLs do set the stage for implementation Implementation tools vary: NPDES permits other Federal, state, local laws & requirements State and local laws and ordinances (enforceable & voluntary) individual, voluntary-based actions

Relationship to other Clean Water Programs Water quality standards Monitoring and Assessment Section 319 nonpoint source program consistency between 303(d) list and 319 project priorities TMDL development precursor to or part of 319 project NPDES permitting Wetlands Watershed innitiatives Water Quality Trading Tribal Programs CERCLA/Superfund Forest Planning/BLM Range Management

1111

1212

14

1515

1616

17

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Whooooo, me?? 26

Lynn VanEvery Idaho DEQ Mike Allred, Utah DEQ Lynn VanEvery Idaho DEQ