Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 94-105 (January 2012) Reviewing the Cost-Effectiveness of Endocrine Early Breast Cancer Therapies: Influence of Differences in Modeling Methods on Outcomes Gerardus W.J. Frederix, MSc, Johan L. Severens, PhD, Anke M. Hövels, PhD, Jan A.M. Raaijmakers, PhD, Jan H.M. Schellens, MD, PhD Value in Health Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 94-105 (January 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.003 Copyright © 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Decision tree of included and excluded studies, with reasons for exclusions. CE, cost-effectiveness; CU, cost utility; NHSEED, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database. Value in Health 2012 15, 94-105DOI: (10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.003) Copyright © 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Overview of time schedules and treatment duration of clinical trials applied in the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of endocrine therapies in early breast cancer (ATAC [32], Intergroup Exemestane Study [33], BIG 1-98 [34], and MA-17 [42]. Value in Health 2012 15, 94-105DOI: (10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.003) Copyright © 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Terms and Conditions