Leta F. Huntsinger, PhD, PE Senior Technical Principal, WSP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Smith Myung, Cambridge Systematics Sean McAtee, Cambridge Systematics Cambridge Systematics.
Advertisements

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Development of a New Commercial Vehicle Travel Model for Triangle Region 14 th TRB Planning Applications Conference, Columbus, Ohio May 7, 2013 Bing Mei.
Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner.
13 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada The Corradino Group, Inc. May 12, th TRB Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada.
Characteristics of Bus Transit Users in a Small-Urban Resort Community Wayne D. Cottrell, Ph.D. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Sichun.
1 National Reading First Impact Study: Critique in the Context of Oregon Reading First Oregon Reading First Center May 13, 2008 Scott K. Baker, Ph.D. Hank.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
Comparison of Cell, GPS, and Bluetooth Derived External Data Results from the 2014 Tyler, Texas Study 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Conference.
COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE. What Smartphone Bicycle GPS Data Can Tell Us About Current Modeling Efforts Katie Kam, The University of Texas at Austin.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Development of the Idaho STDM Trip Matrices Using Cell Phone OD Data
Presented by Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Co-authors Vidya Mysore, Florida Department of Transportation Nanda Srinivasan, Cambridge.
The Impact of Convergence Criteria on Equilibrium Assignment Yongqiang Wu, Huiwei Shen, and Terry Corkery Florida Department of Transportation 11 th Conference.
Evaluating Robustness of Signal Timings for Conditions of Varying Traffic Flows 2013 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium – August 16, 2013.
Developing Travel Models in Rural Areas Based on Actual, Current, Local Data Cy Smith, CEO Sashi Gandavarapu, Data Services Manager AirSage.
Comparison of Cell, GPS, and Bluetooth Derived Travel Data Results from the 2014 Tyler, Texas Study Texas A&M Big Data Workshop February 13, 2015 Ed Hard.
Montgomery County Travel Forecasting Model Validation — Status Report — Status Report Presented To: TPB Travel Forecasting Subcommittee By: Montgomery.
Cell Phone Traffic Data Technology Demonstration in Minnesota ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting & Exposition Bernie Arseneau, Mn/DOT Rashmi Brewer, Mn/DOT.
Travel Demand Modeling Experience Bellevue-Kirkland-Redmond Travel Demand Modeling Experience Jin Ren, P.E. City of Bellevue, Washington, USA October 19,
Rhett Fussell, PE Craig Gresham, PE No Horsing Around, A Hole in One with Mobile Phone Data Using Mobile Phone Location Data to Support Corridor Analysis.
Pilot National Travel Survey 2009 Summary Findings Prepared by Mairead Griffin.
EFFECTS OF HOUSEHOLD LIFE CYCLE CHANGES ON TRAVEL BEHAVIOR EVIDENCE FROM MICHIGAN STATEWIDE HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEYS 13th TRB National Transportation Planning.
TYBEE ISLAND TOURISM STUDY, OUTLINE 1.Introduction 2.Survey of Tybee Island Visitors 3.Visitor Expenditure Patterns 4.Estimated Annual Visitation.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
Preliminary Evaluation of Cellular Origin- Destination Data as a Basis for Forecasting Non-Resident Travel 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Understanding Cellular-based Travel Data Experience from Phoenix Metropolitan Region Wang Zhang, Maricopa Association of Governments Arun Kuppam (Presenter),
May 8, 2009 SERPM65 Subarea Model-Corradino 1 SERPM65 Highway-Only Subarea Modeling Process Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Analysis of Travel Behavior Using the ACS J.G. Berman, Siim S öö t and Susumu Kudo Urban Transportation Center, UIC.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Generation CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Reconciliation of regional travel model and passive device tracking data 14 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Leta F. Huntsinger Rick Donnelly.
Presented to Toll Modeling Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.. September 16, 2010 Time of Day in FSUTMS.
Peter Vovsha, Robert Donnelly, Surabhi Gupta pb
Tennessee Statewide Model Integration with the National Long Distance Passenger Model and Calibration to AirSage Data Vince Bernardin, PhD, RSG Hadi.
Alternate Methodologies for Origin-Destination Data Collection
Use Survey to Improve the DFX Transit Model
Krista Nordback, Ph.D., P.E., Kristin Tufte, Ph.D.
Car, walk or public transport?
Continuous Regional Travel Behaviour Survey
Festival IMPACT Estimated Visitor Spending and Economic Impact of Select Durham Festivals February 25, 2016.
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
16th TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference
Developing External and Truck Trips for a Regional Travel Model
Using Linked Non-Home-Based Trips in Virginia
AMPO Annual Conference October 22, 2014
TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL UPDATE
and Transportation Impacts
Transportation Planning Applications Conference Sheldon Harrison
WIFI Data Collection and the Effectiveness of Various Survey Expansion Techniques- A Case Study on I-95 Corridor in Palm Beach County, FL Presented to.
Downtown Core Parking Demand & Utilization Study Parking Management Advisory Board Meeting September 27, 2016.
“ELECTRIFYING NEW GROWTH: WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?" Interim Report
Impacts of Proxy Reporting in Household Surveys on Trip Rates
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
AMPO Conference | October 19, 2017
Johnson City MPO Travel Demand Model
One-way travel to two-way travel conversion.
Using Google’s Aggregated and Anonymized Trip Data to Estimate Dynamic Origin-Destination Matrices for San Francisco TRB Applications Conference 2017 Bhargava.
Quantification of the Natural Variation in Traffic Flow
Ontario Skiing Tourism Statistics 2015
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting, Ch. 8 (152054A)
WHY AND WHEN WE TRAVEL Household Travel Surveys March 2018.
Chattanooga Transportation Data Collection Review
Ontario Snowmobiling Tourism Statistics 2015
Mark Fermanich, CU-Denver January 3, 2011
Mrs Lebogang Mogakabe M Tech (Student): Civil Engineering 10 July 2018
A New Technique for Destination Choice
Model Work Trips Appropriately Based on Travel Behavior and Change Pattern Differences 2016HTS Characteristics and Changes vs. 2006HTS 16th TRB National.
MSP Regional Travel Behavior Inventory Program
Developing Regional Solutions
Comparison and Analysis of Big Data for a Regional Freeway Study in Washington State Amanda Deering, DKS Associates.
Presentation transcript:

Using Big Data: Exploring the Differences between Weekday and Weekend Travel Leta F. Huntsinger, PhD, PE Senior Technical Principal, WSP Xuan Wang, PhD, PE Project Manager, Regional Transportation Commission Working with Big Data Monday, May 15, 2017

Outline Motivation Background Data description and processing Weekday versus Weekend Comparisons Basic Trip Statistics Travel Time Comparisons District to District Flows Highway Assignment Results Summary and Conclusions

Average Weekday Models Weekday versus Weekend Travel Project Prioritization and Decision Making Research Motivation Household travel surveys and the travel models developed from those surveys typically represent average weekday travel. However, it is often the case that transportation planners and decision makers want to understand the impact of weekend travel on the transportation system, especially for communities with high levels of visitor travel The primary interest revolves around whether weekend travel is considerably different, and if so, how that would impact project prioritization and decision making.

Background Located in the high sierra mountains Biggest Little City Casinos, dining, and entertainment Lake Tahoe and world class ski resorts Over 4 million visitors per year (Washoe County)

Data Collection Study Area: Regional Transportation Commission (Washoe County, Nevada) Study Period: Month of October, 2015 Weekdays Weekends Data Provider: AirSage, Inc. Data Collection Funded by RTC Reno / Sparks urban center – only one in region, then surrounded by rural

Data Format 6 External Zones 77 Internal Zones OD Data: Trip ends outside these zones are mapped to nearest zone 77 Internal Zones Aggregations of model zones OD Data: OD Zone Pair Resident vs Visitor Synthesized Trip Purpose HBW HBO NHB Time of Day Average Weekday Average Weekend Expanded Trip Count

Data Processing Data provided in user specified districts Internal trip ends disaggregated to model TAZs External trip ends disaggregated to external stations District to District Zone to Zone

Weekday vs. Weekend Comparisons Basic Trip Statistics

Avg Weekday Avg Weekend Trips by HH 3.96 2.45 Trips by Per 1.70 1.05 Trips by ~Wk 0.43 0.14 Trips/Job 0.36 0.12

Weekday and Weekend Trips by Time of Day and Trip Purpose

Weekday and Weekend Trips by Time of Day and Trip Purpose

Weekday and Weekend Trips by Time of Day and Trip Purpose

Weekday vs. Weekend Comparisons Travel time Comparisons

AM Weekday Weekend Resident 9.82 9.23 Visitor 12.22 12.49 Total 10.99 11.00 MD Weekday Weekend Resident 8.96 8.80 Visitor 12.61 13.35 Total 10.63 11.33 PM Weekday Weekend Resident 8.96 8.70 Visitor 12.21 12.30 Total 10.30 10.39

Weekday vs. Weekend Comparisons District to district flows

Districts in the Region

5 Highest District to District Flows Weekday Weekend 14,059 13,954 13,317 12,467 11,781 12,175 10,325 9,122 8,332 8,002

5 Highest District to District Flows Residents Weekday Weekend 14,059 13,954 13,317 12,467 11,781 12,175 10,325 9,122 8,332 8,002

5 Highest District to District Flows Visitors Weekday Weekend 8,963 6,988 5,845 5,552 4,290 8,982 5,070 4,812 4,144 3,642

Absolute Difference

Absolute Difference (Normalized)

Percent Difference (Normalized)

Weekday vs. Weekend Comparisons Highway Assignment

Flow Comparisons in relation to gaming venues and Hotel Rooms Weekday Weekend

Flow Comparisons weekday vs weekend midday assignment Differences

Weekend Peak Volume > Weekday Peak volume

Summary and Conclusions Weekday vs Weekend Trip Patterns

Weekday vs. Weekend Differences For this case study: Overall weekday travel is higher for this case study Visitor travel higher on weekends Visitors make more NHB trips Different time of day patterns Average trip lengths are similar between weekday and weekend Visitor average trip lengths are longer Variations in flow patterns Variations in trip assignment

Conclusions Important to validate the data Data are useful in understanding variations in travel patterns Project prioritization and decision making The authors would like to thank AirSage, Inc. for the use of their data in this analysis

Questions? Leta F Huntsinger: huntsinger@pbworld.com Xuan Wang: xwang@rtcwashoe.com