NIRSpec simulation data-package

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GMOS Data Reduction Richard McDermid Gemini Data Reduction Workshop Tucson, July 2010.
Advertisements

PCA Tomography and its application to nearby galactic nuclei João Steiner IAG - Universidade de São Paulo +R. B. Menezes, T. V. Ricci +F. Ferrari (UNIPAMPA)
Prospects – JWST, EUCLID, WFIRST Jeff Kruk (GSFC)
Precision Spectroscopy: some considerations S. Deustua STSCI 2014 STSCI Calibration Workshop 1.
Red Leak Effects in Observations of Solar System Objects with ACS/SBC Paul D. Feldman, Johns Hopkins University Harold A. Weaver, JHU Applied Physics Laboratory.
GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 9, 2004 Likelihood Analysis of LAT Data James Chiang (GLAST SSC – SLAC)
FMOS Observations and Data 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
An XMM-ESAS Update Steve Snowden NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center EPIC Operations and Calibration Meeting - BGWG Palermo - 11 March 2007.
Deterministic Modeling of the MOS Background Steve Snowden NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center EPIC Operations and Calibration Meeting Mallorca 1-3 February.
ADASS XVII - September, Software Modelling of IFU Spectrometers Nuria P. F. Lorente UK Astronomy Technology Centre Royal Observatory, Edinburgh,
Simulating JWST-MIRI data with the Multi-Object Simulator (MOSim) Owen Littlejohns, Paul O’Brien & John Pye Department of Physics & Astronomy University.
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrometer simulation Note in ● Why we need it now ● What should.
Naoyuki Tamura (University of Durham) Expected Performance of FMOS ~ Estimation with Spectrum Simulator ~ Introduction of simulators  Examples of calculations.
Memorandam of the discussion on FMOS observations and data kicked off by Ian Lewis Masayuki Akiyama 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
AAO Fibre Instrument Data Simulator 10 October 2011 ROE Workshop 2011 Michael Goodwin Tony Farrell Gayandhi De Silva Scott Smedley Australian Astronomical.
JWST calibration requirements Harald Kuntschner. JWST - an overview NIRCam –0.6-5 microns –FoV: 2.16x4.4 arcmin (0.0317” for short band and ” for.
6e-1 Science Data Products Daryl Swade DMS Systems Engineer S&OC System Design Review #1.
Characterisation Data Model applied to simulated data Mireille Louys, CDS and LSIIT Strasbourg.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 19 EPIC background Event lists and selection The RGA Calibration quantities Exposure calculations.
Peter Capak Associate Research Scientist IPAC/Caltech.
Clio: 3-5  m planet-finding AO camera Ari Heinze (Steward Observatory) Collaborators: P. Hinz (Steward), S. Sivanandam (Steward), M. Freed (Optical Sciences),
Spectroscopic Observations (Massey & Hanson 2011, arXiv v2.pdf) Examples of Spectrographs Spectroscopy with CCDs Data Reduction and Calibration.
First results of the tests campaign in VISIBLE in VISIBLE for the demonstrator 12 October 2007 SNAP Collaboration Meeting Paris Marie-Hélène Aumeunier.
JWST NIRSpec Dithering Strategies (and a Cross-SI View) Jason Tumlinson JIM / TIPS Oct 15, 2009.
End to End Simulations. p.2 What’s this ? This is the MUSE datacube of NGC 1068 we just received from ESO Can you remind me how many students we have.
More WL Issues Chris Hirata May 10, 2011 for the /usr/WFIRST/HLS/WL group.
2004 January 27Mathematical Challenges of Using Point Spread Function Analysis Algorithms in Astronomical ImagingMighell 1 Mathematical Challenges of Using.
ST–ECF UC, Dec 01 1 NGST support at the ST-ECF Bob Fosbury
Wide-Field Slitless Spectr scopy with NIRISS Van Dixon STScI TIPS/JIM 2012 September 20.
JWST Calibration Error Budget Jerry Kriss. 15 March 20072/14 JWST Flux & Wavelength Calibration Requirements SR-20: JWST shall be capable of achieving.
Surveying the Universe with SNAP Tim McKay University of Michigan Department of Physics Seattle AAS Meeting: 1/03 For the SNAP collaboration.
MOS Data Reduction Michael Balogh University of Durham.
Photometric Redshifts of objects in B field Sanhita Joshi ANGLES Workshop, Crete 07/04/2005.
NICMOS Calibration Challenges in the Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
14 January Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPIC data reduction Piskunov & Valenti 2002, A&A 385, 1095.
Optimization Strategies for the NIRSpec MSA Planning Tool James Muzerolle.
RAW DATA BIAS & DARK SUBTRACTION PIXEL-TO-PIXEL DQE CORR. LOCATE EXTR. WINDOW THROUGHPUT CORRECTION (incl. L-flat, blaze function, transmission of optics,
Observations of Near Infrared Extragalactic Background (NIREBL) ISAS/JAXAT. Matsumoto Dec.2-5, 2003 Japan/Italy seminar at Niigata Univ.
STScI Slitless Spectroscopy Workshop November 2010 aXe Advanced Topics – becoming more dextrous, using aXe with other instruments, making calibration.
Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra Gerhardt R. Meurer The Johns Hopkins University Gerhardt R. Meurer The Johns Hopkins University.
WFC3 slitless spectroscopy
The STIS NUV-MAMA objective prism … … and looking beyond for HST UV slitless spectroscopy Jes ú s Ma í z Apell á niz HST Calibration worskhop 26 October.
NIRSpec - the JWST Multi-Object Spectrograph P. Ferruit (ESA), S. Arribas (CSIS), S. Birkmann (ESA), T. Böker (ESA), A. Bunker (Oxford), S. Charlot (IAP),
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
SINFONI data reduction using the ESO pipeline. Instrument design and its impact on the data (I) integral field spectrometer using mirrors brickwall pattern.
Single Object Spectroscopy and Time Series Observations with NIRSpec
JWST-MIRIM (The MIRI Imager)
NIRCam Readout Pattern Considerations
Alex Fullerton STScI / NIRISS Team Lead
Single Object Slitless Spectroscopy Simulations
A.Zanichelli, B.Garilli, M.Scodeggio, D.Rizzo
NIRSpec Time Series Observations
Observing Strategies and Constraints
The X-ray Universe 2008 Granada, 29 May 2008
JWST Pipeline Overview
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
Mathew A. Malkan (UCLA) and Sean T. Scully (JMU)
NIRSpec pipeline concept Guido De Marchi, Tracy Beck, Torsten Böker
JWST Exposure Time Calculator Overview
Diane Karakla ESAC “On Your Mark” Workshop Madrid, Sept
Spectrophotometric calibration of the IFU spectrograph
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
Summary Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy Jeff Valenti JWST Mission Scientist Space Telescope Science Institute.
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop NIRSpec MSA Planning Tool (MPT)
On the source of the diffuse background light in HUDF
Integral Field Spectroscopy
NIR Spectroscopy at Gemini South
Karen Meech Institute for Astronomy TOPS 2003
Spectroscopic Observations (Massey & Hanson 2011, arXiv v2
Presentation transcript:

