LATMIX Planning Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emerging Technologies… LIDAR MAPPS Summer Conference 11 July 2012.
Advertisements

7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
Studying the Physical Properties of the Atmosphere using LIDAR technique Dinh Van Trung and Nguyen Thanh Binh, Nguyen Dai Hung, Dao Duy Thang, Bui Van.
Lecture 12 Content LIDAR 4/15/2017 GEM 3366.
Performance characteristics and design trades for an ISS Hybrid Doppler Wind Lidar G. D. Emmitt and S. Wood Simpson Weather Associates Charlottesville,
ABRF meeting 09 Light Microscopy Research Group. Why are there no standards? Imaging was largely an ultrastructure tool Digital imaging only common in.
MR P.Durkee 5/20/2015 MR3522Winter 1999 MR Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Winter 1999 Active Microwave Radar.
Measured parameters: particle backscatter at 355 and 532 nm, particle extinction at 355 nm, lidar ratio at 355 nm, particle depolarization at 355 nm, atmospheric.
2 Remote sensing applications in Oceanography: How much we can see using ocean color? Adapted from lectures by: Martin A Montes Rutgers University Institute.
K-meter Survey System Lidar Data Mike Contarino Jennifer Prentice
Sonar Chapter 9. History Sound Navigation And Ranging (SONAR) developed during WW II –Sound pulses emitted reflected off metal objects with characteristic.
Anomalous Propagation Greater density slows the waves more. Less dense air does not slow the waves as much. Since density normally decreases with height,
COPS-GOP-WS3 Hohenheim 2006_04_10 Micro- Rain- Radar Local Area Weather Radar Cloud Radar Meteorological Institute University Hamburg Gerhard Peters.
Radar: Acronym for Radio Detection and Ranging
Spaceborne Weather Radar
Radar equation review 1/19/10. Radar eq (Rayleigh scatter) The only variable is h, the pulse length Most radars have a range of h values. Rewrite the.
The ANTARES experiment is currently the largest underwater neutrino telescope and is taking high quality data since Sea water is used as the detection.
Chapter 9 Electromagnetic Waves. 9.2 ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES.
© Copyright Optech Incorporated. All rights reserved.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R Goddard Lidar Observatory for Winds (GLOW) Wind Profiling from the Howard University Beltsville Research.
A Doppler Radar Emulator and its Application to the Detection of Tornadic Signatures Ryan M. May.
OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001 Active Microwave Radar.
B. Gentry/GSFCSLWG 06/29/05 Scaling Ground-Based Molecular Direct Detection Doppler Lidar Measurements to Space Using Wind Profile Measurements from GLOW.
Mike Newchurch 1, Shi Kuang 1, John Burris 2, Steve Johnson 3, Stephanie Long 1 1 University of Alabama in Huntsville, 2 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center,
Scaling Surface and Aircraft Lidar Results for Space-Based Systems (and vice versa) Mike Hardesty, Barry Rye, Sara Tucker NOAA/ETL and CIRES Boulder, CO.
B. Gentry/GSFCGTWS 2/26/01 Doppler Wind Lidar Measurement Principles Bruce Gentry NASA / Goddard Space Flight Center based on a presentation made to the.
SCM 330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
RASTERTIN. What is LiDAR? LiDAR = Light Detection And Ranging Active form of remote sensing measuring distance to target surfaces using narrow beams of.
Measurement Example III Figure 6 presents the ozone and aerosol variations under a light-aerosol sky condition. The intensity and structure of aerosol.
A new method for first-principles calibration
FOR 274: From Photos to Lidar Introduction to LiDAR What is it? How does it work? LiDAR Jargon and Terms Natural Resource Applications Data Acquisition.
Electromagnetic-laser for ice thickness data Video-Laser for lead and floe size distributions ArcticNet 2013 Leg 1b Ice Observations with helicopter sensors.
Light Detection and Ranging(LIDAR) BY: SONU SANGAM USN-1C07EC096 BRANCH-ECE SEM -VIII.
1 A conical scan type spaceborne precipitation radar K. Okamoto 1),S. Shige 2), T. Manabe 3) 1: Tottori University of Environmental Studies, 2: Kyoto University.
Active Remote Sensing for Elevation Mapping
U NIVERSITY OF J OENSUU F ACULTY OF F ORESTRY Introduction to Lidar and Airborne Laser Scanning Petteri Packalén Kärkihankkeen ”Multi-scale Geospatial.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
Early VALIDAR Case Study Results Rod Frehlich: RAL/NCAR Grady Koch: NASA Langley.
Light detection and ranging technology Seminar By: Md Hyder Hussain Pasha.
Ultrasound Physics Image Formation ‘97. Real-time Scanning Each pulse generates one line Except for multiple focal zones frame one frame consists of many.
Radar Range Equation.
presented by: Reham Mahmoud AbD El-fattah ali
Active Microwave Remote Sensing
Ultrasound Physics Image Formation ‘97.
A Moment Radar Data Emulator: The Current Progress and Future Direction Ryan M. May.
B) Secondary RADAR Secondary Radar is always known as Secondary Surveillance Radar (SSR). SSR is complement to the primary radar as it provide ATC with.
Active Remote Sensing for Elevation Mapping
Ultrasound Physics Image Formation ‘97.
Transient Absorption (Courtesy of Kenneth Hanson, Florida University): The technique applied to molecular dynamics Source hn Sample Detector.
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS & RS INTERVIEW QUESTIONS ANSWERS
David M. Allocca Brian M. Concannon V. Michael Contarino
Huailin Chen, Bruce Gentry, Tulu Bacha, Belay Demoz, Demetrius Venable
James Donahue EE 444 Fall LiDAR James Donahue EE 444 Fall
Planning Factors for Point Density
Digital Numbers The Remote Sensing world calls cell values are also called a digital number or DN. In most of the imagery we work with the DN represents.
CNES’s SPOT 5 (Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre)
David E. Weissman Hofstra University Hempstead, New York 11549
Sound Waves Notes
GAJENDRA KUMAR EC 3rd YR. ROLL NO
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Distance Sensor Models
Validation of airborne 1
Regulation of Airway Ciliary Activity by Ca2+: Simultaneous Measurement of Beat Frequency and Intracellular Ca2+  Alison B. Lansley, Michael J. Sanderson 
Volume 23, Issue 21, Pages (November 2013)
GLAS Cloud Statistics and Their Implications for a Hybrid Mission
HARGLO-2 Wind Intercomparisons
A Pulsed Electric Field Enhances Cutaneous Delivery of Methylene Blue in Excised Full- Thickness Porcine Skin  Patricia G. Johnson, Stephen A. Gallo, Sek.
Woolpert & New Geospatial Technologies
R. Gutierrez, J. Gibeaut, R. Smyth, T. Hepner, J. Andrews, J. Bellian
Watershed and Stream Network Delineation using GIS
Presentation transcript:

LATMIX Planning Meeting LIDAR for LATMIX December 8-9, 2009 Seattle, WA Brian M. Concannon Jennifer E. Prentice NAVAIR brian.concannon@navy.mil jenifer.prentice@navy.mi (301) 342-2034 (301) 342-2025 Jim Ledwell Gene Terray WHOI jledwell@whoi.edu eterray@whoi.edu (508) 289-3305 (508)289-2438 Miles Sundermeyer UMASS, Dartmouth msundermeyer@umassd.edu (508) 999-8892

Lidar 101 Amplitude (dB) Time (depth) Laser Receiver Amplitude (dB) Backscatter Less Turbid Animated slide showing how the lidar return signal is dependant on the properties of the water. Need to modify to show two slabs of water with different IOP’s and corresponding lidar return signal. Time (depth) The slope of the lidar waveform is dependent on the inherent optical properties and is different for different water types. Bottom return

Lidar Data Acquisition & Processing Depth (m) Time or Distance Color Coded Slope vs. Depth Depth (m) Amplitude (dB) A=e-2KsysD Depth (m) Ksys (m-1) Waveform Slope vs. Depth Animated slide showing basic processing technique for in-field viewing of data. Color scale for last protion of animation is arbitrary but Ksys = 0.1 = blue and Ksys=0.7=black.

