Sunu Bagaskara Universitas YARSI

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SAFETY: Safety on the Road Ms. Mai Lawndale High School.
Advertisements

Is it time to revisit the problem young driver? Mrs Bridie Scott-Parker (PhD candidate-under-examination) 1.
Motorcycle Attitudinal Research 22 July Aim & Sample Structure Aims of research: – To explore the knowledge, attitudes and self-reported behaviour.
Driver response to a disabled pedestrian using a dangerous crosswalk Journal of Environmental Psychology (1992) 12, W. Andrew Harrell 學生:董瑩蟬.
CRICOS No J Deterring Drug Drivers: A Study into the Initial Impact of Oral Random Roadside Drug Testing in Queensland Professor Jeremy Davey ICADTS.
Do Now for 5/16/13 Take out E83 #3 and get it ready to hand in.
“Gender and age-related differences in attitudes toward traffic laws and traffic violations” Seminar #34 Karen Jakubowski.
Inter-group differences in road-traffic crash involvement Accident Analysis and Prevention 40 (2008) 2000–2007.
Riding along with a drunk driver: a social norms campaign in Antwerp students An influence on driving under influence? Bart Vriesacker Heidi Stoop Guido.
Gender differences in preschool children’s declared and behavioral compliance with pedestrian rules 學生:董瑩蟬.
Florida Statistics April Road Map: – Research Purpose & Methodology – Summary – Detailed Findings – How Dangerous Is….? – How Distracting Is….?
Adolescents’ Motivation to Engage in Social Perspective Taking Scott W. Brown, Hunter Gehlbach, Andri Ioannou, Mark A. Boyer, Natalie Hudson, Anat Niv-Solomon.
The Effects of Text Messaging On the Driving Performance of Young Novice Drivers MUARC: Kristie Young, Simon Hosking & Michael Regan NRMA Motoring & Services:
BACKGROUND OF INFORMATION Increase in number of accidents Capital losses due to increasing number of accidents.
Case Study: The Evaluation Process Tanya Fosdick.
CRICOS No J Factors influencing perceived risk by French and Australian cyclists and drivers Nadine Chaurand, Wanda Griffin, Narelle Haworth & Patricia.
ANGELINA CAPORICCIO. MAIN POINTS  STATISTICS  WHY DRINKING AND DRIVING IS DANGEROUS  WHAT IS EFFECTS  CONSEQUENCE’S OF DRINKING AND DRIVING  SIGNS.
25 th September 2009 Managing Cross-Organisational Research Teams Aaron Jarden.
L O G O Impact of impulsiveness, venturesomeness, and empathy on driving by older adults Cynthia Owsley, Gerald McGwin Jr., Sandre F. McNeal Journal of.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Drive Right: Teen Safe Driving. When you think of driving, what words, ideas, or phrases come to mind? fun cars expensive responsibility convenient friends.
Managing Risk When Driving. All Licensed Drivers – 191,275,719 All Drivers Involvement Rate in Fatal Crashes/100,000 Licensed Drivers – (37,795.
Safer Journeys: New Zealand’s Road Safety Strategy to 2020 Chris Foley NEW ZEALAND.
Press Conference on Road Safety Network And Launching Fleet Safety Management.
Road Safety. THE FACTS: How many people do you think are involved in road crashes in 2008/09 in Northern Ireland? Number of deaths? 6 Number of serious.
Drivers’ attitudes towards driver assistance systems presented by Juliane Haupt.
Jenefer Husman Arizona State University Jenefer Husman Arizona State University When learning seems (un)important: Future Time Perspective and post-secondary.
Table 2: Correlation between age and readiness to change Table 1: T-test relating gender and readiness to change  It is estimated that 25% of children.
Vulnerable road users: Pedestrians & Motorcycle and bicycle riders.
1 Research methods and models of driver behavior studies.
Misunderstanding of right-of-way rules at various pedestrian crossing types: Observational study and survey 學生:董瑩蟬.
Tips for Parents of Teenage Drivers BALANCING LIFE’S ISSUES.
Modeling pedestrians road crossing behavior in traffic system micro-simulation in China 學生:董瑩蟬.
IMPROPER LANE CHANGE A Collision Countermeasures Presentation.
Risky driving  Patterns of driving behavior that place drivers at risk for mortality,  Involve legal violations  Do NOT involve alcohol or drug use.
BACKGROUND OF INFORMATION Increase in number of incidents Capital losses due to increasing number of accidents.
姓名 : 許浩維 學號 :M 日期 : Road Accident: Driver Behaviour, Learning and Driving Task 1.
Mobile phone use while driving in a sample of Spanish university workers 學生 : 莊靖玟.
MADELEINE A. FUGÈRE, ALITA J. COUSINS, & STEPHANIE A. MACLAREN Presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Please contact Dr.
Pre-Driving Adolescent Attitudes: Can They Change? Helen Mann, Heriot-Watt University.
Motorcycles Bicyclists Buses Funeral Processions Pedestrians Trucks & others.
Detect Driver’s Emotion State By Using EEG Analysis Research Methodology Name: Ahmad Affandi Supli Matrix No: Prepared For: Dr. Farzana binti Kabir.
YOUTH and Road Safety in Europe
Automobile Insurance: The Basics
Section 26.3 Motor Vehicle Safety Objectives
Crosswalk & Pedestrian Signal No protection/separation from traffic
Forgiving In the Moment
Analysis of Motorcycle Crashes: Comparison of 2012 to Previous Years
Pedestrian Safety.
Young people and attitudes
Prevalence of Self-Reported Aggressive Driving Behavior: United States, 2014 July 2016.
Motorcycle Safety Facts (Illinois Data)
Participants & Procedure
Friendship Quality as a Moderator
Project Edward….
Research amongst Physical Therapists in the State of Kuwait: Participation, Perception, Attitude and Barriers Presented by Sameera Aljadi, PT, PhD Assistant.
NATURALISTIC DRIVING STUDIES: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE METHODOLOGY IN MONITORING DRIVER BEHAVIOUR K. Muronga, N Ruxwana* 36th Annual Southern African.
Warm-up/Journal Why is it important for a person to always pay attention while behind the wheel of a motor vehicle? List at least 5 possible distractions.
Knowledge about Crash Risk Factors and Self-Reported Driving Behavior
Exploring the relationship between Authentic Leadership and Project Outcomes and Job Satisfaction with Information Technology Professionals by Mark A.
Response Time (Reaction time)
The Driving Task DRIVER EDUCATION.
Enterprise High School
Drunk Driving What Side Will You Be On?.
MOTOR VEHICLE DRIVING PRACTICES.
2017 SMSA National Training Summit
Morgan M. Welch & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
lesson 11.3 MOTORCYCLES AND SCOOTERS
The Relationship between Social Skills and Academic Achievement of Universitas Klabat Students Ate Gueen L. R. Simanungkalit
Presentation transcript:

