P802.1CF User Service Information Model

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(omniran TG) Short introduction into OmniRAN P802.1CF Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNokia.
Advertisements

Omniran Network Detection and Selection Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNSN
Omniran CF00 1 OmniRAN R3 Considerations Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNSN
Omniran CF00 1 P802.1CF NRM Mapping to real networks Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNokia Networks
Omniran CF CF Network Reference Model Introduction Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNokia Networks+49.
Omniran Thoughts about the tenets in IEEE 802.1CF Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNSN
Omniran CF00 1 VLANs in relation to P802.1CF NRM Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNokia Networks
Omniran CF00 1 Content and outline considerations for Annex: Applicability to non-IEEE 802 PHY layer technologies Date: Authors:
Omniran CF00 1 Key Concepts of Authentication and Trust Establishment Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNokia Networks+49.
Omniran CF00 1 Key Concepts of Network Selection and Detection Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNokia Networks+49.
Omniran CF00 1 Key Concepts of Association and Disassociation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNokia
Omniran CF00 1 P802.1CF NRM Ambiguities Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNokia Networks
P802.1CF Information Model Structure
Progressing OmniRAN Abstract
Layer-2 Network Virtualization
802.1CF perspective on planned Industry Connections activity
Network instantiation
P802.1CF Information Model Structure
Layer-2 Network Virtualization
Relation between information modeling and network operation
P802.1CF NRM Mapping to real networks
Information Model Structure
omniRAN Virtual Access Network Instantiation
P802.1CF architectural considerations for EM and NM
Model for Accounting and Monitoring
omniRAN Network Function Virtualization
P802.1CF Information Model Structure
P802.1CF NRM Refinements Abstract
P802.1CF NRM Discussions Abstract
Network reference model for access network virtualization
P802.1CF User Service Information Model
P802.1CF User Service Information Model
P802.1CF User Service Information Model
Chapter 7.1 Restructuring Proposal
P802.1CF User Service Information Model
Layer-2 Network Virtualization
802.1CF-D1.0 WG ballot comment remedies
802.1CF-D1.0 WG ballot comment remedies
Date: < yyyy-mm-dd >
P802.1CF User Service Information Model
Information Model for AN Setup
Information Model Structure
Information Model Structure
P802.1CF D1.0 Figure Proposals Abstract
Network instantiation
Brief Introduction to OmniRAN P802.1CF
Guidelines for creation of P802.1CF Information Model
SDN Functional Decomposition
P802.1CF architectural considerations for EM and NM
Terminology clean-up User/Subscriber
Information Model Structure
Terminology clean-up User/Subscriber
P802.1CF Information Model Structure
P802.1CF operational models
omniRAN Network Function Virtualization
Key concepts of authorization, QoS, and policy control
IEEE 802 omniRAN R9c Reference Point
P802.1CF D1.0 Figure Proposals Abstract
P802.1CF NRM Refinements Abstract
[place document title here]
IEEE 802 Scope of OmniRAN Abstract
Mapping of QoS Related Parameters
P802.1CF NRM Refinements Abstract
Information Model for AN Setup
An SDN-based approach for OmniRAN Reference Point mapping
[place document title here]
802.1CF ToC Refinements Abstract
OmniRAN SDN Use Case ToC
OmniRAN SDN Use Case ToC
IEEE 802 RAN Recommended Practice ToC Proposal
Presentation transcript:

P802.1CF User Service Information Model Date: 2017-10-10 Authors: Name Affiliation Phone Email Max Riegel Nokia maximilian.riegel@nokia.com Notice: This document does not represent the agreed view of the IEEE 802.1 OmniRAN TG. It represents only the views of the participants listed in the ‘Authors:’ field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor, who reserve the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Copyright policy: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Copyright Policy <http://standards.ieee.org/IPR/copyrightpolicy.html>. Patent policy: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures: <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6> and <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3>. Abstract The presentation contains the graphical representation of the user service information model. It builds on the concepts outlined in omniran-17-0064-004-CF00 and details the overarching user service model as well as its components. First edition provides some examples of the information model for review.

P802.1CF User Service Information Model Max Riegel (Nokia) 2017-10-10

Information Model An information model* in software engineering is a representation of concepts and the relationships, constraints, rules, and operations to specify data semantics for a chosen domain of discourse. Typically it specifies relations between kinds of things, but may also include relations with individual things. It can provide sharable, stable, and organized structure of information requirements or knowledge for the domain context. Y. Tina Lee (1999). "Information modeling from design to implementation"  National Institute of Standards and Technology. * On difference between Information Model and Data Model: RFC 3444; A. Pras , J. Schoenwaelder; IETF, 2003

Information model notation Class name Attribute#1: abstract type Attribute#2: abstract type … Response Function#1(parameter) Response Function#2(parameter) ... Information element with specification of attributes as well as functions, which could be invoked by other elements over reference points. Functions return an result value. Aggregation Aggregation is a special type of association used to model a "whole to its parts" relationship. In basic aggregation relationships (framed diamond), the lifecycle of a part class is independent from the whole class's lifecycle. - Associations are always assumed to be bi-directional; this means that both classes are aware of each other and their relationship - In a uni-directional association (arrow), two classes are related, but only one class knows that the relationship exists. The composition aggregation relationship (filled diamond) is just another form of the aggregation relationship, but the child class's instance lifecycle is dependent on the parent class's instance lifecycle. Whole 0+ Part Whole 1+ Part Whole 0-1 Part Whole 1 Part

