Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluating Calibration of MODIS Thermal Emissive Bands Using Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer Measurements Yonghong Li a, Aisheng Wu a, Xiaoxiong.
Advertisements

Class 8: Radiometric Corrections
Z. P. Szewczyk GIST 25, Oct Recent Field Campaigns with CERES Instruments Z. Peter Szewczyk Kory J. Priestley Lou Smith Remote Sensing of Clouds.
OpenDAP Server-side Functions for Multi-Instrument Aggregation ESIP Session: Advancing the Power and Utility of Server-side Aggregation Jon C. Currey (NASA),
NASA, CGMS-41, July 2013 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Calibration/validation of Operational Instruments at NASA Langley Research.
Investigating the use of Deep Convective Clouds (DCCs) to monitor on-orbit performance of the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) using Lightning Imaging.
ISCCP Calibration 25 th Anniversary Symposium July 23, 2008 NASA GISS Christopher L. Bishop Columbia University New York, New York.
Evaluation of OMI total column ozone with four different algorithms SAO OE, NASA TOMS, KNMI OE/DOAS Juseon Bak 1, Jae H. Kim 1, Xiong Liu 2 1 Pusan National.
Data acquisition From satellites with the MODIS instrument.
Bias analysis and correction for MetOp/AVHRR IR channel using AVHRR-IASI inter-comparison Tiejun Chang and Xiangqian Wu GSICS Joint Research and data Working.
Desert-based calibration of co-located geostationary visible sensors using a daily exoatmospheric radiance model (DERM) Raj Bhatt, Dave Doelling, Ben Scarino,
Multi-Instrument Intercalibration Framework GSICS Meeting March, 2013 Aron Bartle (Mechdyne) James Gallagher (OPeNDAP), Dave Johnson (SSAI) Constantine.
Visible vicarious calibration using RTM
Spectral band adjustment factors in the SW GSICS Annual Meeting, Williamsburg, VA, 7 March 2013 Benjamin Scarino a, David R. Doelling b, Patrick Minnis.
Thomas C. Stone U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ USA GSICS Research Working Group Meeting EUMETSAT 24−28 March 2014 Using the Moon as a Radiometric.
Aqua-MODIS and VIIRS DCC calibration
COMS MI Visible channel Calibration
GSICS Web Meeting, 17 November 2011
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
GSICS DCC calibration update
VIS/NIR reference instrument requirements
GRWG VIS/NIR Sub-Group Briefing Report
Benjamin Scarino, David R
Seung-Hee Ham and B.J. Sohn Seoul National University, Korea
Progress toward DCC Demo product
Wang Ling, Hu Xiuqing, Chen Lin
Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration with D. Doelling (NASA)
Extending DCC to other bands and DCC ray-matching
Fangfang Yu and Xiangqian Wu
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
Fangfang Yu and Xiangqian Wu
MODIS and VIIRS Reflective Solar Bands Calibration Methodologies and
DCC method implementation in FY3/MERSI and FY2
Spectral Band Adjustment Factor (SBAF) Tool
Doelling, Wagner 2015 GSICS annual meeting, New Delhi March 20, 2015
Meteorological Satellite Center Japan Meteorological Agency
Vicarious calibration by liquid cloud target
DCC analysis Outline 1. Comparisions between CERES model and Hu model.
DCC inter-calibration of Himawari-8/AHI VNIR bands
GOES-16 ABI Lunar Data Preparation to GIRO
Using SCIAMACHY to calibrate GEO imagers
GOES-East DCC analysis
On the use of Ray-Matching to transfer calibration
Calibration and Performance MODIS Characterization Support Team (MCST)
Combining Vicarious Calibrations
Introduction of the SCIAMACHY SBAF web tool
Closing the GEO-ring Tim Hewison
Deep Convective Cloud BRDF characterization using PARASOL
Characterizing DCC as invariant calibration target
VIS/NIR sub-group discussion
Implementation of DCC at JMA and comparison with RTM
Update on GSICS Product Development
EUMETSAT implementation of the DCC algorithm Sébastien Wagner
Infrared Inter-Calibration Product Announcements
AIRS/GEO Infrared Intercalibration
Inter-calibration of the SEVIRI solar bands against MODIS Aqua, using Deep Convective Clouds as transfer targets Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration.
GSICS ATBD (ISRO) GSICS Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) for Inter-Calibration of Indian GEO satellites Pradeep Thapliyal Space Applications.
GOES -12 Imager April 4, 2002 GOES-12 Imager - pre-launch info - radiances - products Timothy J. Schmit et al.
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
The Aqua-MODIS calibration transfer using DCC
Using VIIRS I or M band as the calibration reference
Development of the MTSAT1 visible footprint point spread function
Strawman Plan for Inter-Calibration of Solar Channels
Use of GSICS to Improve Operational Radiometric Calibration
Implementation of DCC algorithm for MTSAT-2/Imager
GSICS Data and Products Servers
Proposal for a GSICS DCC product
Progress on FY-3 IR GSICS inter-calibration system
Na XU Xiuqing HU Lin CHEN Ling SUN NSMC CMA
Towards a GSICS DCC product...
Presentation transcript:

Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer 2016 GSICS Joint Meeting on Research and Data Working Groups Tsukuba, Japan 29 February to 4 March 2016

Outline GEO DCC calibration methodology Monthly DCC file description DCC pixel identification Angular transformation (Hu model) Monthly PDF transformation Long-term radiometric trending Monthly DCC file description Monthly PDF and temporal trending results Absolute calibration using DCC referenced to Aqua-MODIS Data availability

GEO DCC domain A fixed DCC domain confined to ±15° latitude and ±20°E-W longitude, and centered at the GEO sub-satellite point is defined for each GEOSat. GOES-15 GOES-13 MET-9 MET-7 FY2E COMS MTSAT-2 Orbit 135°W 75°W 0W 57°E 105°E 128°E 145°E

DCC pixel identification DCC pixels are identified within the DCC domain using the following criteria [Doelling et al, 2013]: GEO parameter DCC threshold Window brightness temperature BT11μm < 205°K Brightness temperature homogeneity Standard deviation of 3x3 pixels BT11μm < 1°K Visible radiance homogeneity Standard deviation of 3x3 pixels visible radiance < 3% Solar zenith angle SZA < 40° View zenith angle VZA < 40° Local time range at GEOSat longitude 12:00 PM < image time < 3:00 PM

Angular transformation DCC response is dependent upon viewing and solar geometry GEO DCC counts are normalized using Hu model [Hu et al 2004] Before applying the Hu model, Subtract the space-count from each DCC pixel count Apply Earth-Sun distance and COS(SZA) factors Corrected count = Measured Count/(d2*COS(SZA)) Normalized count = Hu(SZA, VZA, RAZ, Corrected count) Note: A Hu-model subroutine package (written in Fortran) will be provided with the dataset.

Monthly DCC binary files Sequence of parameters Sigma VIS (0.65 um) Sigma IR BT (11 um) SZA VZA RAZ Channel data (Count or BT) Latitude Longitude GMT time Day of Year All DCC pixels within a month are compiled into a binary file (big-endian format). Examples: MET9_cold_2012_07, COMS_cold_2012_07, etc. Number of parameters included into the binary files are GEO specific Each parameter is written as a 4-byte floating-point number

Monthly PDF A probability distribution function (PDF) of all DCC pixels within a month is generated after the angular corrections. The Mode of the monthly PDF shifts towards left as the sensor response degrades over time Count PDF bin resolutions used are given in the table below GEO Satellite PDF count increment GOES-15 5 GOES-13 4 MET-9 MET-7 3 COMS FY2E 1500* MTSAT-2 * Squared count

Monthly PDF examples (July 2012)

Relative trending The mode of the monthly PDF is tracked over time to obtain the temporal stability of the GEO visible sensor

Absolute calibration transformation The average mode for all 10-years of the Aqua-MODIS (reference sensor) monthly PDFs over the GEO domain is assumed to be the true viewing radiance, and is used to calibrate the GEO counts Spectral corrections between the MODIS and GEO visible channels are made using SCIAMACHY hyperspectral data [Doelling et al, 2012].

DCC calibration targets to transfer calibration We have mainly focused on the DCC methodology to determine the satellite calibration drift The DCC methodology assumes that the reference and monitored sensor DCC mode radiance is equal if the observations were taken during the same temporal window and spatial domain Does not need to be coincident or ray-matched Must validate this assumption

Validation procedure Validate the DCC methodology gain with DCC ray-match calibration techniques using the same reference instrument DCC ray-matching either with 10-km or 30-km cores Compare the calibration gains between these methods and the DCC methodology

Met-9 within 0.25%

MTSAT-2 within 0.29%

GOES-15 within 0.21%