Sunu Bagaskara Universitas YARSI Gender Differences in Risky Riding Behavior: An Exploration Study of Motorcyclists in Jabodetabek Sunu Bagaskara Universitas YARSI

Introduction In Indonesia, 25,858 people were killed and more than 123,000 injured in road traffic accidents in 2016 (Korlantas, 2017) In Jakarta alone, traffic accidents killed 678 people 61% due to human error (Kemenhub, 2017) Finding means to reduce the number of accidents would be of great benefit for the society at large The present study investigates how gender is related to risky riding in a sample of motorcyclists in Greater Jakarta area

Introduction Research has consistently found the association between gender and risk behavior, i.e., males are more willing to take risks than females From evolutionary perspective it has been argued that it is necessary for males to take risks and that this tendency has become an adaptation strategy (Buss, 2004) In terms of risk behavior in road traffic, gender differences have been reported by numerous researchers Turner & McClure (2003) found that males were twice as likely to have reported at least one crash as a driver compared to females and nearly three times as likely to have reported two or more crashes

Introduction Males tend to: perceive traffic violations as less dangerous (Yagil, 1998) show greater positive affect for risky driving behavior (Rhodes & Pivik, 2011) perceive that they have greater driving skill in risky situations (DeJoy, 1992; Farrow & Brissing, 1990) engage in unsafe driving behaviors, such as drinking and driving, and speeding (Harré, Field, & Kirkwood, 1996; Oltedal & Rundmo, 2006) engage in aggressive driving and commit more violations (Blockley & Hartley, 1995; Jonah, 1990)

