COR1 Current Status and Future Plans

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observation of beam halo with corona graph
Advertisements

Digital Camera Essential Elements Part 1 Sept
May 4, 2015Kyle R. Bryant Tutorial Presentation: OPTI521 Distance 1 MTF Definition MTF is a measure of intensity contrast transfer per unit resolution.
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses. Notation for Mirrors and Lenses The object distance is the distance from the object to the mirror or lens Denoted by p.
1 Laser Beam Coherence Purpose: To determine the frequency separation between the axial modes of a He-Ne Laser All sources of light, including lasers,
SWPC CME Imaging Requirements for the post-SOHO era Douglas Biesecker 3/25/2014.
SECCI/COR2 Status Report SECCHI CONSORTIUM MEETING D. Socker, S. Plunkett, A. Vourlidas.
Computer Vision Optical Flow
COR1 Science Overview Joseph M Davila Goddard Space Flight Center.
J.P. Halain – Centre Spatial de Liège
5 th SECCHI Tam Meeting.1 COR2 Status Angelos Vourlidas.
1.B – Solar Dynamo 1.C – Global Circulation 1.D – Irradiance Sources 1.H – Far-side Imaging 1.F – Solar Subsurface Weather 1.E – Coronal Magnetic Field.
CStCyr—SECCHI Paris-Mar #1 STEREO SECCHI COR1 Science O. C. St. Cyr Heliophysics Science Division – Code 670 NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center
Announcements Office hours: My office hours today 2 -3 pm
Ch 25 1 Chapter 25 Optical Instruments © 2006, B.J. Lieb Some figures electronically reproduced by permission of Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle.
Diffraction vs. Interference
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Conceptual Physics 11 th Edition Chapter 28: REFLECTION & REFRACTION Reflection Principle of Least Time Law of Reflection.
Cameras Course web page: vision.cis.udel.edu/cv March 22, 2003  Lecture 16.
1 Digital Cameras Consumer digital cameras have been around since 1995 What features make a good camera? How do we optimize good features with a limited.
Physics 213 General Physics Lecture Last Meeting: Diffraction Today: Optical Instruments.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Optical Instruments.
Presented by: 15 Oct 2001 Neptec Laser Camera System Preliminary Post Flight Results Neptec Design Group.
Integral University EC-024 Digital Image Processing.
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 1 MEIDEX – Crew Tutorial Calibration of IMC-201 Adam D. Devir, MEIDEX Payload Manager.
1 Determination of CME 3D Trajectories using COR Stereoscopy + Analysis of HI1 CME Tracks P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; N. Sheeley,
TESIS on CORONAS-PHOTON S. V. Kuzin (XRAS) and TESIS Team.
1 Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy Lecture Emission in Flames There can be significant amounts of emission produced in flames due to presence of flame.
Optical diagnostics for beam halo (I) Coronagraph (II) OTR halo monitor for J-PARC T. Mitsuhashi, KEK.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
Asteroids Image Calibration and Setup Making a Lightcurve What is a Lightcurve? Cole Cook  Physics and Astronomy  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.
: Chapter 11: Three Dimensional Image Processing 1 Montri Karnjanadecha ac.th/~montri Image.
2007 March 51 EUVI Early Observations Jean-Pierre Wuelser James Lemen Markus Aschwanden Nariaki Nitta.
Development of a Gamma-Ray Beam Profile Monitor for the High-Intensity Gamma-Ray Source Thomas Regier, Department of Physics and Engineering Physics University.
COR1 Status – July 2001 Joseph M. Davila (GSFC) O. C. St. Cyr (CUA)
STEREO - Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory Mission SECCHI Calibration Activities Simon Plunkett SECCHI Operations Scientist Naval Research Laboratory.
NICMOS Calibration Challenges in the Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
11-Jun-04 1 Joseph Hora & the IRAC instrument team Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope.
1Ellen L. Walker 3D Vision Why? The world is 3D Not all useful information is readily available in 2D Why so hard? “Inverse problem”: one image = many.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s a n d A n a l y s i s L a b o r a t o r y APS Formation Sensor.
IPBSM Operation 11th ATF2 Project Meeting Jan. 14, 2011 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Menlo Park, California Y. Yamaguchi, M.Oroku, Jacqueline Yan.
Initial Results from the Scintillator Fast Lost Ion Probe D. Darrow NSTX Physics Meeting February 28, 2005.
XRT SOT Alignment DeLuca With comments from Tarbell & Metcalf 21-Jan-2006.
STEREO SWG COR1 CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE PLANS Joseph Davila 1, O. C. St. Cyr 1 William Thompson 2 1 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 2 Adnet Systems,
Three-Dimensional Structure of Coronal Mass Ejections From LASCO Polarization Measurements K. P. Dere, D. Wang and R. Howard ApJL, 620; L119-L
Astronomical Spectroscopic Techniques. Contents 1.Optics (1): Stops, Pupils, Field Optics and Cameras 2.Basic Electromagnetics –Math –Maxwell's equations.
COR1 Status William Thompson SECCHI Team Meeting, Dublin, Ireland, March 2010.
Wide-Field Imager for Solar PRobe Plus (WISPR)
Astronomical Spectroscopic Techniques
Other imaging techniques
Lessons learnt from the STEREO Heliospheric. Imagers: Tracking
NAC flat fielding and intensity calibration
OSIRIS flight calibrations so far
Charge Transfer Efficiency of Charge Coupled Device
: Chapter 11: Three Dimensional Image Processing
On-Orbit Performance and Calibration of the HMI Instrument J
Instrument Characterization: Status
Current HMI Polar Fields
Image Stabilization System (ISS)
First Assessments of EUVI Performance on STEREO SECCHI
Volume I Companion Presentation Frank R. Miele Pegasus Lectures, Inc.
ESS 261 Topics in magnetospheric physics Space weather forecast models ____ the prediction of solar wind speed April 23, 2008.
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Diffraction vs. Interference
Karen Meech Institute for Astronomy TOPS 2003
STEREO Michael L. Kaiser STEREO Project Scientist
Echidna: current status and expected performance
Observational Astronomy
Optics Alan Title, HMI-LMSAL Lead,
Presentation transcript:

COR1 Current Status and Future Plans William Thompson Adnet Systems, Inc. Joseph Davila NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 5th SECCHI Consortium Meeting March 5-8, 2007 Orsay, France

All refractive design in axial package Seven spherical lenses, rad-hard material (1 singlet, 3 cemented doublets) 1.2 meters long SHUTTER, FOCAL PLANE MASK FPA DOUBLET-2 LYOT STOP, LYOT SPOT, DOUBLET-1, FILTER BAFFLES ENTRANCE APERTURE, OBJECTIVE LENS ROTATING POLARIZER BAFFLES FIELD LENS, OCCULTER, LIGHT TRAP Three cascaded imaging systems: Objective lens forms a solar image at the occulter Field lens images front aperture onto the Lyot Stop Pair of doublets relay coronal image onto the CCD DOOR, DIFFUSER

Scattered Light (preflight) COR-1A COR-1B Overall scattered light levels are much better than the 10-6 B/Bsun requirement. Small areas with higher scatter due to features on front surface of field lens.

Inflight Comparison Inflight scattered light levels match the predictions from preflight testing. COR-1B COR-1A Behind objective switched out at Cape—actually cleaner than preflight testing.

Inflight performance

Image showing 3 separate polarization components Concept of Operations Three images are taken at polarizer positions of 0°, 120°, and 240°. Combining the three images allows one to derive both the polarized brightness (pB) and the total brightness (B). The polarized brightness calculation rejects most of the stray light. Image showing 3 separate polarization components

Linearity Ahead Behind Detectors on both COR1A and COR1B are slightly non-linear IP-summed ~1% CCD-summed ~3% Measured with two separate techniques Exposure time of 1.7 seconds chosen to keep well within linear range. Sensitivity (DN/sec) CCD-summed Ahead IP-summed Behind

Stability Both COR1A and COR1B have shown decreases in the scattered light since their doors were opened, by about 15% Only the diffuse scattered light shows a decrease—the discrete features remain constant COR1B shows some evolution between the 3 polarizer components.

