Improving Intraoperative handoffs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MCIC Perioperative Initiative February 14, 2006 Operating Room Briefings.
Advertisements

Implementation of a Surgical Safety Check List
Building Your SUSP Team Part II
Healthcare Safety: How will your next patient be injured?
Measurement. T EAM STEPPS 05.2 Mod Page 2 Measurement Objectives  Describe the importance of measurement  Describe the Kirkpatrick model of training.
The Impact of Anesthesia Handovers
SUSP Surgeon call February 26, 2014
Dr. ABDULLAH ABDU ALMIKHLAFY Assistant professor & Head of community medicine department Presented By University of Science & Technology Sana’a – Yemen.
Bureau of Workers’ Comp PA Training for Health & Safety (PATHS)
Implementation Planning. T EAM STEPPS 05.2 Mod Page 2 Implementation Planning Objectives  Describe the steps involved in implementing TeamSTEPPS.
The Otorhinolaryngology Hand-Off: Pursuing Excellence in Patient Care and Safety Mark A. Zacharek, MD, FACS, FAAOA Associate Professor Associate Residency.
Pre-operative Assessment and Intra operative Nursing Role
Revised for 2013 Shannon Hein RN, CPN(C).  published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal in May 2004  Found an overall incidence rate of adverse.
Morning Briefings and Huddles
Talking to Your Nursing and Surgical Tech Colleagues.
Call 2: Background of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist.
1 National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG). 2 National Patient Safety Goals – set forth by The Joint Commission Identity patients correctly: – Use at least.
Jill A. Marsteller, PhD,MPP August 10, 2011 CSTS: The Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study Assessing Culture.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2012 Optional SUSP Tools: Briefing Audits, Morning Huddle, and Shadowing.
Check-In Call June 21 st, Welcome Back Today’s Topics A series of polls Common barriers Checklists for special needs Monitoring your progress How.
Learning Outcomes Discuss current trends and issues in health care and nursing. Describe the essential elements of quality and safety in nursing and their.
Safe Surgery 2015: South Carolina Presentation – Circulating Nurses and Surgical Techs [ Insert Implementation Team Member Names] [ Insert Hospital Name]
Switching to Celsius Kimberly Montague RN, MSN Fishbone Diagram: Process Maps and Flowcharts: Global Aim: The global aim of this project is to improve.
An OR Teamwork Faculty Development Program The Center for Medical Simulation’s Comprehensive Program for Operating Room Teamwork.
National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG) Online Orientation -the purpose is to improve patient safety -the goals focus on problems in health care safety and.
HANDOFF REPORTING Using SBAR for exchange of information.
Transport of Critically Ill Patients Authors: Frank Dupont, MD, Michelle Johnson, MPH, Anne Pohlman, APN-CNS, Sam Ruokis, Team Background Evaluate and.
Leader of the Pack: The Role of the DON in Green House Homes
Difficult Airway Awareness QI project
Domain: 4 Communication- (9% 17 Questions)
Improving Transition of Care
Source: AMA: Steps Forward
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
Safety and Quality in the Cardiothoracic Operating Room
Implementation of a Surgical Safety Check List
MHA Immersion Pilot Project Mercy Hospital Springfield Improving Transitions of Care and Reducing Hospital Readmissions for Total Hip.
Pre-Induction Time Out
Pre-operative Assessment and Intra operative Nursing Role
Development Policies and Procedures Manual
An Intervention to Learn from Mistakes and Improve Safety Culture
Transfer of Care System protocol for transfer of care from EMS providers to Emergency Department providers.
Controlling Measuring Quality of Patient Care
PROCESS MAP TOOLKIT.
Cara Crouch, MD and Joseph Morabito, DO
Ventricular Septal Defect Pre-PICU Clinical Pathway
PROCESS MAP TOOLKIT.
Improving Anticoagulant Compliance With Neuraxial Anesthesia
utah
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEALTH CARE TEAM
Organization Wide Daily Safety Huddle
Five Month Check-In Call
PROCESS MAP TOOLKIT.
PROCESS MAP TOOLKIT.
PROCESS MAP TOOLKIT.
PROCESS MAP TOOLKIT.
Barriers to Safe Transitions
RL SOLUTIONS Safety Event Reporting
Why is Teamwork Important?
Practicing for Patients
ACPAN NATIONAL CONFERENCE 2018
Operations and Safety Committee Spring 2014
Operations and Safety Committee Spring 2014
NICU and OR Handoff Starting 2/25/19.
Jaque Goudreault, University of New Hampshire, Senior Nursing Student
Research Implications Clinical Implications Practice Recommendations
Patient Safety It’s the Way WeCare Buffy Key
The Effects of Debriefing Following Medical Error
utah
PROCESS MAP TOOLKIT.
Presentation transcript:

Improving Intraoperative handoffs By Terry Easton, Matt Lyman, and Corey Tingey With help from Drs. Gravlee and Marshall

The Problem The focus of our project is intraoperative handoffs. We feel a standardized approach should be developed for the process of transferring information from one anesthesia caregiver to another. Handoffs are extremely variable and if done poorly, they can lead down a path of errors, harm, and even death. Done well, handoffs can be a safety net to ensure the patient is well cared for at all times.

