Public support to organic certification

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Free Trade Agreements: Trade and environment related capacity building Nina C. Rør, Deputy Director General.
Advertisements

General introduction to the New Approach and CE marking Contribution to workshop in Sofia, Bulgaria on 19 and 20 april 2006 by Annette Dragsdahl, Senior.
Arrangements regarding ECP 2014–2020 implementation 1.Implementation of the Republic of Slovenia Budget Act Specific section for the period:
The Farm Bill is Done! Hearings were first held in Spring 2011 Nine votes were taken in the House, Senate, or in committees This farm bill was the first.
1 Fiscal Federalism in Iraq: OIL and GAS. The oil situation: a snapshot.
Organic Agriculture: A Trade and Sustainable Development Opportunity for Developing Countries Sophia Twarog, Ph.D.
Ethiopia’s Government Key Policy Commitments Towards G8 Implementation: Current Status and Future challenges Ethiopia’s Country Team Contribution for Agricultural.
Meeting of the CEI Working Group on Agriculture – Rome, 22 May 2006 FAO’s Technical Assistance Framework for Trust Funds in the Western Balkans 2006 –
Innovations to insure agricultural catastrophic risks Dr. Emilio Hernandez Agricultural Finance Officer, AGS Islamabad, April.
Seventh Framework Programme Grant Agreement No Improving the Organic Certification System Workshop in Brussels, October 14, 2011 Lizzie Melby Jespersen.
US Department of the Interior The Office of Insular Affairs (OIA)
Regional Workshop 5: Improving Methods for Regional Aquaculture Development and Promotion Podgorica, October 2014 FAO Technical Cooperation Programme.
Organic Agriculture Development in Georgia Prepared by : Mariam Jorjadze, Elkana Cologne October 2011.
Role of Breeders Organisations in agricultural policy Attila Takacs Hungarian Animal Breeders Association.
ETF Conference, Building & Financing European Transport Infrastructure, Brussels, 23rd Oct Building & Financing European Transport Infrastructures.
Valstybinė maisto ir veterinarijos tarnyba State Food and Veterinary Service Lithuanian experience in modernizing SPS measures Dr. Vidmantas Paulauskas.
SANCO-D-4 International Questions (bilateral) EU Rules for Food Import – Amman, 29 November 2010 Wolf Maier, DG Health and Consumers, EU Commission.
Rosa S. Rolle Senior Agro-Industry and Post-harvest Officer FAO Regional Officer for Asia and the Pacific Integration of Small Farmers into Horticultural.
National Quality Infrastructure TRTA3 Approach
Forum on the Future of Agriculture 2010 What is Russia’s agricultural potential. What is needed to unlock/realize it? Minister of Agriculture of the Republic.
Challenges to Organic Trade Organic Standards and Technical Regulations 70 countries with organic regulations of some type Some standards only Some,
Slide 1 ANSI Annual Conference 2002 Breaking Down Border: Business, Standards and Trade Standards Outreach and the U.S. Government Faraaz H. Siddiqi Senior.
Funding Modifications, Updating the EMA Law, Salary Supplement and Continuing Ed Requirements Art Faulkner Director.
16-17 November 2005 COSCAP – NA Project Steering Group Guangzhou, China 1 Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency.
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine. Organic Sector Department of Agriculture, Food & the Marine regulates the sector in Ireland 5 private.
IPRTA FORUM Mexico 08 Panel 1: Emerging challenges, opportunities and recent developments for IPRTA to developing countries Valentín Mir Director International.
FAO TCP/RER/3402 “Assistance to Western Balkan Countries for Improving Compliance to International Standards on Aquatic Animal Health” Regional Workshop.
G20 Agriculture Deputies Meeting, May 12, 2011 FOOD RESERVES Ivan Polanco Director of Public Policies, ANEC - National Associations of Marketing Companies.
GROUP CERTIFICATION: THE INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEM Istituto per la Certificazione Etica ed Ambientale.
Public support for national organic data collection and dissemination
Smallholders Inclusive Vegetable Production for Market in Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR Silinthone Sacklokham National University of Laos.
7th ASEAN COMPETITION CONFERENCE 8-9 March 2017, Malaysia “ASEAN’s Young Competition Agencies – The Tough Get Going” Dato’ Ahmad Hisham Kamaruddin Member.
The Czech Health System – its Presence and Future
Public support to develop a national/common organic logo
Fighting Corruption, EU Procurement and EU Subsidies Fraud in Belgium
Public support to organic farm investment
Including organic agriculture/gardening in schools
Standards Outreach and the U.S. Government
Financing Czech projects in South Korea
Public procurement of organic products
Ministry of Finance Contribution of the Operational Programmes to the implementation of the NSRF objectives Boriana Pencheva Director Management.
Rural Development experiences of Hungary
Pavel Racocha May, 2004 Dubrovnik, Croatia
University “Hasan Prishtina” – Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Public support to organic research and extension
Public support to organic vocational training and academic programs
Mechanisms on Food Safety and Product Quality
Political justification for supporting organic processing & marketing
Public support to organic agriculture through tax breaks
Public support to consumer education and promotion campaigns
Public support to domestic organic trade and retail uptake
Public support to PGS development
Conversion and maintenance area payments for organic production
Public support to organic exports
Building organic expertise within the public sector
Pursuing organic equivalence arrangements
Current budgetary and regulatory position of the CAP
CMO introduction and main legal framework
TRADE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF PAKISTAN SUB-REGIONAL OFFICE SUKKUR
Role of Industry Self-regulation in Phytosanitary Compliance
Farm Advisory System in Hungary
CAP decision making process
Strategic Policies for a More Competitive Agriculture Sector
Developing the power sector in Federal Nepal Main lessons from international experience Kathmandu, November 06, 2018.
Rural Partnerships between Small Farmers and Private Sector
ICS Staff One person is responsible for overall ICS and can delegate the responsibilities so that for each procedure or task of the ICS, one person is.
IMPLEMENTATION OF INDEX INSURANCE: EXAMPLES FROM ACROSS THE CONTINENT
Participation of the private and academic sectors in ITU activities
Position of the European Farmers on the changes and news within the new CAP François GUERIN | Second National Farmers meeting in Bulgaria 6 February.
Presentation transcript:

Public support to organic certification

Political justification for supporting organic certification

Certification as a public good Certification is there to correct a market imperfection: the asymmetry of information between seller and buyer. Optimizes market functioning in a free market economy. Control is often a duty of the state, e.g. food safety control. Organic control can also be the role of a government (partly delegated to private Certification Bodies (CB)). Covering certification costs can give equal access to certification for operators all over the territory (remote areas) and for all farming systems (diversified production). Presence and outreach of organic certifiers is a strong factor in organic sector growth.

Possible ways to support organic input certification

Different models of support Set-up a national certification body financed through the regular public budget (certification free of charge for all national organic operators). E.g. Denmark. Set-up national certification body providing only local certification, at reduced costs. E.g. Lao PDR. Support the national CB to get international accreditation (e.g. IFOAM Accreditation). E.g. Czech Republic. Subsidies for organic certification (e.g.: US cost-share program, Tunisia, many Chinese local governments) or full reimbursement (e.g.: Philippines, Samoa). Subsidies for food quality scheme certification in general (e.g. EU) Support conversion projects or setting-up Internal Control Systems (ICS) for group certification (e.g. Indonesia).

Country examples

US National Organic Certification Cost Share Program Support to Organic Agriculture (OA) certification is the main form of support to OA in the US. NOCCSP and AMA reimburse up to 75% of the annual certification costs with maximum of EUR 697 per farm. Federal budget allocates EUR 9.5 million annually as mandatory funding for certification cost-share. Administered at the state level. NOCCSP: The National Organic Certification Cost Share Program AMA: Agricultural Management Assistance Organic Certification Cost Share Program These are noncompetitive financial assistance programs that help defray the costs of organic certification for organic farmers.

Denmark: free public certification for all First law on organic farming voted in 1998 established the public organic certification system for all operators. Followed by spectacular sector growth. Free of charge for all, including farmers, processors, handlers. Responsible agencies are the Danish Agrifish Agency and the Danish Veterinary and Food Agency. 10 regional control and enforcement offices. Exceptions to the “free of charge” policy: • Extra controls due to risk of fraud; • Certification for exporting to other regulating countries not covered by equivalence arrangements; • Certification to private standards that are demanded by certain EU markets.

The Philippines, Tunisia, Mexico Law in The Philippines provides full organic certification cost reimbursement for the first 3 years. Payment is done directly by the Department of Ag regional field office to the chosen CB. In Tunisia, organic certification is subsidized since 1999. Subsidy covers 70% of the certification costs for a period of 5 to 7 years. Mexico: federal government reimburses: 50% of capacity building costs to obtain OA certification, 50-75% of the technical assistance costs for operators to produce their Organic System Plan, and 50-75% of the certification costs. Plus it supports organic CBs by covering 50% of their organic accreditation costs.

Pitfalls and challenges of this form of support

Main challenges Main challenge of subsidies/reimbursement: Complicated reimbursement procedures can make access difficult for small operators. Challenges of the public certification model: Cannot work in countries with low cultural trust in government or high corruption. Needs to have the right competence (e.g. to obtain international accreditation). Risk that not enough resources are allocated, so unable to reach all operators (e.g. Costa Rica). Might not be able to provide all options required by the market (e.g. private scheme OA certification, certification to other regulations, etc.)

Thank you for your attention! Complete policy toolkit available at www.ifoam.bio