How is the real final outcome of these eyes?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Comparison of bitoric with monotoric laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 Laser. By Mohamed Abdul-Rahman.
Advertisements

Irrigation Vs. Non- Irrigating Corneal flap interface In the Management of Grade II – III Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis (DLK)
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم LDV. Femto-LASIK Basir Eye Center Dr. Ahmad Shojaei
2006 年 10 月 28 日 中國廈門屈光手術研討會 Early Clinical Outcomes of Epi-LASIK for Myopia in Taiwan 台灣諾貝爾醫療集團 張朝凱醫師. 陳美齡醫師. 王倫奕醫師. 劉淳熙醫師. 張鼎業醫師. 林玉凰醫師. 戴文瑛醫師. 蕭清仁博士.
GUSTAVO TAMAYO MD CLAUDIA CASTELL MD
Evaluation of Enhancement Rates following Hyperopic LASIK with Femtosecond versus Microkeratome Assisted Flap Creation Raj Rajpara, BS * Richard M. Awdeh,
Use of a Novel Y- Suture Technique to Reduce Detachments in Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) Habeeb Ahmad, MD Martin Heur,
Topographically-guided photo-refractive keratectomy (TG-PRK) for complications of refractive surgery David TC Lin, MD, FRCSC Simon Holland, MD, FRCSC,
INTRAOPERATIVE FLAP COMPLICATIONS IN LASIK SURGERY PERFORMED BY OPHTHALMOLOGY RESIDENTS IN TRAINING Arturo Gómez-Bastar MD Arturo Ramirez-MirandaMD Lorena.
IN THE NAME OF GOD All-in-one Femtosecond Laser Refractive Surgery Sh.Hanjani, M.D Ophthalmologist.
Incidence and outcomes of LASIK free cap
Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy for Irregular Astigmatism following Penetrating Keratoplasty Johnson Tan, MBBS MRCSEd (Ophth) FRCSEd (Ophth)
PRK Enhancement with Mitomycin - C after LASIK - a case series
Bryan Y Kim 1, Shintaro Kanayama MD PhD 1, Tueng T Shen MD PhD 1, Thomas E Gillette MD 2 1 University of Washington Department of Ophthalmology, 2 Eye.
Jérôme C. VRYGHEM, M.D. Brussels Eye Doctors Brussels, Belgium
Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,
Comparison of flap thickness results using M2 130 micron flap and one use plus 100 micron flap Ahmed El-Massry M.D. Ophthalmology Department Alexandria.
Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of Multizone Laser Vision Correction in Presbyopic Patients ASCRS 2010 Paul Van Saarloos PhD – CustomVis, employee.
ASCRS 08 Changes Of Higher Order Aberrations After Excimer Laser Treatment For Moderate Myopia by Means of Preoperative Wavefront Aberration Levels using.
Prospective Study of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus Scott X. Stevens, MD Bend Ophthalmology, LLC Author has no financial interest.
Collagen cross-linking (CXL) for keratoconus (KC) with simultaneous topographical-guided photorefractive keratectomy (TG-PRK) Simon Holland, MD, FRCSC,
Corneal CXL in Children With Progessive Keratoconus Author do not have any financial interest in the surgical procedure or the medicines used in this study.
Custom Flap Formation: Advantages of Elliptical Flaps for LASIK Patients Custom Flap Formation: Advantages of Elliptical Flaps for LASIK Patients Henry.
March 2011 Bascom Palmer Eye Institute University of Miami Elaine Wu, M.D. Ana Paula Canto, M.D. William Culbertson, M.D. Sonia Yoo, M.D. Financial disclosure:
Results of Collagen Crosslinking followed by posterior chamber toric implantable collamer lens implantation in patients with Keratoconus & High Myopia.
M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD The.
Myoung Joon Kim, MD / Sara Yoon, MD Tracy Purcell, PhD / David J Schanzlin, MD L aser In Situ Keratomileusis versus Photorefractive Keratectomy for the.
A New Technique for Precise, Predictable SBK Surgery Using the B&L Zyoptix XP Microkeratome David R. Shapiro, MD Shapiro Laser Eye Center Ventura, California.
REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES WITH TORIC ICL IMPLANTS CHIEF AUTHOR: Dr. D.RAMAMURTHY CO – AUTHOR: Dr. R.CHITRA The authors have no financial interest in the subject.