Introduction Females tend to: express a higher motivation to comply with traffic rules (Yagil, 1998) to be less optimistic when making comparisons about their driving skills to the average motorist (deJoy, 1992) perceive risky driving behaviors as generally more serious and more likely to results in accidents (deJoy, 1992; Rhodes & Pivik, 2011) make more errors with control aspects when taking a driving test (Forsyth, 1993)

Introduction Most previous research were conducted in Western, developed countries Indonesia is a more motorcycle-centric country (98.8 millions units or 81.5% of registered vehicles) Study focusing on motorcyclists is scarce

Method Participants 212 males (mean age=23,0, S.D.=5.90) and 141 females (mean age=23,2, S.D.=6.14) Riding experience: males M=8.05 years, S.D.=5.12; females=7.26 years, S.D=6.17, t=1.303, df=352, p=.193

Method Measures: Demographic questionnaire: age, gender, experience, driving license Risky driving behavior scale (Rhodes & Pivik, 2011), 17 items, 5-point scale (1=never, 5=almost always); a=.90 Brief Sensation Seeking Scale (Hoyle et al., 2002), 7 items, 5-point scale (1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree); a=.70

Method Procedure: Questionnaires were distributed by research assistants using convenience sampling via an online questionnaire platform Friends, family and colleagues of the researchers were approached, informed about the research and asked to participate No personal details were collected which could allow the identification of the participant Respondents were told that the study aimed to explore the relationship between riding experience and riding behavior They were all assured that the results would only be used for scientific purposes and that all information provided was completely confidential and anonymous Participants were not given any monetary compensation whatsoever

Results Correlation matrix 1 2 3 4 5 Experience - .155* -.044 .655** -.069 SS -.029 .180** .070 RDB -.203** -.261** Age .023 Gender Note. * p<.01, ** p<.001, SS=Sensation Seeking; RDB=Risky Driving Behavior; Gender=1 (male) & 2 (females)

Results Male motorcyclists reported higher frequency of risky riding behavior (M=38.2, S.D=10.38) compared to female motorcyclists (M=32.9, S.D=8.43), t=5.039, df=352, p<.001 A One-way ANCOVA was conducted to determine a statistically significant difference between males and females on the risky riding behavior mean score controlling for age There’s a significant effect of gender on risky riding behavior after controlling for age, F(1, 350)=15.1, p<.001

Results Risky riding behaviors Mean t p Male (SD) Female (SD) Switching lanes frequently 3.22 (.92) 2.82 (.92) 4.015 <.001 Exceeding speed limit 2.51 (1.00) 1.87 (.88) 6.173 Riding fast on curves 2.06 (.96) 1.68 (.82) 3.919 Riding after drinking 1.34 (.71) 1.10 (.43) 3.600 Riding through a red light 2.11 (.93) 1.89 (.92) 2.132 <.005 Braking hard to stop in time 2.22 (.99) 1.87 (.82) 3.467

Results Risky riding behaviors Mean t p Male (SD) Female (SD) Racing with other vehicles 2.50 (1.07) 1.95 (1.00) 4.906 <.001 Overtaking other vehicle on curves 2.14 (1.03) 1.63 (.90) 4,784 Turning or switching lane without giving a sign 2.07 (.92) 1.69 (.83) 3.962 Not reducing speed on curves 1.99 (.94) 1.48 (.65) 5.588 Not keeping safe distance with other vehicle 2.14 (.94) 1.76 (.79) 3.940

Results Risky riding behaviors Mean t p Male (SD) Female (SD) Performing fast acceleration and braking 2.32 (.92) 2.17 (.82) 4.015 .111 Riding while fatigue/sleepy 2.25 (1.03) 2.18 (.96) .752 .469 Doing things that can distract you while riding 2.35 (1.06) 2.13 (1.00) 1.960 .051 Getting distracted by passengers activities 2.65 (1.04) 2.61 (.96) .372 .710 Riding against the traffic direction 2.00 (.90) 1.89 (.86) 1.050 .294 Not wearing helmet 2.34 (1.05) 2.23 (.96) 1.039 .300

Discussion Male motorcyclists take more risks in riding, even after controlling for age Consistent with previous research SS is not correlated with RDB

Limitations Self-report method Online-offline questionnaire cross validation