A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY ON THE IMMEDIATE LOADING OF MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES SUPPORTED BY 4 ONE-PIECE UNSPLINTED DIRECT LASER METAL FORMING (DLMF)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPLANTOLOGY QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
Advertisements

Introduction to Removable Prosthodontics
Almitech Implant System for implant retained overdentures. Mike Shulman, DDS Utilizing the Almitech Implant System to restore completely edentulous mandible.
INTRODUCTION - REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE
DEPARTMENT OF DENTISTRY Dental Implant Dr. Jane K. Bwana.
What is going on in the specialities IMPLANTS/PROSTHETICS MARCO ESPOSITO Senior Lecturer in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, and Editor.
32 Removable Prosthodontics. 2 Artificial structures replacing teeth and tissues Restore lost functions –Stabilize arch –Improve aesthetics Additional.
Dental Implants Chapter 15 DAE/DHE 203. Implants - defined Surgically inserted into bone Used as “anchors” to support a prosthetic Replace missing teeth.
+ ABOI/ID Part II Case Presentation – Template 2016.
DR.FARIBORZ SAADAT DMD.PHD. PROSTHODONTIST
Sean Ferguson Product Manager
McCracken’s Removable Partial Prosthodontics. Chapter 10 & 19
Topic: Basic research Presented at the 23 rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Association for Osseointegration September 2014, Rome, Italy.
PowerPoint® Presentation for Dental Materials with Labs
Overdentures Dr Clarisse Ng.
Chapter 59 Chapter 59 Oral Bone Loss and Systemic Osteoporosis: Weighing the Risk Benefit Ratio of Treatment Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights.
Presenter: Dr. Sana Ehsen Supervisors: Dr. Farhan Raza Khan 1.
NYU Implant 연구회 서울 Tx. Plan Template. NYU Implant 연구회 서울 Patient Information Name : * * * Age : ** Yrs Sex : Male Ethnicity : Asian 환자얼굴사진.
Dr Naseer Ahmed BDS, Fellow of college of physicians and surgeons Pakistan (FCPS) Assistant Professor Head Department of Prosthodontics AIDM 4/23/2017.
Complications of Dental Implants: Identification, Frequency and Associated Risk Factors NE McDermott, BS*, S-K Chuang, DMD, MD*, VA Vehemente, BS*, S Daher,
Aim Clinical indication Manufacturing scan prosthesis CT scan protocol Double scan registration wizard Double scan.
Case series of wide diameter (6 mm) implants immediately loaded with posterior single restorations A Immediate loading of implants replacing single molars.
Rola Shadid, BDS, MSc, Associate Fellow of AAID
Acrylic partial denture
SR Dental Hospital Introduction Best dental hospital Best dental hospital in Chennai will always be the one and only SR.
Submerged deciduous teeth
©2013 Delmar, Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in.
Dental Implants. Learning Objectives Understand basic terminology and components of a dental implant including: Process Implant materials Advantages of.
Chapter 53 Dental Implants.
Introduction to Prosthodontics
NMeanStd. DeviationStd. Error Mean BONE LOSS 4 MONTHS Int Con 19,0893,25863,05783 Ext Con 20,1628,24124,05394 NMeanStd. DeviationStd. Error Mean BONE LOSS.
Lecture 2 dental implant. Types of dental implant 1.Mucosal Insert 2.Endodontic Implant (Stabilizer) 3.Sub-periosteal implant 4.Endosteal or Endosseous.
Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants: success criteria. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106: 527– 551.
Dental Implant.
لثة \ خامس اسنان د. زيد م(3) 3\ 4\ Dental implant.
Introduction & Objective
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
Presenter: 施佑昇
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
Paryag,1 P. Seerattan,1 R. Rafeek,1 M. Mankee,2 J. Lowe1.