NIRSpec simulation data-package Giovanna Giardino, Pierre Ferruit, Jacopo Chevallard, Camilla Pacifici ESAC JWST Workshop

NIRSpec simulations Ingredients of the simulation Simulation procedure Outline of the data package MOS simulation & IFS simulation

Ingredients for the Sky: sources MOS simulation - DEEP FIELD HUBBLE eXDF (Catalogue Bouwens et al. 2014) ~ 700 objects WFC3 Field 2.3'x2.0’ - MOS FOV is 3.4’ x 3.6’ Bouwens Catalogue tiled 2x2 ~ 2800 objects Photometry (10 bands - Δλ= 0.4 – 1.6 μm) BEAGLE Chevallard & Charlot 2016, MNRAS, 462 BEAGLE: This tool incorporates the consistent modeling of stellar radiation and its transfer through the interstellar and intergalactic media, allowing one to derive “phyiscally” plausible galaxy spectra from photomotric and spectral data, in a Bayesian framework. BayEsian Analysis of GaLaxy sEds Mock spectra: z = 4 - 8

Ingredients for the Sky: background Zodiacal light (0.5-5.5 μm): Blue-part: reddened spectrum of a solar analogue (Phoenix code) Red-part: Black-Body T=256.15 K Parasitic light (open telescope!): “Galactic sky” straylight. Zodiacal straylight Emission from telescope Worse case!

MPT selection of targets and MSA configuration nod in 1x3 slitlet 2 pointings dither 6 exposures Disperser: PRISM

Procedure Sky Scene Instrument Performance Simulator Sources (pointlike) + Background Instrument Performance Simulator Fourier optics software + coordinate transf. closely matching instrument Radiometric response (throughput, slit- diffraction-losses, QE) Count rate images – 94.9 ks 100 integrations in IRS2 read-out mode Include photon noise (incl. dark) + read noise

Simulated exposure #1

Background subtracted f = A-0.5(B+C) ~ 100 ks integration Dither 0

Background subtracted – 100 ks integration Dither 1

Extracted products (NIPS) Dorner, Giardino, Ferruit et al. 2016, A&A, 592 Spectral trace (wavelength and spatial coordinate for each pixel) 2D recitified spectra (wavelength - spatial coordinate) 1D spectrrum FITS files Uncalibrated flux units

Calibrated spectra Simulated observation of radiometric standard (1.0 W m-2 m-1)  Comparison with synthetic input spectra MAB = 28.4

Data package MOSsimulationESAC2016 Input catalogue and Spectra APT file Count rate observations: Background subtracted count-rate images (2 files, one for each dither pointing) 6 Exposures (3 nodding x 2 dithers), noisy and noiseless Extracted products Data files of Traces, 2D rectified spectra, 1D spectra (FITS) Plots of Traces, 2D rectified spectra, 1D spectra (PNG)  AREDME file

IFS Simulations –Input data Input data cube (prepared by C. Pacifici): a z~3 galaxy – fit of the (photometric) HST data of one of the sources in the CANDELS program, using a library of spectral energy distribution models. GAL2136 F160W filter

Sky Scene  IPS input

Simulation output – Count-rate image 11.2 ks - 12 integrations in IRS2 read-out mode Include photon noise (incl. dark), read noise

Background subtracted – Count-rate image

Data package JWST-NIRSpec-IFU-simulations-GAL2136-20160923  JWST-NIRSpec-IFU-simulations_20160923.pdf

Enjoy your data tapas!

MOS Simulations characteristics Assumptions: point-sources! Includes: zodiacal background, galactic + zodiacal parasitic + telescope emission (uniform!) Fourier wave optics simulation + radiometric propagation (PSF , slit-effect, slit and diffraction loss, instrument throughput - field dependent) Ideal Noise: photon noise (incl. ideal dark currents) + read noise Sort-of-cosmetics (TBD with Pierre) Does not include: 1/f detector noise Real dark map Cosmic rays Other detector effects (IPC, non-linearity) MSA failed shutters, leakage, finite contrast Background variations across the field Calibration errors/noise: e.g. no flat field noise, perfect flux calibration, perfect wavelength calibration for centered source