Jitter Sensitivity Spacecraft jitter affects COR1 scattered light pattern. Spacecraft jitter greatly improved on Jan 23 (Ahead) and Jan 24 (Behind). Still studying how to model jitter effects in data.

SWAVES roll on Ahead, Dec 18th Roll Maneuvers Roll maneuvers allow the separation of instrumental and coronal effects. Coronal hole assumed to be zero intensity Derived scattered light suitable for extracting pB B affected more by instrumental evolution Behind evolution also affecting pB calculation There are several roll maneuvers now on each spacecraft. SWAVES roll on Ahead, Dec 18th

Compression Image compression is required to be able to bring down data with sufficient cadence to see all CMEs. ICER is limited to a dynamic range of just over 13 bits. Dynamic range in COR1 is limited by scattered light Top end limited by brightest part of the image, near occulter. Bottom end limited by Poisson noise in fainter outer regions. Resulting dynamic range is less than 13 bits for 2х2 binning for both COR1A and COR1B Strategy is to select a compression mode that keeps the digital noise below the Poisson noise. Binning to 1024х1024 first improves statistics Optics designed for 1024х1024 operation Selected ICER 05 compression mode Space weather: 128х128 binned with ICER 11

Observing Plans Three polarizer positions (0°, 120°, 240°) taken in rapid sequence All images binned to 1024х1024 resolution Currently planning on IP-binning for better linearity May need to go to CCD-binning to reduce radiation-induced noise Images scaled to 13 bits and compressed with ICER 05 Complete polarizer sequence repeated every 10 minutes SSR2 data decreases cadence to 5 minutes for few hours

Removing Scattered Light Polarized brightness (pB) calculation removes much of the scattered light. Still some residual scattered light Running and base difference movies also work well Jitter sensitivity less for B than for pB Other strategies include: Removing model derived from calibration rolls Works well for pB Instrument evolution limits effectiveness for B Monthly minimum image technique Effect of instrument evolution not yet clear Daily minimum image technique Mainly effective for CMEs Above models are applied to each polarization component before combining into pB

Without Background Subtraction Most of the scattered light is removed by the pB calculation. Behind pB Ahead

Running Difference Behind B Ahead Running differences appear best in brightness images. Behind B Ahead

Subtracting Rotation Model Most representative of corona. Instrument evolution so far restricts use to pB. Behind pB Ahead

Subtracting Daily Minimum Below is a demonstration of subtracting the daily minimum image from polarized brightness data Behind pB Ahead

Subtracting Daily Minimum It also works for total brightness. Some evolution in background can be seen for Ahead. Behind B Ahead

Extra Slides

Instrument Performance Relative brightness The measured straylight is lower than the model predictions. The K corona is fainter than the stray light, but significantly brighter than the noise floor. Signal to noise ratio When the 3 polarization angles are combined, the pB of the K corona is recovered from the unpolarized background CMEs are visible from the occulter to the detector edge. Requirement B A

Sample subfield image (COR-1A) Resolution Resolution tested by projecting Air Force resolution test target onto various portions of the detector. Measurements done in vacuum, to avoid problems with air vs. vacuum focal lengths. Were able to resolve with high contrast all the way down to the Nyquist frequency. Sample subfield image (COR-1A)

Flat Field The field is highly flat, with discrete areas of vignetting near the occulter and camera aperture edges. The flat field is monitored in flight with the diffuser window mounted in the door.

Polarization Response Polarcor linear polarizers provide better than 10,000:1 contrast ratio. Hollow core motor rotates polarizer in beam to angles 0°, 120°, and 240° to derive polarized brightness. Rotation of polarizer moves image on detector by ~0.3 pixels for both COR-1A & B. Minimized by putting slight tilt on polarizer. Measurements of polarization response compared to fitted curve (COR-1A)