DEPARTMENT OF PROSTHODONTICS
Department of Prosthodontics, K.L.E.S’ Institute of Dental Sciences,
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
M. Rapani*, L. Ravera, V. Perrotti, A. Piattelli, L. Ricci, G. Iezzi
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
Topic: Implant therapy outcomes, surgical aspects
Gingival papillae after single-implant computer guided
Overdenture Maintenance
Abutment connect radiograph 12 month follow-up radiograph
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
Bruxism and prosthetic treatment: A critical review
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
periodontal disease: diagnosis and treatment
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
Presentation transcript:

A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY ON THE IMMEDIATE LOADING OF MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES SUPPORTED BY 4 ONE-PIECE UNSPLINTED DIRECT LASER METAL FORMING (DLMF) IMPLANTS. RESULTS FROM A 1-YEAR FOLLOW-UP REPORT ON 96 IMPLANTS M. Rapani*, F. Mangano, C. Mangano, J.A. Shibli, V. Perrotti, L. Ricci, A. Piattelli, G. di Gregorio *Department of Oral Science, Nano and Biotechnology, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti #85 ABSTRACT Aim: the aim of this prospective multicenter study was to evaluate treatment outcomes of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 one-piece unsplinted implants placed and loaded immediately, investigating survival and success rate of the implants, marginal bone loss and maintenance complications. Materials and Methods: 96 one-piece DLMF implants (TixOs Nano OvdR, Leader-Novaxa, Milan, Italy) were inserted in the edentolous mandible of 24 patients in 4 different clinical centers. Four implants were placed in each edentolous mandible. Immediately after implant placement, a mandibular overdenture was connected to the implants. At the 1-year scheduled follow-up examination, clinical, radiographic and prosthetic parameters were assessed. Success criteria included: absence of pain, sensitivity, suppuration, implant mobility, absence of continuous peri-implant radiolucency; distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact (DIB) <1.5 mm. Results: after 12 months of loading, the overall implant survival rate was 98.9%, with one implant loss. Among the surviving implants (95), 4 did not fulfil the success criteria, giving an implant-crown success of 95.8%. The mean DIB was 0.28 mm (± 0.30). Discussion and Conclusions: based on these results, the immediate loading of 4 unsplinted DLMF implants by means of ball attachment supported mandibular overdentures seem to represent a safe and successful procedure. INTRODUCTION Edentolous patients with a severely resorbed mandible have often experience problems with conventional dentures, such as insufficient stability and retention during masticatory function. An implant overdenture provides stability of the prosthesis. The aim of the present 1-year prospective multicenter study was to evaluate treatment outcomes of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 one-piece unsplinted DLMF implants placed and loaded immediately, investigating implant survival rate, implant success, marginal bone loss and maintenance complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 24 patients with a complete mandibular edentulism were enrolled in 4 different clinical centers. Panoramic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans were undertaken. Four one-piece DLMF implants (TixOs Nano OvdR, Leader-Novaxa, Milan, Italy), with a roughness surface, were placed in each edentolous mandible for a total of 96 implants inserted. The implants were immediately loaded with provisional restoration and after two weeks, the definitive prosthesis was delivered. At the 1-year of functional loading the evaluation of implant survival and implant success was performed according to the following clinical and radiographic parameters: absence of pain, sensitivity, suppuration, implant mobility, absence of continuous peri-implant radiolucency; distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact (DIB) <1.5 mm. Prosthetic complications were evaluated, such as the need for reactivation of retentive caps, substitution/replacement of the matrix cap or acrylic resin or tooth (denture) fractures. RESULTS Implant Survival The overall implant survival rate was 98.9%, with 95 implants in function. This failure of one implant was attributed to lack of osseointegration, without clinical signs of peri-implant infection. Implant success 91 out of 95 implants (95.8%) were classified in the implant success group Two of these implants (2.1%) had a history of exudation, with some sensitivity on function. Two additional implants (2.1%) had a DIB between 2-4 mm, associated with deep periodontal probing. The overall radiographic evaluation of the implants revealed a mean distance from the implant shoulder to the first crestal bone to implant contact (DIB) of 0.28 mm (± 0.30) at the 1-year examination. Prosthetic maintenance The most common maintenance need was the replacement of the retentive caps in the denture base, because of inadequate retention. Ten of the patients (41.6%) required the substitution of the retentive caps to their overdentures. These repairs averaged around an hour of dental chair time. Reline of 2 dentures was required (8.3%). Repairs classified as “other” included those needed as a result of cracked or fractured dentures and loose or lost denture teeth (4.1%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Today, immediate loading of mandibular implant overdentures using four splinted implants is a scientifically and clinically validated protocol, and several studies have concluded that overall implant success had not been adversely affected by immediate loading. Based on these results and within the limits of this study, the immediate loading of 4 unsplinted DLMF implants by means of ball attachment supported mandibular overdentures seem to represent a safe and successful procedure, with excellent 1-year survival (98.9%) and success rates (95.8%). No detrimental effects on marginal bone level were evidenced after 1-year of functional loading. The most common maintenance need was replacement of the retentive caps in the denture base, because of inadequate retention. The overdenture at 1-year follow-up control. Panoramic radiograph at the 1- year follow up control. Table. Prosthetic maintenance. Scanning electron microscopy of the implant surface Schematic drawing of the one piece DLMF implant (TixOs Nano OvdR) evaluated in this study