Journal of Vision. 2011;11(6):14. doi: / Figure Legend:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure Legend: From: Human grasp point selection
Advertisements

Journal of Vision. 2006;6(5):2. doi: /6.5.2 Figure Legend:
From: Complex interactions between spatial, orientation, and motion cues for biological motion perception across visual space Journal of Vision. 2013;13(2):8.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
From: Holistic integration of gaze cues in visual face and body perception: Evidence from the composite design Journal of Vision. 2017;17(1):24. doi: /
From: Unsupervised clustering method to detect microsaccades
Journal of Vision. 2003;3(11):7. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(12):7. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Vector subtraction using visual and extraretinal motion signals: A new look at efference copy and corollary discharge theories Journal of Vision.
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):3. doi: /4.9.3 Figure Legend:
From: Occlusion-related lateral connections stabilize kinetic depth stimuli through perceptual coupling Journal of Vision. 2009;9(10):20. doi: /
Figure Legend: From: Bayesian inference for psychometric functions
From: What are the units of storage in visual working memory?
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(10):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(9):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Breaking object correspondence across saccades impairs object recognition: The role of color and luminance Journal of Vision. 2016;16(11):1. doi: /
From: Additive Manufacturing of Glass
Date of download: 11/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Figure Legend: From: The natural statistics of blur
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The attenuation surface for contrast sensitivity has the form of a witch's hat within the central visual field Journal of Vision. 2012;12(11):23.
From: Illumination assumptions account for individual differences in the perceptual interpretation of a profoundly ambiguous stimulus in the color domain:
Figure Legend: From: Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
From: Motion processing with two eyes in three dimensions
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(9):9. doi: /9.9.9 Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The color lexicon of the Somali language
From: Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Comparing integration rules in visual search
Figure Legend: From: Color constancy and hue scaling
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(6):4. doi: /4.6.4 Figure Legend:
From: Surface color perception and equivalent illumination models
From: What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene?
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(2):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: statistical inference
From: Perceptual entrainment of individually unambiguous motions
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: A new analytical method for characterizing nonlinear visual processes with stimuli of arbitrary distribution: Theory and applications Journal of.
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(12):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2014;14(14):2. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Motion processing with two eyes in three dimensions
From: Probing visual consciousness: Rivalry between eyes and images
From: Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty Journal of Vision. 2013;13(7):8. doi: /
From: Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty Journal of Vision. 2013;13(7):8. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(6):4. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(1):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The psychometric function: The lapse rate revisited
From: Size-induced distortions in perceptual maps of visual space
From: Variability of eye movements when viewing dynamic natural scenes
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(10):5. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The perceptual basis of common photographic practice
From: What's color got to do with it
From: Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(7):20. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(3):28. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The absolute threshold of cone vision
Figure Legend: From: The fine structure of multifocal ERG topographies
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(12):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
Figure Legend: From: Eidolons: Novel stimuli for vision research
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):15. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Motion-induced blindness and microsaccades: Cause and effect
Adaptation Disrupts Motion Integration in the Primate Dorsal Stream
Presentation transcript:

From: Optimal inference explains the perceptual coherence of visual motion stimuli Journal of Vision. 2011;11(6):14. doi:10.1167/11.6.14 Figure Legend: Model simulations for different parameter settings. (a) Illustration of seven different settings for the likelihood parameters. The black line in the central log–log plot shows the default width of the speed likelihood as a function of speed. The inset plot shows the default shape of the measurement distribution (see Figure B1a), thus illustrating the relationship between speed and direction uncertainty. Each of the surrounding six log–log plots and insets shows a variation of one of the three likelihood parameters, as highlighted in red (default values are redrawn from the center plot, in gray, for comparison). For example, the upper right and lower left plots show an increase or decrease of the speed at which the transition occurs, c 1, respectively. Left and right plots show a change in the proportionality factor at high speeds, c 2. Upper/lower plots show a change in the proportionality between the standard deviations for speed and direction, c 3. (b) Illustration of seven different settings for the prior parameters. The black line in the central log–log plot shows the speed prior. Inset pie chart shows the prior for the two hypotheses (blue for coherent, green for transparent). Each of the surrounding six log–log plots and insets shows a variation of one of the three prior parameters. The upper right and lower left plots show changes in the speed at which the prior transitions from a constant regime to a power-law regime, c 4. Upper/lower plots show a change in the rate of decay, c 5. Left/right plots show a change in the coherence prior, p(H coh). (c, d) Simulated “percepts” of the model, corresponding to parameter values indicated in (a) and (b), respectively. For each of the grayscale plots, the individual squares correspond to plaid stimuli with different component and pattern speeds (see Figure 3a), and the intensity of each square indicates the probability that the associated plaid stimulus is perceived as transparent (black = 0%, white = 100%). Date of download: 11/14/2017 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2017. All rights reserved.