Two perspectives of information model Infrastructure Information model is structured according to functional entities User Service Information model is structured according to functional phases

User Service Information Model User service (session) Session-ID 1 Subscription NAI 1 Unmodified from omniran-17-0064-04 Requires revision! Service provider SP-ID:FQDN 1 User User-ID 1+ Network access policies NDS-policy-ID 1+ Access link Link-ID 1 Security association Session-Key 0+ 1 Subscription service SS-ID 1 Datapath Datapath-ID 1 IP Provider AR-ID 1+ Service-Flow ServiceFlow-ID 1+ Accounting record AccountingRecord-ID

Should FDM appear in the User Service Information Model? FDM describes the kind of information and the procedures for detecting and mitigating faulty behavior of the network. The section does not expose any relationship to individual user sessions. It seems, the FDM functions are better addressed in the Infrastructure Information model.

Access Link – Option 1 Access Link Link-ID: Unique link identifier LinkConfiguration: configuration values of the link SupportedLinkCapabilities: possible configuration attributes SupportedSecurityCapabilities: possible security modes SupportedQosCapabilities: possible QoS configurations SupportedApplications: possible applications PreferredLinkProfile: desired link configuration attributes PreferredSecurityProfile: desired security mode PreferredQosProfile: desired QoS mode LinkConfiguration ASSOCIATE (SupportedLinkCapabilities, PreferredLinkProfile, SupportedSecurityCapabilities, PreferredSecurityProfile, SupportedQosCapabilities, PreferredQosProfile) LinkConfiguration REASSOCIATE (Link-ID) void DISASSOCIATE ()

Access Link – Option 2 Access Link 1 TE 1 NA Link-ID: Unique link identifier TE-ID: Terminal identifier NA-ID: NA identifier LinkConfiguration: configuration values of the link 1 TE TE-ID: Unique terminal identifier SupportedLinkCapabilities: possible configuration attributes SupportedSecurityCapabilities: possible security modes SupportedQosCapabilities: possible QoS configurations PreferredLinkProfile: desired link configuration attributes PreferredSecurityProfile: desired security mode PreferredQosProfile: desired QoS mode LinkConfiguration ASSOCIATE (SupportedLinkCapabilities, PreferredLinkProfile, SupportedSecurityCapabilities, PreferredSecurityProfile, SupportedQosCapabilities, PreferredQosProfile) void DISASSOCIATE () 1 NA NA-ID: Unique node of attachment identifier SupportedLinkCapabilities: possible configuration attributes SupportedSecurityCapabilities: possible security modes SupportedQosCapabilities: possible QoS configurations PreferredLinkProfile: desired link configuration attributes PreferredSecurityProfile: desired security mode PreferredQosProfile: desired QoS mode LinkConfiguration ASSOCIATE (SupportedLinkCapabilities, PreferredLinkProfile, SupportedSecurityCapabilities, PreferredSecurityProfile, SupportedQosCapabilities, PreferredQosProfile) LinkConfiguration REASSOCIATE (Link-ID) void DISASSOCIATE ()

Security Association Security Association 1 Subscription 1 TE 1 AN 1 SessionKey: Unique session credential EncryptionMode: Encryption configuration Subscription-ID: NAI TE-ID: Terminal identifier used for supplicant identifier AN-ID: Access network identifier used for authenticator identifier SS-ID: Subscription service identifier 1 Subscription Subscription-ID: NAI SubscriptionCredential: Subscription credential User-ID: Username ServiceProvider-ID: FQDN ServiceProfile: Definition of provided services. 1 TE TE-ID: Unique terminal identifier SupportedAuthMethods: possible authentication methods SupportedEncryptionModes: possible encryption methods PreferredAuthMethod: preferred authentication methods PreferredEncryptionMode: preferred encryption mode Subscription-ID IDENTIFY (ANCredential, SupportedEncryptionMode , PreferredEncryptionMode) SubscriptionCredential AUTHENTICATE (SupportedAuthMethods, PreferredAuthMethod, SSCredential) 1 AN AN-ID: Unique AN identifier ANCredential: Authenticator credential SupportedEncryptionModes: possible encryption methods PreferredEncryptionMode: preferred encryption mode resultMsg TEAUTHENTICATE (TE-ID, queryMsg) 1 SS SS-ID: Unique SS identifier SSCredential: Subscription service credential SupportedAuthMethods: possible authentication methods PreferredAuthMethod: preferred authentication methods AuthResult ACCESSREQ (TE-ID, Subscription-ID) SessionKey AUTHENTICATE (SupportedAuthMethods, PreferredAuthMethod, SubscriptionCredential)

Outlook The examples provide first impressions how the user service information model may look like. Model structure, attributes and functions reflect the textual descriptions of chapter 7 Attribute descriptions might be revised according to the insights from information modeling Complete model could be established along the same lines for the next conference call. Does the approach make sense?