Comparison of LASIK and Mitomycin-C Assisted LASEK for Correction of Refractive Errors After Cataract Surgery Dr. Nitin Balakrishnan, Crystal Vision Laser.
Successful Use of Corneal Tissue from LASIK Donors in Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Case Series Mark D. Mifflin, MD Majid Moshirfar,
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Intracorneal Ring Segment (Intacs SK) in Keratoconus Abdulrahman Al-Muammar, MD, FRCSC I have no financial interest.
Faik Orucov*, MD, Sinan Goker*,MD, Abraham Solomon**, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery**, MD *Refractive Surgery Department, ISTANBUL SURGERY HOSPITAL Istanbul,
Retrospective Comparison of Flap Complications in LASIK Using Hansatome Mechanical Microkeratome and Femtosecond Laser Majid Moshirfar, MD Jeffrey P Gardiner,
Visual and IOP Outcomes after PRK in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome [Poster Number: P190] Kraig S. Bower, Denise A. Sediq, Charles D. Coe, Keith Wroblewski,
Wavefront-guided Ablation Retreatment in Myopic Eyes Engy M Mohamed MD, Orkun Muftuoglu MD, R.Wayne Bowman MD, V. Vinod Mootha MD, H. Dwight Cavanagh MD,PhD,
Comparing laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy in different eyes of the same patient. Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, Faik Orucov, MD*,
Faik Orucov*, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ.
Varsha Rathi DO, P K Vaddavalli MS, S Murthy MS, V S Sangwan, MS
Evaluation of Topography-guided LASIK and Simultaneous Collagen Cross-linking in the Management of Post-LASIK Ectasia Diana Ng, MD1 Anastasios John Kanellopoulos,
Late In-the-bag Intraocular Lens Dislocation:
Eun Chul Kim, M.D. , Man Soo Kim,M.D.
William W. Culbertson, MD Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
CustomVue vs Conventional LASIK: one year study
17100 Contact lens fitting after corneal CXL
A Comparison of Visual Acuity, Refractive Outcomes, and Satisfaction Between LASIK Performed with a Microkeratome and a Femto Laser Nauman hashmani (MBBS),
Incidence of Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis After LASIK with 15 KHz, 30 KHz and 60 KHz IntraLase Femtosecond Laser Flap Creation Carly Guss, BA,1 Christina.
DSAEK using corneas with previous LASIK
ASCRS 2016 New Orleans, Louisiana
Topographically-guided photo-refractive keratectomy (TG-PRK) for complications of refractive surgery David TC Lin, MD, FRCSC Simon Holland, MD, FRCSC,
Collagen cross-linking (CXL) for keratoconus (KC) with simultaneous topographical-guided photorefractive keratectomy (TG-PRK) Simon Holland, MD, FRCSC,
Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.
EPI-LASIK using the Zyoptix XP EPI Separator Suphi Taneri
post-lasik corneal ectasia
Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ keratomileusis
Long-term refractive results after multizone LASIK for extreme myopia
LASIK Application in High Myopic Eyes; 10 Years Survey
No financial interest for all authors
Asociación Para Evitar La Ceguera En México
Three-Year Follow-up after LASIK in Eye with Extremely Thin Corneal Bed Hidemasa Torii, MD, Kazuno Negishi, MD, Murat Dogru, MD, Takefumi Yamaguchi, MD,
Outcomes Post Laser-In-Situ Keratomileusis in HIV+ Patient Population
The authors have no financial interest to disclosure
V isual Outcomes and Complications of Mini-Enhancements after Refractive Surgery Lichtinger A, MD; Purcell TL, Ph.D; Bernabe-Ko J, MD; Schanzlin DJ, MD.
Dr Haralabos Eleftheriadis, M.D Ultralase Clinic Bristol UK
Lasik decentration with the VISX ActiveTrak™ System
Mohamed Abdelrahman Awadalla,FRCS Magrabi Eye Hospital Cairo - Egypt
PERRY S. BINDER, MS MD* San Diego, California
University of California, San Diego Shiley Eye Center
Majid Moshirfar, MD, FACS
Refractive Surgery Outcomes: Corneas Thinner than 500 microns Vs
Presentation transcript:

How is the real final outcome of these eyes? EARLY FLAP DISPLACEMENT AFTER LASIK How is the real final outcome of these eyes? Rosario Cobo-Soriano MD PhD Félix González-López MD Rafael Bilbao-Calabuig MD Fernando Llovet MD PhD The authors have no financial disclosure to declare

INTRODUCTION Postop LASIK complication Benign complication Variable reported incidence: 0.012% a 5,8% Ordinariy detected promptly (first 24-48h) Late dislocations:Trauma (days to years) Dislodged Flap Causes Interface overhydration , poor adherence. Brimonidine ? Eye rubbing, excessive blinking, squeezing from discomfort/ photophobia. Nasal/superior hinge? Dryness and adhesion of the flap to the upper tarsal conjunctiva. Intralase vs mechanical microkeratome? Other factors: Flap diameter/thickness? Refraction? mean K?, Pictures taken from Melki SA et al., Ophthalmology 2000;107

INTRODUCTION Flap remains wrinkled for several hours or overnight Incongruous fitting and apposition between the edematous folded flap and bed surfaces despite prompt surgical replacement. But , even after a prompt surgical flap reposition.. What is the real outcome of these eyes…? How long to recover optimal vision? Worse UCVA? Do they lose BCVA? Higher enhancement rate? Anatomic complications rate? DLK, epithelial ingrowth?

STUDY PURPOSE, PATIENTS & METHOD Main objective: To evaluate in a large series, the refractive and visual outcomes of eyes that suffered from an early postoperative flap dislocation . Retrospective, comparative (case/control) study Cases: Dislocated flap eyes from July/2002 to March/2015 Controls: Eyes operated-on uneventfully from January to June/2012 Clínica Baviera-Spain (24h-Emergency Service) Microqueratome: Manual Moria-LSK-One N= 536 dislodged flaps Late (>3 days): n= 77 eyes (4 bilateral cases) Early (<48h): n= 459 eyes 0,12% 408 patients (51 bilateral cases) 0,12%

RESULTS. PREOP DATA Measurement CASES N=459 CONTROLS N=12,624 P 51,2 - Laterality (% OS) 51,2 - Age 38,9 (12) 33,8(8) <0,01 Mean K pre 43,6 (2) 43,7 (1,6) NS Mean Cil K -1,28 (0,9) -1,08 (1,1) <0,05 SE pre -2,72 (3,2) -2,85 (2,8) Myopia (%) Hyperopia (%) Significant astigmatism (≥2D) (%) BCVA Pachymetry 555 (28) 555 (31) NS Pachym BED 460 (31) 462 (30) Ablation 70 (29) 66 (29) Flap Thickness 94 (20%) 92,4 (18 %)

RESULTS POSTOP DATA P<0,01 Mean follow-up until discharge: 190 days Anatomic Complications N (%) Epithelial ingrowth 73(16) Folds (different severity) 70(15) DLK 14(3) Peripheral haze 10(2) Central-Difuse haze 7 (1,5) Complete/Free Flap 4 (0,8) (1flap lost) Recurrent keratitis Mean follow-up until discharge: 190 days 9% eyes with follow-up > 1 year Efficacy: % eyes postop UCVA ≥ preop BCVA. / Safety: % eyes with loss ≥ 2 lines of BCVA.

DISCUSSION. LITERATURE REVIEW Ref. N Efficacy Safety Predictability % Enhancmt Walter, Ophthalmology 2001. Prospective Brimonidina 6/39 15,4% 69% >20/40 P<0,01 1 ojo (16%) < 2 líneas BCVA SE= -0,88D 36% P<001 Clare. Ophthalmology 2011. Retrospective 10 /81,000 61,8% vs 83,2% (AV =1) SE = +0,16D vs -0,07D (control) Recep. JCRS 2000 Comparative contralateral uneventful eye 21 No dif ES Clínica Baviera 459 0,12% 61% 4,7% 75% 12% Scarce bibliography to compare with

CONCLUSIONS Post-LASIK flap dislocation is an infrequent complication Incidence rate aceptable (0,1%). Our series shows that a flap dislocation after LASIK changes the final outcomes despite early detection and prompt surgical reposition, compared with eyes with an uneventful postoperative healing. Our results show a slower recovery and poorer visual performance in all functional and refractive parameters (efficacy, predictability, enhancement and safety). There are no studies to compare with. Higher rate of anatomical complications.