Two-wave Two-variable Models

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Working with Under-identified Structural Equation Models
Advertisements

Autocorrelation Functions and ARIMA Modelling
Cross-lagged Panel Models
CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH o What are the Uses of Correlational Research?What are the Uses of Correlational Research? o What are the Requirements for Correlational.
The STARTS Model David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
Treatment of missing values
Structural Equation Modeling
Cross Sectional Designs
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Niina Kotamäki.
1 General Structural Equation (LISREL) Models Week #2 Class #2.
Standardized Change Score Analysis David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
APIM with Distinguishable Dyads: SEM Estimation
10 Further Time Series OLS Issues Chapter 10 covered OLS properties for finite (small) sample time series data -If our Chapter 10 assumptions fail, we.
Moderation: Assumptions
Structural Equation Modeling
Structural Equation Modeling
The Autoregressive Model of Change David A. Kenny.
AAEC 4302 ADVANCED STATISTICAL METHODS IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Chapter 13.3 Multicollinearity.
Change Score Analysis David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
Structural Equation Modeling Intro to SEM Psy 524 Ainsworth.
An Introduction to HLM and SEM
Example Models for Multi-wave Data David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
Moderation: Introduction
Dynamical Correlation: A New Method to Quantify Synchrony Siwei Liu 1, Yang Zhou 1, Richard Palumbo 2, & Jane-Ling Wang 1 1 UC Davis; 2 University of Rhode.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 7: fitting a model, fit indices, comparingmodels, statistical power.
SEM: Basics Byrne Chapter 1 Tabachnick SEM
Discovering the Causes of Problem Gambling: Overcoming Methodological Challenges Donald Schopflocher, PhD Associate Professor, School of Public Health,
Cross-lagged Panel Correlation (CLPC) David A. Kenny December 25, 2013.
Maternal Romantic Relationship Quality, Parenting Stress and Child Outcomes: A Mediational Model Christine R. Keeports, Nicole J. Holmberg, & Laura D.
1 Analysis Consequences of Dependent Measurement Problems in Research on Older Couples Jason T. Newsom Institute on Aging Portland State University Presented.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Psych 818 DeShon. Construct Validity: MTMM ● Assessed via convergent and divergent evidence ● Convergent – Measures of the.
Full Structural Models Kline Chapter 10 Brown Chapter 5 ( )
Mediation: Solutions to Assumption Violation
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 12: Wrap Up: Latent Growth Models, Pitfalls, Critique and Future Directions for SEM.
Mediation: The Four Steps David A. Kenny davidakenny.net.
Controlling for Baseline
G Lecture 81 Comparing Measurement Models across Groups Reducing Bias with Hybrid Models Setting the Scale of Latent Variables Thinking about Hybrid.
The Simple Linear Regression Model: Specification and Estimation ECON 4550 Econometrics Memorial University of Newfoundland Adapted from Vera Tabakova’s.
SEM Basics 2 Byrne Chapter 2 Kline pg 7-15, 50-51, ,
Social Relations Model: Multiple Variables David A. Kenny.
1. The independent variables do not form a linearly dependent set--i.e. the explanatory variables are not perfectly correlated. 2. Homoscedasticity--the.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Longitudinal Data David A. Kenny December
Two-wave Two-variable Models David A. Kenny December 24, 2013.
MULTICOLLINEARITY: WHAT HAPPENS IF THE REGRESSORS ARE CORRELATED?
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 18 Multivariate Statistics.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Final Lecture: Multiple-Group Models, a Word about Latent Growth Models, Pitfalls, Critique and Future Directions.
Chapter 17 STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)  Relatively new statistical technique used to test theoretical or causal.
Dr. Richard Charnigo Professor of Statistics and Biostatistics 07 December 2015.
Testing the Equality of Means and Variances in Over-Time Data David A. Kenny.
Mediation: Assumptions David A. Kenny davidakenny.net.
Chapter 16 PATH ANALYSIS. Chapter 16 PATH ANALYSIS.
Full Structural Models Byrne Chapter 6 Kline Chapter 10 (stop 288, but the reporting section at the end is good to mark for later)
Psych 706: stats II Class #4.
Evaluation of Ethiology
Segment 1: Actor-Partner Models vs. Common-Fate Models
Kakhramon Yusupov June 15th, :30pm – 3:00pm Session 3
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
The Trait Model of Change
Introduction to microeconometrics
Cross Sectional Designs
Social Relations Model: Estimation of Relationship Effects
IV and Modelling Expectations
Power in Measuring Change in Two-Wave Studies
Special Topic: Longitudinal Mediation Analysis
James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University
Multivariate Modeling (intro)
Chapter 14 Multiple Regression
Multiple Regression Berlin Chen
Autoregressive and Growth Curve Models
Structural Equation Modeling
Presentation transcript:

Two-wave Two-variable Models David A. Kenny

The Basic Design Two variables Measured at two times Gives rise to 4 variables Say Depression and Marital Satisfaction are measured for wives with a separation of one year. We have D1, D2, S1, and S2.

Standard Cross-lagged Regression Model Time 1 variables cause Time 2 variables. Two stabilities S1  S2 D1  D2 Two cross-lagged effects S1  D2 D1  S2 Time 2 disturbances correlated. Inadvisable to have paths between Time 2 variables (S2  D2 or D2  S2)

Causal Preponderance Is S a stronger cause of D than is D of S? No easy way because the units of measurement of S and D are likely very different. Can standardize all the variables, but as will be seen this is more difficult when S and D are latent.

Assumptions No measurement error in S1 and D1. (Ironically, OK if there is measurement error in S2 and D2.) Nothing that causes both the time 1 variable and the time 2 variables. Such a variable is sometimes called a confounder. So if there is a gender (and gender is not controlled) difference at time 1, once we control for S1 and D1, there are no remaining gender differences at time 2 in S or D. The lagged effect of variables is exactly the length of measurement.

What to Do about the Assumptions? Measurement error in S1 and D1: Latent variable analysis (discussed in a latter slide). Confounders Measure them. Sensitivity analysis: See how the results change assuming confounders. Wrong lag Multi-wave study can be used to establish the optimal lag.

Latent Variables Can have as few as two indicators per latent variable. Correlate errors of the same indicator measured at different times. Test to see if loadings do not change over time.

Causal Preponderance Note that even if the Time 1 latent variables are standardized, the Time 2 ones are not. One can standardize disturbances (U and V in the figure), but cannot standardize latent endogenous variables (S2 and D2). One can through a series on non-linear constraints standardized latent endogenous variables, it is very complicated. However, the SEM program laavan does have an option to standardize all latent variables (std.lv=TRUE).

Depression and Marital Satisfaction Example Gustavson, K. B. et al.  (2012). Reciprocal longitudinal associations between depressive symptoms and romantic partners' synchronized view of relationship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 29, 776- 794.