Scope of the problem and solutions At the University Hospital, 20+ inpatient OR’s are running during each weekday. As a result, the number of intraoperative handoffs per day is significant. Within the last 2 years, a standardized method was developed in Epic to facilitate this information exchange. However, compliance with the Epic handoff system has been extremely low. As a group, we feel with a more robust handoff, the electronic handoff menu will have improved compliance among providers.

The Stakeholders The in-room anesthesia provider(s) The attending anesthesiologist Post-op nurses Operating surgeon The patient i. The in-room anesthesia provider – Their knowledge of the patient and what has occurred during the pre and intraoperative period will allow him/her to take better care of the patient and formulate a plan as to what should happen should a problem arise. ii. The attending Anesthesiologist – The attending, who may be needed in an urgent situation, may not know all of the intricacies of the case and may have to spend valuable time looking through the chart trying to learn what should have been handed off to the in-room provider. iii. Post-op nurses – The in-room providers cannot give a very thorough hand off to the post op nurses if they themselves have not received a thorough hand off and care of the patient can suffer. When post-op nurses have a thorough knowledge of what occurred in the case it allows them to prevent potential complications and trouble shoot problems quicker. iv. The Operating Surgeon – The operating team expects the in-room provider to know everything going on with the case at hand and knowledge gaps could lead to intraoperative delays or complications post op that the surgery team will have to manage. v. The Patient - There are numerous ways a patient’s care may suffer when a hand off is incomplete. A fixed hand off system should allow for optimal care of the patient throughout the perioperative period.

Environmental/Strategic Factors Patient Factors System/Process Epic checklist not useful Comorbidities (clinical condition) Existing institutional norms (culture) Complexity of surgical procedure Timing/appropriateness of hand off Lines, monitors, regional/neuraxial anesthesia Poor communication of essential patient information at the time of intraoperative handoffs. Poor compliance with standardized approach (checklist – Epic) at the time of intraoperative handoffs Variable process Awake patient ICU transport Safety culture Lack of motivation: “too much trouble” Disruptive to surgeon Reluctance to change Rapid movement/change in OR High turnover of employees Lack of defined leader Noise level Appropriate time in conduct of anesthetic Distraction from other tasks/people Comfort level of provider Staffing workload/hours Safe to relieve Staff Factors Environmental/Strategic Factors

Smart goals and objectives Area for improvement: Communication of essential elements at the time of intraoperative handoff Overall Goal: To standardize an approach to guide handoffs (checklist) Objectives: Improve communication, reduce variability, avoid errors and complications that may result in harm to the patient

Smart goals and objectives continued Area for improvement: Compliance and acceptance of handoff process Overall Goal: To ensure all members of the anesthesia team consistently employ a standardized approach (checklist) Objective: Improve compliance and monitor compliance rates through Epic

Smart goals and objectives continued Area for improvement: Operational considerations of safe and effective handoffs Overall goal: To perform intraoperative handoffs at an appropriate time during the anesthetic Objectives: Perform appropriate handoffs by an available, focused, and knowledgeable provider

Smart goals and objectives continued Area for improvement: Ease of use Overall goal: To make the handoff process concise, accessible, and Epic-friendly Objectives: Develop accessible handoff window that includes comprehensive yet concise information vital to handoff process

Process Flowchart Provider starts last case and prepares for an upcoming transfer of care Relief provider arrives: - Current provider available for a transfer of care? - Safe and appropriate time in case for transfer of care? If Yes: Perform handoff via Epic checklist Relief provider assumes responsibility for patient If No: Relief provider checks back later or assists current provider

POTENTIAL Next steps Modify how handoff window behaves in Epic during handoff process Default pop-up when changing staff Improve handoff window with SmartLinks for important, patient-specific information Train staff and monitor compliance

REferences McQueen-Shadfar L., Taekman J. Say what you mean to say: improving patient handoffs in the operating room and beyond. Simul Healthc. 2010;5(4):248– 253.[PubMed] Groah L. Hand offs—a link to improving patient safety. AORN J. 2006;83(1):227– 230.[PubMed] Rogers S. O., Jr, Gawande A. A., Kwaan M., et al. Analysis of surgical errors in closed malpractice claims at 4 liability insurers. Surgery. 2006;140(1):25– 33.[PubMed] Bajaj P. What's new in patient safety and how it will affect your practice. Indian J Anaesth. 2007;51(5):363–364. Vidyarthi A. The Patient Handoff, Opportunities for Improvement. Webinar. Critical Care Trends: Today and Tomorrow series for AstraZeneca; Oct, 2007. Levitan D. Digital handoff smoothes flow between OR and ICU. Anesthesiology News. 2010;36(6):6.