Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Code Governance Review: WWU views on potential changes to UNC and the Modification Panel Simon Trivella – 30 th March 2010 Governance Workstream.
Advertisements

Review of industry code governance 26 March 2010.
UNC Modification Proposal Revised Timescales for LDZ Shrinkage Arrangements Simon Trivella – 25 th September 2008 Distribution Workstream.
Code Administrators Working Group Introduction 28 August 2008.
Code Governance Review Initial Proposals Industry Codes and Licensing Ofgem.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Chris Shanley - National Grid NTS.
Code Administrator's Working Group Duncan Burt CUSC and Grid Code.
Lessons Learned Process – A Strawman.  Lessons Learned  “To pass on any lessons that can be usefully applied to other projects”  “The data in the report.
Overview of Balancing & Settlement Code Change Process By Gareth Evans on Behalf of Gazprom Marketing & Trading –Retail.
Code Governance Review Major Policy reform Proposals Gas Customer Forum 26 January 2009.
Code Governance Review Overview of consultation documents Mark Feather 11 February 2009.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.
Proposed DN Pensions Deficit Charge Transmission Workstream 2 November 2006.
Code Administrators Working Group (CAWG) Meeting 3, 29th October 2008.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Beverley Viney - National Grid NTS.
Agency Charging Statement Overview of Consultation 11 th February 2008.
Code Administration Code of Practice Tim Davis KPIs Q
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services 14 th September 2007.
Development Modification Proposal: Introduction of an Inter-day Linepack Product Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
Customer Charge On behalf of all DNs 19 November 2010.
Transmission Workstream 6 January 2011
Distribution workstream 29th January 2009
Presentation to the BSC Panel
Transmission Workstream February 2009
Modification Proposal 0283 Update
Presentation to the BSC Panel
Grid Code What is the Standard Modification Process? Panel
Manifest Errors for Entry Capacity Overruns Workgroup 364
Review of UNC Section Q “Emergencies”
Grid Code Development Forum – 6 September 2017
UNC Modifications 061 & 062 – An Overview
Grid Code Review Panel 16th August 2017
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
CAP190: Workgroup Report CUSC Modifications Panel, 26th August 2011
UNC Trader User – Licence obligations
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
Electricity Governance Comparison
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
NTS Entry Charging Review Update
Development Modification Proposal 0337: Introduction of a Inter-day Linepack Product – OPEN LETTER Review Group August th November 2010.
0291 – NTS Licence Special Condition 27 – Balancing Arrangements
CSS Update for CoMC 19th September 2018
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
Code Administration Code of Practice
The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Proposer: Malcolm Montgomery Panel Date: 20/10/16
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
Rebecca Hailes For 15 March 2018
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Panel Date: 21st August 2014
Joint Office Presentation for Modification 0678
Transmission Planning Code Review
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
Proposer: Transporter /
Lessons Learned Process – A Strawman
Richard Fairholme Transmission Workstream 4th September 2008
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Mark Freeman 29th January 2007
Modification 0448 – European Driven Change Process Flow Diagram
CUSC “Alternate” Proposal process
Options for the Development of a Demand Side Response Mechanism
CUSC Amendment Panel Recommendation
Ofgem presentation to Gas Transmission Workstream
Joint Office UNC Elections
Joint Office UNC Elections
Gas Customer Forum 28 July 2008
Modification 0621 / GB Charging Project DSC Change Management Committee update June 2018.
Proposer: Steve Mulinganie, Gazprom Energy Panel Date: 20th June 2019
DSG Governance Group Recommendations.
Joint Office UNC Elections
Presentation transcript:

Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Ritchard Hewitt - National Grid NTS

Background – Code Governance Review (CGR) Ofgem announced the Review of Industry Code Governance in November 2007 Code Governance Review (CGR) concluded at the end of March 2010 when Ofgem published their Final Proposals The licence modifications necessary to implement the Final Proposals for the CGR and the Code of Practice (CoP) were published on 3 June 2010 and become effective on the 31 December 2010

Background – Review Group 0267 Review Group 0267 “Review of UNC Governance Arrangements” raised October 2009 The Joint Office of Gas Transporters (JO), has been working with the industry on the necessary modifications to the UNC via the Governance Workstream National Grid volunteered to raise all the necessary governance modifications to implement the CGR Final Proposals National Grid have committed to liase with the industry in development of the proposals

Transmission Workstream – objectives of presentation Raise awareness of approach and timetable for developing the CGR UNC Modification Proposals Provide an overview of the content of each Modification Proposal Facilitate the provision of feedback Modification Proposals will be updated and formally raised for August Panel – consultation

Alternatives - 0318 Aspect of the Code of Practice (CoP) - the approach to be taken when raising alternatives to Modification Proposals: alternative solutions being developed to the same degree as an original solution; and alternative proposals are raised prior to or during the working group stage. No alternatives (or further alternatives) can be raised once a Modification has been issued for Consultation

Role of Code Administrators & Code of Practice - 0319 The CGR Final Proposals require that code administrators: Act as a ‘critical friend’, in particular to small participants; and Act consistently with the Code Administrator Code of Practice. Other key elements: Ofgem send back powers Published reasons for Panel recommendations (based on relevant objectives) Legal text provision Cost information

Appointment and Voting Rights for a Consumer Representative and Independent Panel Chair - 0320 Main elements of proposal 0320: Option for the National Consumer Council & Authority to each appoint one Consumer Representative Consumer Representatives to become Voting Members Appointment of an Independent chair’s and provision of a casting vote where panel determinations are at stalemate Not applicable for recommendations on whether or not to implement mods

Environment 0321 Evaluation of proposed modifications shall include assessment of the quantifiable impact on “greenhouse gas emissions” Details to be included in reports produced during progression of the proposal

Charging Methodologies – 0322 (NTS) / 0325 (DN) Two proposals NTS Charging Methodology and Connection Charging Methodology Distribution Network Charging Methodology Key elements: Existing methodology (to be detailed in Appendix A) is incorporated within the Uniform Network Code UNC Modification Rules are amended to reflect that: a change to the Charging Methodology is not able to be made unless the requirements of the UNC Modification Rules are complied with the Transporters must convene regular meetings of the charging methodology forum/s a Modification Proposal in respect of a UNC Charging Methodology may only be made by a UNC signatory or a Materially Affected Party (being a person or class of persons designated by the Authority for this purpose)

Self-Governance (‘SG’) 0323 UNC Modification Rules change 3 main elements of proposal: Panel able to recommend to Authority that Panel can take implementation decisions for non-material mods Authority also able to designate ‘self governance’ mods & approve / reject Panel recommendations Appeals Process

Significant Code Review (‘SCR’) 0324 UNC Modification Rules change Main elements of proposal: Once an SCR has started any non-urgent mods seeking to change same section of UNC as SCR are ‘suspended’ Panel submits decision to Authority to subsume mod into SCR or allow to progress individually Once SCR is complete related mods are ‘unsuspended’

Summary Number Title 0318 Alternatives 0319 Role of Code Administrators and CoP 0320 Appointment and Voting rights for a Consumer Rep and Independent chair 0321 Environmental assessment 0322 NTS Charging methodologies 0323 Self Governance 0324 Significant Code Reviews 0325 DN Charging methodologies