Lidar System Flown 2008 and 2009

Telescope Modifications for LATMIX Dye Return Dichroic Beam Splitter Lidar Return Simultaneous collection of Blue backscatter and Green dye fluorescence

Lidar Volume Mapping Approaches

LATMIX Lidar Vertical Resolution Altitude T0 f (laser pulse width, system bandwidth, dig sample rate) Laser pulse width = 10 ns -> 1.1 meter depth in water System Bandwidth = 100 MHz (log amp, PMT) = 10 ns Digitizer Sample Rate = 400 MSPS = 2.5 ns per sample Bottom Line: Depth Resolution ~ 1meter with 4X oversample Note: relative depth accuracy ~10 centimeters

LATMIX Lidar Horizontal Resolution f (scan pattern, pulse rate, platform speed, platform altitude) Scan Pattern = circular cone Full Angle = 39 deg Scan Rate up o 15 Hz Pulse Rate – up to 1700 Hz Platform Speed = 100 m/s (1 km/10 sec) Conservative Example: 100 m/s along track 305 m alt 1000 Hz PRF 11.5 Hz scan rate Swath Width = 216 m Min Horizontal = 8 m Min Along Track = 8 m Notes - back scan fill - Peak perf ~ 6 m Across Track Res is f (scan speed, PRF) A/C track Swath Width is f (scan angle, Alt) Along Track Res is f (scan speed, A/C speed)

Flight Patterns vs. Time Evolution Racetrack 9 km/ (100 m/s) = 90 sec = 1.5 min 5.5 km 30 sec leader (3 km) 0.100 m/s x T sec = N km For T =45 sec: Whole Pattern = 7 minute Across track map speed = 1.5 km/hr (20% overlap) 30 sec leader (3 km)

Flight Patterns vs. Time Evolution Dog Bone 5.5 km 30 sec leader (3 km) 100 m/s x T sec = N km T = 45 sec Whole Pattern = 9 min Revisit mid-point every 5 min Across track map speed = 1.9 km/h (33% overlap, ) 30 sec leader (3 km) 17.5 km/ (100 m/s) = 175 sec = 3.25 min

Performance and Flight Limitations Lidar Fog, Low Clouds, Rain Must Monitor Op Area Aircraft/Crew Predicted or Actual Lightning Strong Turbulence 12 – 14 hour duty day

Dye mapping Opportunity Sept 12, 2008 Intensity vs. Position Dye Returns Depth vs. Position Dye Returns 024315-024335 UTC Equivalent to 024301-024319 GPS Time

Environmental Transect June 24, 2009 N. Sargasso Sea Hatteras Data Start and End Latitude (deg)

01:24:18 (UTC) End of Transect SE

01:30:35 UTC Southbound Pass

01:38:30 UTC Northbound Pass

Lidar Data Analysis Goals The measured backscatter (480 nm) and fluorescence (~520 nm) intensities will be used to Map the 3D dye concentration with 5-10 m horizontal and ~1 m vertical resolutions Study the temporal evolution of the dye patch Estimate the along- and cross-isopycnal diffusivities Track the floats and AUV

Questions?

BACKUP

Mapping Floaters and AUV’s Blue Return ~ E x Area x R( bb) ~ E x 20 m2 x 0.0005 ~ E x 0.01 AUV Return ~ E x Area x R( bb) ~ E x ? m2 x ? ~ E x 0.25 x 0.2 ~ E x 0.05 Automating sorting through the data to find 1 shot requites the AUV/floater return look VERY different

Mapping Floaters and AUV’s Lidar will only detect light within it’s scanning, instantaneous FOV 45º LED upward looking cone of light LED - LIDAR can detect 10-6 W easily - Ratio of LIDAR Aperture to LED Spot at 325m separation = 10-5 - attenuation in water ~ e-1.5 = 0.22 - LED Power > 0.2 W (515 to 525 nm) Retro-Reflective Surface - 0.1 m2 Retro tape on ground required ND 3 in Rx for 5 m spot at 305 m - attenuation in water ~ e-3 = 0.05 - 0.01 m retro-tape = easy detection LED retro

01:43:45 UTC Eastbound Pass

01:51:53 UTC Westbound Pass

Intensity vs. Position Dye Returns Sept. 12, 2008 Forward Scan Aft Scan

Depth vs. Position Dye Returns Sept. 12, 2008 Depth calculated at 50% rise of max peak Surface onset calculated at 50% rise of surface flash

Light in the Ocean http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorations/04deepscope/background/deeplight/deeplight.html Basic illustration of the depth at which different colors of light penetrate ocean waters. Longer wavelength light (reds and oranges) is absorbed more quickly than shorter wavelength light (greens and blues).

HITS 4.1 All Tanker Types + Merchants TW